From: Matt Corallo Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 20:31:48 +0000 (-0400) Subject: Clarify ChannelMonitor remote commitment tracking and fix a race X-Git-Tag: v0.0.12~392^2~2 X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9df30535757d90ad85ca4ff07850f085c7e2b65c;p=rust-lightning Clarify ChannelMonitor remote commitment tracking and fix a race --- diff --git a/src/ln/channelmonitor.rs b/src/ln/channelmonitor.rs index 0daedeac9..61b0f4557 100644 --- a/src/ln/channelmonitor.rs +++ b/src/ln/channelmonitor.rs @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ enum KeyStorage { #[derive(Clone)] struct LocalSignedTx { + /// txid of the transaction in tx, just used to make comparison faster txid: Sha256dHash, tx: Transaction, revocation_key: PublicKey, @@ -155,9 +156,16 @@ pub struct ChannelMonitor { old_secrets: [([u8; 32], u64); 49], remote_claimable_outpoints: HashMap>, - remote_htlc_outputs_on_chain: Mutex>, - //hash to commitment number mapping use to determine the state of transaction owning it - // (revoked/non-revoked) and so lightnen pruning + /// We cannot identify HTLC-Success or HTLC-Timeout transactions by themselves on the chain. + /// Nor can we figure out their commitment numbers without the commitment transaction they are + /// spending. Thus, in order to claim them via revocation key, we track all the remote + /// commitment transactions which we find on-chain, mapping them to the commitment number which + /// can be used to derive the revocation key and claim the transactions. + remote_commitment_txn_on_chain: Mutex>, + /// Cache used to make pruning of payment_preimages faster. + /// Maps payment_hash values to commitment numbers for remote transactions for non-revoked + /// remote transactions (ie should remain pretty small). + /// Serialized to disk but should generally not be sent to Watchtowers. remote_hash_commitment_number: HashMap<[u8; 32], u64>, // We store two local commitment transactions to avoid any race conditions where we may update @@ -188,7 +196,7 @@ impl Clone for ChannelMonitor { old_secrets: self.old_secrets.clone(), remote_claimable_outpoints: self.remote_claimable_outpoints.clone(), - remote_htlc_outputs_on_chain: Mutex::new((*self.remote_htlc_outputs_on_chain.lock().unwrap()).clone()), + remote_commitment_txn_on_chain: Mutex::new((*self.remote_commitment_txn_on_chain.lock().unwrap()).clone()), remote_hash_commitment_number: self.remote_hash_commitment_number.clone(), prev_local_signed_commitment_tx: self.prev_local_signed_commitment_tx.clone(), @@ -221,7 +229,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { old_secrets: [([0; 32], 1 << 48); 49], remote_claimable_outpoints: HashMap::new(), - remote_htlc_outputs_on_chain: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()), + remote_commitment_txn_on_chain: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()), remote_hash_commitment_number: HashMap::new(), prev_local_signed_commitment_tx: None, @@ -591,10 +599,10 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { } } - if !inputs.is_empty() || !txn_to_broadcast.is_empty() { + if !inputs.is_empty() || !txn_to_broadcast.is_empty() { // ie we're confident this is actually ours // We're definitely a remote commitment transaction! // TODO: Register commitment_txid with the ChainWatchInterface! - self.remote_htlc_outputs_on_chain.lock().unwrap().insert(commitment_txid, commitment_number); + self.remote_commitment_txn_on_chain.lock().unwrap().insert(commitment_txid, commitment_number); } if inputs.is_empty() { return txn_to_broadcast; } // Nothing to be done...probably a false positive/local tx @@ -619,6 +627,15 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { txn_to_broadcast.push(spend_tx); } else if let Some(per_commitment_data) = per_commitment_option { + // While this isn't useful yet, there is a potential race where if a counterparty + // revokes a state at the same time as the commitment transaction for that state is + // confirmed, and the watchtower receives the block before the user, the user could + // upload a new ChannelMonitor with the revocation secret but the watchtower has + // already processed the block, resulting in the remote_commitment_txn_on_chain entry + // not being generated by the above conditional. Thus, to be safe, we go ahead and + // insert it here. + self.remote_commitment_txn_on_chain.lock().unwrap().insert(commitment_txid, commitment_number); + if let Some(revocation_points) = self.their_cur_revocation_points { let revocation_point_option = if revocation_points.0 == commitment_number { Some(&revocation_points.1) } @@ -723,7 +740,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { } } } else { - //TODO: For each input check if its in our remote_htlc_outputs_on_chain map! + //TODO: For each input check if its in our remote_commitment_txn_on_chain map! } txn_to_broadcast