From: Wilmer Paulino Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 23:59:05 +0000 (-0700) Subject: Add anchors coverage to test_claim_value_force_close X-Git-Tag: v0.0.117-rc1~1^2~5 X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ea4b187df47fef990d3bc3e7ec0ce832fb1a107e;p=rust-lightning Add anchors coverage to test_claim_value_force_close --- diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs index 62355f406..ce51fe4f9 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs @@ -93,9 +93,13 @@ fn chanmon_fail_from_stale_commitment() { expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false, update_a.contents.short_channel_id, true); } -fn test_spendable_output<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, spendable_tx: &Transaction) -> Vec { +fn test_spendable_output<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, spendable_tx: &Transaction, has_anchors_htlc_event: bool) -> Vec { let mut spendable = node.chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events(); - assert_eq!(spendable.len(), 1); + assert_eq!(spendable.len(), if has_anchors_htlc_event { 2 } else { 1 }); + if has_anchors_htlc_event { + if let Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::HTLCResolution { .. }) = spendable.pop().unwrap() {} + else { panic!(); } + } if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs, .. } = spendable.pop().unwrap() { assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1); let spend_tx = node.keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(), @@ -240,13 +244,13 @@ fn do_chanmon_claim_value_coop_close(anchors: bool) { assert_eq!(Vec::::new(), nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()); - let spendable_outputs_a = test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &shutdown_tx[0]); + let spendable_outputs_a = test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &shutdown_tx[0], false); assert_eq!( get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id).get_spendable_outputs(&shutdown_tx[0], shutdown_tx_conf_height_a), spendable_outputs_a ); - let spendable_outputs_b = test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &shutdown_tx[0]); + let spendable_outputs_b = test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &shutdown_tx[0], false); assert_eq!( get_monitor!(nodes[1], chan_id).get_spendable_outputs(&shutdown_tx[0], shutdown_tx_conf_height_b), spendable_outputs_b @@ -278,7 +282,7 @@ fn fuzzy_assert_eq>(a: V, b: V) { assert!(b_u64 >= a_u64 - 5); } -fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { +fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(anchors: bool, prev_commitment_tx: bool) { // Tests `get_claimable_balances` with an HTLC across a force-close. // We build a channel with an HTLC pending, then force close the channel and check that the // `get_claimable_balances` return value is correct as transactions confirm on-chain. @@ -291,9 +295,34 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true; } let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); - let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); + let mut user_config = test_default_channel_config(); + if anchors { + user_config.channel_handshake_config.negotiate_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx = true; + user_config.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true; + } + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(user_config), Some(user_config)]); let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + let coinbase_tx = Transaction { + version: 2, + lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO, + input: vec![TxIn { ..Default::default() }], + output: vec![ + TxOut { + value: Amount::ONE_BTC.to_sat(), + script_pubkey: nodes[0].wallet_source.get_change_script().unwrap(), + }, + TxOut { + value: Amount::ONE_BTC.to_sat(), + script_pubkey: nodes[1].wallet_source.get_change_script().unwrap(), + }, + ], + }; + if anchors { + nodes[0].wallet_source.add_utxo(bitcoin::OutPoint { txid: coinbase_tx.txid(), vout: 0 }, coinbase_tx.output[0].value); + nodes[1].wallet_source.add_utxo(bitcoin::OutPoint { txid: coinbase_tx.txid(), vout: 1 }, coinbase_tx.output[1].value); + } + let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 1_000_000); let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 }; @@ -309,7 +338,7 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { let htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety - let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64; + let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id); let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id); let remote_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_id); @@ -348,9 +377,11 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { // Before B receives the payment preimage, it only suggests the push_msat value of 1_000 sats // as claimable. A lists both its to-self balance and the (possibly-claimable) HTLCs. + let commitment_tx_fee = chan_feerate as u64 * + (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000; + let anchor_outputs_value = if anchors { 2 * channel::ANCHOR_OUTPUT_VALUE_SATOSHI } else { 0 }; assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose { - amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 3_000 - 4_000 - 1_000 - 3 - chan_feerate * - (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000, + amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 3_000 - 4_000 - 1_000 - 3 - commitment_tx_fee - anchor_outputs_value, }, sent_htlc_balance.clone(), sent_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()]), sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances())); assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose { @@ -390,16 +421,17 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { // Once B has received the payment preimage, it includes the value of the HTLC in its // "claimable if you were to close the channel" balance. + let commitment_tx_fee = chan_feerate as u64 * + (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + + if prev_commitment_tx { 1 } else { 2 } * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000; let mut a_expected_balances = vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose { amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - // Channel funding value in satoshis 4_000 - // The to-be-failed HTLC value in satoshis 3_000 - // The claimed HTLC value in satoshis 1_000 - // The push_msat value in satoshis 3 - // The dust HTLC value in satoshis - // The commitment transaction fee with two HTLC outputs: - chan_feerate * (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + - if prev_commitment_tx { 1 } else { 2 } * - channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000, + commitment_tx_fee - // The commitment transaction fee with two HTLC outputs + anchor_outputs_value, // The anchor outputs value in satoshis }, sent_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()]; if !prev_commitment_tx { a_expected_balances.push(sent_htlc_balance.clone()); @@ -417,13 +449,37 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &remote_txn[0]); mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &remote_txn[0]); - let b_broadcast_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0); + if anchors { + let mut events = nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events(); + assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); + match events.pop().unwrap() { + Event::BumpTransaction(bump_event) => { + let mut first_htlc_event = bump_event.clone(); + if let BumpTransactionEvent::HTLCResolution { ref mut htlc_descriptors, .. } = &mut first_htlc_event { + htlc_descriptors.remove(1); + } else { + panic!("Unexpected event"); + } + let mut second_htlc_event = bump_event; + if let BumpTransactionEvent::HTLCResolution { ref mut htlc_descriptors, .. } = &mut second_htlc_event { + htlc_descriptors.remove(0); + } else { + panic!("Unexpected event"); + } + nodes[1].bump_tx_handler.handle_event(&first_htlc_event); + nodes[1].bump_tx_handler.handle_event(&second_htlc_event); + }, + _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), + } + } + + let b_broadcast_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast(); assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn.len(), 2); // b_broadcast_txn should spend the HTLCs output of the commitment tx for 3_000 and 4_000 sats - check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[0], remote_txn[0]); - check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[1], remote_txn[0]); - assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[0].input.len(), 1); - assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[1].input.len(), 1); + check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[0], remote_txn[0], coinbase_tx); + check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[1], remote_txn[0], coinbase_tx); + assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[0].input.len(), if anchors { 2 } else { 1 }); + assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[1].input.len(), if anchors { 2 } else { 1 }); assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[b_broadcast_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 3_000); assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[b_broadcast_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 4_000); @@ -444,10 +500,10 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { // other Balance variants, as close has already happened. assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); - + let commitment_tx_fee = chan_feerate as u64 * + (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000; assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { - amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 3_000 - 4_000 - 1_000 - 3 - chan_feerate * - (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000, + amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 3_000 - 4_000 - 1_000 - 3 - commitment_tx_fee - anchor_outputs_value, confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1, }, sent_htlc_balance.clone(), sent_htlc_timeout_balance.clone()]), sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances())); @@ -476,7 +532,7 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { }, received_htlc_claiming_balance.clone(), received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance.clone()]), sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances())); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &remote_txn[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &remote_txn[0], false); assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); // After broadcasting the HTLC claim transaction, node A will still consider the HTLC @@ -523,7 +579,7 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()); expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], timeout_payment_hash, false); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &a_broadcast_txn[1]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &a_broadcast_txn[1], false); // Node B will no longer consider the HTLC "contentious" after the HTLC claim transaction // confirms, and consider it simply "awaiting confirmations". Note that it has to wait for the @@ -543,7 +599,7 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { // After reaching the commitment output CSV, we'll get a SpendableOutputs event for it and have // only the HTLCs claimable on node B. connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_b_commitment_claimable - nodes[1].best_block_info().1); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &remote_txn[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &remote_txn[0], anchors); assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { amount_satoshis: 3_000, @@ -554,7 +610,7 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { // After reaching the claimed HTLC output CSV, we'll get a SpendableOutptus event for it and // have only one HTLC output left spendable. connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_b_htlc_claimable - nodes[1].best_block_info().1); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &b_broadcast_txn[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &b_broadcast_txn[0], anchors); assert_eq!(vec![received_htlc_timeout_claiming_balance.clone()], nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()); @@ -582,8 +638,10 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { #[test] fn test_claim_value_force_close() { - do_test_claim_value_force_close(true); - do_test_claim_value_force_close(false); + do_test_claim_value_force_close(false, true); + do_test_claim_value_force_close(false, false); + do_test_claim_value_force_close(true, true); + do_test_claim_value_force_close(true, false); } #[test] @@ -750,7 +808,7 @@ fn test_balances_on_local_commitment_htlcs() { confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable, }], nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()); - let to_self_spendable_output = test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_txn[0]); + let to_self_spendable_output = test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_txn[0], false); assert_eq!( get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id).get_spendable_outputs(&as_txn[0], commitment_tx_conf_height_a), to_self_spendable_output @@ -760,7 +818,7 @@ fn test_balances_on_local_commitment_htlcs() { // `SpendableOutputs` event and removing the claimable balance entry. connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_a_htlc_claimable - nodes[0].best_block_info().1); assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty()); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_txn[1]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &timeout_htlc_txn[0], false); // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're // using `ConnectStyle::HighlyRedundantTransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks`, we don't get new @@ -885,7 +943,7 @@ fn test_no_preimage_inbound_htlc_balances() { // For node B, we'll get the non-HTLC funds claimable after ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &as_txn[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &as_txn[0], false); bs_pre_spend_claims.retain(|e| if let Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { .. } = e { false } else { true }); // The next few blocks for B look the same as for A, though for the opposite HTLC @@ -951,11 +1009,11 @@ fn test_no_preimage_inbound_htlc_balances() { confirmation_height: core::cmp::max(as_timeout_claimable_height, htlc_cltv_timeout), }], nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_txn[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_txn[0], false); connect_blocks(&nodes[0], as_timeout_claimable_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1); assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty()); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_htlc_timeout_claim[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_htlc_timeout_claim[0], false); // The process for B should be completely identical as well, noting that the non-HTLC-balance // was already claimed. @@ -979,7 +1037,7 @@ fn test_no_preimage_inbound_htlc_balances() { assert_eq!(vec![b_received_htlc_balance.clone()], nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &bs_htlc_timeout_claim[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &bs_htlc_timeout_claim[0], false); connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1); assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty()); @@ -1223,7 +1281,7 @@ fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_commitment_balances(confirm_htlc_spend_first: bo sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances())); connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &as_revoked_txn[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &as_revoked_txn[0], false); let mut payment_failed_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(payment_failed_events[..2].to_vec(), @@ -1232,14 +1290,14 @@ fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_commitment_balances(confirm_htlc_spend_first: bo dust_payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new()); connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[if confirm_htlc_spend_first { 2 } else { 3 }]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[if confirm_htlc_spend_first { 2 } else { 3 }], false); connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[if confirm_htlc_spend_first { 3 } else { 2 }]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[if confirm_htlc_spend_first { 3 } else { 2 }], false); expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], live_payment_hash, false); connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[0], false); connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[1]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[1], false); expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], timeout_payment_hash, false); assert_eq!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances(), Vec::new()); @@ -1378,7 +1436,7 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances() { sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances())); connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 3); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0], false); assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // to_self output to B amount_satoshis: 10_000, @@ -1391,7 +1449,7 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances() { sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances())); connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 2); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_htlc_claim_tx[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_htlc_claim_tx[0], false); assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // to_self output in B's revoked commitment amount_satoshis: 10_000, @@ -1458,9 +1516,9 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances() { sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances())); connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 2); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_second_htlc_claim_tx[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_second_htlc_claim_tx[0], false); connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_second_htlc_claim_tx[1]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[0], &as_second_htlc_claim_tx[1], false); assert_eq!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances(), Vec::new()); @@ -1606,7 +1664,7 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() { sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances())); connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 5); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &as_revoked_txn[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &as_revoked_txn[0], false); assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // to_self output in A's revoked commitment @@ -1638,7 +1696,7 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() { sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances())); connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 5); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[1]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[1], false); assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // to_self output in A's revoked commitment @@ -1662,7 +1720,7 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() { connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 5); expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], revoked_payment_hash, false); - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[0]); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[0], false); assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty()); // Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're @@ -2415,7 +2473,7 @@ fn do_test_anchors_monitor_fixes_counterparty_payment_script_on_reload(confirm_c ).unwrap(); check_spends!(spend_tx, &commitment_tx); } else { - test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx); + test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx, false); } }