DisabledStaged,
}
+/// An enum indicating whether the local or remote side offered a given HTLC.
+enum HTLCInitiator {
+ LocalOffered,
+ RemoteOffered,
+}
+
+/// Used when calculating whether we or the remote can afford an additional HTLC.
+struct HTLCCandidate {
+ amount_msat: u64,
+ origin: HTLCInitiator,
+}
+
+impl HTLCCandidate {
+ fn new(amount_msat: u64, origin: HTLCInitiator) -> Self {
+ Self {
+ amount_msat,
+ origin,
+ }
+ }
+}
+
// TODO: We should refactor this to be an Inbound/OutboundChannel until initial setup handshaking
// has been completed, and then turn into a Channel to get compiler-time enforcement of things like
// calling channel_id() before we're set up or things like get_outbound_funding_signed on an
(COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT + num_htlcs as u64 * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) * self.feerate_per_kw as u64 / 1000 * 1000
}
- // Get the commitment tx fee for the local (i.e our) next commitment transaction
- // based on the number of pending HTLCs that are on track to be in our next
- // commitment tx. `addl_htcs` is an optional parameter allowing the caller
- // to add a number of additional HTLCs to the calculation. Note that dust
- // HTLCs are excluded.
- fn next_local_commit_tx_fee_msat(&self, addl_htlcs: usize) -> u64 {
+ // Get the commitment tx fee for the local's (i.e. our) next commitment transaction based on the
+ // number of pending HTLCs that are on track to be in our next commitment tx, plus an additional
+ // HTLC if `fee_spike_buffer_htlc` is Some, plus a new HTLC given by `new_htlc_amount`. Dust HTLCs
+ // are excluded.
+ fn next_local_commit_tx_fee_msat(&self, htlc: HTLCCandidate, fee_spike_buffer_htlc: Option<()>) -> u64 {
assert!(self.is_outbound());
- let mut their_acked_htlcs = self.pending_inbound_htlcs.len();
+ let real_dust_limit_success_sat = (self.feerate_per_kw as u64 * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000) + self.holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
+ let real_dust_limit_timeout_sat = (self.feerate_per_kw as u64 * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000) + self.holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
+
+ let mut addl_htlcs = 0;
+ if fee_spike_buffer_htlc.is_some() { addl_htlcs += 1; }
+ match htlc.origin {
+ HTLCInitiator::LocalOffered => {
+ if htlc.amount_msat / 1000 >= real_dust_limit_timeout_sat {
+ addl_htlcs += 1;
+ }
+ },
+ HTLCInitiator::RemoteOffered => {
+ if htlc.amount_msat / 1000 >= real_dust_limit_success_sat {
+ addl_htlcs += 1;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ let mut included_htlcs = 0;
+ for ref htlc in self.pending_inbound_htlcs.iter() {
+ if htlc.amount_msat / 1000 < real_dust_limit_success_sat {
+ continue
+ }
+ // We include LocalRemoved HTLCs here because we may still need to broadcast a commitment
+ // transaction including this HTLC if it times out before they RAA.
+ included_htlcs += 1;
+ }
+
for ref htlc in self.pending_outbound_htlcs.iter() {
- if htlc.amount_msat / 1000 <= self.holder_dust_limit_satoshis {
+ if htlc.amount_msat / 1000 < real_dust_limit_timeout_sat {
continue
}
match htlc.state {
- OutboundHTLCState::Committed => their_acked_htlcs += 1,
- OutboundHTLCState::RemoteRemoved {..} => their_acked_htlcs += 1,
- OutboundHTLCState::LocalAnnounced {..} => their_acked_htlcs += 1,
+ OutboundHTLCState::LocalAnnounced {..} => included_htlcs += 1,
+ OutboundHTLCState::Committed => included_htlcs += 1,
+ OutboundHTLCState::RemoteRemoved {..} => included_htlcs += 1,
+ // We don't include AwaitingRemoteRevokeToRemove HTLCs because our next commitment
+ // transaction won't be generated until they send us their next RAA, which will mean
+ // dropping any HTLCs in this state.
_ => {},
}
}
for htlc in self.holding_cell_htlc_updates.iter() {
match htlc {
- &HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::AddHTLC { .. } => their_acked_htlcs += 1,
- _ => {},
+ &HTLCUpdateAwaitingACK::AddHTLC { amount_msat, .. } => {
+ if amount_msat / 1000 < real_dust_limit_timeout_sat {
+ continue
+ }
+ included_htlcs += 1
+ },
+ _ => {}, // Don't include claims/fails that are awaiting ack, because once we get the
+ // ack we're guaranteed to never include them in commitment txs anymore.
}
}
- self.commit_tx_fee_msat(their_acked_htlcs + addl_htlcs)
+ self.commit_tx_fee_msat(included_htlcs + addl_htlcs)
}
- // Get the commitment tx fee for the remote's next commitment transaction
- // based on the number of pending HTLCs that are on track to be in their
- // next commitment tx. `addl_htcs` is an optional parameter allowing the caller
- // to add a number of additional HTLCs to the calculation. Note that dust HTLCs
- // are excluded.
- fn next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(&self, addl_htlcs: usize) -> u64 {
+ // Get the commitment tx fee for the remote's next commitment transaction based on the number of
+ // pending HTLCs that are on track to be in their next commitment tx, plus an additional HTLC if
+ // `fee_spike_buffer_htlc` is Some, plus a new HTLC given by `new_htlc_amount`. Dust HTLCs are
+ // excluded.
+ fn next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(&self, htlc: HTLCCandidate, fee_spike_buffer_htlc: Option<()>) -> u64 {
assert!(!self.is_outbound());
- // When calculating the set of HTLCs which will be included in their next
- // commitment_signed, all inbound HTLCs are included (as all states imply it will be
- // included) and only committed outbound HTLCs, see below.
- let mut their_acked_htlcs = self.pending_inbound_htlcs.len();
+ let real_dust_limit_success_sat = (self.feerate_per_kw as u64 * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000) + self.counterparty_dust_limit_satoshis;
+ let real_dust_limit_timeout_sat = (self.feerate_per_kw as u64 * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000) + self.counterparty_dust_limit_satoshis;
+
+ let mut addl_htlcs = 0;
+ if fee_spike_buffer_htlc.is_some() { addl_htlcs += 1; }
+ match htlc.origin {
+ HTLCInitiator::LocalOffered => {
+ if htlc.amount_msat / 1000 >= real_dust_limit_success_sat {
+ addl_htlcs += 1;
+ }
+ },
+ HTLCInitiator::RemoteOffered => {
+ if htlc.amount_msat / 1000 >= real_dust_limit_timeout_sat {
+ addl_htlcs += 1;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // When calculating the set of HTLCs which will be included in their next commitment_signed, all
+ // non-dust inbound HTLCs are included (as all states imply it will be included) and only
+ // committed outbound HTLCs, see below.
+ let mut included_htlcs = 0;
+ for ref htlc in self.pending_inbound_htlcs.iter() {
+ if htlc.amount_msat / 1000 <= real_dust_limit_timeout_sat {
+ continue
+ }
+ included_htlcs += 1;
+ }
+
for ref htlc in self.pending_outbound_htlcs.iter() {
- if htlc.amount_msat / 1000 <= self.counterparty_dust_limit_satoshis {
+ if htlc.amount_msat / 1000 <= real_dust_limit_success_sat {
continue
}
- // We only include outbound HTLCs if it will not be included in their next
- // commitment_signed, i.e. if they've responded to us with an RAA after announcement.
+ // We only include outbound HTLCs if it will not be included in their next commitment_signed,
+ // i.e. if they've responded to us with an RAA after announcement.
match htlc.state {
- OutboundHTLCState::Committed => their_acked_htlcs += 1,
- OutboundHTLCState::RemoteRemoved {..} => their_acked_htlcs += 1,
+ OutboundHTLCState::Committed => included_htlcs += 1,
+ OutboundHTLCState::RemoteRemoved {..} => included_htlcs += 1,
_ => {},
}
}
- self.commit_tx_fee_msat(their_acked_htlcs + addl_htlcs)
+ self.commit_tx_fee_msat(included_htlcs + addl_htlcs)
}
pub fn update_add_htlc<F, L: Deref>(&mut self, msg: &msgs::UpdateAddHTLC, mut pending_forward_status: PendingHTLCStatus, create_pending_htlc_status: F, logger: &L) -> Result<(), ChannelError>
// Check that the remote can afford to pay for this HTLC on-chain at the current
// feerate_per_kw, while maintaining their channel reserve (as required by the spec).
let remote_commit_tx_fee_msat = if self.is_outbound() { 0 } else {
- // +1 for this HTLC.
- self.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(1)
+ let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(msg.amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::RemoteOffered);
+ self.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None) // Don't include the extra fee spike buffer HTLC in calculations
};
if pending_remote_value_msat - msg.amount_msat < remote_commit_tx_fee_msat {
return Err(ChannelError::Close("Remote HTLC add would not leave enough to pay for fees".to_owned()));
}
if !self.is_outbound() {
- // `+1` for this HTLC, `2 *` and `+1` fee spike buffer we keep for the remote. This deviates from the
- // spec because in the spec, the fee spike buffer requirement doesn't exist on the receiver's side,
- // only on the sender's.
- // Note that when we eventually remove support for fee updates and switch to anchor output fees,
- // we will drop the `2 *`, since we no longer be as sensitive to fee spikes. But, keep the extra +1
- // as we should still be able to afford adding this HTLC plus one more future HTLC, regardless of
- // being sensitive to fee spikes.
- let remote_fee_cost_incl_stuck_buffer_msat = 2 * self.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(1 + 1);
+ // `2 *` and `Some(())` is for the fee spike buffer we keep for the remote. This deviates from
+ // the spec because in the spec, the fee spike buffer requirement doesn't exist on the
+ // receiver's side, only on the sender's.
+ // Note that when we eventually remove support for fee updates and switch to anchor output
+ // fees, we will drop the `2 *`, since we no longer be as sensitive to fee spikes. But, keep
+ // the extra htlc when calculating the next remote commitment transaction fee as we should
+ // still be able to afford adding this HTLC plus one more future HTLC, regardless of being
+ // sensitive to fee spikes.
+ let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(msg.amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::RemoteOffered);
+ let remote_fee_cost_incl_stuck_buffer_msat = 2 * self.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, Some(()));
if pending_remote_value_msat - msg.amount_msat - chan_reserve_msat < remote_fee_cost_incl_stuck_buffer_msat {
// Note that if the pending_forward_status is not updated here, then it's because we're already failing
// the HTLC, i.e. its status is already set to failing.
}
} else {
// Check that they won't violate our local required channel reserve by adding this HTLC.
-
- // +1 for this HTLC.
- let local_commit_tx_fee_msat = self.next_local_commit_tx_fee_msat(1);
+ let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(msg.amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::RemoteOffered);
+ let local_commit_tx_fee_msat = self.next_local_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None);
if self.value_to_self_msat < self.counterparty_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis * 1000 + local_commit_tx_fee_msat {
return Err(ChannelError::Close("Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_owned()));
}
if !self.is_outbound() {
// Check that we won't violate the remote channel reserve by adding this HTLC.
-
let counterparty_balance_msat = self.channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - self.value_to_self_msat;
let holder_selected_chan_reserve_msat = Channel::<ChanSigner>::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(self.channel_value_satoshis);
- // 1 additional HTLC corresponding to this HTLC.
- let counterparty_commit_tx_fee_msat = self.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(1);
+ let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::LocalOffered);
+ let counterparty_commit_tx_fee_msat = self.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None);
if counterparty_balance_msat < holder_selected_chan_reserve_msat + counterparty_commit_tx_fee_msat {
return Err(ChannelError::Ignore("Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value".to_owned()));
}
return Err(ChannelError::Ignore(format!("Cannot send value that would overdraw remaining funds. Amount: {}, pending value to self {}", amount_msat, pending_value_to_self_msat)));
}
- // The `+1` is for the HTLC currently being added to the commitment tx and
- // the `2 *` and `+1` are for the fee spike buffer.
+ // `2 *` and extra HTLC are for the fee spike buffer.
let commit_tx_fee_msat = if self.is_outbound() {
- 2 * self.next_local_commit_tx_fee_msat(1 + 1)
+ let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::LocalOffered);
+ 2 * self.next_local_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, Some(()))
} else { 0 };
if pending_value_to_self_msat - amount_msat < commit_tx_fee_msat {
return Err(ChannelError::Ignore(format!("Cannot send value that would not leave enough to pay for fees. Pending value to self: {}. local_commit_tx_fee {}", pending_value_to_self_msat, commit_tx_fee_msat)));
use bitcoin::hashes::hex::FromHex;
use hex;
use ln::channelmanager::{HTLCSource, PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash};
- use ln::channel::{Channel,ChannelKeys,InboundHTLCOutput,OutboundHTLCOutput,InboundHTLCState,OutboundHTLCState,HTLCOutputInCommitment,TxCreationKeys};
+ use ln::channel::{Channel,ChannelKeys,InboundHTLCOutput,OutboundHTLCOutput,InboundHTLCState,OutboundHTLCState,HTLCOutputInCommitment,HTLCCandidate,HTLCInitiator,TxCreationKeys};
use ln::channel::MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS;
use ln::features::InitFeatures;
use ln::msgs::{OptionalField, DataLossProtect, DecodeError};
use ln::chan_utils;
- use ln::chan_utils::{ChannelPublicKeys, HolderCommitmentTransaction, CounterpartyChannelTransactionParameters};
+ use ln::chan_utils::{ChannelPublicKeys, HolderCommitmentTransaction, CounterpartyChannelTransactionParameters, HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT, HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT};
use chain::chaininterface::{FeeEstimator,ConfirmationTarget};
use chain::keysinterface::{InMemoryChannelKeys, KeysInterface};
use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.feerate_per_kw, original_fee);
}
+ #[test]
+ fn test_holder_vs_counterparty_dust_limit() {
+ // Test that when calculating the local and remote commitment transaction fees, the correct
+ // dust limits are used.
+ let feeest = TestFeeEstimator{fee_est: 15000};
+ let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
+ let seed = [42; 32];
+ let network = Network::Testnet;
+ let keys_provider = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, network);
+
+ // Go through the flow of opening a channel between two nodes, making sure
+ // they have different dust limits.
+
+ // Create Node A's channel pointing to Node B's pubkey
+ let node_b_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap());
+ let config = UserConfig::default();
+ let mut node_a_chan = Channel::<EnforcingChannelKeys>::new_outbound(&&feeest, &&keys_provider, node_b_node_id, 10000000, 100000, 42, &config).unwrap();
+
+ // Create Node B's channel by receiving Node A's open_channel message
+ // Make sure A's dust limit is as we expect.
+ let open_channel_msg = node_a_chan.get_open_channel(genesis_block(network).header.block_hash());
+ assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.dust_limit_satoshis, 1560);
+ let node_b_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[7; 32]).unwrap());
+ let node_b_chan = Channel::<EnforcingChannelKeys>::new_from_req(&&feeest, &&keys_provider, node_b_node_id, InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel_msg, 7, &config).unwrap();
+
+ // Node B --> Node A: accept channel, explicitly setting B's dust limit.
+ let mut accept_channel_msg = node_b_chan.get_accept_channel();
+ accept_channel_msg.dust_limit_satoshis = 546;
+ node_a_chan.accept_channel(&accept_channel_msg, &config, InitFeatures::known()).unwrap();
+
+ // Put some inbound and outbound HTLCs in A's channel.
+ let htlc_amount_msat = 11_092_000; // put an amount below A's effective dust limit but above B's.
+ node_a_chan.pending_inbound_htlcs.push(InboundHTLCOutput {
+ htlc_id: 0,
+ amount_msat: htlc_amount_msat,
+ payment_hash: PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&[42; 32]).into_inner()),
+ cltv_expiry: 300000000,
+ state: InboundHTLCState::Committed,
+ });
+
+ node_a_chan.pending_outbound_htlcs.push(OutboundHTLCOutput {
+ htlc_id: 1,
+ amount_msat: htlc_amount_msat, // put an amount below A's dust amount but above B's.
+ payment_hash: PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&[43; 32]).into_inner()),
+ cltv_expiry: 200000000,
+ state: OutboundHTLCState::Committed,
+ source: HTLCSource::OutboundRoute {
+ path: Vec::new(),
+ session_priv: SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode("0fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff").unwrap()[..]).unwrap(),
+ first_hop_htlc_msat: 548,
+ }
+ });
+
+ // Make sure when Node A calculates their local commitment transaction, none of the HTLCs pass
+ // the dust limit check.
+ let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(htlc_amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::LocalOffered);
+ let local_commit_tx_fee = node_a_chan.next_local_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None);
+ let local_commit_fee_0_htlcs = node_a_chan.commit_tx_fee_msat(0);
+ assert_eq!(local_commit_tx_fee, local_commit_fee_0_htlcs);
+
+ // Finally, make sure that when Node A calculates the remote's commitment transaction fees, all
+ // of the HTLCs are seen to be above the dust limit.
+ node_a_chan.channel_transaction_parameters.is_outbound_from_holder = false;
+ let remote_commit_fee_3_htlcs = node_a_chan.commit_tx_fee_msat(3);
+ let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(htlc_amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::LocalOffered);
+ let remote_commit_tx_fee = node_a_chan.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None);
+ assert_eq!(remote_commit_tx_fee, remote_commit_fee_3_htlcs);
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn test_timeout_vs_success_htlc_dust_limit() {
+ // Make sure that when `next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat` and `next_local_commit_tx_fee_msat`
+ // calculate the real dust limits for HTLCs (i.e. the dust limit given by the counterparty
+ // *plus* the fees paid for the HTLC) they don't swap `HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT` for
+ // `HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT`, and vice versa.
+ let fee_est = TestFeeEstimator{fee_est: 253 };
+ let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
+ let seed = [42; 32];
+ let network = Network::Testnet;
+ let keys_provider = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, network);
+
+ let node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap());
+ let config = UserConfig::default();
+ let mut chan = Channel::<EnforcingChannelKeys>::new_outbound(&&fee_est, &&keys_provider, node_id, 10000000, 100000, 42, &config).unwrap();
+
+ let commitment_tx_fee_0_htlcs = chan.commit_tx_fee_msat(0);
+ let commitment_tx_fee_1_htlc = chan.commit_tx_fee_msat(1);
+
+ // If HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT and HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT were swapped: then this HTLC would be
+ // counted as dust when it shouldn't be.
+ let htlc_amt_above_timeout = ((253 * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000) + chan.holder_dust_limit_satoshis + 1) * 1000;
+ let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(htlc_amt_above_timeout, HTLCInitiator::LocalOffered);
+ let commitment_tx_fee = chan.next_local_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_tx_fee, commitment_tx_fee_1_htlc);
+
+ // If swapped: this HTLC would be counted as non-dust when it shouldn't be.
+ let dust_htlc_amt_below_success = ((253 * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000) + chan.holder_dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
+ let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(dust_htlc_amt_below_success, HTLCInitiator::RemoteOffered);
+ let commitment_tx_fee = chan.next_local_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_tx_fee, commitment_tx_fee_0_htlcs);
+
+ chan.channel_transaction_parameters.is_outbound_from_holder = false;
+
+ // If swapped: this HTLC would be counted as non-dust when it shouldn't be.
+ let dust_htlc_amt_above_timeout = ((253 * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000) + chan.counterparty_dust_limit_satoshis + 1) * 1000;
+ let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(dust_htlc_amt_above_timeout, HTLCInitiator::LocalOffered);
+ let commitment_tx_fee = chan.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_tx_fee, commitment_tx_fee_0_htlcs);
+
+ // If swapped: this HTLC would be counted as dust when it shouldn't be.
+ let htlc_amt_below_success = ((253 * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000) + chan.counterparty_dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
+ let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(htlc_amt_below_success, HTLCInitiator::RemoteOffered);
+ let commitment_tx_fee = chan.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None);
+ assert_eq!(commitment_tx_fee, commitment_tx_fee_1_htlc);
+ }
+
#[test]
fn channel_reestablish_no_updates() {
let feeest = TestFeeEstimator{fee_est: 15000};
fn test_chan_reserve_violation_outbound_htlc_inbound_chan() {
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
// Set the fee rate for the channel very high, to the point where the fundee
- // sending any amount would result in a channel reserve violation. In this test
- // we check that we would be prevented from sending an HTLC in this situation.
+ // sending any above-dust amount would result in a channel reserve violation.
+ // In this test we check that we would be prevented from sending an HTLC in
+ // this situation.
chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 6000 };
chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 6000 };
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
}}
}
- let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(1000);
+ let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(4843000);
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value"));
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
}
+#[test]
+fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_outbound_chan() {
+ // Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an outbound channel, they don't count when
+ // calculating our commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ // Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a
+ // channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
+ // transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 98817000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+ let dust_amt = 546000; // Dust amount
+ // In the previous code, routing this dust payment would cause nodes[0] to perceive a channel
+ // reserve violation even though it's a dust HTLC and therefore shouldn't count towards the
+ // commitment transaction fee.
+ let (_, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_amt);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_inbound_chan() {
+ // Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an inbound channel, they don't count when
+ // calculating our counterparty's commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 98000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
+
+ let payment_amt = 46000; // Dust amount
+ // In the previous code, these first four payments would succeed.
+ let (_, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
+ let (_, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
+ let (_, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
+ let (_, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
+
+ // Then these next 5 would be interpreted by nodes[1] as violating the fee spike buffer.
+ let (_, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
+ let (_, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
+ let (_, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
+ let (_, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
+ let (_, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
+
+ // And this last payment previously resulted in nodes[1] closing on its inbound-channel
+ // counterparty, because it counted all the previous dust HTLCs against nodes[0]'s commitment
+ // transaction fee and therefore perceived this next payment as a channel reserve violation.
+ let (_, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
+}
+
#[test]
fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_inbound_chan() {
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
let commit_tx_fee_0_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1);
let recv_value_3 = commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs - commit_tx_fee_0_htlcs - total_fee_msat;
- {
- let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_3 + 1);
- let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None).err().unwrap();
- match err {
- PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedRetrySafe(ref fails) => {
- match &fails[0] {
- &APIError::ChannelUnavailable{ref err} =>
- assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)),
- _ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
- }
- },
- _ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
- }
- assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
- nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string(), 3);
- }
-
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1], &nodes[2]][..], recv_value_3, recv_value_3);
let commit_tx_fee_1_htlc = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1);
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff