From: Jeffrey Czyz <jkczyz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 21:13:32 +0000 (-0600)
Subject: Merge similar InvoiceRequestBuilder impl blocks
X-Git-Tag: v0.0.123-beta~46^2~8
X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=702a003270a452ee65daf28869b77f1f63c24caa;p=rust-lightning

Merge similar InvoiceRequestBuilder impl blocks

This avoids needing to create additional macros when adding c_bindings
support.
---

diff --git a/lightning/src/offers/invoice_request.rs b/lightning/src/offers/invoice_request.rs
index ecdde2b66..bbacd99d8 100644
--- a/lightning/src/offers/invoice_request.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/offers/invoice_request.rs
@@ -144,6 +144,14 @@ impl<'a, 'b, T: secp256k1::Signing> InvoiceRequestBuilder<'a, 'b, ExplicitPayerI
 			secp_ctx: None,
 		}
 	}
+
+	/// Builds an unsigned [`InvoiceRequest`] after checking for valid semantics. It can be signed
+	/// by [`UnsignedInvoiceRequest::sign`].
+	pub fn build(self) -> Result<UnsignedInvoiceRequest, Bolt12SemanticError> {
+		let (unsigned_invoice_request, keys, _) = self.build_with_checks()?;
+		debug_assert!(keys.is_none());
+		Ok(unsigned_invoice_request)
+	}
 }
 
 impl<'a, 'b, T: secp256k1::Signing> InvoiceRequestBuilder<'a, 'b, DerivedPayerId, T> {
@@ -163,6 +171,21 @@ impl<'a, 'b, T: secp256k1::Signing> InvoiceRequestBuilder<'a, 'b, DerivedPayerId
 			secp_ctx: Some(secp_ctx),
 		}
 	}
+
+	/// Builds a signed [`InvoiceRequest`] after checking for valid semantics.
+	pub fn build_and_sign(self) -> Result<InvoiceRequest, Bolt12SemanticError> {
+		let (unsigned_invoice_request, keys, secp_ctx) = self.build_with_checks()?;
+		debug_assert!(keys.is_some());
+
+		let secp_ctx = secp_ctx.unwrap();
+		let keys = keys.unwrap();
+		let invoice_request = unsigned_invoice_request
+			.sign::<_, Infallible>(
+				|message| Ok(secp_ctx.sign_schnorr_no_aux_rand(message.as_ref().as_digest(), &keys))
+			)
+			.unwrap();
+		Ok(invoice_request)
+	}
 }
 
 impl<'a, 'b, P: PayerIdStrategy, T: secp256k1::Signing> InvoiceRequestBuilder<'a, 'b, P, T> {
@@ -301,33 +324,6 @@ impl<'a, 'b, P: PayerIdStrategy, T: secp256k1::Signing> InvoiceRequestBuilder<'a
 	}
 }
 
-impl<'a, 'b, T: secp256k1::Signing> InvoiceRequestBuilder<'a, 'b, ExplicitPayerId, T> {
-	/// Builds an unsigned [`InvoiceRequest`] after checking for valid semantics. It can be signed
-	/// by [`UnsignedInvoiceRequest::sign`].
-	pub fn build(self) -> Result<UnsignedInvoiceRequest, Bolt12SemanticError> {
-		let (unsigned_invoice_request, keys, _) = self.build_with_checks()?;
-		debug_assert!(keys.is_none());
-		Ok(unsigned_invoice_request)
-	}
-}
-
-impl<'a, 'b, T: secp256k1::Signing> InvoiceRequestBuilder<'a, 'b, DerivedPayerId, T> {
-	/// Builds a signed [`InvoiceRequest`] after checking for valid semantics.
-	pub fn build_and_sign(self) -> Result<InvoiceRequest, Bolt12SemanticError> {
-		let (unsigned_invoice_request, keys, secp_ctx) = self.build_with_checks()?;
-		debug_assert!(keys.is_some());
-
-		let secp_ctx = secp_ctx.unwrap();
-		let keys = keys.unwrap();
-		let invoice_request = unsigned_invoice_request
-			.sign::<_, Infallible>(
-				|message| Ok(secp_ctx.sign_schnorr_no_aux_rand(message.as_ref().as_digest(), &keys))
-			)
-			.unwrap();
-		Ok(invoice_request)
-	}
-}
-
 #[cfg(test)]
 impl<'a, 'b, P: PayerIdStrategy, T: secp256k1::Signing> InvoiceRequestBuilder<'a, 'b, P, T> {
 	fn chain_unchecked(mut self, network: Network) -> Self {