}
}
+ /// Gets the `Shutdown` message we should send our peer on reconnect, if any.
+ pub fn get_outbound_shutdown(&self) -> Option<msgs::Shutdown> {
+ if self.context.channel_state & (ChannelState::LocalShutdownSent as u32) != 0 {
+ assert!(self.context.shutdown_scriptpubkey.is_some());
+ Some(msgs::Shutdown {
+ channel_id: self.context.channel_id,
+ scriptpubkey: self.get_closing_scriptpubkey(),
+ })
+ } else { None }
+ }
+
/// May panic if some calls other than message-handling calls (which will all Err immediately)
/// have been called between remove_uncommitted_htlcs_and_mark_paused and this call.
///
self.context.channel_state &= !(ChannelState::PeerDisconnected as u32);
self.context.sent_message_awaiting_response = None;
- let shutdown_msg = if self.context.channel_state & (ChannelState::LocalShutdownSent as u32) != 0 {
- assert!(self.context.shutdown_scriptpubkey.is_some());
- Some(msgs::Shutdown {
- channel_id: self.context.channel_id,
- scriptpubkey: self.get_closing_scriptpubkey(),
- })
- } else { None };
+ let shutdown_msg = self.get_outbound_shutdown();
let announcement_sigs = self.get_announcement_sigs(node_signer, genesis_block_hash, user_config, best_block.height(), logger);
fn handle_error(&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &msgs::ErrorMessage) {
let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(self);
+ match &msg.data as &str {
+ "cannot co-op close channel w/ active htlcs"|
+ "link failed to shutdown" =>
+ {
+ // LND hasn't properly handled shutdown messages ever, and force-closes any time we
+ // send one while HTLCs are still present. The issue is tracked at
+ // https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/6039 and has had multiple patches
+ // to fix it but none so far have managed to land upstream. The issue appears to be
+ // very low priority for the LND team despite being marked "P1".
+ // We're not going to bother handling this in a sensible way, instead simply
+ // repeating the Shutdown message on repeat until morale improves.
+ if msg.channel_id != [0; 32] {
+ let per_peer_state = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
+ let peer_state_mutex_opt = per_peer_state.get(counterparty_node_id);
+ if peer_state_mutex_opt.is_none() { return; }
+ let mut peer_state = peer_state_mutex_opt.unwrap().lock().unwrap();
+ if let Some(chan) = peer_state.channel_by_id.get(&msg.channel_id) {
+ if let Some(msg) = chan.get_outbound_shutdown() {
+ peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown {
+ node_id: *counterparty_node_id,
+ msg,
+ });
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+ _ => {}
+ }
+
if msg.channel_id == [0; 32] {
let channel_ids: Vec<[u8; 32]> = {
let per_peer_state = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
}
+#[test]
+fn test_lnd_bug_6039() {
+ // LND sends a nonsense error message any time it gets a shutdown if there are still HTLCs
+ // pending. We currently swallow that error to work around LND's bug #6039. This test emulates
+ // the LND nonsense and ensures we at least kinda handle it.
+ let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
+ let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+ let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
+
+ let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100_000);
+
+ nodes[0].node.close_channel(&chan.2, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
+ let node_0_shutdown = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_0_shutdown);
+
+ // Generate an lnd-like error message and check that we respond by simply screaming louder to
+ // see if LND will accept our protocol compliance.
+ let err_msg = msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: chan.2, data: "link failed to shutdown".to_string() };
+ nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &err_msg);
+ let _node_0_repeated_shutdown = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ let node_1_shutdown = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
+ assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
+
+ claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage);
+
+ // Assume that LND will eventually respond to our Shutdown if we clear all the remaining HTLCs
+ nodes[0].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_1_shutdown);
+
+ // ClosingSignNegotion process
+ let node_0_closing_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendClosingSigned, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_0_closing_signed);
+ let node_1_closing_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendClosingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[0].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_1_closing_signed);
+ let (_, node_0_2nd_closing_signed) = get_closing_signed_broadcast!(nodes[0].node, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+ nodes[1].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_0_2nd_closing_signed.unwrap());
+ let (_, node_1_none) = get_closing_signed_broadcast!(nodes[1].node, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ assert!(node_1_none.is_none());
+ check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
+ check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
+
+ // Shutdown basically removes the channelDetails, testing of shutdowncomplete state unnecessary
+ assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
+}
+
#[test]
fn expect_channel_shutdown_state_with_force_closure() {
// Test sending a shutdown prior to channel_ready after funding generation
projects / rust-lightning / commitdiff