From: Matt Corallo <git@bluematt.me>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 12:57:39 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Make several tests more robust against harmless transaction changes
X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7e344dfc11ec0217f28643a05f990d2b06c935f4;p=rust-lightning

Make several tests more robust against harmless transaction changes

In the next commit we'll be changing the order some transactions
get spent in packages, causing some tests to spuriously fail. Here
we update a few tests to avoid that by checking sets of inputs
rather than specific ordering.
---

diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
index 200e5ed84..f0a63f8b9 100644
--- a/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
@@ -1637,15 +1637,15 @@ fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances(anchors: bool) {
 			assert_eq!(as_commitment_claim_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout, 4); // Separate to_remote claim
 			check_spends!(as_commitment_claim_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
 			assert_eq!(as_commitment_claim_txn[1].input.len(), 2);
-			assert_eq!(as_commitment_claim_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout, 2);
-			assert_eq!(as_commitment_claim_txn[1].input[1].previous_output.vout, 3);
+			assert!(as_commitment_claim_txn[1].input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.vout == 2));
+			assert!(as_commitment_claim_txn[1].input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.vout == 3));
 			check_spends!(as_commitment_claim_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
 			Some(as_commitment_claim_txn.remove(0))
 		} else {
 			assert_eq!(as_commitment_claim_txn[0].input.len(), 3);
-			assert_eq!(as_commitment_claim_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout, 2);
-			assert_eq!(as_commitment_claim_txn[0].input[1].previous_output.vout, 0);
-			assert_eq!(as_commitment_claim_txn[0].input[2].previous_output.vout, 1);
+			assert!(as_commitment_claim_txn[0].input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.vout == 2));
+			assert!(as_commitment_claim_txn[0].input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.vout == 0));
+			assert!(as_commitment_claim_txn[0].input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.vout == 1));
 			check_spends!(as_commitment_claim_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
 			None
 		}
@@ -1953,9 +1953,9 @@ fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims(anchors: bool) {
 		Some(claim_txn.remove(0))
 	} else {
 		assert_eq!(claim_txn[0].input.len(), 3);
-		assert_eq!(claim_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout, 3);
-		assert_eq!(claim_txn[0].input[1].previous_output.vout, 0);
-		assert_eq!(claim_txn[0].input[2].previous_output.vout, 1);
+		assert!(claim_txn[0].input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.vout == 3));
+		assert!(claim_txn[0].input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.vout == 0));
+		assert!(claim_txn[0].input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.vout == 1));
 		check_spends!(claim_txn[0], as_revoked_txn[0]);
 		None
 	};