From: Matt Corallo Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:54:24 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Do not always persist ChannelManager on channel_update messages X-Git-Tag: v0.0.99~10^2~1 X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=eca6da354b6ad20fdc39898af7088eb5d778f47e;p=rust-lightning Do not always persist ChannelManager on channel_update messages If we receive a `channel_update` message for a channel unrelated to our own, we shouldn't trigger a persistence of our `ChannelManager`. This avoids significant persistence traffic during initial node startup. --- diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channel.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channel.rs index 5f5bc51db..2f447c861 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/channel.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/channel.rs @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ impl HTLCCandidate { } /// Information needed for constructing an invoice route hint for this channel. -#[derive(Clone)] +#[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq)] pub struct CounterpartyForwardingInfo { /// Base routing fee in millisatoshis. pub fee_base_msat: u32, diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs index f72c76e7a..e536d462c 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ const CHECK_CLTV_EXPIRY_SANITY: u32 = MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32 - LATENCY_GRA const CHECK_CLTV_EXPIRY_SANITY_2: u32 = MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32 - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS - 2*CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER; /// Details of a channel, as returned by ChannelManager::list_channels and ChannelManager::list_usable_channels -#[derive(Clone)] +#[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq)] pub struct ChannelDetails { /// The channel's ID (prior to funding transaction generation, this is a random 32 bytes, /// thereafter this is the txid of the funding transaction xor the funding transaction output). @@ -3346,14 +3346,15 @@ impl ChannelMana Ok(()) } - fn internal_channel_update(&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &msgs::ChannelUpdate) -> Result<(), MsgHandleErrInternal> { + /// Returns ShouldPersist if anything changed, otherwise either SkipPersist or an Err. + fn internal_channel_update(&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &msgs::ChannelUpdate) -> Result { let mut channel_state_lock = self.channel_state.lock().unwrap(); let channel_state = &mut *channel_state_lock; let chan_id = match channel_state.short_to_id.get(&msg.contents.short_channel_id) { Some(chan_id) => chan_id.clone(), None => { // It's not a local channel - return Ok(()) + return Ok(NotifyOption::SkipPersist) } }; match channel_state.by_id.entry(chan_id) { @@ -3363,7 +3364,7 @@ impl ChannelMana // If the announcement is about a channel of ours which is public, some // other peer may simply be forwarding all its gossip to us. Don't provide // a scary-looking error message and return Ok instead. - return Ok(()); + return Ok(NotifyOption::SkipPersist); } return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close("Got a channel_update for a channel from the wrong node - it shouldn't know about our private channels!".to_owned(), chan_id)); } @@ -3371,7 +3372,7 @@ impl ChannelMana }, hash_map::Entry::Vacant(_) => unreachable!() } - Ok(()) + Ok(NotifyOption::DoPersist) } fn internal_channel_reestablish(&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &msgs::ChannelReestablish) -> Result<(), MsgHandleErrInternal> { @@ -4116,8 +4117,13 @@ impl } fn handle_channel_update(&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &msgs::ChannelUpdate) { - let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(&self.total_consistency_lock, &self.persistence_notifier); - let _ = handle_error!(self, self.internal_channel_update(counterparty_node_id, msg), *counterparty_node_id); + PersistenceNotifierGuard::optionally_notify(&self.total_consistency_lock, &self.persistence_notifier, || { + if let Ok(persist) = handle_error!(self, self.internal_channel_update(counterparty_node_id, msg), *counterparty_node_id) { + persist + } else { + NotifyOption::SkipPersist + } + }); } fn handle_channel_reestablish(&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &msgs::ChannelReestablish) { @@ -4823,6 +4829,9 @@ mod tests { use core::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering}; use std::thread; use core::time::Duration; + use ln::functional_test_utils::*; + use ln::features::InitFeatures; + use ln::msgs::ChannelMessageHandler; #[test] fn test_wait_timeout() { @@ -4865,6 +4874,53 @@ mod tests { } } } + + #[test] + fn test_notify_limits() { + // Check that a few cases which don't require the persistence of a new ChannelManager, + // indeed, do not cause the persistence of a new ChannelManager. + let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3); + let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs); + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]); + let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + + let mut chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + + // We check that the channel info nodes have doesn't change too early, even though we try + // to connect messages with new values + chan.0.contents.fee_base_msat *= 2; + chan.1.contents.fee_base_msat *= 2; + let node_a_chan_info = nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].clone(); + let node_b_chan_info = nodes[1].node.list_channels()[0].clone(); + + // The first two nodes (which opened a channel) should now require fresh persistence + assert!(nodes[0].node.await_persistable_update_timeout(Duration::from_millis(1))); + assert!(nodes[1].node.await_persistable_update_timeout(Duration::from_millis(1))); + // ... but the last node should not. + assert!(!nodes[2].node.await_persistable_update_timeout(Duration::from_millis(1))); + // After persisting the first two nodes they should no longer need fresh persistence. + assert!(!nodes[0].node.await_persistable_update_timeout(Duration::from_millis(1))); + assert!(!nodes[1].node.await_persistable_update_timeout(Duration::from_millis(1))); + + // Node 3, unrelated to the only channel, shouldn't care if it receives a channel_update + // about the channel. + nodes[2].node.handle_channel_update(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &chan.0); + nodes[2].node.handle_channel_update(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &chan.1); + assert!(!nodes[2].node.await_persistable_update_timeout(Duration::from_millis(1))); + + // The nodes which are a party to the channel should also ignore messages from unrelated + // parties. + nodes[0].node.handle_channel_update(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &chan.0); + nodes[0].node.handle_channel_update(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &chan.1); + nodes[1].node.handle_channel_update(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &chan.0); + nodes[1].node.handle_channel_update(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &chan.1); + assert!(!nodes[0].node.await_persistable_update_timeout(Duration::from_millis(1))); + assert!(!nodes[1].node.await_persistable_update_timeout(Duration::from_millis(1))); + + // At this point the channel info given by peers should still be the same. + assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0], node_a_chan_info); + assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels()[0], node_b_chan_info); + } } #[cfg(all(any(test, feature = "_test_utils"), feature = "unstable"))]