From 22d74bf28ba0d54750cd243208a5ecddd49d1d71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Elias Rohrer Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 09:34:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Rename `PaymentReceived` to `PaymentClaimable` --- fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs | 10 ++-- fuzz/src/full_stack.rs | 2 +- lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs | 4 +- lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs | 46 +++++++++---------- lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs | 38 +++++++-------- lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs | 10 ++-- lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs | 40 ++++++++-------- lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs | 4 +- lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs | 4 +- lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs | 2 +- lightning/src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs | 2 +- lightning/src/ln/reload_tests.rs | 14 +++--- lightning/src/util/events.rs | 16 +++---- 13 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-) diff --git a/fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs b/fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs index 783bbc06a..e5c58eb02 100644 --- a/fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs +++ b/fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs @@ -843,16 +843,16 @@ pub fn do_test(data: &[u8], underlying_out: Out) { let mut events = nodes[$node].get_and_clear_pending_events(); // Sort events so that PendingHTLCsForwardable get processed last. This avoids a // case where we first process a PendingHTLCsForwardable, then claim/fail on a - // PaymentReceived, claiming/failing two HTLCs, but leaving a just-generated - // PaymentReceived event for the second HTLC in our pending_events (and breaking + // PaymentClaimable, claiming/failing two HTLCs, but leaving a just-generated + // PaymentClaimable event for the second HTLC in our pending_events (and breaking // our claim_set deduplication). events.sort_by(|a, b| { - if let events::Event::PaymentReceived { .. } = a { + if let events::Event::PaymentClaimable { .. } = a { if let events::Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } = b { Ordering::Less } else { Ordering::Equal } } else if let events::Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } = a { - if let events::Event::PaymentReceived { .. } = b { + if let events::Event::PaymentClaimable { .. } = b { Ordering::Greater } else { Ordering::Equal } } else { Ordering::Equal } @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ pub fn do_test(data: &[u8], underlying_out: Out) { let had_events = !events.is_empty(); for event in events.drain(..) { match event { - events::Event::PaymentReceived { payment_hash, .. } => { + events::Event::PaymentClaimable { payment_hash, .. } => { if claim_set.insert(payment_hash.0) { if $fail { nodes[$node].fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash); diff --git a/fuzz/src/full_stack.rs b/fuzz/src/full_stack.rs index b6292c608..05d82c29b 100644 --- a/fuzz/src/full_stack.rs +++ b/fuzz/src/full_stack.rs @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ pub fn do_test(data: &[u8], logger: &Arc) { Event::FundingGenerationReady { temporary_channel_id, counterparty_node_id, channel_value_satoshis, output_script, .. } => { pending_funding_generation.push((temporary_channel_id, counterparty_node_id, channel_value_satoshis, output_script)); }, - Event::PaymentReceived { payment_hash, .. } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { payment_hash, .. } => { //TODO: enhance by fetching random amounts from fuzz input? payments_received.push(payment_hash); }, diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs index 47856fb48..d19254c84 100644 --- a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs +++ b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs @@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ mod test { nodes[fwd_idx].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]); commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[fwd_idx], nodes[0], &payment_event.commitment_msg, false, true); - // Note that we have to "forward pending HTLCs" twice before we see the PaymentReceived as + // Note that we have to "forward pending HTLCs" twice before we see the PaymentClaimable as // this "emulates" the payment taking two hops, providing some privacy to make phantom node // payments "look real" by taking more time. expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[fwd_idx]); @@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ mod test { nodes[fwd_idx].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); let payment_preimage_opt = if user_generated_pmt_hash { None } else { Some(payment_preimage) }; - expect_payment_received!(&nodes[fwd_idx], payment_hash, payment_secret, payment_amt, payment_preimage_opt, route.paths[0].last().unwrap().pubkey); + expect_payment_claimable!(&nodes[fwd_idx], payment_hash, payment_secret, payment_amt, payment_preimage_opt, route.paths[0].last().unwrap().pubkey); do_claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &vec!(&vec!(&nodes[fwd_idx])[..]), false, payment_preimage); let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 2); diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs index b1b6b7971..d0b967b9e 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ fn do_test_simple_monitor_temporary_update_fail(disconnect: bool) { let events_3 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1); match events_3[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash); assert_eq!(amount_msat, 1_000_000); assert_eq!(receiver_node_id.unwrap(), nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ fn do_test_monitor_temporary_update_fail(disconnect_count: usize) { let events_5 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 1); match events_5[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { assert_eq!(payment_hash_2, *payment_hash); assert_eq!(amount_msat, 1_000_000); assert_eq!(receiver_node_id.unwrap(), nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ fn test_monitor_update_fail_cs() { let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); match events[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash); assert_eq!(amount_msat, 1_000_000); assert_eq!(receiver_node_id.unwrap(), nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); @@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ fn test_monitor_update_fail_no_rebroadcast() { let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); match events[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { payment_hash, .. } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { payment_hash, .. } => { assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), @@ -814,12 +814,12 @@ fn test_monitor_update_raa_while_paused() { nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_raa); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash_2, our_payment_secret_2, 1000000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash_2, our_payment_secret_2, 1000000); nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_raa); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash_1, our_payment_secret_1, 1000000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash_1, our_payment_secret_1, 1000000); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_1); claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], payment_preimage_2); @@ -1049,11 +1049,11 @@ fn do_test_monitor_update_fail_raa(test_ignore_second_cs: bool) { let events_6 = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events_6.len(), 2); match events_6[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { payment_hash, .. } => { assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2); }, + Event::PaymentClaimable { payment_hash, .. } => { assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), }; match events_6[1] { - Event::PaymentReceived { payment_hash, .. } => { assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_3); }, + Event::PaymentClaimable { payment_hash, .. } => { assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_3); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), }; @@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ fn do_test_monitor_update_fail_raa(test_ignore_second_cs: bool) { let events_9 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events_9.len(), 1); match events_9[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { payment_hash, .. } => assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_4.unwrap()), + Event::PaymentClaimable { payment_hash, .. } => assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_4.unwrap()), _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), }; claim_payment(&nodes[2], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[0]], payment_preimage_4.unwrap()); @@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ fn raa_no_response_awaiting_raa_state() { check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0); let bs_responses = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, payment_secret_1, 1000000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, payment_secret_1, 1000000); // We send a third payment here, which is somewhat of a redundant test, but the // chanmon_fail_consistency test required it to actually find the bug (by seeing out-of-sync @@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@ fn raa_no_response_awaiting_raa_state() { nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 1000000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 1000000); let bs_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa); @@ -1282,7 +1282,7 @@ fn raa_no_response_awaiting_raa_state() { nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_3, payment_secret_3, 1000000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_3, payment_secret_3, 1000000); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_1); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2); @@ -1394,7 +1394,7 @@ fn claim_while_disconnected_monitor_update_fail() { check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 1000000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 1000000); nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); @@ -1469,7 +1469,7 @@ fn monitor_failed_no_reestablish_response() { check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, payment_secret_1, 1000000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, payment_secret_1, 1000000); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_1); } @@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@ fn first_message_on_recv_ordering() { check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, payment_secret_1, 1000000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, payment_secret_1, 1000000); let bs_responses = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_responses.0); @@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ fn first_message_on_recv_ordering() { check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 1000000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 1000000); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_1); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2); @@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ fn test_monitor_update_fail_claim() { let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 2); match events[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id } => { assert_eq!(payment_hash_2, *payment_hash); assert_eq!(1_000_000, amount_msat); assert_eq!(receiver_node_id.unwrap(), nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ fn test_monitor_update_fail_claim() { _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), } match events[1] { - Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { assert_eq!(payment_hash_3, *payment_hash); assert_eq!(1_000_000, amount_msat); assert_eq!(receiver_node_id.unwrap(), nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); @@ -1750,7 +1750,7 @@ fn test_monitor_update_on_pending_forwards() { _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), }; nodes[0].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[0], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 1000000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[0], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 1000000); claim_payment(&nodes[2], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[0]], payment_preimage_2); } @@ -1799,7 +1799,7 @@ fn monitor_update_claim_fail_no_response() { nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 1000000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 1000000); let bs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]); @@ -2073,7 +2073,7 @@ fn test_pending_update_fee_ack_on_reconnect() { check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[0], payment_hash, payment_secret, 1_000_000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[0], payment_hash, payment_secret, 1_000_000); claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], payment_preimage); } @@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ fn do_channel_holding_cell_serialize(disconnect: bool, reload_a: bool) { let as_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, payment_secret_1, 100000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, payment_secret_1, 100000); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], (), false, true, false); @@ -2385,7 +2385,7 @@ fn do_channel_holding_cell_serialize(disconnect: bool, reload_a: bool) { }; nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 100000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 100000); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_1); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2); diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs index 20014f799..37e5091a8 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs @@ -736,9 +736,9 @@ pub struct ChannelManager channel_state: Mutex::Signer>>, /// Storage for PaymentSecrets and any requirements on future inbound payments before we will - /// expose them to users via a PaymentReceived event. HTLCs which do not meet the requirements + /// expose them to users via a PaymentClaimable event. HTLCs which do not meet the requirements /// here are failed when we process them as pending-forwardable-HTLCs, and entries are removed - /// after we generate a PaymentReceived upon receipt of all MPP parts or when they time out. + /// after we generate a PaymentClaimable upon receipt of all MPP parts or when they time out. /// /// See `ChannelManager` struct-level documentation for lock order requirements. pending_inbound_payments: Mutex>, @@ -3503,7 +3503,7 @@ impl ChannelManager ChannelManager ChannelManager ChannelManager ChannelManager ChannelManager ChannelManager, invoice_expiry_delta_secs: u32) -> Result<(PaymentHash, PaymentSecret), ()> { inbound_payment::create(&self.inbound_payment_key, min_value_msat, invoice_expiry_delta_secs, &self.keys_manager, self.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64) @@ -5775,7 +5775,7 @@ impl ChannelManager ChannelManager ChannelManager ChannelManager, invoice_expiry_delta_secs: u32) -> Result { inbound_payment::create_from_hash(&self.inbound_payment_key, min_value_msat, payment_hash, invoice_expiry_delta_secs, self.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64) } @@ -8540,7 +8540,7 @@ pub mod bench { $node_b.handle_revoke_and_ack(&$node_a.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_a }, MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, $node_b.get_our_node_id())); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b }); - expect_payment_received!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b }, payment_hash, payment_secret, 10_000); + expect_payment_claimable!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b }, payment_hash, payment_secret, 10_000); $node_b.claim_funds(payment_preimage); expect_payment_claimed!(NodeHolder { node: &$node_b }, payment_hash, 10_000); diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs index 9ca5bbab1..5ec5d2b35 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs @@ -1471,15 +1471,15 @@ macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events { } #[macro_export] #[cfg(any(test, feature = "_bench_unstable", feature = "_test_utils"))] -macro_rules! expect_payment_received { +macro_rules! expect_payment_claimable { ($node: expr, $expected_payment_hash: expr, $expected_payment_secret: expr, $expected_recv_value: expr) => { - expect_payment_received!($node, $expected_payment_hash, $expected_payment_secret, $expected_recv_value, None, $node.node.get_our_node_id()) + expect_payment_claimable!($node, $expected_payment_hash, $expected_payment_secret, $expected_recv_value, None, $node.node.get_our_node_id()) }; ($node: expr, $expected_payment_hash: expr, $expected_payment_secret: expr, $expected_recv_value: expr, $expected_payment_preimage: expr, $expected_receiver_node_id: expr) => { let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); match events[0] { - $crate::util::events::Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id: _, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { + $crate::util::events::Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id: _, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { assert_eq!($expected_payment_hash, *payment_hash); assert_eq!($expected_recv_value, amount_msat); assert_eq!($expected_receiver_node_id, receiver_node_id.unwrap()); @@ -1774,7 +1774,7 @@ pub fn do_pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_p if payment_received_expected { assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1); match events_2[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, ref via_channel_id, ref via_user_channel_id } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, ref via_channel_id, ref via_user_channel_id } => { assert_eq!(our_payment_hash, *payment_hash); assert_eq!(node.node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap()); match &purpose { @@ -1817,7 +1817,7 @@ pub fn pass_along_route<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_rou assert_eq!(events.len(), expected_route.len()); for (path_idx, (ev, expected_path)) in events.drain(..).zip(expected_route.iter()).enumerate() { // Once we've gotten through all the HTLCs, the last one should result in a - // PaymentReceived (but each previous one should not!), . + // PaymentClaimable (but each previous one should not!), . let expect_payment = path_idx == expected_route.len() - 1; pass_along_path(origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, our_payment_hash.clone(), Some(our_payment_secret), ev, expect_payment, None); } diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs index d8dcb013e..43140c316 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs @@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ fn test_update_fee_with_fundee_update_add_htlc() { let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); match events[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { .. } => { }, + Event::PaymentClaimable { .. } => { }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), }; @@ -1179,7 +1179,7 @@ fn holding_cell_htlc_counting() { assert_eq!(events.len(), payments.len()); for (event, &(_, ref hash)) in events.iter().zip(payments.iter()) { match event { - &Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, .. } => { + &Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, .. } => { assert_eq!(*payment_hash, *hash); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), @@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() { commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], payment_event_11.commitment_msg, false); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[2], our_payment_hash_1, our_payment_secret_1, recv_value_1); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[2], our_payment_hash_1, our_payment_secret_1, recv_value_1); // flush the htlcs in the holding cell assert_eq!(commitment_update_2.update_add_htlcs.len(), 2); @@ -1956,7 +1956,7 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() { let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 2); match events[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { assert_eq!(our_payment_hash_21, *payment_hash); assert_eq!(recv_value_21, amount_msat); assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap()); @@ -1972,7 +1972,7 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() { _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), } match events[1] { - Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { assert_eq!(our_payment_hash_22, *payment_hash); assert_eq!(recv_value_22, amount_msat); assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap()); @@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@ fn channel_reserve_in_flight_removes() { assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_3, payment_secret_3, 100000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_3, payment_secret_3, 100000); // Note that as this RAA was generated before the delivery of the update_fulfill it shouldn't // resolve the second HTLC from A's point of view. @@ -2153,7 +2153,7 @@ fn channel_reserve_in_flight_removes() { check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[0], payment_hash_4, payment_secret_4, 10000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[0], payment_hash_4, payment_secret_4, 10000); claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], payment_preimage_4); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_3); @@ -3739,7 +3739,7 @@ fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1); match events_2[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, via_user_channel_id: _ } => { assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash); assert_eq!(amount_msat, 1_000_000); assert_eq!(receiver_node_id.unwrap(), nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); @@ -4025,7 +4025,7 @@ fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_dual_htlc() { let events_5 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 1); match events_5[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, .. } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, .. } => { assert_eq!(payment_hash_2, *payment_hash); match &purpose { PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => { @@ -4068,7 +4068,7 @@ fn do_test_htlc_timeout(send_partial_mpp: bool) { let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); // Now do the relevant commitment_signed/RAA dances along the path, noting that the final - // hop should *not* yet generate any PaymentReceived event(s). + // hop should *not* yet generate any PaymentClaimable event(s). pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000, our_payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), events.drain(..).next().unwrap(), false, None); our_payment_hash } else { @@ -5800,7 +5800,7 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() { let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); match events[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { .. } => {}, + Event::PaymentClaimable { .. } => {}, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), } nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1); @@ -6059,7 +6059,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_exceed_max_htlc_num_and_htlc_id_increment() commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, 100000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, 100000); } let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000); unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, @@ -7954,7 +7954,7 @@ fn test_preimage_storage() { let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); match events[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { ref purpose, .. } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { ref purpose, .. } => { match &purpose { PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, .. } => { claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage.unwrap()); @@ -8024,7 +8024,7 @@ fn test_secret_timeout() { let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); match events[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret }, .. } => { + Event::PaymentClaimable { purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret }, .. } => { assert!(payment_preimage.is_none()); assert_eq!(payment_secret, our_payment_secret); // We don't actually have the payment preimage with which to claim this payment! @@ -8959,7 +8959,7 @@ fn do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(test_for_second_fail_panic: bool) { commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false); } expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, 10_000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, 10_000); { // Note that we use a different PaymentId here to allow us to duplicativly pay @@ -9021,7 +9021,7 @@ fn do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(test_for_second_fail_panic: bool) { #[test] fn test_dup_htlc_second_fail_panic() { // Previously, if we received two HTLCs back-to-back, where the second overran the expected - // value for the payment, we'd fail back both HTLCs after generating a `PaymentReceived` event. + // value for the payment, we'd fail back both HTLCs after generating a `PaymentClaimable` event. // Then, if the user failed the second payment, they'd hit a "tried to fail an already failed // HTLC" debug panic. This tests for this behavior, checking that only one HTLC is auto-failed. do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(true); @@ -9208,9 +9208,9 @@ fn test_keysend_payments_to_private_node() { #[test] fn test_double_partial_claim() { - // Test what happens if a node receives a payment, generates a PaymentReceived event, the HTLCs + // Test what happens if a node receives a payment, generates a PaymentClaimable event, the HTLCs // time out, the sender resends only some of the MPP parts, then the user processes the - // PaymentReceived event, ensuring they don't inadvertently claim only part of the full payment + // PaymentClaimable event, ensuring they don't inadvertently claim only part of the full payment // amount. let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4); let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs); @@ -9231,7 +9231,7 @@ fn test_double_partial_claim() { }); send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, payment_secret); - // nodes[3] has now received a PaymentReceived event...which it will take some (exorbitant) + // nodes[3] has now received a PaymentClaimable event...which it will take some (exorbitant) // amount of time to respond to. // Connect some blocks to time out the payment @@ -9255,7 +9255,7 @@ fn test_double_partial_claim() { pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), events.drain(..).next().unwrap(), false, None); // At this point nodes[3] has received one half of the payment, and the user goes to handle - // that PaymentReceived event they got hours ago and never handled...we should refuse to claim. + // that PaymentClaimable event they got hours ago and never handled...we should refuse to claim. nodes[3].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage); check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 0); assert!(nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs index cee75f8c2..8726c6a99 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ fn test_balances_on_local_commitment_htlcs() { commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, 10_000_000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, 10_000_000); let (route_2, payment_hash_2, payment_preimage_2, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 20_000_000); nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route_2, payment_hash_2, &Some(payment_secret_2), PaymentId(payment_hash_2.0)).unwrap(); @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ fn test_balances_on_local_commitment_htlcs() { commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 20_000_000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 20_000_000); nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_2); get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs index 2bf36ffba..aa0308925 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ fn run_onion_failure_test_with_fail_intercept(_name: &str, test_case: if test_case == 2 || test_case == 200 { expect_htlc_forward!(&nodes[2]); - expect_event!(&nodes[2], Event::PaymentReceived); + expect_event!(&nodes[2], Event::PaymentClaimable); callback_node(); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash.clone() }]); } @@ -1229,7 +1229,7 @@ fn test_phantom_failure_reject_payment() { nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]); nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, recv_amt_msat, None, route.paths[0].last().unwrap().pubkey); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, recv_amt_msat, None, route.paths[0].last().unwrap().pubkey); nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash }]); nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs index 2da80ae3f..c3656e5ed 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs @@ -1515,7 +1515,7 @@ fn do_test_intercepted_payment(test: InterceptTest) { expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]); let payment_preimage = nodes[2].node.get_payment_preimage(payment_hash, payment_secret).unwrap(); - expect_payment_received!(&nodes[2], payment_hash, payment_secret, amt_msat, Some(payment_preimage), nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()); + expect_payment_claimable!(&nodes[2], payment_hash, payment_secret, amt_msat, Some(payment_preimage), nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()); do_claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &vec!(&vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..]), false, payment_preimage); let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 2); diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs index 42835ed80..f2166246d 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ fn test_0conf_channel_with_async_monitor() { nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_send.msgs[0]); commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], bs_send.commitment_msg, false); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[2], payment_hash, payment_secret, 1_000_000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[2], payment_hash, payment_secret, 1_000_000); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage); confirm_transaction(&nodes[0], &tx); diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/reload_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/reload_tests.rs index 1056ceebd..92957040d 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/reload_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/reload_tests.rs @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ fn test_forwardable_regen() { assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, 100_000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, 100_000); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ fn test_forwardable_regen() { nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]); commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], payment_event.commitment_msg, false); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[2], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 200_000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[2], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 200_000); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage_2); @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ fn do_test_partial_claim_before_restart(persist_both_monitors: bool) { // Test what happens if a node receives an MPP payment, claims it, but crashes before // persisting the ChannelManager. If `persist_both_monitors` is false, also crash after only // updating one of the two channels' ChannelMonitors. As a result, on startup, we'll (a) still - // have the PaymentReceived event, (b) have one (or two) channel(s) that goes on chain with the + // have the PaymentClaimable event, (b) have one (or two) channel(s) that goes on chain with the // HTLC preimage in them, and (c) optionally have one channel that is live off-chain but does // not have the preimage tied to the still-pending HTLC. // @@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ fn do_test_partial_claim_before_restart(persist_both_monitors: bool) { nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap(); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2); - // Send the payment through to nodes[3] *without* clearing the PaymentReceived event + // Send the payment through to nodes[3] *without* clearing the PaymentClaimable event let mut send_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); assert_eq!(send_events.len(), 2); do_pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), send_events[0].clone(), true, false, None); @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ fn do_test_partial_claim_before_restart(persist_both_monitors: bool) { let original_manager = nodes[3].node.encode(); - expect_payment_received!(nodes[3], payment_hash, payment_secret, 15_000_000); + expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[3], payment_hash, payment_secret, 15_000_000); nodes[3].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage); check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 2); @@ -748,11 +748,11 @@ fn do_test_partial_claim_before_restart(persist_both_monitors: bool) { nodes[2].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), false); // During deserialization, we should have closed one channel and broadcast its latest - // commitment transaction. We should also still have the original PaymentReceived event we + // commitment transaction. We should also still have the original PaymentClaimable event we // never finished processing. let events = nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), if persist_both_monitors { 4 } else { 3 }); - if let Event::PaymentReceived { amount_msat: 15_000_000, .. } = events[0] { } else { panic!(); } + if let Event::PaymentClaimable { amount_msat: 15_000_000, .. } = events[0] { } else { panic!(); } if let Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::OutdatedChannelManager, .. } = events[1] { } else { panic!(); } if persist_both_monitors { if let Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::OutdatedChannelManager, .. } = events[2] { } else { panic!(); } diff --git a/lightning/src/util/events.rs b/lightning/src/util/events.rs index 18058bc03..0e6de5d00 100644 --- a/lightning/src/util/events.rs +++ b/lightning/src/util/events.rs @@ -362,11 +362,11 @@ pub enum Event { /// /// # Note /// LDK will not stop an inbound payment from being paid multiple times, so multiple - /// `PaymentReceived` events may be generated for the same payment. + /// `PaymentClaimable` events may be generated for the same payment. /// /// [`ChannelManager::claim_funds`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::claim_funds /// [`ChannelManager::fail_htlc_backwards`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::fail_htlc_backwards - PaymentReceived { + PaymentClaimable { /// The node that received the payment. /// This is useful to identify payments which were received via [phantom node payments]. /// This field will always be filled in when the event was generated by LDK versions @@ -390,14 +390,14 @@ pub enum Event { /// Indicates a payment has been claimed and we've received money! /// /// This most likely occurs when [`ChannelManager::claim_funds`] has been called in response - /// to an [`Event::PaymentReceived`]. However, if we previously crashed during a + /// to an [`Event::PaymentClaimable`]. However, if we previously crashed during a /// [`ChannelManager::claim_funds`] call you may see this event without a corresponding - /// [`Event::PaymentReceived`] event. + /// [`Event::PaymentClaimable`] event. /// /// # Note /// LDK will not stop an inbound payment from being paid multiple times, so multiple - /// `PaymentReceived` events may be generated for the same payment. If you then call - /// [`ChannelManager::claim_funds`] twice for the same [`Event::PaymentReceived`] you may get + /// `PaymentClaimable` events may be generated for the same payment. If you then call + /// [`ChannelManager::claim_funds`] twice for the same [`Event::PaymentClaimable`] you may get /// multiple `PaymentClaimed` events. /// /// [`ChannelManager::claim_funds`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::claim_funds @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ impl Writeable for Event { // We never write out FundingGenerationReady events as, upon disconnection, peers // drop any channels which have not yet exchanged funding_signed. }, - &Event::PaymentReceived { ref payment_hash, ref amount_msat, ref purpose, ref receiver_node_id, ref via_channel_id, ref via_user_channel_id } => { + &Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref amount_msat, ref purpose, ref receiver_node_id, ref via_channel_id, ref via_user_channel_id } => { 1u8.write(writer)?; let mut payment_secret = None; let payment_preimage; @@ -1035,7 +1035,7 @@ impl MaybeReadable for Event { None if payment_preimage.is_some() => PaymentPurpose::SpontaneousPayment(payment_preimage.unwrap()), None => return Err(msgs::DecodeError::InvalidValue), }; - Ok(Some(Event::PaymentReceived { + Ok(Some(Event::PaymentClaimable { receiver_node_id, payment_hash, amount_msat, -- 2.39.5