X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=src%2Fln%2Fchannelmonitor.rs;h=59ed177b38fb3da0743e4a2ee71332f0e9abc1b0;hb=ccf86849bf0c56c31c4ea6eb799500a24eec86a4;hp=8d6d23ad00a160b6342eade2dce0fffbf33ca06c;hpb=6c1123cafd5e4821042e6f57efdf83af62e6fc6a;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/src/ln/channelmonitor.rs b/src/ln/channelmonitor.rs index 8d6d23ad..59ed177b 100644 --- a/src/ln/channelmonitor.rs +++ b/src/ln/channelmonitor.rs @@ -155,7 +155,13 @@ impl ManyChannelMonitor for SimpleManyChannelMonitor { const CLTV_SHARED_CLAIM_BUFFER: u32 = 12; /// If an HTLC expires within this many blocks, force-close the channel to broadcast the /// HTLC-Success transaction. -const CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER: u32 = 6; +/// In other words, this is an upper bound on how many blocks we think it can take us to get a +/// transaction confirmed (and we use it in a few more, equivalent, places). +pub(crate) const CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER: u32 = 6; +/// Number of blocks by which point we expect our counterparty to have seen new blocks on the +/// network and done a full update_fail_htlc/commitment_signed dance (+ we've updated all our +/// copies of ChannelMonitors, including watchtowers). +pub(crate) const HTLC_FAIL_TIMEOUT_BLOCKS: u32 = 3; #[derive(Clone, PartialEq)] enum KeyStorage { @@ -1184,16 +1190,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { } } if let Some(ref cur_local_tx) = self.current_local_signed_commitment_tx { - let mut needs_broadcast = false; - for &(ref htlc, _, _) in cur_local_tx.htlc_outputs.iter() { - if htlc.cltv_expiry <= height + CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER { - if htlc.offered || self.payment_preimages.contains_key(&htlc.payment_hash) { - needs_broadcast = true; - } - } - } - - if needs_broadcast { + if self.would_broadcast_at_height(height) { broadcaster.broadcast_transaction(&cur_local_tx.tx); for tx in self.broadcast_by_local_state(&cur_local_tx) { broadcaster.broadcast_transaction(&tx); @@ -1206,10 +1203,29 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { pub(super) fn would_broadcast_at_height(&self, height: u32) -> bool { if let Some(ref cur_local_tx) = self.current_local_signed_commitment_tx { for &(ref htlc, _, _) in cur_local_tx.htlc_outputs.iter() { - if htlc.cltv_expiry <= height + CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER { - if htlc.offered || self.payment_preimages.contains_key(&htlc.payment_hash) { - return true; - } + // For inbound HTLCs which we know the preimage for, we have to ensure we hit the + // chain with enough room to claim the HTLC without our counterparty being able to + // time out the HTLC first. + // For outbound HTLCs which our counterparty hasn't failed/claimed, our primary + // concern is being able to claim the corresponding inbound HTLC (on another + // channel) before it expires. In fact, we don't even really care if our + // counterparty here claims such an outbound HTLC after it expired as long as we + // can still claim the corresponding HTLC. Thus, to avoid needlessly hitting the + // chain when our counterparty is waiting for expiration to off-chain fail an HTLC + // we give ourselves a few blocks of headroom after expiration before going + // on-chain for an expired HTLC. + // Note that, to avoid a potential attack whereby a node delays claiming an HTLC + // from us until we've reached the point where we go on-chain with the + // corresponding inbound HTLC, we must ensure that outbound HTLCs go on chain at + // least CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER blocks prior to the inbound HTLC. + // aka outbound_cltv + HTLC_FAIL_TIMEOUT_BLOCKS == height - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + // inbound_cltv == height + CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + // outbound_cltv + HTLC_FAIL_TIMEOUT_BLOCKS + CLTV_CLAIM_BUFER <= inbound_cltv - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + // HTLC_FAIL_TIMEOUT_BLOCKS + 2*CLTV_CLAIM_BUFER <= inbound_cltv - outbound_cltv + // HTLC_FAIL_TIMEOUT_BLOCKS + 2*CLTV_CLAIM_BUFER <= CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA + if ( htlc.offered && htlc.cltv_expiry + HTLC_FAIL_TIMEOUT_BLOCKS <= height) || + (!htlc.offered && htlc.cltv_expiry <= height + CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER && self.payment_preimages.contains_key(&htlc.payment_hash)) { + return true; } } }