X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=src%2Fln%2Fchannel.rs;h=ab8b3bcdf6cb0ca0bd8251ff8f474f939758df68;hb=90b545ffe3e6855e09156361ecb1d5384add1e46;hp=f6e97f12f5cd26b4510b7270f1702397ab1cdaba;hpb=eeefdaf7a2d150ff89ec0ce11da1bbe7b98816bb;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/src/ln/channel.rs b/src/ln/channel.rs index f6e97f12..ab8b3bcd 100644 --- a/src/ln/channel.rs +++ b/src/ln/channel.rs @@ -138,18 +138,16 @@ enum HTLCState { AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke, /// Removed by us and a new commitment_signed was sent (if we were AwaitingRemoteRevoke when we /// created it we would have put it in the holding cell instead). When they next revoke_and_ack - /// we'll promote to LocalRemovedAwaitingCommitment if we fulfilled, otherwise we'll drop at - /// that point. + /// we'll drop it. /// Note that we have to keep an eye on the HTLC until we've received a broadcastable /// commitment transaction without it as otherwise we'll have to force-close the channel to /// claim it before the timeout (obviously doesn't apply to revoked HTLCs that we can't claim - /// anyway). + /// anyway). That said, ChannelMonitor does this for us (see + /// ChannelMonitor::would_broadcast_at_height) so we actually remove the HTLC from our own + /// local state before then, once we're sure that the next commitment_signed and + /// ChannelMonitor::provide_latest_local_commitment_tx_info will not include this HTLC. /// Implies HTLCOutput::outbound: false LocalRemoved, - /// Removed by us, sent a new commitment_signed and got a revoke_and_ack. Just waiting on an - /// updated local commitment transaction. Implies local_removed_fulfilled. - /// Implies HTLCOutput::outbound: false - LocalRemovedAwaitingCommitment, } struct HTLCOutput { //TODO: Refactor into Outbound/InboundHTLCOutput (will save memory and fewer panics) @@ -706,7 +704,6 @@ impl Channel { HTLCState::AwaitingRemoteRevokeToRemove => generated_by_local, HTLCState::AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke => false, HTLCState::LocalRemoved => !generated_by_local, - HTLCState::LocalRemovedAwaitingCommitment => false, }; if include { @@ -749,10 +746,6 @@ impl Channel { value_to_self_msat_offset += htlc.amount_msat as i64; } }, - HTLCState::LocalRemovedAwaitingCommitment => { - assert!(htlc.local_removed_fulfilled); - value_to_self_msat_offset += htlc.amount_msat as i64; - }, _ => {}, } } @@ -1018,7 +1011,7 @@ impl Channel { let mut pending_idx = std::usize::MAX; for (idx, htlc) in self.pending_htlcs.iter().enumerate() { if !htlc.outbound && htlc.payment_hash == payment_hash_calc && - htlc.state != HTLCState::LocalRemoved && htlc.state != HTLCState::LocalRemovedAwaitingCommitment { + htlc.state != HTLCState::LocalRemoved { if let Some(PendingHTLCStatus::Fail(_)) = htlc.pending_forward_state { } else { if pending_idx != std::usize::MAX { @@ -1143,7 +1136,7 @@ impl Channel { // we'll fail this one as soon as remote commits to it. continue; } - } else if htlc.state == HTLCState::LocalRemoved || htlc.state == HTLCState::LocalRemovedAwaitingCommitment { + } else if htlc.state == HTLCState::LocalRemoved { return Err(HandleError{err: "Unable to find a pending HTLC which matched the given payment preimage", action: None}); } else { panic!("Have an inbound HTLC when not awaiting remote revoke that had a garbage state"); @@ -1275,10 +1268,13 @@ impl Channel { pub fn funding_created(&mut self, msg: &msgs::FundingCreated) -> Result<(msgs::FundingSigned, ChannelMonitor), HandleError> { if self.channel_outbound { - return Err(HandleError{err: "Received funding_created for an outbound channel?", action: None}); + return Err(HandleError{err: "Received funding_created for an outbound channel?", action: Some(msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage {msg: msgs::ErrorMessage {channel_id: self.channel_id, data: "Received funding_created for an outbound channel?".to_string()}})}); } if self.channel_state != (ChannelState::OurInitSent as u32 | ChannelState::TheirInitSent as u32) { - return Err(HandleError{err: "Received funding_created after we got the channel!", action: None}); + // BOLT 2 says that if we disconnect before we send funding_signed we SHOULD NOT + // remember the channel, so its safe to just send an error_message here and drop the + // channel. + return Err(HandleError{err: "Received funding_created after we got the channel!", action: Some(msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage {msg: msgs::ErrorMessage {channel_id: self.channel_id, data: "Received funding_created after we got the channel!".to_string()}})}); } if self.channel_monitor.get_min_seen_secret() != (1 << 48) || self.cur_remote_commitment_transaction_number != (1 << 48) - 1 || self.cur_local_commitment_transaction_number != (1 << 48) - 1 { panic!("Should not have advanced channel commitment tx numbers prior to funding_created"); @@ -1379,7 +1375,6 @@ impl Channel { HTLCState::AwaitingRemoteRevokeToRemove => { if for_remote_update_check { continue; } }, HTLCState::AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke => { if for_remote_update_check { continue; } }, HTLCState::LocalRemoved => {}, - HTLCState::LocalRemovedAwaitingCommitment => { if for_remote_update_check { continue; } }, } if !htlc.outbound { inbound_htlc_count += 1; @@ -1556,16 +1551,6 @@ impl Channel { need_our_commitment = true; } } - // Finally delete all the LocalRemovedAwaitingCommitment HTLCs - // We really shouldnt have two passes here, but retain gives a non-mutable ref (Rust bug) - let mut claimed_value_msat = 0; - self.pending_htlcs.retain(|htlc| { - if htlc.state == HTLCState::LocalRemovedAwaitingCommitment { - claimed_value_msat += htlc.amount_msat; - false - } else { true } - }); - self.value_to_self_msat += claimed_value_msat; self.cur_local_commitment_transaction_number -= 1; self.last_local_commitment_txn = new_local_commitment_txn; @@ -1689,7 +1674,10 @@ impl Channel { // We really shouldnt have two passes here, but retain gives a non-mutable ref (Rust bug) self.pending_htlcs.retain(|htlc| { if htlc.state == HTLCState::LocalRemoved { - if htlc.local_removed_fulfilled { true } else { false } + if htlc.local_removed_fulfilled { + value_to_self_msat_diff += htlc.amount_msat as i64; + } + false } else if htlc.state == HTLCState::AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke { if let Some(reason) = htlc.fail_reason.clone() { // We really want take() here, but, again, non-mut ref :( revoked_htlcs.push((htlc.payment_hash, reason)); @@ -1724,9 +1712,6 @@ impl Channel { } else if htlc.state == HTLCState::AwaitingRemoteRevokeToRemove { htlc.state = HTLCState::AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke; require_commitment = true; - } else if htlc.state == HTLCState::LocalRemoved { - assert!(htlc.local_removed_fulfilled); - htlc.state = HTLCState::LocalRemovedAwaitingCommitment; } } self.value_to_self_msat = (self.value_to_self_msat as i64 + value_to_self_msat_diff) as u64; @@ -2334,6 +2319,7 @@ impl Channel { /// This returns an option instead of a pure UpdateAddHTLC as we may be in a state where we are /// waiting on the remote peer to send us a revoke_and_ack during which time we cannot add new /// HTLCs on the wire or we wouldn't be able to determine what they actually ACK'ed. + /// You MUST call send_commitment prior to any other calls on this Channel pub fn send_htlc(&mut self, amount_msat: u64, payment_hash: [u8; 32], cltv_expiry: u32, onion_routing_packet: msgs::OnionPacket) -> Result, HandleError> { if (self.channel_state & (ChannelState::ChannelFunded as u32 | BOTH_SIDES_SHUTDOWN_MASK)) != (ChannelState::ChannelFunded as u32) { return Err(HandleError{err: "Cannot send HTLC until channel is fully established and we haven't started shutting down", action: None}); @@ -2401,6 +2387,8 @@ impl Channel { } /// Creates a signed commitment transaction to send to the remote peer. + /// Always returns a Channel-failing HandleError::action if an immediately-preceding (read: the + /// last call to this Channel) send_htlc returned Ok(Some(_)) and there is an Err. pub fn send_commitment(&mut self) -> Result<(msgs::CommitmentSigned, ChannelMonitor), HandleError> { if (self.channel_state & (ChannelState::ChannelFunded as u32)) != (ChannelState::ChannelFunded as u32) { return Err(HandleError{err: "Cannot create commitment tx until channel is fully established", action: None});