--- /dev/null
+//! Further functional tests which test blockchain reorganizations.
+
+use ln::channelmonitor::ANTI_REORG_DELAY;
+use ln::features::InitFeatures;
+use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, ErrorAction, HTLCFailChannelUpdate};
+use util::events::{Event, EventsProvider, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider};
+
+use bitcoin::util::hash::BitcoinHash;
+use bitcoin::blockdata::block::{Block, BlockHeader};
+
+use std::default::Default;
+
+use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
+
+fn do_test_onchain_htlc_reorg(local_commitment: bool, claim: bool) {
+ // Our on-chain HTLC-claim learning has a few properties worth testing:
+ // * If an upstream HTLC is claimed with a preimage (both against our own commitment
+ // transaction our counterparty's), we claim it backwards immediately.
+ // * If an upstream HTLC is claimed with a timeout, we delay ANTI_REORG_DELAY before failing
+ // it backwards to ensure our counterparty can't claim with a preimage in a reorg.
+ //
+ // Here we test both properties in any combination based on the two bools passed in as
+ // arguments.
+ //
+ // If local_commitment is set, we first broadcast a local commitment containing an offered HTLC
+ // and an HTLC-Timeout tx, otherwise we broadcast a remote commitment containing a received
+ // HTLC and a local HTLC-Timeout tx spending it.
+ //
+ // We then either allow these transactions to confirm (if !claim) or we wait until one block
+ // before they otherwise would and reorg them out, confirming an HTLC-Success tx instead.
+ let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3);
+ let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
+ let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+
+ create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::supported(), InitFeatures::supported());
+ let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::supported(), InitFeatures::supported());
+
+ let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1000000);
+
+ // Provide preimage to node 2 by claiming payment
+ nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage, 1000000);
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
+ get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
+
+ let mut headers = Vec::new();
+ let mut header = BlockHeader { version: 0x2000_0000, prev_blockhash: Default::default(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
+ let claim_txn = if local_commitment {
+ // Broadcast node 1 commitment txn to broadcast the HTLC-Timeout
+ let node_1_commitment_txn = nodes[1].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get_mut(&chan_2.2).unwrap().channel_monitor().get_latest_local_commitment_txn();
+ assert_eq!(node_1_commitment_txn.len(), 2); // 1 local commitment tx, 1 Outbound HTLC-Timeout
+ assert_eq!(node_1_commitment_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // to-self and Offered HTLC (to-remote/to-node-3 is dust)
+ check_spends!(node_1_commitment_txn[0], chan_2.3);
+ check_spends!(node_1_commitment_txn[1], node_1_commitment_txn[0].clone());
+
+ // Give node 2 node 1's transactions and get its response (claiming the HTLC instead).
+ nodes[2].block_notifier.block_connected(&Block { header, txdata: node_1_commitment_txn.clone() }, CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1);
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], false); // We should get a BroadcastChannelUpdate (and *only* a BroadcstChannelUpdate)
+ let node_2_commitment_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(node_2_commitment_txn.len(), 3); // ChannelMonitor: 1 offered HTLC-Claim, ChannelManger: 1 local commitment tx, 1 Received HTLC-Claim
+ assert_eq!(node_2_commitment_txn[1].output.len(), 2); // to-remote and Received HTLC (to-self is dust)
+ check_spends!(node_2_commitment_txn[1], chan_2.3);
+ check_spends!(node_2_commitment_txn[2], node_2_commitment_txn[1].clone());
+ check_spends!(node_2_commitment_txn[0], node_1_commitment_txn[0]);
+
+ // Confirm node 1's commitment txn (and HTLC-Timeout) on node 1
+ nodes[1].block_notifier.block_connected(&Block { header, txdata: node_1_commitment_txn.clone() }, CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1);
+
+ // ...but return node 1's commitment tx in case claim is set and we're preparing to reorg
+ vec![node_1_commitment_txn[0].clone(), node_2_commitment_txn[0].clone()]
+ } else {
+ // Broadcast node 2 commitment txn
+ let node_2_commitment_txn = nodes[2].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get_mut(&chan_2.2).unwrap().channel_monitor().get_latest_local_commitment_txn();
+ assert_eq!(node_2_commitment_txn.len(), 2); // 1 local commitment tx, 1 Received HTLC-Claim
+ assert_eq!(node_2_commitment_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // to-remote and Received HTLC (to-self is dust)
+ check_spends!(node_2_commitment_txn[0], chan_2.3);
+ check_spends!(node_2_commitment_txn[1], node_2_commitment_txn[0].clone());
+
+ // Give node 1 node 2's commitment transaction and get its response (timing the HTLC out)
+ nodes[1].block_notifier.block_connected(&Block { header, txdata: vec![node_2_commitment_txn[0].clone()] }, CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1);
+ let node_1_commitment_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(node_1_commitment_txn.len(), 3); // ChannelMonitor: 1 offered HTLC-Timeout, ChannelManger: 1 local commitment tx, 1 Offered HTLC-Timeout
+ assert_eq!(node_1_commitment_txn[1].output.len(), 2); // to-local and Offered HTLC (to-remote is dust)
+ check_spends!(node_1_commitment_txn[1], chan_2.3);
+ check_spends!(node_1_commitment_txn[2], node_1_commitment_txn[1].clone());
+ check_spends!(node_1_commitment_txn[0], node_2_commitment_txn[0]);
+
+ // Confirm node 2's commitment txn (and node 1's HTLC-Timeout) on node 1
+ nodes[1].block_notifier.block_connected(&Block { header, txdata: vec![node_2_commitment_txn[0].clone(), node_1_commitment_txn[0].clone()] }, CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1);
+ // ...but return node 2's commitment tx (and claim) in case claim is set and we're preparing to reorg
+ node_2_commitment_txn
+ };
+ check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], false); // We should get a BroadcastChannelUpdate (and *only* a BroadcstChannelUpdate)
+ headers.push(header.clone());
+ // At CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 we have a confirmation count of 1, so CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH +
+ // ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1 will give us a confirmation count of ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1.
+ for i in CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2..CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1 {
+ header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: header.bitcoin_hash(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
+ nodes[1].block_notifier.block_connected_checked(&header, i, &vec![], &[0; 0]);
+ headers.push(header.clone());
+ }
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
+ assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
+
+ if claim {
+ // Now reorg back to CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH and confirm node 2's broadcasted transactions:
+ for (height, header) in (CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1..CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1).zip(headers.iter()).rev() {
+ nodes[1].block_notifier.block_disconnected(&header, height);
+ }
+
+ header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: Default::default(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
+ nodes[1].block_notifier.block_connected(&Block { header, txdata: claim_txn }, CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1);
+
+ // ChannelManager only polls ManyChannelMonitor::get_and_clear_pending_htlcs_updated when we
+ // probe it for events, so we probe non-message events here (which should still end up empty):
+ assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
+ } else {
+ // Confirm the timeout tx and check that we fail the HTLC backwards
+ header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: header.bitcoin_hash(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 };
+ nodes[1].block_notifier.block_connected_checked(&header, CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + ANTI_REORG_DELAY, &vec![], &[0; 0]);
+ expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
+ }
+
+ check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
+ // Which should result in an immediate claim/fail of the HTLC:
+ let htlc_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
+ if claim {
+ assert_eq!(htlc_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
+ } else {
+ assert_eq!(htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
+ nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
+ }
+ commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], htlc_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
+ if claim {
+ expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], our_payment_preimage);
+ } else {
+ let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
+ assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
+ if let MessageSendEvent::PaymentFailureNetworkUpdate { update: HTLCFailChannelUpdate::ChannelClosed { ref is_permanent, .. } } = events[0] {
+ assert!(is_permanent);
+ } else { panic!("Unexpected event!"); }
+ expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false);
+ }
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_onchain_htlc_claim_reorg_local_commitment() {
+ do_test_onchain_htlc_reorg(true, true);
+}
+#[test]
+fn test_onchain_htlc_timeout_delay_local_commitment() {
+ do_test_onchain_htlc_reorg(true, false);
+}
+#[test]
+fn test_onchain_htlc_claim_reorg_remote_commitment() {
+ do_test_onchain_htlc_reorg(false, true);
+}
+#[test]
+fn test_onchain_htlc_timeout_delay_remote_commitment() {
+ do_test_onchain_htlc_reorg(false, false);
+}