X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Fchannelmanager.rs;h=47d705fe625b4889d7d3da19681af0d4272b8807;hb=88a86d126f1bab0af8270a6388843dcc4a354e70;hp=1d3b292da876f7ccf5a1ff042551bb1d062ddb42;hpb=0b3240ee6a6e1baeafaed9e766997098be588358;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs index 1d3b292d..47d705fe 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs @@ -838,6 +838,10 @@ const CHECK_CLTV_EXPIRY_SANITY: u32 = MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32 - LATENCY_GRA #[allow(dead_code)] const CHECK_CLTV_EXPIRY_SANITY_2: u32 = MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32 - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS - 2*CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER; +/// The number of blocks before we consider an outbound payment for expiry if it doesn't have any +/// pending HTLCs in flight. +pub(crate) const PAYMENT_EXPIRY_BLOCKS: u32 = 3; + /// Information needed for constructing an invoice route hint for this channel. #[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq)] pub struct CounterpartyForwardingInfo { @@ -907,17 +911,30 @@ pub struct ChannelDetails { pub unspendable_punishment_reserve: Option, /// The `user_channel_id` passed in to create_channel, or 0 if the channel was inbound. pub user_channel_id: u64, + /// Our total balance. This is the amount we would get if we close the channel. + /// This value is not exact. Due to various in-flight changes and feerate changes, exactly this + /// amount is not likely to be recoverable on close. + /// + /// This does not include any pending HTLCs which are not yet fully resolved (and, thus, whose + /// balance is not available for inclusion in new outbound HTLCs). This further does not include + /// any pending outgoing HTLCs which are awaiting some other resolution to be sent. + /// This does not consider any on-chain fees. + /// + /// See also [`ChannelDetails::outbound_capacity_msat`] + pub balance_msat: u64, /// The available outbound capacity for sending HTLCs to the remote peer. This does not include - /// any pending HTLCs which are not yet fully resolved (and, thus, who's balance is not + /// any pending HTLCs which are not yet fully resolved (and, thus, whose balance is not /// available for inclusion in new outbound HTLCs). This further does not include any pending /// outgoing HTLCs which are awaiting some other resolution to be sent. /// + /// See also [`ChannelDetails::balance_msat`] + /// /// This value is not exact. Due to various in-flight changes, feerate changes, and our /// conflict-avoidance policy, exactly this amount is not likely to be spendable. However, we /// should be able to spend nearly this amount. pub outbound_capacity_msat: u64, /// The available inbound capacity for the remote peer to send HTLCs to us. This does not - /// include any pending HTLCs which are not yet fully resolved (and, thus, who's balance is not + /// include any pending HTLCs which are not yet fully resolved (and, thus, whose balance is not /// available for inclusion in new inbound HTLCs). /// Note that there are some corner cases not fully handled here, so the actual available /// inbound capacity may be slightly higher than this. @@ -1488,6 +1505,7 @@ impl ChannelMana res.reserve(channel_state.by_id.len()); for (channel_id, channel) in channel_state.by_id.iter().filter(f) { let (inbound_capacity_msat, outbound_capacity_msat) = channel.get_inbound_outbound_available_balance_msat(); + let balance_msat = channel.get_balance_msat(); let (to_remote_reserve_satoshis, to_self_reserve_satoshis) = channel.get_holder_counterparty_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(); res.push(ChannelDetails { @@ -1502,6 +1520,7 @@ impl ChannelMana short_channel_id: channel.get_short_channel_id(), channel_value_satoshis: channel.get_value_satoshis(), unspendable_punishment_reserve: to_self_reserve_satoshis, + balance_msat, inbound_capacity_msat, outbound_capacity_msat, user_channel_id: channel.get_user_id(), @@ -2389,8 +2408,8 @@ impl ChannelMana })) }, PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { .. } => { - return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::RouteError { - err: "Payment already completed" + return Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError { + err: "Payment already completed".to_owned() })); }, PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { .. } => { @@ -2411,15 +2430,31 @@ impl ChannelMana /// Signals that no further retries for the given payment will occur. /// /// After this method returns, any future calls to [`retry_payment`] for the given `payment_id` - /// will fail with [`PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError`]. + /// will fail with [`PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError`]. If no such event has been generated, + /// an [`Event::PaymentFailed`] event will be generated as soon as there are no remaining + /// pending HTLCs for this payment. + /// + /// Note that calling this method does *not* prevent a payment from succeeding. You must still + /// wait until you receive either a [`Event::PaymentFailed`] or [`Event::PaymentSent`] event to + /// determine the ultimate status of a payment. /// /// [`retry_payment`]: Self::retry_payment + /// [`Event::PaymentFailed`]: events::Event::PaymentFailed + /// [`Event::PaymentSent`]: events::Event::PaymentSent pub fn abandon_payment(&self, payment_id: PaymentId) { let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(&self.total_consistency_lock, &self.persistence_notifier); let mut outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap(); if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut payment) = outbounds.entry(payment_id) { - let _ = payment.get_mut().mark_abandoned(); + if let Ok(()) = payment.get_mut().mark_abandoned() { + if payment.get().remaining_parts() == 0 { + self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push(events::Event::PaymentFailed { + payment_id, + payment_hash: payment.get().payment_hash().expect("PendingOutboundPayments::RetriesExceeded always has a payment hash set"), + }); + payment.remove(); + } + } } } @@ -3250,22 +3285,28 @@ impl ChannelMana final_cltv_expiry_delta: path_last_hop.cltv_expiry_delta, }) } else { None }; - self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push( - events::Event::PaymentPathFailed { - payment_id: Some(payment_id), - payment_hash, - rejected_by_dest: false, - network_update: None, - all_paths_failed: payment.get().remaining_parts() == 0, - path: path.clone(), - short_channel_id: None, - retry, - #[cfg(test)] - error_code: None, - #[cfg(test)] - error_data: None, - } - ); + let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap(); + pending_events.push(events::Event::PaymentPathFailed { + payment_id: Some(payment_id), + payment_hash, + rejected_by_dest: false, + network_update: None, + all_paths_failed: payment.get().remaining_parts() == 0, + path: path.clone(), + short_channel_id: None, + retry, + #[cfg(test)] + error_code: None, + #[cfg(test)] + error_data: None, + }); + if payment.get().abandoned() && payment.get().remaining_parts() == 0 { + pending_events.push(events::Event::PaymentFailed { + payment_id, + payment_hash: payment.get().payment_hash().expect("PendingOutboundPayments::RetriesExceeded always has a payment hash set"), + }); + payment.remove(); + } } } else { log_trace!(self.logger, "Received duplicative fail for HTLC with payment_hash {}", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0)); @@ -3296,6 +3337,7 @@ impl ChannelMana session_priv_bytes.copy_from_slice(&session_priv[..]); let mut outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap(); let mut all_paths_failed = false; + let mut full_failure_ev = None; if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut payment) = outbounds.entry(payment_id) { if !payment.get_mut().remove(&session_priv_bytes, Some(&path)) { log_trace!(self.logger, "Received duplicative fail for HTLC with payment_hash {}", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0)); @@ -3307,6 +3349,13 @@ impl ChannelMana } if payment.get().remaining_parts() == 0 { all_paths_failed = true; + if payment.get().abandoned() { + full_failure_ev = Some(events::Event::PaymentFailed { + payment_id, + payment_hash: payment.get().payment_hash().expect("PendingOutboundPayments::RetriesExceeded always has a payment hash set"), + }); + payment.remove(); + } } } else { log_trace!(self.logger, "Received duplicative fail for HTLC with payment_hash {}", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0)); @@ -3322,7 +3371,8 @@ impl ChannelMana }) } else { None }; log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing outbound payment HTLC with payment_hash {}", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0)); - match &onion_error { + + let path_failure = match &onion_error { &HTLCFailReason::LightningError { ref err } => { #[cfg(test)] let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone()); @@ -3331,22 +3381,20 @@ impl ChannelMana // TODO: If we decided to blame ourselves (or one of our channels) in // process_onion_failure we should close that channel as it implies our // next-hop is needlessly blaming us! - self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push( - events::Event::PaymentPathFailed { - payment_id: Some(payment_id), - payment_hash: payment_hash.clone(), - rejected_by_dest: !payment_retryable, - network_update, - all_paths_failed, - path: path.clone(), - short_channel_id, - retry, + events::Event::PaymentPathFailed { + payment_id: Some(payment_id), + payment_hash: payment_hash.clone(), + rejected_by_dest: !payment_retryable, + network_update, + all_paths_failed, + path: path.clone(), + short_channel_id, + retry, #[cfg(test)] - error_code: onion_error_code, + error_code: onion_error_code, #[cfg(test)] - error_data: onion_error_data - } - ); + error_data: onion_error_data + } }, &HTLCFailReason::Reason { #[cfg(test)] @@ -3361,24 +3409,25 @@ impl ChannelMana // ChannelDetails. // TODO: For non-temporary failures, we really should be closing the // channel here as we apparently can't relay through them anyway. - self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push( - events::Event::PaymentPathFailed { - payment_id: Some(payment_id), - payment_hash: payment_hash.clone(), - rejected_by_dest: path.len() == 1, - network_update: None, - all_paths_failed, - path: path.clone(), - short_channel_id: Some(path.first().unwrap().short_channel_id), - retry, + events::Event::PaymentPathFailed { + payment_id: Some(payment_id), + payment_hash: payment_hash.clone(), + rejected_by_dest: path.len() == 1, + network_update: None, + all_paths_failed, + path: path.clone(), + short_channel_id: Some(path.first().unwrap().short_channel_id), + retry, #[cfg(test)] - error_code: Some(*failure_code), + error_code: Some(*failure_code), #[cfg(test)] - error_data: Some(data.clone()), - } - ); + error_data: Some(data.clone()), + } } - } + }; + let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap(); + pending_events.push(path_failure); + if let Some(ev) = full_failure_ev { pending_events.push(ev); } }, HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(HTLCPreviousHopData { short_channel_id, htlc_id, incoming_packet_shared_secret, .. }) => { let err_packet = match onion_error { @@ -4907,14 +4956,19 @@ where inbound_payment.expiry_time > header.time as u64 }); + let mut pending_events = self.pending_events.lock().unwrap(); let mut outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap(); - outbounds.retain(|_, payment| { - const PAYMENT_EXPIRY_BLOCKS: u32 = 3; + outbounds.retain(|payment_id, payment| { if payment.remaining_parts() != 0 { return true } - if let PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { starting_block_height, .. } = payment { - return *starting_block_height + PAYMENT_EXPIRY_BLOCKS > height - } - true + if let PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { starting_block_height, payment_hash, .. } = payment { + if *starting_block_height + PAYMENT_EXPIRY_BLOCKS <= height { + log_info!(self.logger, "Timing out payment with id {} and hash {}", log_bytes!(payment_id.0), log_bytes!(payment_hash.0)); + pending_events.push(events::Event::PaymentFailed { + payment_id: *payment_id, payment_hash: *payment_hash, + }); + false + } else { true } + } else { true } }); }