// because the update is bogus, ultimately the error that's returned
// should be a PermanentFailure.
if let ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure = chain_mon.chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update) {} else { panic!("Expected monitor error to be permanent"); }
- logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::chain::chainmonitor".to_string(), regex::Regex::new("Persistence of ChannelMonitorUpdate for channel [0-9a-f]* in progress").unwrap(), 1);
+ logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::chain::chainmonitor", regex::Regex::new("Persistence of ChannelMonitorUpdate for channel [0-9a-f]* in progress").unwrap(), 1);
assert_eq!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
} else { assert!(false); }
}
assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Payment preimage didn't match payment hash".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Payment preimage didn't match payment hash", 1);
}
#[test]
assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "We don't support MPP keysend payments".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "We don't support MPP keysend payments", 1);
}
#[test]
match nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &None, PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap_err() {
PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError { ref err }) => {
- assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Payment secret is required for multi-path payments").unwrap().is_match(err)) },
+ assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Payment secret is required for multi-path payments").unwrap().is_match(err))
+ },
_ => panic!("unexpected error")
}
}
match inbound_payment::verify(bad_payment_hash, &payment_data, nodes[0].node.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64, &nodes[0].node.inbound_payment_key, &nodes[0].logger) {
Ok(_) => panic!("Unexpected ok"),
Err(()) => {
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::inbound_payment".to_string(), "Failing HTLC with user-generated payment_hash".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::inbound_payment", "Failing HTLC with user-generated payment_hash", 1);
}
}
if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = msg_events[0] {
match action {
&ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. } => {
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), expected_regex, 1);
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::ln::channelmanager", expected_regex, 1);
},
_ => panic!("unexpected event!"),
}
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash_1, &Some(payment_secret_1), PaymentId(payment_hash_1.0)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs", 1);
}
// This should also be true if we try to forward a payment.
_ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
}
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value", 1);
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1]], max_can_send);
}
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept", 1);
}
// channel reserve is bigger than their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat so loop to deplete
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string(), 2);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value", 2);
}
let (route_22, our_payment_hash_22, our_payment_preimage_22, our_payment_secret_22) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_22);
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value", 1);
}
#[test]
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC"));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC", 1);
}
#[test]
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs", 1);
}
#[test]
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)));
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept", 1);
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], max_in_flight);
}
}
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), "Cannot afford to send new feerate at 2530 without infringing max dust htlc exposure".to_string(), 1);
+ nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channel", "Cannot afford to send new feerate at 2530 without infringing max dust htlc exposure", 1);
}
let _ = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, true, true);
- nodes[1].logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), regex::Regex::new(r"Refusing to forward over real channel SCID as our counterparty requested").unwrap(), 1);
+ nodes[1].logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::ln::channelmanager", regex::Regex::new(r"Refusing to forward over real channel SCID as our counterparty requested").unwrap(), 1);
let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
node.messenger.handle_onion_message(&prev_node.get_node_pk(), &onion_msg);
if idx == num_nodes - 1 {
node.logger.assert_log_contains(
- "lightning::onion_message::messenger".to_string(),
- format!("Received an onion message with path_id: {:02x?}", expected_path_id).to_string(), 1);
+ "lightning::onion_message::messenger",
+ &format!("Received an onion message with path_id: {:02x?}", expected_path_id), 1);
}
prev_node = node;
}
pass_along_path(&nodes, None);
// Make sure the last node successfully decoded the reply path.
nodes[3].logger.assert_log_contains(
- "lightning::onion_message::messenger".to_string(),
- format!("Received an onion message with path_id None and a reply_path").to_string(), 1);
+ "lightning::onion_message::messenger",
+ &format!("Received an onion message with path_id None and a reply_path"), 1);
// Destination::BlindedPath
let blinded_path = BlindedPath::new(&[nodes[1].get_node_pk(), nodes[2].get_node_pk(), nodes[3].get_node_pk()], &*nodes[3].keys_manager, &secp_ctx).unwrap();
nodes[0].messenger.send_onion_message(&[], Destination::BlindedPath(blinded_path), OnionMessageContents::Custom(test_msg), Some(reply_path)).unwrap();
pass_along_path(&nodes, None);
nodes[3].logger.assert_log_contains(
- "lightning::onion_message::messenger".to_string(),
- format!("Received an onion message with path_id None and a reply_path").to_string(), 2);
+ "lightning::onion_message::messenger",
+ &format!("Received an onion message with path_id None and a reply_path"), 2);
}
#[test]
/// 1. belongs to the specified module and
/// 2. contains `line` in it.
/// And asserts if the number of occurrences is the same with the given `count`
- pub fn assert_log_contains(&self, module: String, line: String, count: usize) {
+ pub fn assert_log_contains(&self, module: &str, line: &str, count: usize) {
let log_entries = self.lines.lock().unwrap();
let l: usize = log_entries.iter().filter(|&(&(ref m, ref l), _c)| {
- m == &module && l.contains(line.as_str())
+ m == module && l.contains(line)
}).map(|(_, c) | { c }).sum();
assert_eq!(l, count)
}
/// 1. belong to the specified module and
/// 2. match the given regex pattern.
/// Assert that the number of occurrences equals the given `count`
- pub fn assert_log_regex(&self, module: String, pattern: regex::Regex, count: usize) {
+ pub fn assert_log_regex(&self, module: &str, pattern: regex::Regex, count: usize) {
let log_entries = self.lines.lock().unwrap();
let l: usize = log_entries.iter().filter(|&(&(ref m, ref l), _c)| {
- m == &module && pattern.is_match(&l)
+ m == module && pattern.is_match(&l)
}).map(|(_, c) | { c }).sum();
assert_eq!(l, count)
}
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff