From: Matt Corallo Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 22:53:16 +0000 (-0500) Subject: Correct comment in onchaintx.rs X-Git-Tag: v0.0.12~109^2~2 X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9de9288100408196955b19081844d57e593af228;p=rust-lightning Correct comment in onchaintx.rs This comment was stale and referred to a previous implementation of #462, which changed before it was merged. --- diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/onchaintx.rs b/lightning/src/ln/onchaintx.rs index c731bc079..e456b7164 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/onchaintx.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/onchaintx.rs @@ -487,8 +487,8 @@ impl OnchainTxHandler { let mut aggregated_soonest = ::std::u32::MAX; let mut spendable_outputs = Vec::new(); - // Try to aggregate outputs if they're 1) belong to same parent tx, 2) their - // timelock expiration isn't imminent (<= CLTV_SHARED_CLAIM_BUFFER). + // Try to aggregate outputs if their timelock expiration isn't imminent (absolute_timelock + // <= CLTV_SHARED_CLAIM_BUFFER) and they don't require an immediate nLockTime (aggregable). for req in claimable_outpoints { // Don't claim a outpoint twice that would be bad for privacy and may uselessly lock a CPFP input for a while if let Some(_) = self.claimable_outpoints.get(&req.outpoint) { log_trace!(self, "Bouncing off outpoint {}:{}, already registered its claiming request", req.outpoint.txid, req.outpoint.vout); } else {