]> git.bitcoin.ninja Git - rust-lightning/commitdiff
Refactor forward_htlcs to return whether to push a forward event
authorWilmer Paulino <wilmer@wilmerpaulino.com>
Fri, 8 Mar 2024 07:30:18 +0000 (23:30 -0800)
committerWilmer Paulino <wilmer@wilmerpaulino.com>
Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:28:05 +0000 (14:28 -0700)
When decoding pending `update_add_htlc` onions, we may need to forward
HTLCs using `ChannelManager::forward_htlcs`. This may end up queueing a
`PendingHTLCsForwardable` event, but we're only decoding these pending
onions as a result of handling a `PendingHTLCsForwardable`, so we
shouldn't have to queue another one and wait for it to be handled. By
having a `forward_htlcs` variant that does not push the forward event,
we can ignore the forward event push when forwarding HTLCs which we just
decoded the onion for.

lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs

index c40174980fbc17b64f8622ee416d90fc5c6c768b..c76ba5d3afc040e8ccf9f62435576da18920c1ab 100644 (file)
@@ -5355,9 +5355,14 @@ where
                }
        }
 
+       fn fail_htlc_backwards_internal(&self, source: &HTLCSource, payment_hash: &PaymentHash, onion_error: &HTLCFailReason, destination: HTLCDestination) {
+               let push_forward_event = self.fail_htlc_backwards_internal_without_forward_event(source, payment_hash, onion_error, destination);
+               if push_forward_event { self.push_pending_forwards_ev(); }
+       }
+
        /// Fails an HTLC backwards to the sender of it to us.
        /// Note that we do not assume that channels corresponding to failed HTLCs are still available.
-       fn fail_htlc_backwards_internal(&self, source: &HTLCSource, payment_hash: &PaymentHash, onion_error: &HTLCFailReason, destination: HTLCDestination) {
+       fn fail_htlc_backwards_internal_without_forward_event(&self, source: &HTLCSource, payment_hash: &PaymentHash, onion_error: &HTLCFailReason, destination: HTLCDestination) -> bool {
                // Ensure that no peer state channel storage lock is held when calling this function.
                // This ensures that future code doesn't introduce a lock-order requirement for
                // `forward_htlcs` to be locked after the `per_peer_state` peer locks, which calling
@@ -5375,12 +5380,12 @@ where
                // Note that we MUST NOT end up calling methods on self.chain_monitor here - we're called
                // from block_connected which may run during initialization prior to the chain_monitor
                // being fully configured. See the docs for `ChannelManagerReadArgs` for more.
+               let mut push_forward_event;
                match source {
                        HTLCSource::OutboundRoute { ref path, ref session_priv, ref payment_id, .. } => {
-                               if self.pending_outbound_payments.fail_htlc(source, payment_hash, onion_error, path,
+                               push_forward_event = self.pending_outbound_payments.fail_htlc(source, payment_hash, onion_error, path,
                                        session_priv, payment_id, self.probing_cookie_secret, &self.secp_ctx,
-                                       &self.pending_events, &self.logger)
-                               { self.push_pending_forwards_ev(); }
+                                       &self.pending_events, &self.logger);
                        },
                        HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData {
                                ref short_channel_id, ref htlc_id, ref incoming_packet_shared_secret,
@@ -5414,9 +5419,9 @@ where
                                        }
                                };
 
-                               let mut push_forward_ev = self.decode_update_add_htlcs.lock().unwrap().is_empty();
+                               push_forward_event = self.decode_update_add_htlcs.lock().unwrap().is_empty();
                                let mut forward_htlcs = self.forward_htlcs.lock().unwrap();
-                               push_forward_ev &= forward_htlcs.is_empty();
+                               push_forward_event &= forward_htlcs.is_empty();
                                match forward_htlcs.entry(*short_channel_id) {
                                        hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut entry) => {
                                                entry.get_mut().push(failure);
@@ -5426,7 +5431,6 @@ where
                                        }
                                }
                                mem::drop(forward_htlcs);
-                               if push_forward_ev { self.push_pending_forwards_ev(); }
                                let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
                                pending_events.push_back((events::Event::HTLCHandlingFailed {
                                        prev_channel_id: *channel_id,
@@ -5434,6 +5438,7 @@ where
                                }, None));
                        },
                }
+               push_forward_event
        }
 
        /// Provides a payment preimage in response to [`Event::PaymentClaimable`], generating any
@@ -7016,8 +7021,14 @@ where
 
        #[inline]
        fn forward_htlcs(&self, per_source_pending_forwards: &mut [(u64, OutPoint, ChannelId, u128, Vec<(PendingHTLCInfo, u64)>)]) {
+               let push_forward_event = self.forward_htlcs_without_forward_event(per_source_pending_forwards);
+               if push_forward_event { self.push_pending_forwards_ev() }
+       }
+
+       #[inline]
+       fn forward_htlcs_without_forward_event(&self, per_source_pending_forwards: &mut [(u64, OutPoint, ChannelId, u128, Vec<(PendingHTLCInfo, u64)>)]) -> bool {
+               let mut push_forward_event = false;
                for &mut (prev_short_channel_id, prev_funding_outpoint, prev_channel_id, prev_user_channel_id, ref mut pending_forwards) in per_source_pending_forwards {
-                       let mut push_forward_event = false;
                        let mut new_intercept_events = VecDeque::new();
                        let mut failed_intercept_forwards = Vec::new();
                        if !pending_forwards.is_empty() {
@@ -7079,9 +7090,7 @@ where
                                                        } else {
                                                                // We don't want to generate a PendingHTLCsForwardable event if only intercepted
                                                                // payments are being processed.
-                                                               if forward_htlcs_empty && decode_update_add_htlcs_empty {
-                                                                       push_forward_event = true;
-                                                               }
+                                                               push_forward_event |= forward_htlcs_empty && decode_update_add_htlcs_empty;
                                                                entry.insert(vec!(HTLCForwardInfo::AddHTLC(PendingAddHTLCInfo {
                                                                        prev_short_channel_id, prev_funding_outpoint, prev_channel_id, prev_htlc_id, prev_user_channel_id, forward_info })));
                                                        }
@@ -7091,15 +7100,15 @@ where
                        }
 
                        for (htlc_source, payment_hash, failure_reason, destination) in failed_intercept_forwards.drain(..) {
-                               self.fail_htlc_backwards_internal(&htlc_source, &payment_hash, &failure_reason, destination);
+                               push_forward_event |= self.fail_htlc_backwards_internal_without_forward_event(&htlc_source, &payment_hash, &failure_reason, destination);
                        }
 
                        if !new_intercept_events.is_empty() {
                                let mut events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap();
                                events.append(&mut new_intercept_events);
                        }
-                       if push_forward_event { self.push_pending_forwards_ev() }
                }
+               push_forward_event
        }
 
        fn push_pending_forwards_ev(&self) {
index 5840fead943049a6ac2a26eb4e784253ad3bcffb..0877bfd37737172910d7c441cdcd7a37cc1aa8d9 100644 (file)
@@ -1827,14 +1827,9 @@ macro_rules! expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations {
 /// there are any [`Event::HTLCHandlingFailed`] events their [`HTLCDestination`] is included in the
 /// `expected_failures` set.
 pub fn expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions(events: Vec<Event>, expected_failures: &[HTLCDestination]) {
-       match events[0] {
-               Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
-               _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events),
-       };
-
        let count = expected_failures.len() + 1;
        assert_eq!(events.len(), count);
-
+       assert!(events.iter().find(|event| matches!(event, Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. })).is_some());
        if expected_failures.len() > 0 {
                expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(events, expected_failures)
        }
index af6eee9cf85249bb2e2110bce91034ba1ef5b5d1..971c10c55f97ba66950365a514e2455f62d92859 100644 (file)
@@ -2750,7 +2750,7 @@ fn claim_htlc_outputs_single_tx() {
                check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
                check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
                let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
-               expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[0], events[0..1], true);
+               expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions(events[0..2].to_vec(), &[HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 }]);
                match events.last().unwrap() {
                        Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
@@ -3312,13 +3312,13 @@ fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use
                let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
                assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
                match events[0] {
-                       Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
-                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
-               };
-               match events[1] {
                        Event::HTLCHandlingFailed { .. } => { },
                        _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
                }
+               match events[1] {
+                       Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
+                       _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
+               };
                // Deliberately don't process the pending fail-back so they all fail back at once after
                // block connection just like the !deliver_bs_raa case
        }
@@ -5351,7 +5351,7 @@ fn do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(deliver_last_raa: bool, anno
        connect_blocks(&nodes[2], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
        check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
        if deliver_last_raa {
-               expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[2], events[0..1], true);
+               expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[2], events[1..2], true);
 
                let expected_destinations: Vec<HTLCDestination> = repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(3).collect();
                expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), expected_destinations);
@@ -6182,7 +6182,7 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free_multihop() {
        // nodes[1]'s ChannelManager will now signal that we have HTLC forwards to process.
        let process_htlc_forwards_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
        assert_eq!(process_htlc_forwards_event.len(), 2);
-       match &process_htlc_forwards_event[0] {
+       match &process_htlc_forwards_event[1] {
                &Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
        }
@@ -7543,7 +7543,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() {
        let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, 3_000_000);
        let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &route_params, &nodes[1].network_graph.read_only(), None,
                nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &Default::default(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
-       send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
+       let failed_payment_hash = send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000).1;
 
        let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
        assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
@@ -7582,7 +7582,7 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() {
        let block_129 = create_dummy_block(block_11.block_hash(), 42, vec![revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[1].clone()]);
        connect_block(&nodes[0], &block_129);
        let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
-       expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[0], events[0..1], true);
+       expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions(events[0..2].to_vec(), &[HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: failed_payment_hash }]);
        match events.last().unwrap() {
                Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
                _ => panic!("Unexpected event"),