G8XSU [Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:23:18 +0000 (10:23 -0700)]
Doc Clarity: Handling gaps in persisted ChannelMonitorUpdates
If there are any gaps in the persisted [`ChannelMonitorUpdate`]s,
implementer can safely ignore [`ChannelMonitorUpdate`]s after the gap and load without them.
Since, acc. to channel-manager, we have only made progress if all contiguos
ChannelMonitorUpdates have been persisted.
benthecarman [Tue, 20 Feb 2024 18:47:50 +0000 (18:47 +0000)]
Add HTLCsTimedOut closing reason
Before a force closure from timed out HTLCs was treated the same as when
the user manually force closed the channel. This leads to various UX
issues. This adds a new `ClosureReason` called `HTLCsTimedOut` that
signifies that the closure was caused because the HTLCs timed out. To go
along with this, previously we'd always send "Channel force-closed" when
force closing the channel in the error message which was ambigous, now
we send the force closure reason so the peer can know why the channel
was closed.
Jeffrey Czyz [Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:04:01 +0000 (17:04 -0500)]
Use OnionMessenger::send_onion_message in tests
Use OnionMessenger's public interface in tests whenever possible (i.e.,
when not using any intermediate_nodes in an OnionMessagePath. This
allows us to exercise DefaultMessageRouter, and, in particular that a
path can be found for an unannounced sender when its in the introduction
node.
Jeffrey Czyz [Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:04:43 +0000 (16:04 -0500)]
Fix sender is the introduction node onion messages
DefaultMessageRouter will form an OnionMessagePath from a BlindedPath
where the sender is the introduction node but only if the sender is
announced. If the sender is unannounced, then DefaultMessageRouter will
fail. While DefaultMessageRouter will only create a blinded path with an
announced introduction node, it may receive one where the introduction
node is unannounced. Don't return an error in this case, as the
OnionMessenger can advance the blinded path by one hop.
This may occur when two nodes have an unannounced channel and one (the
offer creator) wants to use it for payments without an intermediary node
and without putting its node id in the offer.
Elias Rohrer [Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:37:08 +0000 (10:37 +0100)]
Expose `{prev,next}_user_channel_id` fields in `PaymentForwarded`
This is useful for users that track channels by `user_channel_id`.
For example, in `lightning-liquidity` we currently keep a full
`HashMap<ChanelId, u128>` around *just* to be able to associate
`PaymentForwarded` events with the channels otherwise tracked by
`user_channel_id`.
Matt Corallo [Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:47:07 +0000 (19:47 +0000)]
Avoid writing `ChannelManager` when hitting lnd bug 6039
When we hit lnd bug 6039, we end up sending error messages to peers
in a loop. This should be fine, but because we used the generic
`PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop` lock above the specific
handling, we end up writing `ChannelManager` every time we manage a
round-trip to our peer.
This can add up quite quickly, and isn't actually changing, so we
really need to avoid writing the `ChannelManager` in this case.
Duncan Dean [Tue, 21 Mar 2023 19:12:53 +0000 (21:12 +0200)]
Implement interactive tx construction protocol via `InteractiveTxConstructor`
This implements the interactive construction protocol described at
https://github.com/lightning/bolts/blob/78e5a6b066d3a8e235931dfc06aa325337874749/02-peer-protocol.md?plain=1#L92.
Our implementation includes a state machine with typed states and transitions
to ensure consumers have compile-time assurances that the protocol is upheld.
States are tracked as in the `StateMachine` enum and can take on all
possible states during the negotiation.
The states are further divided into two categories, namely by the two traits
they implement, either `ReceivedMsgState` or `SentMsgState`.
The defined `StateTransitions` enforce the transitions that `ReceivedMsgState`,
`SentMsgState`, and the `_TxComplete`s can go through.
Co-authored-by: Wilmer Paulino <9447167+wpaulino@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Duncan Dean <git@dunxen.dev> Co-authored-by: Jurvis Tan <5944973+jurvis@users.noreply.github.com>
Matt Corallo [Tue, 6 Feb 2024 23:17:50 +0000 (23:17 +0000)]
Add `PersistenceNotifierGuard` take to offer/refund payments
This resolves an issue where offer and refund payments get delayed
while we wait for the `invoice_request`/`invoice` onion messages to
get sent. It further ensures we're likely to have the
`ChannelManager` persisted with the new payment info after
initiating the send/receive.
Matt Corallo [Tue, 6 Feb 2024 23:13:08 +0000 (23:13 +0000)]
Use `{}`, not `{:?}` for `PublicKey` logging
The `Debug` serialization of `PublicKey`s includes both the X and Y
coordinate, which isn't something most of our users deal with.
Instead, logging using `Display` gives users the keys they're used
to.
Matt Corallo [Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:19:51 +0000 (15:19 +0000)]
Avoid new "out of disk space" issues in CI
Our 1.63 build on Ubuntu has been failing for quite some time
because it runs out of disk space trying to build tests in the last
cfg-flag steps. Thus, we add a few new `cargo clean`s here to fix
it.
Jeffrey Czyz [Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:21:03 +0000 (15:21 -0600)]
Fail request_refund_payment for unsupported chain
If a Refund has an unsupported chain, ChannelManager should not send an
invoice as it can't be paid on that chain. Instead, return an error when
calling ChannelManager::request_refund_payment for such refunds.
Use correct min/max htlc in test util for constructing blinded pay params.
In testing, we use channel updates to construct blinded paths and the
{Forward,Receive}Tlvs encoded within. Given a blinded path from node A > B > C,
we currently use channel_update_A->B to construct the payment constraints for
A’s blinded payload.
This is incorrect for setting A's PaymentConstraints::htlc_minimum_msat,
because channel_update_A->B contains the minimum value that *B* will accept,
and we want the constraints to contain the min value that *A* will accept.
This never caused test failures before because min/max htlc values were always
identical in both channel directions.
Therefore, set A’s htlc min/max values to the min/max that A will accept.
Jeffrey Czyz [Thu, 7 Mar 2024 22:59:09 +0000 (16:59 -0600)]
Drop error type parameter from SignError
SignError allows implementors of SignFunction to return a custom error
type. Drop this as an unconstrained type causes problems with bindings
and isn't useful unless the caller can take some sort of action based on
different errors.
Jeffrey Czyz [Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:17:08 +0000 (10:17 -0600)]
Support BOLT 12 signing in c_bindings
Replace the Fn trait bound on signing methods with a dedicated trait
since Fn is not supported in bindings. Implement the trait for Fn so
that closures can still be used in Rust.
Jeffrey Czyz [Mon, 26 Feb 2024 02:42:57 +0000 (20:42 -0600)]
Add c_bindings version of InvoiceBuilder
Use the macros introduced in the previous commit to define two builders
for each type parameterization of InvoiceBuilder
- InvoiceWithExplicitSigningPubkeyBuilder
- InvoiceWithDerivedSigningPubkeyBuilder
The difference between these and InvoiceBuilder is that these have
methods that take `self` by mutable reference instead of by value and
don't return anything instead returning the modified builder. This is
required because bindings don't support move semantics nor impl blocks
specific to a certain type parameterization. Because of this, the
builder's contents must be cloned when building a Bolt12Invoice.
Keeps InvoiceBuilder defined so that it can be used internally in
ChannelManager's OffersMessageHandler even when compiled for c_bindings.
Elias Rohrer [Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:24:50 +0000 (10:24 +0100)]
Impl `PartialEq`/`Eq` for `Offer`/`Refund`
We add custom implementations based on comparing the `bytes` for
`Offer`/`Refund` themselves as this is sufficient and should be faster
than comapring all fields in the worst case.
Jeffrey Czyz [Sun, 25 Feb 2024 20:58:07 +0000 (14:58 -0600)]
Macro-ize InvoiceBuilder
InvoiceBuilder is not exported to bindings because it has methods that
take `self` by value and are only implemented for certain type
parameterizations. Define these methods using macros such that different
builders and related methods can be defined for c_bindings.
Jeffrey Czyz [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 19:34:24 +0000 (13:34 -0600)]
Add c_bindings version of InvoiceRequestBuilder
Use the macros introduced in the previous commit to define two builders
for each type parameterization of InvoiceRequestBuilder
- InvoiceRequestWithExplicitPayerIdBuilder
- InvoiceRequestWithDerivedPayerIdBuilder
The difference between these and InvoiceRequestBuilder is that these
have methods that take `self` by mutable reference instead of by value
and don't return anything instead returning the modified builder. This
is required because bindings don't support move semantics nor impl
blocks specific to a certain type parameterization. Because of this, the
builder's contents must be cloned when building an InvoiceRequest.
Keeps InvoiceRequestBuilder defined so that it can be used internally in
ChannelManager::pay_for_offer even when compiled for c_bindings.
Jeffrey Czyz [Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:47:38 +0000 (16:47 -0600)]
Macro-ize InvoiceRequestBuilder
InvoiceRequestBuilder is not exported to bindings because it has methods
that take `self` by value and are only implemented for certain type
parameterizations. Define these methods using macros such that different
builders and related methods can be defined for c_bindings.
Jeffrey Czyz [Sat, 24 Feb 2024 02:30:50 +0000 (20:30 -0600)]
Add c_bindings version of RefundBuilder
Use the macros introduced in the previous commit to define a builder
called RefundMaybeWithDerivedMetadataBuilder.
The difference between this and RefundBuilder is that this has methods
that take `self` by mutable reference instead of by value and don't
return anything instead returning the modified builder. This is required
because bindings don't support move semantics. Because of this, the
builder's contents must be cloned when building a Refund.
Keeps RefundBuilder defined so that it can be used internally in
ChannelManager::create_refund_builder even when compiled for c_bindings.
Jeffrey Czyz [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 22:52:49 +0000 (16:52 -0600)]
Macro-ize RefundBuilder
RefundBuilder is not exported to bindings because it has methods that
take `self` by value. Define these methods using macros such that
different builders and related methods can be defined for c_bindings.
Jeffrey Czyz [Fri, 23 Feb 2024 22:33:23 +0000 (16:33 -0600)]
Add c_bindings version of OfferBuilder
Use the macros introduced in the previous commit to define two builders
for each type parameterization of OfferBuilder
- OfferWithExplicitMetadataBuilder
- OfferWithDerivedMetadataBuilder
The difference between these and OfferBuilder is that these have methods
that take `self` by mutable reference instead of by value and don't
return anything instead returning the modified builder. This is required
because bindings don't support move semantics nor impl blocks specific
to a certain type parameterization. Because of this, the builder's
contents must be cloned when building an Offer.
Keeps OfferBuilder defined so that it can be used internally in
ChannelManager::create_offer_builder even when compiled for c_bindings.
Elias Rohrer [Fri, 1 Mar 2024 10:42:54 +0000 (11:42 +0100)]
Prefer implementing `From` over `Into`
.. as the std library docs state that implementing Into should be avoided:
"One should avoid implementing Into and implement From instead.
Implementing From automatically provides one with an implementation of
Into thanks to the blanket implementation in the standard library."
Matt Corallo [Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:50:26 +0000 (14:50 +0000)]
Update docs on `PaymentFailureReason::RouteNotFound` to add context
tnull noted on discord that its somewhat unclear to users what
`RouteNotFound` actually means - that we ran out of routes, rather
than could not find a route at all - so the docs are updated here.
Jeffrey Czyz [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 21:58:14 +0000 (15:58 -0600)]
Prefer one-hop blinded path to Tor intro nodes
If a node is announced, prefer using a one-hop blinded path with it as
the introduction node to using a two-hop blinded path with a Tor-only
introduction node. The one-hop blinded path is more reliable, thus only
use Tor-only nodes if the recipient is unannounced. And then, prefer
non-Tor-only nodes.
Jeffrey Czyz [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:23:56 +0000 (11:23 -0600)]
Prefer well-connected nodes for introduction nodes
When forming blinded paths, using a reliable node as the introduction
node is important to ensure onion message reliability. Order blinded
paths by how well-connected the introduction node is as a proxy for
reliability.
For short paths (e.g., when the sender and recipient share an LSP), this
may also result in a scenario where initiating a direct connection isn't
necessary. That is helpful when using RGS since it currently doesn't
include node announcements and thus cannot initiate a direct connection.
Jeffrey Czyz [Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:37:39 +0000 (18:37 -0600)]
Prefer non-Tor nodes when creating blinded paths
Tor nodes can have high latency which can have a detrimental effect on
onion message reliability. Prefer using nodes that aren't Tor-only when
creating blinded paths both in offers and in onion message reply paths.
Jeffrey Czyz [Tue, 27 Feb 2024 19:25:25 +0000 (13:25 -0600)]
Add NodeInfo::is_tor_only
Add a method to NodeInfo to determine if the node has only announced Tor
addresses. Useful for preferring blinded paths that don't use Tor for
better reliability and improved latency.
Jeffrey Czyz [Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:43:59 +0000 (18:43 -0600)]
Macro-ize OfferBuilder
OfferBuilder is not exported to bindings because it has methods that
take `self` by value and are only implemented for certain type
parameterizations. Define these methods using macros such that different
builders and related methods can be defined for c_bindings.