X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Fchannelmanager.rs;h=03522e24ce9742dce47dcb274f12682854eed802;hb=77948dbcd7b167ff4386f1b9de13bd2d2aa97032;hp=4ebbc3e55346ee53aa9cf1cb861720f85198b5b5;hpb=b2ce9d387480c7e4131c9e7aa5047c7711aa3cf7;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs index 4ebbc3e5..03522e24 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs @@ -1959,17 +1959,24 @@ impl ChannelMana break Some(("Forwarding node has tampered with the intended HTLC values or origin node has an obsolete cltv_expiry_delta", 0x1000 | 13, Some(self.get_channel_update_for_unicast(chan).unwrap()))); } let cur_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1; - // Theoretically, channel counterparty shouldn't send us a HTLC expiring now, but we want to be robust wrt to counterparty - // packet sanitization (see HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER rational) + // Theoretically, channel counterparty shouldn't send us a HTLC expiring now, + // but we want to be robust wrt to counterparty packet sanitization (see + // HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER rationale). if msg.cltv_expiry <= cur_height + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER as u32 { // expiry_too_soon break Some(("CLTV expiry is too close", 0x1000 | 14, Some(self.get_channel_update_for_unicast(chan).unwrap()))); } if msg.cltv_expiry > cur_height + CLTV_FAR_FAR_AWAY as u32 { // expiry_too_far break Some(("CLTV expiry is too far in the future", 21, None)); } - // In theory, we would be safe against unintentional channel-closure, if we only required a margin of LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS. - // But, to be safe against policy reception, we use a longer delay. - if (*outgoing_cltv_value) as u64 <= (cur_height + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER) as u64 { + // If the HTLC expires ~now, don't bother trying to forward it to our + // counterparty. They should fail it anyway, but we don't want to bother with + // the round-trips or risk them deciding they definitely want the HTLC and + // force-closing to ensure they get it if we're offline. + // We previously had a much more aggressive check here which tried to ensure + // our counterparty receives an HTLC which has *our* risk threshold met on it, + // but there is no need to do that, and since we're a bit conservative with our + // risk threshold it just results in failing to forward payments. + if (*outgoing_cltv_value) as u64 <= (cur_height + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS) as u64 { break Some(("Outgoing CLTV value is too soon", 0x1000 | 14, Some(self.get_channel_update_for_unicast(chan).unwrap()))); } @@ -2085,6 +2092,21 @@ impl ChannelMana Some(id) => id.clone(), }; + macro_rules! insert_outbound_payment { + () => { + let payment = payment_entry.or_insert_with(|| PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { + session_privs: HashSet::new(), + pending_amt_msat: 0, + pending_fee_msat: Some(0), + payment_hash: *payment_hash, + payment_secret: *payment_secret, + starting_block_height: self.best_block.read().unwrap().height(), + total_msat: total_value, + }); + assert!(payment.insert(session_priv_bytes, path)); + } + } + let channel_state = &mut *channel_lock; if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut chan) = channel_state.by_id.entry(id) { match { @@ -2094,7 +2116,7 @@ impl ChannelMana if !chan.get().is_live() { return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err: "Peer for first hop currently disconnected/pending monitor update!".to_owned()}); } - let send_res = break_chan_entry!(self, chan.get_mut().send_htlc_and_commit( + break_chan_entry!(self, chan.get_mut().send_htlc_and_commit( htlc_msat, payment_hash.clone(), htlc_cltv, HTLCSource::OutboundRoute { path: path.clone(), session_priv: session_priv.clone(), @@ -2103,20 +2125,7 @@ impl ChannelMana payment_secret: payment_secret.clone(), payee: payee.clone(), }, onion_packet, &self.logger), - channel_state, chan); - - let payment = payment_entry.or_insert_with(|| PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { - session_privs: HashSet::new(), - pending_amt_msat: 0, - pending_fee_msat: Some(0), - payment_hash: *payment_hash, - payment_secret: *payment_secret, - starting_block_height: self.best_block.read().unwrap().height(), - total_msat: total_value, - }); - assert!(payment.insert(session_priv_bytes, path)); - - send_res + channel_state, chan) } { Some((update_add, commitment_signed, monitor_update)) => { if let Err(e) = self.chain_monitor.update_channel(chan.get().get_funding_txo().unwrap(), monitor_update) { @@ -2126,8 +2135,10 @@ impl ChannelMana // is restored. Therefore, we must return an error indicating that // it is unsafe to retry the payment wholesale, which we do in the // send_payment check for MonitorUpdateFailed, below. + insert_outbound_payment!(); // Only do this after possibly break'ing on Perm failure above. return Err(APIError::MonitorUpdateFailed); } + insert_outbound_payment!(); log_debug!(self.logger, "Sending payment along path resulted in a commitment_signed for channel {}", log_bytes!(chan.get().channel_id())); channel_state.pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { @@ -2142,7 +2153,7 @@ impl ChannelMana }, }); }, - None => {}, + None => { insert_outbound_payment!(); }, } } else { unreachable!(); } return Ok(()); @@ -2275,6 +2286,9 @@ impl ChannelMana } else { None }, }) } else if has_err { + // If we failed to send any paths, we shouldn't have inserted the new PaymentId into + // our `pending_outbound_payments` map at all. + debug_assert!(self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap().get(&payment_id).is_none()); Err(PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedRetrySafe(results.drain(..).map(|r| r.unwrap_err()).collect())) } else { Ok(payment_id) @@ -6538,7 +6552,7 @@ pub mod bench { use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, Init}; use routing::network_graph::NetworkGraph; use routing::router::{Payee, get_route}; - use routing::scorer::Scorer; + use routing::scoring::Scorer; use util::test_utils; use util::config::UserConfig; use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PaymentPurpose}; @@ -6646,7 +6660,7 @@ pub mod bench { macro_rules! send_payment { ($node_a: expr, $node_b: expr) => { let usable_channels = $node_a.list_usable_channels(); - let payee = Payee::new($node_b.get_our_node_id()) + let payee = Payee::from_node_id($node_b.get_our_node_id()) .with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); let route = get_route(&$node_a.get_our_node_id(), &payee, &dummy_graph,