From: Matt Corallo Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 16:38:22 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Add an `inbound_payment_id_secret` to `ChannelManager` X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=aa09c33a1719944769ba98624bfe18ea33083f44;p=rust-lightning Add an `inbound_payment_id_secret` to `ChannelManager` In the next commit we'll start generating `PaymentId`s for inbound payments randomly by HMAC'ing the HTLC set of the payment. Here we start by defining the HMAC secret for these HMACs. This requires one small test adaptation and a full_stack_target fuzz change because it changes the RNG consumption. --- diff --git a/fuzz/src/full_stack.rs b/fuzz/src/full_stack.rs index 90449248e..e0ce11537 100644 --- a/fuzz/src/full_stack.rs +++ b/fuzz/src/full_stack.rs @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ pub fn do_test(mut data: &[u8], logger: &Arc) { // Adding new calls to `EntropySource::get_secure_random_bytes` during startup can change all the // keys subsequently generated in this test. Rather than regenerating all the messages manually, // it's easier to just increment the counter here so the keys don't change. - keys_manager.counter.fetch_sub(3, Ordering::AcqRel); + keys_manager.counter.fetch_sub(4, Ordering::AcqRel); let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(network, Arc::clone(&logger))); let gossip_sync = Arc::new(P2PGossipSync::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger))); diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs index 2cfa60ea7..0f9bfd889 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs @@ -2261,6 +2261,9 @@ where /// keeping additional state. probing_cookie_secret: [u8; 32], + /// When generating [`PaymentId`]s for inbound payments, we HMAC the HTLCs with this secret. + inbound_payment_id_secret: [u8; 32], + /// The highest block timestamp we've seen, which is usually a good guess at the current time. /// Assuming most miners are generating blocks with reasonable timestamps, this shouldn't be /// very far in the past, and can only ever be up to two hours in the future. @@ -3152,6 +3155,7 @@ where fake_scid_rand_bytes: entropy_source.get_secure_random_bytes(), probing_cookie_secret: entropy_source.get_secure_random_bytes(), + inbound_payment_id_secret: entropy_source.get_secure_random_bytes(), highest_seen_timestamp: AtomicUsize::new(current_timestamp as usize), @@ -12381,6 +12385,7 @@ where let mut events_override = None; let mut in_flight_monitor_updates: Option>> = None; let mut decode_update_add_htlcs: Option>> = None; + let mut inbound_payment_id_secret = None; read_tlv_fields!(reader, { (1, pending_outbound_payments_no_retry, option), (2, pending_intercepted_htlcs, option), @@ -12395,6 +12400,7 @@ where (11, probing_cookie_secret, option), (13, claimable_htlc_onion_fields, optional_vec), (14, decode_update_add_htlcs, option), + (15, inbound_payment_id_secret, option), }); let mut decode_update_add_htlcs = decode_update_add_htlcs.unwrap_or_else(|| new_hash_map()); if fake_scid_rand_bytes.is_none() { @@ -12405,6 +12411,10 @@ where probing_cookie_secret = Some(args.entropy_source.get_secure_random_bytes()); } + if inbound_payment_id_secret.is_none() { + inbound_payment_id_secret = Some(args.entropy_source.get_secure_random_bytes()); + } + if let Some(events) = events_override { pending_events_read = events; } @@ -12930,6 +12940,7 @@ where fake_scid_rand_bytes: fake_scid_rand_bytes.unwrap(), probing_cookie_secret: probing_cookie_secret.unwrap(), + inbound_payment_id_secret: inbound_payment_id_secret.unwrap(), our_network_pubkey, secp_ctx, diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs index efd2fc9e9..31346c6b7 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs @@ -7670,8 +7670,8 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() { assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output); assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output); - assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[1].input[0].previous_output); - assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output); + assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[1].input[0].previous_output); + assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output); // node_txn[3] spends the revoked outputs from the revoked_htlc_txn (which only have one // output, checked above).