From: Matt Corallo Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 05:49:18 +0000 (-0500) Subject: Fix rustc nightly compiler error. X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e0defa67b5057a5a69135328aa9b79f6efeb72fa;p=rust-lightning Fix rustc nightly compiler error. This works around a regression in nightly rustc that prevents type inference from working properly. --- diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/router.rs b/lightning/src/ln/router.rs index 592e3cdb3..14ec26c36 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/router.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/router.rs @@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 200); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (13 << 8) | 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &vec![0b11]); // it should also override our view of their features - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, node3); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 13); @@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 200); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (13 << 8) | 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &vec![0b11]); // it should also override our view of their features - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, node3); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 13); @@ -1655,7 +1655,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 200); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (13 << 8) | 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &vec![0b11]); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, node3); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 13); @@ -1726,8 +1726,8 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } { // Simple test with outbound channel to 4 to test that last_hops and first_hops connect @@ -1750,14 +1750,14 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 0); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, (8 << 8) | 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &vec![0b11]); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // No feature flags will meet the relevant-to-channel conversion assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, node7); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 8); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } last_hops[0].fee_base_msat = 1000; @@ -1793,8 +1793,8 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 10); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } { // ...but still use 8 for larger payments as 6 has a variable feerate @@ -1835,8 +1835,8 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 2000); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } { // Test Router serialization/deserialization