// the limit. In case it's less rare than I anticipate, we may want to revisit
// handling this case better and maybe fulfilling some of the HTLCs while attempting
// to rebalance channels.
- match &htlc_update {
+ let fail_htlc_res = match &htlc_update {
&HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::AddHTLC {
amount_msat, cltv_expiry, ref payment_hash, ref source, ref onion_routing_packet,
skimmed_fee_msat, blinding_point, ..
}
}
}
+ None
},
&HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::ClaimHTLC { ref payment_preimage, htlc_id, .. } => {
// If an HTLC claim was previously added to the holding cell (via
{ monitor_update } else { unreachable!() };
update_fulfill_count += 1;
monitor_update.updates.append(&mut additional_monitor_update.updates);
+ None
},
&HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::FailHTLC { htlc_id, ref err_packet } => {
- match self.fail_htlc(htlc_id, err_packet.clone(), false, logger) {
- Ok(update_fail_msg_option) => {
- // If an HTLC failure was previously added to the holding cell (via
- // `queue_fail_htlc`) then generating the fail message itself must
- // not fail - we should never end up in a state where we double-fail
- // an HTLC or fail-then-claim an HTLC as it indicates we didn't wait
- // for a full revocation before failing.
- debug_assert!(update_fail_msg_option.is_some());
- update_fail_count += 1;
- },
- Err(e) => {
- if let ChannelError::Ignore(_) = e {}
- else {
- panic!("Got a non-IgnoreError action trying to fail holding cell HTLC");
- }
- }
- }
+ Some(self.fail_htlc(htlc_id, err_packet.clone(), false, logger)
+ .map(|fail_msg_opt| fail_msg_opt.map(|_| ())))
},
&HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::FailMalformedHTLC { htlc_id, failure_code, sha256_of_onion } => {
- match self.fail_htlc(htlc_id, (failure_code, sha256_of_onion), false, logger) {
- Ok(update_fail_malformed_opt) => {
- debug_assert!(update_fail_malformed_opt.is_some()); // See above comment
- update_fail_count += 1;
- },
- Err(e) => {
- if let ChannelError::Ignore(_) = e {}
- else {
- panic!("Got a non-IgnoreError action trying to fail holding cell HTLC");
- }
- }
+ Some(self.fail_htlc(htlc_id, (failure_code, sha256_of_onion), false, logger)
+ .map(|fail_msg_opt| fail_msg_opt.map(|_| ())))
+ }
+ };
+ match fail_htlc_res {
+ Some(Ok(fail_msg_opt)) => {
+ // If an HTLC failure was previously added to the holding cell (via
+ // `queue_fail_{malformed_}htlc`) then generating the fail message itself must
+ // not fail - we should never end up in a state where we double-fail
+ // an HTLC or fail-then-claim an HTLC as it indicates we didn't wait
+ // for a full revocation before failing.
+ debug_assert!(fail_msg_opt.is_some());
+ update_fail_count += 1;
+ },
+ Some(Err(e)) => {
+ if let ChannelError::Ignore(_) = e {}
+ else {
+ panic!("Got a non-IgnoreError action trying to fail holding cell HTLC");
}
},
+ None => {}
}
}
if update_add_count == 0 && update_fulfill_count == 0 && update_fail_count == 0 && self.context.holding_cell_update_fee.is_none() {