(htlc, htlc_source.as_ref().map(|htlc_source| htlc_source.as_ref()))
), logger);
} else {
- debug_assert!(false, "We should have per-commitment option for any recognized old commitment txn");
+ // Our fuzzers aren't contrained by pesky things like valid signatures, so can
+ // spend our funding output with a transaction which doesn't match our past
+ // commitment transactions. Thus, we can only debug-assert here when not
+ // fuzzing.
+ debug_assert!(cfg!(fuzzing), "We should have per-commitment option for any recognized old commitment txn");
fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "revoked counterparty", commitment_txid, tx, height,
block_hash, [].iter().map(|reference| *reference), logger);
}
claim_id
},
};
- debug_assert!(self.pending_claim_requests.get(&claim_id).is_none());
+ // Because fuzzing can cause hash collisions, we can end up with conflicting claim
+ // ids here, so we only assert when not fuzzing.
+ debug_assert!(cfg!(fuzzing) || self.pending_claim_requests.get(&claim_id).is_none());
for k in req.outpoints() {
log_info!(logger, "Registering claiming request for {}:{}", k.txid, k.vout);
self.claimable_outpoints.insert(k.clone(), (claim_id, conf_height));