X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fchain%2Fchannelmonitor.rs;h=1933a3f524e8a19c1a2397e37ba053db355e62e0;hb=refs%2Fheads%2F2022-11-more-robust-unconfirmed;hp=4d109294cf061e4a5a5f296ca839b1d5c778e716;hpb=66ced68ec652ff84b654bd50919a70f866418089;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs b/lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs index 4d109294..1933a3f5 100644 --- a/lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs +++ b/lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ //! ChannelMonitors to get out of the HSM and onto monitoring devices. use bitcoin::blockdata::block::BlockHeader; -use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::{TxOut,Transaction}; +use bitcoin::blockdata::transaction::{OutPoint as BitcoinOutPoint, TxOut, Transaction}; use bitcoin::blockdata::script::{Script, Builder}; use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes; @@ -33,34 +33,43 @@ use bitcoin::secp256k1::{Secp256k1, ecdsa::Signature}; use bitcoin::secp256k1::{SecretKey, PublicKey}; use bitcoin::secp256k1; -use ln::{PaymentHash, PaymentPreimage}; -use ln::msgs::DecodeError; -use ln::chan_utils; -use ln::chan_utils::{CounterpartyCommitmentSecrets, HTLCOutputInCommitment, HTLCType, ChannelTransactionParameters, HolderCommitmentTransaction}; -use ln::channelmanager::HTLCSource; -use chain; -use chain::{BestBlock, WatchedOutput}; -use chain::chaininterface::{BroadcasterInterface, FeeEstimator, LowerBoundedFeeEstimator}; -use chain::transaction::{OutPoint, TransactionData}; -use chain::keysinterface::{SpendableOutputDescriptor, StaticPaymentOutputDescriptor, DelayedPaymentOutputDescriptor, Sign, KeysInterface}; -use chain::onchaintx::OnchainTxHandler; -use chain::package::{CounterpartyOfferedHTLCOutput, CounterpartyReceivedHTLCOutput, HolderFundingOutput, HolderHTLCOutput, PackageSolvingData, PackageTemplate, RevokedOutput, RevokedHTLCOutput}; -use chain::Filter; -use util::logger::Logger; -use util::ser::{Readable, ReadableArgs, MaybeReadable, Writer, Writeable, U48, OptionDeserWrapper}; -use util::byte_utils; -use util::events::Event; - -use prelude::*; +use crate::ln::{PaymentHash, PaymentPreimage}; +use crate::ln::msgs::DecodeError; +use crate::ln::chan_utils; +use crate::ln::chan_utils::{CounterpartyCommitmentSecrets, HTLCOutputInCommitment, HTLCClaim, ChannelTransactionParameters, HolderCommitmentTransaction}; +use crate::ln::channelmanager::HTLCSource; +use crate::chain; +use crate::chain::{BestBlock, WatchedOutput}; +use crate::chain::chaininterface::{BroadcasterInterface, FeeEstimator, LowerBoundedFeeEstimator}; +use crate::chain::transaction::{OutPoint, TransactionData}; +use crate::chain::keysinterface::{SpendableOutputDescriptor, StaticPaymentOutputDescriptor, DelayedPaymentOutputDescriptor, Sign, KeysInterface}; +#[cfg(anchors)] +use crate::chain::onchaintx::ClaimEvent; +use crate::chain::onchaintx::OnchainTxHandler; +use crate::chain::package::{CounterpartyOfferedHTLCOutput, CounterpartyReceivedHTLCOutput, HolderFundingOutput, HolderHTLCOutput, PackageSolvingData, PackageTemplate, RevokedOutput, RevokedHTLCOutput}; +use crate::chain::Filter; +use crate::util::logger::Logger; +use crate::util::ser::{Readable, ReadableArgs, MaybeReadable, Writer, Writeable, U48, OptionDeserWrapper}; +use crate::util::byte_utils; +use crate::util::events::Event; +#[cfg(anchors)] +use crate::util::events::{AnchorDescriptor, BumpTransactionEvent}; + +use crate::prelude::*; use core::{cmp, mem}; -use io::{self, Error}; +use crate::io::{self, Error}; use core::convert::TryInto; use core::ops::Deref; -use sync::Mutex; +use crate::sync::Mutex; -/// An update generated by the underlying Channel itself which contains some new information the -/// ChannelMonitor should be made aware of. -#[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq))] +/// An update generated by the underlying channel itself which contains some new information the +/// [`ChannelMonitor`] should be made aware of. +/// +/// Because this represents only a small number of updates to the underlying state, it is generally +/// much smaller than a full [`ChannelMonitor`]. However, for large single commitment transaction +/// updates (e.g. ones during which there are hundreds of HTLCs pending on the commitment +/// transaction), a single update may reach upwards of 1 MiB in serialized size. +#[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq, Eq))] #[derive(Clone)] #[must_use] pub struct ChannelMonitorUpdate { @@ -70,12 +79,14 @@ pub struct ChannelMonitorUpdate { /// increasing and increase by one for each new update, with one exception specified below. /// /// This sequence number is also used to track up to which points updates which returned - /// ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::TemporaryFailure have been applied to all copies of a given + /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress`] have been applied to all copies of a given /// ChannelMonitor when ChannelManager::channel_monitor_updated is called. /// /// The only instance where update_id values are not strictly increasing is the case where we /// allow post-force-close updates with a special update ID of [`CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID`]. See /// its docs for more details. + /// + /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress`]: super::ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress pub update_id: u64, } @@ -117,7 +128,7 @@ impl Readable for ChannelMonitorUpdate { } /// An event to be processed by the ChannelManager. -#[derive(Clone, PartialEq)] +#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq)] pub enum MonitorEvent { /// A monitor event containing an HTLCUpdate. HTLCEvent(HTLCUpdate), @@ -126,10 +137,10 @@ pub enum MonitorEvent { CommitmentTxConfirmed(OutPoint), /// Indicates a [`ChannelMonitor`] update has completed. See - /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::TemporaryFailure`] for more information on how this is used. + /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress`] for more information on how this is used. /// - /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::TemporaryFailure`]: super::ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::TemporaryFailure - UpdateCompleted { + /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress`]: super::ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress + Completed { /// The funding outpoint of the [`ChannelMonitor`] that was updated funding_txo: OutPoint, /// The Update ID from [`ChannelMonitorUpdate::update_id`] which was applied or @@ -141,15 +152,15 @@ pub enum MonitorEvent { }, /// Indicates a [`ChannelMonitor`] update has failed. See - /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::PermanentFailure`] for more information on how this is used. + /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure`] for more information on how this is used. /// - /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::PermanentFailure`]: super::ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::PermanentFailure + /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure`]: super::ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure UpdateFailed(OutPoint), } impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum_upgradable!(MonitorEvent, - // Note that UpdateCompleted and UpdateFailed are currently never serialized to disk as they are + // Note that Completed and UpdateFailed are currently never serialized to disk as they are // generated only in ChainMonitor - (0, UpdateCompleted) => { + (0, Completed) => { (0, funding_txo, required), (2, monitor_update_id, required), }, @@ -162,7 +173,7 @@ impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum_upgradable!(MonitorEvent, /// Simple structure sent back by `chain::Watch` when an HTLC from a forward channel is detected on /// chain. Used to update the corresponding HTLC in the backward channel. Failing to pass the /// preimage claim backward will lead to loss of funds. -#[derive(Clone, PartialEq)] +#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq)] pub struct HTLCUpdate { pub(crate) payment_hash: PaymentHash, pub(crate) payment_preimage: Option, @@ -228,7 +239,7 @@ pub const ANTI_REORG_DELAY: u32 = 6; pub(crate) const HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER: u32 = CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS; // TODO(devrandom) replace this with HolderCommitmentTransaction -#[derive(Clone, PartialEq)] +#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq)] struct HolderSignedTx { /// txid of the transaction in tx, just used to make comparison faster txid: Txid, @@ -255,9 +266,23 @@ impl_writeable_tlv_based!(HolderSignedTx, { (14, htlc_outputs, vec_type) }); +#[cfg(anchors)] +impl HolderSignedTx { + fn non_dust_htlcs(&self) -> Vec { + self.htlc_outputs.iter().filter_map(|(htlc, _, _)| { + if let Some(_) = htlc.transaction_output_index { + Some(htlc.clone()) + } else { + None + } + }) + .collect() + } +} + /// We use this to track static counterparty commitment transaction data and to generate any /// justice or 2nd-stage preimage/timeout transactions. -#[derive(PartialEq)] +#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)] struct CounterpartyCommitmentParameters { counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key: PublicKey, counterparty_htlc_base_key: PublicKey, @@ -307,14 +332,15 @@ impl Readable for CounterpartyCommitmentParameters { } } -/// An entry for an [`OnchainEvent`], stating the block height when the event was observed and the -/// transaction causing it. +/// An entry for an [`OnchainEvent`], stating the block height and hash when the event was +/// observed, as well as the transaction causing it. /// /// Used to determine when the on-chain event can be considered safe from a chain reorganization. -#[derive(PartialEq)] +#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)] struct OnchainEventEntry { txid: Txid, height: u32, + block_hash: Option, // Added as optional, will be filled in for any entry generated on 0.0.113 or after event: OnchainEvent, transaction: Option, // Added as optional, but always filled in, in LDK 0.0.110 } @@ -353,7 +379,7 @@ type CommitmentTxCounterpartyOutputInfo = Option<(u32, u64)>; /// Upon discovering of some classes of onchain tx by ChannelMonitor, we may have to take actions on it /// once they mature to enough confirmations (ANTI_REORG_DELAY) -#[derive(PartialEq)] +#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)] enum OnchainEvent { /// An outbound HTLC failing after a transaction is confirmed. Used /// * when an outbound HTLC output is spent by us after the HTLC timed out @@ -369,6 +395,8 @@ enum OnchainEvent { /// transaction which appeared on chain. commitment_tx_output_idx: Option, }, + /// An output waiting on [`ANTI_REORG_DELAY`] confirmations before we hand the user the + /// [`SpendableOutputDescriptor`]. MaturingOutput { descriptor: SpendableOutputDescriptor, }, @@ -380,6 +408,9 @@ enum OnchainEvent { on_local_output_csv: Option, /// If the funding spend transaction was a known remote commitment transaction, we track /// the output index and amount of the counterparty's `to_self` output here. + /// + /// This allows us to generate a [`Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable`] for the + /// counterparty output. commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output: CommitmentTxCounterpartyOutputInfo, }, /// A spend of a commitment transaction HTLC output, set in the cases where *no* `HTLCUpdate` @@ -390,6 +421,9 @@ enum OnchainEvent { /// * an inbound HTLC is claimed by us (with a preimage). /// * a revoked-state HTLC transaction was broadcasted, which was claimed by the revocation /// signature. + /// * a revoked-state HTLC transaction was broadcasted, which was claimed by an + /// HTLC-Success/HTLC-Failure transaction (and is still claimable with a revocation + /// signature). HTLCSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_output_idx: u32, /// If the claim was made by either party with a preimage, this is filled in @@ -407,6 +441,7 @@ impl Writeable for OnchainEventEntry { (0, self.txid, required), (1, self.transaction, option), (2, self.height, required), + (3, self.block_hash, option), (4, self.event, required), }); Ok(()) @@ -417,16 +452,18 @@ impl MaybeReadable for OnchainEventEntry { fn read(reader: &mut R) -> Result, DecodeError> { let mut txid = Txid::all_zeros(); let mut transaction = None; + let mut block_hash = None; let mut height = 0; let mut event = None; read_tlv_fields!(reader, { (0, txid, required), (1, transaction, option), (2, height, required), + (3, block_hash, option), (4, event, ignorable), }); if let Some(ev) = event { - Ok(Some(Self { txid, transaction, height, event: ev })) + Ok(Some(Self { txid, transaction, height, block_hash, event: ev })) } else { Ok(None) } @@ -455,7 +492,7 @@ impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum_upgradable!(OnchainEvent, ); -#[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq))] +#[cfg_attr(any(test, fuzzing, feature = "_test_utils"), derive(PartialEq, Eq))] #[derive(Clone)] pub(crate) enum ChannelMonitorUpdateStep { LatestHolderCommitmentTXInfo { @@ -569,28 +606,84 @@ pub enum Balance { /// HTLCs which we sent to our counterparty which are claimable after a timeout (less on-chain /// fees) if the counterparty does not know the preimage for the HTLCs. These are somewhat /// likely to be claimed by our counterparty before we do. - MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout { - /// The amount available to claim, in satoshis, excluding the on-chain fees which will be - /// required to do so. + MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC { + /// The amount potentially available to claim, in satoshis, excluding the on-chain fees + /// which will be required to do so. claimable_amount_satoshis: u64, /// The height at which we will be able to claim the balance if our counterparty has not /// done so. claimable_height: u32, }, + /// HTLCs which we received from our counterparty which are claimable with a preimage which we + /// do not currently have. This will only be claimable if we receive the preimage from the node + /// to which we forwarded this HTLC before the timeout. + MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC { + /// The amount potentially available to claim, in satoshis, excluding the on-chain fees + /// which will be required to do so. + claimable_amount_satoshis: u64, + /// The height at which our counterparty will be able to claim the balance if we have not + /// yet received the preimage and claimed it ourselves. + expiry_height: u32, + }, + /// The channel has been closed, and our counterparty broadcasted a revoked commitment + /// transaction. + /// + /// Thus, we're able to claim all outputs in the commitment transaction, one of which has the + /// following amount. + CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { + /// The amount, in satoshis, of the output which we can claim. + /// + /// Note that for outputs from HTLC balances this may be excluding some on-chain fees that + /// were already spent. + claimable_amount_satoshis: u64, + }, } /// An HTLC which has been irrevocably resolved on-chain, and has reached ANTI_REORG_DELAY. -#[derive(PartialEq)] +#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)] struct IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC { - commitment_tx_output_idx: u32, + commitment_tx_output_idx: Option, + /// The txid of the transaction which resolved the HTLC, this may be a commitment (if the HTLC + /// was not present in the confirmed commitment transaction), HTLC-Success, or HTLC-Timeout + /// transaction. + resolving_txid: Option, // Added as optional, but always filled in, in 0.0.110 /// Only set if the HTLC claim was ours using a payment preimage payment_preimage: Option, } -impl_writeable_tlv_based!(IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC, { - (0, commitment_tx_output_idx, required), - (2, payment_preimage, option), -}); +// In LDK versions prior to 0.0.111 commitment_tx_output_idx was not Option-al and +// IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC objects only existed for non-dust HTLCs. This was a bug, but to maintain +// backwards compatibility we must ensure we always write out a commitment_tx_output_idx field, +// using `u32::max_value()` as a sentinal to indicate the HTLC was dust. +impl Writeable for IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC { + fn write(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> { + let mapped_commitment_tx_output_idx = self.commitment_tx_output_idx.unwrap_or(u32::max_value()); + write_tlv_fields!(writer, { + (0, mapped_commitment_tx_output_idx, required), + (1, self.resolving_txid, option), + (2, self.payment_preimage, option), + }); + Ok(()) + } +} + +impl Readable for IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC { + fn read(reader: &mut R) -> Result { + let mut mapped_commitment_tx_output_idx = 0; + let mut resolving_txid = None; + let mut payment_preimage = None; + read_tlv_fields!(reader, { + (0, mapped_commitment_tx_output_idx, required), + (1, resolving_txid, option), + (2, payment_preimage, option), + }); + Ok(Self { + commitment_tx_output_idx: if mapped_commitment_tx_output_idx == u32::max_value() { None } else { Some(mapped_commitment_tx_output_idx) }, + resolving_txid, + payment_preimage, + }) + } +} /// A ChannelMonitor handles chain events (blocks connected and disconnected) and generates /// on-chain transactions to ensure no loss of funds occurs. @@ -723,7 +816,10 @@ pub(crate) struct ChannelMonitorImpl { // of block connection between ChannelMonitors and the ChannelManager. funding_spend_seen: bool, + /// Set to `Some` of the confirmed transaction spending the funding input of the channel after + /// reaching `ANTI_REORG_DELAY` confirmations. funding_spend_confirmed: Option, + confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output: CommitmentTxCounterpartyOutputInfo, /// The set of HTLCs which have been either claimed or failed on chain and have reached /// the requisite confirmations on the claim/fail transaction (either ANTI_REORG_DELAY or the @@ -1146,7 +1242,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { B::Target: BroadcasterInterface, L::Target: Logger, { - self.inner.lock().unwrap().broadcast_latest_holder_commitment_txn(broadcaster, logger) + self.inner.lock().unwrap().broadcast_latest_holder_commitment_txn(broadcaster, logger); } /// Updates a ChannelMonitor on the basis of some new information provided by the Channel @@ -1213,9 +1309,11 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { /// Gets the list of pending events which were generated by previous actions, clearing the list /// in the process. /// - /// This is called by ChainMonitor::get_and_clear_pending_events() and is equivalent to - /// EventsProvider::get_and_clear_pending_events() except that it requires &mut self as we do - /// no internal locking in ChannelMonitors. + /// This is called by the [`EventsProvider::process_pending_events`] implementation for + /// [`ChainMonitor`]. + /// + /// [`EventsProvider::process_pending_events`]: crate::util::events::EventsProvider::process_pending_events + /// [`ChainMonitor`]: crate::chain::chainmonitor::ChainMonitor pub fn get_and_clear_pending_events(&self) -> Vec { self.inner.lock().unwrap().get_and_clear_pending_events() } @@ -1241,14 +1339,20 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { } /// Used by ChannelManager deserialization to broadcast the latest holder state if its copy of - /// the Channel was out-of-date. You may use it to get a broadcastable holder toxic tx in case of - /// fallen-behind, i.e when receiving a channel_reestablish with a proof that our counterparty side knows - /// a higher revocation secret than the holder commitment number we are aware of. Broadcasting these - /// transactions are UNSAFE, as they allow counterparty side to punish you. Nevertheless you may want to - /// broadcast them if counterparty don't close channel with his higher commitment transaction after a - /// substantial amount of time (a month or even a year) to get back funds. Best may be to contact - /// out-of-band the other node operator to coordinate with him if option is available to you. - /// In any-case, choice is up to the user. + /// the Channel was out-of-date. + /// + /// You may also use this to broadcast the latest local commitment transaction, either because + /// a monitor update failed with [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure`] or because we've + /// fallen behind (i.e. we've received proof that our counterparty side knows a revocation + /// secret we gave them that they shouldn't know). + /// + /// Broadcasting these transactions in the second case is UNSAFE, as they allow counterparty + /// side to punish you. Nevertheless you may want to broadcast them if counterparty doesn't + /// close channel with their commitment transaction after a substantial amount of time. Best + /// may be to contact the other node operator out-of-band to coordinate other options available + /// to you. In any-case, the choice is up to you. + /// + /// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure`]: super::ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::PermanentFailure pub fn get_latest_holder_commitment_txn(&self, logger: &L) -> Vec where L::Target: Logger { self.inner.lock().unwrap().get_latest_holder_commitment_txn(logger) @@ -1384,11 +1488,11 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { } /// Returns the set of txids that should be monitored for re-organization out of the chain. - pub fn get_relevant_txids(&self) -> Vec { + pub fn get_relevant_txids(&self) -> Vec<(Txid, Option)> { let inner = self.inner.lock().unwrap(); - let mut txids: Vec = inner.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf + let mut txids: Vec<(Txid, Option)> = inner.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf .iter() - .map(|entry| entry.txid) + .map(|entry| (entry.txid, entry.block_hash)) .chain(inner.onchain_tx_handler.get_relevant_txids().into_iter()) .collect(); txids.sort_unstable(); @@ -1401,7 +1505,155 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { pub fn current_best_block(&self) -> BestBlock { self.inner.lock().unwrap().best_block.clone() } +} + +impl ChannelMonitorImpl { + /// Helper for get_claimable_balances which does the work for an individual HTLC, generating up + /// to one `Balance` for the HTLC. + fn get_htlc_balance(&self, htlc: &HTLCOutputInCommitment, holder_commitment: bool, + counterparty_revoked_commitment: bool, confirmed_txid: Option) + -> Option { + let htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx = + if let Some(v) = htlc.transaction_output_index { v } else { return None; }; + + let mut htlc_spend_txid_opt = None; + let mut holder_timeout_spend_pending = None; + let mut htlc_spend_pending = None; + let mut holder_delayed_output_pending = None; + for event in self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter() { + match event.event { + OnchainEvent::HTLCUpdate { commitment_tx_output_idx, htlc_value_satoshis, .. } + if commitment_tx_output_idx == Some(htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx) => { + debug_assert!(htlc_spend_txid_opt.is_none()); + htlc_spend_txid_opt = event.transaction.as_ref().map(|tx| tx.txid()); + debug_assert!(holder_timeout_spend_pending.is_none()); + debug_assert_eq!(htlc_value_satoshis.unwrap(), htlc.amount_msat / 1000); + holder_timeout_spend_pending = Some(event.confirmation_threshold()); + }, + OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_output_idx, preimage, .. } + if commitment_tx_output_idx == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx => { + debug_assert!(htlc_spend_txid_opt.is_none()); + htlc_spend_txid_opt = event.transaction.as_ref().map(|tx| tx.txid()); + debug_assert!(htlc_spend_pending.is_none()); + htlc_spend_pending = Some((event.confirmation_threshold(), preimage.is_some())); + }, + OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput { + descriptor: SpendableOutputDescriptor::DelayedPaymentOutput(ref descriptor) } + if descriptor.outpoint.index as u32 == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx => { + debug_assert!(holder_delayed_output_pending.is_none()); + holder_delayed_output_pending = Some(event.confirmation_threshold()); + }, + _ => {}, + } + } + let htlc_resolved = self.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.iter() + .find(|v| if v.commitment_tx_output_idx == Some(htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx) { + debug_assert!(htlc_spend_txid_opt.is_none()); + htlc_spend_txid_opt = v.resolving_txid; + true + } else { false }); + debug_assert!(holder_timeout_spend_pending.is_some() as u8 + htlc_spend_pending.is_some() as u8 + htlc_resolved.is_some() as u8 <= 1); + + let htlc_output_to_spend = + if let Some(txid) = htlc_spend_txid_opt { + debug_assert!( + self.onchain_tx_handler.channel_transaction_parameters.opt_anchors.is_none(), + "This code needs updating for anchors"); + BitcoinOutPoint::new(txid, 0) + } else { + BitcoinOutPoint::new(confirmed_txid.unwrap(), htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx) + }; + let htlc_output_spend_pending = self.onchain_tx_handler.is_output_spend_pending(&htlc_output_to_spend); + + if let Some(conf_thresh) = holder_delayed_output_pending { + debug_assert!(holder_commitment); + return Some(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { + claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, + confirmation_height: conf_thresh, + }); + } else if htlc_resolved.is_some() && !htlc_output_spend_pending { + // Funding transaction spends should be fully confirmed by the time any + // HTLC transactions are resolved, unless we're talking about a holder + // commitment tx, whose resolution is delayed until the CSV timeout is + // reached, even though HTLCs may be resolved after only + // ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations. + debug_assert!(holder_commitment || self.funding_spend_confirmed.is_some()); + } else if counterparty_revoked_commitment { + let htlc_output_claim_pending = self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| { + if let OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput { + descriptor: SpendableOutputDescriptor::StaticOutput { .. } + } = &event.event { + if event.transaction.as_ref().map(|tx| tx.input.iter().any(|inp| { + if let Some(htlc_spend_txid) = htlc_spend_txid_opt { + Some(tx.txid()) == htlc_spend_txid_opt || + inp.previous_output.txid == htlc_spend_txid + } else { + Some(inp.previous_output.txid) == confirmed_txid && + inp.previous_output.vout == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx + } + })).unwrap_or(false) { + Some(()) + } else { None } + } else { None } + }); + if htlc_output_claim_pending.is_some() { + // We already push `Balance`s onto the `res` list for every + // `StaticOutput` in a `MaturingOutput` in the revoked + // counterparty commitment transaction case generally, so don't + // need to do so again here. + } else { + debug_assert!(holder_timeout_spend_pending.is_none(), + "HTLCUpdate OnchainEvents should never appear for preimage claims"); + debug_assert!(!htlc.offered || htlc_spend_pending.is_none() || !htlc_spend_pending.unwrap().1, + "We don't (currently) generate preimage claims against revoked outputs, where did you get one?!"); + return Some(Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { + claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, + }); + } + } else if htlc.offered == holder_commitment { + // If the payment was outbound, check if there's an HTLCUpdate + // indicating we have spent this HTLC with a timeout, claiming it back + // and awaiting confirmations on it. + if let Some(conf_thresh) = holder_timeout_spend_pending { + return Some(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { + claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, + confirmation_height: conf_thresh, + }); + } else { + return Some(Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC { + claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, + claimable_height: htlc.cltv_expiry, + }); + } + } else if self.payment_preimages.get(&htlc.payment_hash).is_some() { + // Otherwise (the payment was inbound), only expose it as claimable if + // we know the preimage. + // Note that if there is a pending claim, but it did not use the + // preimage, we lost funds to our counterparty! We will then continue + // to show it as ContentiousClaimable until ANTI_REORG_DELAY. + debug_assert!(holder_timeout_spend_pending.is_none()); + if let Some((conf_thresh, true)) = htlc_spend_pending { + return Some(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { + claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, + confirmation_height: conf_thresh, + }); + } else { + return Some(Balance::ContentiousClaimable { + claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, + timeout_height: htlc.cltv_expiry, + }); + } + } else if htlc_resolved.is_none() { + return Some(Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC { + claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, + expiry_height: htlc.cltv_expiry, + }); + } + None + } +} +impl ChannelMonitor { /// Gets the balances in this channel which are either claimable by us if we were to /// force-close the channel now or which are claimable on-chain (possibly awaiting /// confirmation). @@ -1411,9 +1663,9 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { /// balance, or until our counterparty has claimed the balance and accrued several /// confirmations on the claim transaction. /// - /// Note that the balances available when you or your counterparty have broadcasted revoked - /// state(s) may not be fully captured here. - // TODO, fix that ^ + /// Note that for `ChannelMonitors` which track a channel which went on-chain with versions of + /// LDK prior to 0.0.111, balances may not be fully captured if our counterparty broadcasted + /// a revoked state. /// /// See [`Balance`] for additional details on the types of claimable balances which /// may be returned here and their meanings. @@ -1422,9 +1674,13 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { let us = self.inner.lock().unwrap(); let mut confirmed_txid = us.funding_spend_confirmed; + let mut confirmed_counterparty_output = us.confirmed_commitment_tx_counterparty_output; let mut pending_commitment_tx_conf_thresh = None; let funding_spend_pending = us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| { - if let OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { .. } = event.event { + if let OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output, .. } = + event.event + { + confirmed_counterparty_output = commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output; Some((event.txid, event.confirmation_threshold())) } else { None } }); @@ -1436,71 +1692,12 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { } macro_rules! walk_htlcs { - ($holder_commitment: expr, $htlc_iter: expr) => { + ($holder_commitment: expr, $counterparty_revoked_commitment: expr, $htlc_iter: expr) => { for htlc in $htlc_iter { - if let Some(htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx) = htlc.transaction_output_index { - if let Some(conf_thresh) = us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| { - if let OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput { descriptor: SpendableOutputDescriptor::DelayedPaymentOutput(descriptor) } = &event.event { - if descriptor.outpoint.index as u32 == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx { Some(event.confirmation_threshold()) } else { None } - } else { None } - }) { - debug_assert!($holder_commitment); - res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { - claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, - confirmation_height: conf_thresh, - }); - } else if us.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.iter().any(|v| v.commitment_tx_output_idx == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx) { - // Funding transaction spends should be fully confirmed by the time any - // HTLC transactions are resolved, unless we're talking about a holder - // commitment tx, whose resolution is delayed until the CSV timeout is - // reached, even though HTLCs may be resolved after only - // ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations. - debug_assert!($holder_commitment || us.funding_spend_confirmed.is_some()); - } else if htlc.offered == $holder_commitment { - // If the payment was outbound, check if there's an HTLCUpdate - // indicating we have spent this HTLC with a timeout, claiming it back - // and awaiting confirmations on it. - let htlc_update_pending = us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| { - if let OnchainEvent::HTLCUpdate { commitment_tx_output_idx: Some(commitment_tx_output_idx), .. } = event.event { - if commitment_tx_output_idx == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx { - Some(event.confirmation_threshold()) } else { None } - } else { None } - }); - if let Some(conf_thresh) = htlc_update_pending { - res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { - claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, - confirmation_height: conf_thresh, - }); - } else { - res.push(Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout { - claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, - claimable_height: htlc.cltv_expiry, - }); - } - } else if us.payment_preimages.get(&htlc.payment_hash).is_some() { - // Otherwise (the payment was inbound), only expose it as claimable if - // we know the preimage. - // Note that if there is a pending claim, but it did not use the - // preimage, we lost funds to our counterparty! We will then continue - // to show it as ContentiousClaimable until ANTI_REORG_DELAY. - let htlc_spend_pending = us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| { - if let OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_output_idx, preimage, .. } = event.event { - if commitment_tx_output_idx == htlc_commitment_tx_output_idx { - Some((event.confirmation_threshold(), preimage.is_some())) - } else { None } - } else { None } - }); - if let Some((conf_thresh, true)) = htlc_spend_pending { - res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { - claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, - confirmation_height: conf_thresh, - }); - } else { - res.push(Balance::ContentiousClaimable { - claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, - timeout_height: htlc.cltv_expiry, - }); - } + if htlc.transaction_output_index.is_some() { + + if let Some(bal) = us.get_htlc_balance(htlc, $holder_commitment, $counterparty_revoked_commitment, confirmed_txid) { + res.push(bal); } } } @@ -1509,8 +1706,8 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { if let Some(txid) = confirmed_txid { let mut found_commitment_tx = false; - if Some(txid) == us.current_counterparty_commitment_txid || Some(txid) == us.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid { - walk_htlcs!(false, us.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid).unwrap().iter().map(|(a, _)| a)); + if let Some(counterparty_tx_htlcs) = us.counterparty_claimable_outpoints.get(&txid) { + // First look for the to_remote output back to us. if let Some(conf_thresh) = pending_commitment_tx_conf_thresh { if let Some(value) = us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find_map(|event| { if let OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput { @@ -1529,9 +1726,50 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { // confirmation with the same height or have never met our dust amount. } } + if Some(txid) == us.current_counterparty_commitment_txid || Some(txid) == us.prev_counterparty_commitment_txid { + walk_htlcs!(false, false, counterparty_tx_htlcs.iter().map(|(a, _)| a)); + } else { + walk_htlcs!(false, true, counterparty_tx_htlcs.iter().map(|(a, _)| a)); + // The counterparty broadcasted a revoked state! + // Look for any StaticOutputs first, generating claimable balances for those. + // If any match the confirmed counterparty revoked to_self output, skip + // generating a CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable. + let mut spent_counterparty_output = false; + for event in us.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter() { + if let OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput { + descriptor: SpendableOutputDescriptor::StaticOutput { output, .. } + } = &event.event { + res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { + claimable_amount_satoshis: output.value, + confirmation_height: event.confirmation_threshold(), + }); + if let Some(confirmed_to_self_idx) = confirmed_counterparty_output.map(|(idx, _)| idx) { + if event.transaction.as_ref().map(|tx| + tx.input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.vout == confirmed_to_self_idx) + ).unwrap_or(false) { + spent_counterparty_output = true; + } + } + } + } + + if spent_counterparty_output { + } else if let Some((confirmed_to_self_idx, amt)) = confirmed_counterparty_output { + let output_spendable = us.onchain_tx_handler + .is_output_spend_pending(&BitcoinOutPoint::new(txid, confirmed_to_self_idx)); + if output_spendable { + res.push(Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { + claimable_amount_satoshis: amt, + }); + } + } else { + // Counterparty output is missing, either it was broadcasted on a + // previous version of LDK or the counterparty hadn't met dust. + } + } found_commitment_tx = true; } else if txid == us.current_holder_commitment_tx.txid { - walk_htlcs!(true, us.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|(a, _, _)| a)); + walk_htlcs!(true, false, us.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|(a, _, _)| a)); if let Some(conf_thresh) = pending_commitment_tx_conf_thresh { res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { claimable_amount_satoshis: us.current_holder_commitment_tx.to_self_value_sat, @@ -1541,7 +1779,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { found_commitment_tx = true; } else if let Some(prev_commitment) = &us.prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx { if txid == prev_commitment.txid { - walk_htlcs!(true, prev_commitment.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|(a, _, _)| a)); + walk_htlcs!(true, false, prev_commitment.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|(a, _, _)| a)); if let Some(conf_thresh) = pending_commitment_tx_conf_thresh { res.push(Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { claimable_amount_satoshis: prev_commitment.to_self_value_sat, @@ -1562,19 +1800,24 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { }); } } - // TODO: Add logic to provide claimable balances for counterparty broadcasting revoked - // outputs. } else { let mut claimable_inbound_htlc_value_sat = 0; for (htlc, _, _) in us.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter() { if htlc.transaction_output_index.is_none() { continue; } if htlc.offered { - res.push(Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout { + res.push(Balance::MaybeTimeoutClaimableHTLC { claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, claimable_height: htlc.cltv_expiry, }); } else if us.payment_preimages.get(&htlc.payment_hash).is_some() { claimable_inbound_htlc_value_sat += htlc.amount_msat / 1000; + } else { + // As long as the HTLC is still in our latest commitment state, treat + // it as potentially claimable, even if it has long-since expired. + res.push(Balance::MaybePreimageClaimableHTLC { + claimable_amount_satoshis: htlc.amount_msat / 1000, + expiry_height: htlc.cltv_expiry, + }); } } res.push(Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose { @@ -1594,7 +1837,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { macro_rules! walk_htlcs { ($holder_commitment: expr, $htlc_iter: expr) => { for (htlc, source) in $htlc_iter { - if us.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.iter().any(|v| Some(v.commitment_tx_output_idx) == htlc.transaction_output_index) { + if us.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.iter().any(|v| v.commitment_tx_output_idx == htlc.transaction_output_index) { // We should assert that funding_spend_confirmed is_some() here, but we // have some unit tests which violate HTLC transaction CSVs entirely and // would fail. @@ -1702,7 +1945,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { /// been revoked yet, the previous one, we we will never "forget" to resolve an HTLC. macro_rules! fail_unbroadcast_htlcs { ($self: expr, $commitment_tx_type: expr, $commitment_txid_confirmed: expr, $commitment_tx_confirmed: expr, - $commitment_tx_conf_height: expr, $confirmed_htlcs_list: expr, $logger: expr) => { { + $commitment_tx_conf_height: expr, $commitment_tx_conf_hash: expr, $confirmed_htlcs_list: expr, $logger: expr) => { { debug_assert_eq!($commitment_tx_confirmed.txid(), $commitment_txid_confirmed); macro_rules! check_htlc_fails { @@ -1746,6 +1989,7 @@ macro_rules! fail_unbroadcast_htlcs { txid: $commitment_txid_confirmed, transaction: Some($commitment_tx_confirmed.clone()), height: $commitment_tx_conf_height, + block_hash: Some(*$commitment_tx_conf_hash), event: OnchainEvent::HTLCUpdate { source: (**source).clone(), payment_hash: htlc.payment_hash.clone(), @@ -1933,7 +2177,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { macro_rules! claim_htlcs { ($commitment_number: expr, $txid: expr) => { let (htlc_claim_reqs, _) = self.get_counterparty_output_claim_info($commitment_number, $txid, None); - self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view(&Vec::new(), htlc_claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger); + self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_requests(htlc_claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger); } } if let Some(txid) = self.current_counterparty_commitment_txid { @@ -1959,10 +2203,10 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { // block. Even if not, its a reasonable metric for the bump criteria on the HTLC // transactions. let (claim_reqs, _) = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, self.best_block.height()); - self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view(&Vec::new(), claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger); + self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_requests(claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger); if let Some(ref tx) = self.prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx { let (claim_reqs, _) = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&tx, self.best_block.height()); - self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view(&Vec::new(), claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger); + self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_requests(claim_reqs, self.best_block.height(), self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger); } } } @@ -2002,6 +2246,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { panic!("Attempted to apply ChannelMonitorUpdates out of order, check the update_id before passing an update to update_monitor!"); } let mut ret = Ok(()); + let bounded_fee_estimator = LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&*fee_estimator); for update in updates.updates.iter() { match update { ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::LatestHolderCommitmentTXInfo { commitment_tx, htlc_outputs } => { @@ -2019,7 +2264,6 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { }, ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::PaymentPreimage { payment_preimage } => { log_trace!(logger, "Updating ChannelMonitor with payment preimage"); - let bounded_fee_estimator = LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&*fee_estimator); self.provide_payment_preimage(&PaymentHash(Sha256::hash(&payment_preimage.0[..]).into_inner()), &payment_preimage, broadcaster, &bounded_fee_estimator, logger) }, ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::CommitmentSecret { idx, secret } => { @@ -2035,8 +2279,29 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { self.lockdown_from_offchain = true; if *should_broadcast { self.broadcast_latest_holder_commitment_txn(broadcaster, logger); + // If the channel supports anchor outputs, we'll need to emit an external + // event to be consumed such that a child transaction is broadcast with a + // high enough feerate for the parent commitment transaction to confirm. + if self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors() { + let funding_output = HolderFundingOutput::build( + self.funding_redeemscript.clone(), self.channel_value_satoshis, + self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors(), + ); + let best_block_height = self.best_block.height(); + let commitment_package = PackageTemplate::build_package( + self.funding_info.0.txid.clone(), self.funding_info.0.index as u32, + PackageSolvingData::HolderFundingOutput(funding_output), + best_block_height, false, best_block_height, + ); + self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_requests( + vec![commitment_package], best_block_height, best_block_height, + broadcaster, &bounded_fee_estimator, logger, + ); + } } else if !self.holder_tx_signed { - log_error!(logger, "You have a toxic holder commitment transaction avaible in channel monitor, read comment in ChannelMonitor::get_latest_holder_commitment_txn to be informed of manual action to take"); + log_error!(logger, "WARNING: You have a potentially-unsafe holder commitment transaction available to broadcast"); + log_error!(logger, " in channel monitor for channel {}!", log_bytes!(self.funding_info.0.to_channel_id())); + log_error!(logger, " Read the docs for ChannelMonitor::get_latest_holder_commitment_txn and take manual action!"); } else { // If we generated a MonitorEvent::CommitmentTxConfirmed, the ChannelManager // will still give us a ChannelForceClosed event with !should_broadcast, but we @@ -2087,6 +2352,34 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { pub fn get_and_clear_pending_events(&mut self) -> Vec { let mut ret = Vec::new(); mem::swap(&mut ret, &mut self.pending_events); + #[cfg(anchors)] + for claim_event in self.onchain_tx_handler.get_and_clear_pending_claim_events().drain(..) { + match claim_event { + ClaimEvent::BumpCommitment { + package_target_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight, commitment_tx, anchor_output_idx, + } => { + let commitment_txid = commitment_tx.txid(); + debug_assert_eq!(self.current_holder_commitment_tx.txid, commitment_txid); + let pending_htlcs = self.current_holder_commitment_tx.non_dust_htlcs(); + let commitment_tx_fee_satoshis = self.channel_value_satoshis - + commitment_tx.output.iter().fold(0u64, |sum, output| sum + output.value); + ret.push(Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::ChannelClose { + package_target_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight, + commitment_tx, + commitment_tx_fee_satoshis, + anchor_descriptor: AnchorDescriptor { + channel_keys_id: self.channel_keys_id, + channel_value_satoshis: self.channel_value_satoshis, + outpoint: BitcoinOutPoint { + txid: commitment_txid, + vout: anchor_output_idx, + }, + }, + pending_htlcs, + })); + }, + } + } ret } @@ -2115,7 +2408,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { /// Returns packages to claim the revoked output(s), as well as additional outputs to watch and /// general information about the output that is to the counterparty in the commitment /// transaction. - fn check_spend_counterparty_transaction(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, logger: &L) + fn check_spend_counterparty_transaction(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, block_hash: &BlockHash, logger: &L) -> (Vec, TransactionOutputs, CommitmentTxCounterpartyOutputInfo) where L::Target: Logger { // Most secp and related errors trying to create keys means we have no hope of constructing @@ -2186,13 +2479,13 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { if let Some(per_commitment_data) = per_commitment_option { fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "revoked_counterparty", commitment_txid, tx, height, - per_commitment_data.iter().map(|(htlc, htlc_source)| + block_hash, per_commitment_data.iter().map(|(htlc, htlc_source)| (htlc, htlc_source.as_ref().map(|htlc_source| htlc_source.as_ref())) ), logger); } else { debug_assert!(false, "We should have per-commitment option for any recognized old commitment txn"); fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "revoked counterparty", commitment_txid, tx, height, - [].iter().map(|reference| *reference), logger); + block_hash, [].iter().map(|reference| *reference), logger); } } } else if let Some(per_commitment_data) = per_commitment_option { @@ -2209,7 +2502,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { self.counterparty_commitment_txn_on_chain.insert(commitment_txid, commitment_number); log_info!(logger, "Got broadcast of non-revoked counterparty commitment transaction {}", commitment_txid); - fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "counterparty", commitment_txid, tx, height, + fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "counterparty", commitment_txid, tx, height, block_hash, per_commitment_data.iter().map(|(htlc, htlc_source)| (htlc, htlc_source.as_ref().map(|htlc_source| htlc_source.as_ref())) ), logger); @@ -2299,13 +2592,13 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { CounterpartyOfferedHTLCOutput::build(*per_commitment_point, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_htlc_base_key, - preimage.unwrap(), htlc.clone())) + preimage.unwrap(), htlc.clone(), self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors())) } else { PackageSolvingData::CounterpartyReceivedHTLCOutput( CounterpartyReceivedHTLCOutput::build(*per_commitment_point, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_htlc_base_key, - htlc.clone())) + htlc.clone(), self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors())) }; let aggregation = if !htlc.offered { false } else { true }; let counterparty_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(commitment_txid, transaction_output_index, counterparty_htlc_outp, htlc.cltv_expiry,aggregation, 0); @@ -2345,7 +2638,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { (claimable_outpoints, Some((htlc_txid, outputs))) } - // Returns (1) `PackageTemplate`s that can be given to the OnChainTxHandler, so that the handler can + // Returns (1) `PackageTemplate`s that can be given to the OnchainTxHandler, so that the handler can // broadcast transactions claiming holder HTLC commitment outputs and (2) a holder revokable // script so we can detect whether a holder transaction has been seen on-chain. fn get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&self, holder_tx: &HolderSignedTx, conf_height: u32) -> (Vec, Option<(Script, PublicKey, PublicKey)>) { @@ -2390,7 +2683,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { /// revoked using data in holder_claimable_outpoints. /// Should not be used if check_spend_revoked_transaction succeeds. /// Returns None unless the transaction is definitely one of our commitment transactions. - fn check_spend_holder_transaction(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, logger: &L) -> Option<(Vec, TransactionOutputs)> where L::Target: Logger { + fn check_spend_holder_transaction(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, block_hash: &BlockHash, logger: &L) -> Option<(Vec, TransactionOutputs)> where L::Target: Logger { let commitment_txid = tx.txid(); let mut claim_requests = Vec::new(); let mut watch_outputs = Vec::new(); @@ -2413,7 +2706,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { let mut to_watch = self.get_broadcasted_holder_watch_outputs(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, tx); append_onchain_update!(res, to_watch); fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "latest holder", commitment_txid, tx, height, - self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter() + block_hash, self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter() .map(|(htlc, _, htlc_source)| (htlc, htlc_source.as_ref())), logger); } else if let &Some(ref holder_tx) = &self.prev_holder_signed_commitment_tx { if holder_tx.txid == commitment_txid { @@ -2422,7 +2715,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { let res = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(holder_tx, height); let mut to_watch = self.get_broadcasted_holder_watch_outputs(holder_tx, tx); append_onchain_update!(res, to_watch); - fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "previous holder", commitment_txid, tx, height, + fail_unbroadcast_htlcs!(self, "previous holder", commitment_txid, tx, height, block_hash, holder_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|(htlc, _, htlc_source)| (htlc, htlc_source.as_ref())), logger); } @@ -2441,6 +2734,11 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { let commitment_tx = self.onchain_tx_handler.get_fully_signed_holder_tx(&self.funding_redeemscript); let txid = commitment_tx.txid(); let mut holder_transactions = vec![commitment_tx]; + // When anchor outputs are present, the HTLC transactions are only valid once the commitment + // transaction confirms. + if self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors() { + return holder_transactions; + } for htlc in self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter() { if let Some(vout) = htlc.0.transaction_output_index { let preimage = if !htlc.0.offered { @@ -2474,6 +2772,11 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { let commitment_tx = self.onchain_tx_handler.get_fully_signed_copy_holder_tx(&self.funding_redeemscript); let txid = commitment_tx.txid(); let mut holder_transactions = vec![commitment_tx]; + // When anchor outputs are present, the HTLC transactions are only final once the commitment + // transaction confirms due to the CSV 1 encumberance. + if self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors() { + return holder_transactions; + } for htlc in self.current_holder_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter() { if let Some(vout) = htlc.0.transaction_output_index { let preimage = if !htlc.0.offered { @@ -2520,7 +2823,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { if height > self.best_block.height() { self.best_block = BestBlock::new(block_hash, height); - self.block_confirmed(height, vec![], vec![], vec![], &broadcaster, &fee_estimator, &logger) + self.block_confirmed(height, block_hash, vec![], vec![], vec![], &broadcaster, &fee_estimator, &logger) } else if block_hash != self.best_block.block_hash() { self.best_block = BestBlock::new(block_hash, height); self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.retain(|ref entry| entry.height <= height); @@ -2572,14 +2875,14 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { let mut commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output = None; if (tx.input[0].sequence.0 >> 8*3) as u8 == 0x80 && (tx.lock_time.0 >> 8*3) as u8 == 0x20 { let (mut new_outpoints, new_outputs, counterparty_output_idx_sats) = - self.check_spend_counterparty_transaction(&tx, height, &logger); + self.check_spend_counterparty_transaction(&tx, height, &block_hash, &logger); commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output = counterparty_output_idx_sats; if !new_outputs.1.is_empty() { watch_outputs.push(new_outputs); } claimable_outpoints.append(&mut new_outpoints); if new_outpoints.is_empty() { - if let Some((mut new_outpoints, new_outputs)) = self.check_spend_holder_transaction(&tx, height, &logger) { + if let Some((mut new_outpoints, new_outputs)) = self.check_spend_holder_transaction(&tx, height, &block_hash, &logger) { debug_assert!(commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output.is_none(), "A commitment transaction matched as both a counterparty and local commitment tx?"); if !new_outputs.1.is_empty() { @@ -2594,7 +2897,8 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.push(OnchainEventEntry { txid, transaction: Some((*tx).clone()), - height: height, + height, + block_hash: Some(block_hash), event: OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { on_local_output_csv: balance_spendable_csv, commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output, @@ -2613,28 +2917,30 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { // While all commitment/HTLC-Success/HTLC-Timeout transactions have one input, HTLCs // can also be resolved in a few other ways which can have more than one output. Thus, // we call is_resolving_htlc_output here outside of the tx.input.len() == 1 check. - self.is_resolving_htlc_output(&tx, height, &logger); + self.is_resolving_htlc_output(&tx, height, &block_hash, &logger); - self.is_paying_spendable_output(&tx, height, &logger); + self.is_paying_spendable_output(&tx, height, &block_hash, &logger); } if height > self.best_block.height() { self.best_block = BestBlock::new(block_hash, height); } - self.block_confirmed(height, txn_matched, watch_outputs, claimable_outpoints, &broadcaster, &fee_estimator, &logger) + self.block_confirmed(height, block_hash, txn_matched, watch_outputs, claimable_outpoints, &broadcaster, &fee_estimator, &logger) } /// Update state for new block(s)/transaction(s) confirmed. Note that the caller must update /// `self.best_block` before calling if a new best blockchain tip is available. More /// concretely, `self.best_block` must never be at a lower height than `conf_height`, avoiding - /// complexity especially in `OnchainTx::update_claims_view`. + /// complexity especially in + /// `OnchainTx::update_claims_view_from_requests`/`OnchainTx::update_claims_view_from_matched_txn`. /// /// `conf_height` should be set to the height at which any new transaction(s)/block(s) were /// confirmed at, even if it is not the current best height. fn block_confirmed( &mut self, conf_height: u32, + conf_hash: BlockHash, txn_matched: Vec<&Transaction>, mut watch_outputs: Vec, mut claimable_outpoints: Vec, @@ -2652,21 +2958,26 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { let should_broadcast = self.should_broadcast_holder_commitment_txn(logger); if should_broadcast { - let funding_outp = HolderFundingOutput::build(self.funding_redeemscript.clone()); + let funding_outp = HolderFundingOutput::build(self.funding_redeemscript.clone(), self.channel_value_satoshis, self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors()); let commitment_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(self.funding_info.0.txid.clone(), self.funding_info.0.index as u32, PackageSolvingData::HolderFundingOutput(funding_outp), self.best_block.height(), false, self.best_block.height()); claimable_outpoints.push(commitment_package); self.pending_monitor_events.push(MonitorEvent::CommitmentTxConfirmed(self.funding_info.0)); let commitment_tx = self.onchain_tx_handler.get_fully_signed_holder_tx(&self.funding_redeemscript); self.holder_tx_signed = true; - // Because we're broadcasting a commitment transaction, we should construct the package - // assuming it gets confirmed in the next block. Sadly, we have code which considers - // "not yet confirmed" things as discardable, so we cannot do that here. - let (mut new_outpoints, _) = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, self.best_block.height()); - let new_outputs = self.get_broadcasted_holder_watch_outputs(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, &commitment_tx); - if !new_outputs.is_empty() { - watch_outputs.push((self.current_holder_commitment_tx.txid.clone(), new_outputs)); + // We can't broadcast our HTLC transactions while the commitment transaction is + // unconfirmed. We'll delay doing so until we detect the confirmed commitment in + // `transactions_confirmed`. + if !self.onchain_tx_handler.opt_anchors() { + // Because we're broadcasting a commitment transaction, we should construct the package + // assuming it gets confirmed in the next block. Sadly, we have code which considers + // "not yet confirmed" things as discardable, so we cannot do that here. + let (mut new_outpoints, _) = self.get_broadcasted_holder_claims(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, self.best_block.height()); + let new_outputs = self.get_broadcasted_holder_watch_outputs(&self.current_holder_commitment_tx, &commitment_tx); + if !new_outputs.is_empty() { + watch_outputs.push((self.current_holder_commitment_tx.txid.clone(), new_outputs)); + } + claimable_outpoints.append(&mut new_outpoints); } - claimable_outpoints.append(&mut new_outpoints); } // Find which on-chain events have reached their confirmation threshold. @@ -2721,9 +3032,10 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { source: source.clone(), htlc_value_satoshis, })); - if let Some(idx) = commitment_tx_output_idx { - self.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.push(IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC { commitment_tx_output_idx: idx, payment_preimage: None }); - } + self.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.push(IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC { + commitment_tx_output_idx, resolving_txid: Some(entry.txid), + payment_preimage: None, + }); }, OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput { descriptor } => { log_debug!(logger, "Descriptor {} has got enough confirmations to be passed upstream", log_spendable!(descriptor)); @@ -2732,7 +3044,10 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { }); }, OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_output_idx, preimage, .. } => { - self.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.push(IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC { commitment_tx_output_idx, payment_preimage: preimage }); + self.htlcs_resolved_on_chain.push(IrrevocablyResolvedHTLC { + commitment_tx_output_idx: Some(commitment_tx_output_idx), resolving_txid: Some(entry.txid), + payment_preimage: preimage, + }); }, OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_to_counterparty_output, .. } => { self.funding_spend_confirmed = Some(entry.txid); @@ -2741,7 +3056,8 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { } } - self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view(&txn_matched, claimable_outpoints, conf_height, self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger); + self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_requests(claimable_outpoints, conf_height, self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger); + self.onchain_tx_handler.update_claims_view_from_matched_txn(&txn_matched, conf_height, conf_hash, self.best_block.height(), broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger); // Determine new outputs to watch by comparing against previously known outputs to watch, // updating the latter in the process. @@ -2795,10 +3111,24 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { F::Target: FeeEstimator, L::Target: Logger, { - self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.retain(|ref entry| if entry.txid == *txid { - log_info!(logger, "Removing onchain event with txid {}", txid); - false - } else { true }); + let mut removed_height = None; + for entry in self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter() { + if entry.txid == *txid { + removed_height = Some(entry.height); + break; + } + } + + if let Some(removed_height) = removed_height { + log_info!(logger, "transaction_unconfirmed of txid {} implies height {} was reorg'd out", txid, removed_height); + self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.retain(|ref entry| if entry.height >= removed_height { + log_info!(logger, "Transaction {} reorg'd out", entry.txid); + false + } else { true }); + } + + debug_assert!(!self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().any(|ref entry| entry.txid == *txid)); + self.onchain_tx_handler.transaction_unconfirmed(txid, broadcaster, fee_estimator, logger); } @@ -2855,6 +3185,16 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { } fn should_broadcast_holder_commitment_txn(&self, logger: &L) -> bool where L::Target: Logger { + // There's no need to broadcast our commitment transaction if we've seen one confirmed (even + // with 1 confirmation) as it'll be rejected as duplicate/conflicting. + if self.funding_spend_confirmed.is_some() || + self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.iter().find(|event| match event.event { + OnchainEvent::FundingSpendConfirmation { .. } => true, + _ => false, + }).is_some() + { + return false; + } // We need to consider all HTLCs which are: // * in any unrevoked counterparty commitment transaction, as they could broadcast said // transactions and we'd end up in a race, or @@ -2920,28 +3260,20 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { /// Check if any transaction broadcasted is resolving HTLC output by a success or timeout on a holder /// or counterparty commitment tx, if so send back the source, preimage if found and payment_hash of resolved HTLC - fn is_resolving_htlc_output(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, logger: &L) where L::Target: Logger { + fn is_resolving_htlc_output(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, block_hash: &BlockHash, logger: &L) where L::Target: Logger { 'outer_loop: for input in &tx.input { let mut payment_data = None; - let witness_items = input.witness.len(); - let htlctype = input.witness.last().map(|w| w.len()).and_then(HTLCType::scriptlen_to_htlctype); - let prev_last_witness_len = input.witness.second_to_last().map(|w| w.len()).unwrap_or(0); - let revocation_sig_claim = (witness_items == 3 && htlctype == Some(HTLCType::OfferedHTLC) && prev_last_witness_len == 33) - || (witness_items == 3 && htlctype == Some(HTLCType::AcceptedHTLC) && prev_last_witness_len == 33); - let accepted_preimage_claim = witness_items == 5 && htlctype == Some(HTLCType::AcceptedHTLC) - && input.witness.second_to_last().unwrap().len() == 32; + let htlc_claim = HTLCClaim::from_witness(&input.witness); + let revocation_sig_claim = htlc_claim == Some(HTLCClaim::Revocation); + let accepted_preimage_claim = htlc_claim == Some(HTLCClaim::AcceptedPreimage); #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] - let accepted_timeout_claim = witness_items == 3 && htlctype == Some(HTLCType::AcceptedHTLC) && !revocation_sig_claim; - let offered_preimage_claim = witness_items == 3 && htlctype == Some(HTLCType::OfferedHTLC) && - !revocation_sig_claim && input.witness.second_to_last().unwrap().len() == 32; - + let accepted_timeout_claim = htlc_claim == Some(HTLCClaim::AcceptedTimeout); + let offered_preimage_claim = htlc_claim == Some(HTLCClaim::OfferedPreimage); #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] - let offered_timeout_claim = witness_items == 5 && htlctype == Some(HTLCType::OfferedHTLC); + let offered_timeout_claim = htlc_claim == Some(HTLCClaim::OfferedTimeout); let mut payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([0; 32]); - if accepted_preimage_claim { - payment_preimage.0.copy_from_slice(input.witness.second_to_last().unwrap()); - } else if offered_preimage_claim { + if offered_preimage_claim || accepted_preimage_claim { payment_preimage.0.copy_from_slice(input.witness.second_to_last().unwrap()); } @@ -2965,7 +3297,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { log_error!(logger, "Input spending {} ({}:{}) in {} resolves {} HTLC with payment hash {} with {}!", $tx_info, input.previous_output.txid, input.previous_output.vout, tx.txid(), if outbound_htlc { "outbound" } else { "inbound" }, log_bytes!($htlc.payment_hash.0), - if revocation_sig_claim { "revocation sig" } else { "preimage claim after we'd passed the HTLC resolution back" }); + if revocation_sig_claim { "revocation sig" } else { "preimage claim after we'd passed the HTLC resolution back. We can likely claim the HTLC output with a revocation claim" }); } else { log_info!(logger, "Input spending {} ({}:{}) in {} resolves {} HTLC with payment hash {} with {}", $tx_info, input.previous_output.txid, input.previous_output.vout, tx.txid(), @@ -3012,29 +3344,20 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { if payment_data.is_none() { log_claim!($tx_info, $holder_tx, htlc_output, false); let outbound_htlc = $holder_tx == htlc_output.offered; - if !outbound_htlc || revocation_sig_claim { - self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.push(OnchainEventEntry { - txid: tx.txid(), height, transaction: Some(tx.clone()), - event: OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation { - commitment_tx_output_idx: input.previous_output.vout, - preimage: if accepted_preimage_claim || offered_preimage_claim { - Some(payment_preimage) } else { None }, - // If this is a payment to us (!outbound_htlc, above), - // wait for the CSV delay before dropping the HTLC from - // claimable balance if the claim was an HTLC-Success - // transaction. - on_to_local_output_csv: if accepted_preimage_claim { - Some(self.on_holder_tx_csv) } else { None }, - }, - }); - } else { - // Outbound claims should always have payment_data, unless - // we've already failed the HTLC as the commitment transaction - // which was broadcasted was revoked. In that case, we should - // spend the HTLC output here immediately, and expose that fact - // as a Balance, something which we do not yet do. - // TODO: Track the above as claimable! - } + self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.push(OnchainEventEntry { + txid: tx.txid(), height, block_hash: Some(*block_hash), transaction: Some(tx.clone()), + event: OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation { + commitment_tx_output_idx: input.previous_output.vout, + preimage: if accepted_preimage_claim || offered_preimage_claim { + Some(payment_preimage) } else { None }, + // If this is a payment to us (ie !outbound_htlc), wait for + // the CSV delay before dropping the HTLC from claimable + // balance if the claim was an HTLC-Success transaction (ie + // accepted_preimage_claim). + on_to_local_output_csv: if accepted_preimage_claim && !outbound_htlc { + Some(self.on_holder_tx_csv) } else { None }, + }, + }); continue 'outer_loop; } } @@ -3066,6 +3389,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { self.onchain_events_awaiting_threshold_conf.push(OnchainEventEntry { txid: tx.txid(), height, + block_hash: Some(*block_hash), transaction: Some(tx.clone()), event: OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_output_idx: input.previous_output.vout, @@ -3089,6 +3413,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { txid: tx.txid(), transaction: Some(tx.clone()), height, + block_hash: Some(*block_hash), event: OnchainEvent::HTLCSpendConfirmation { commitment_tx_output_idx: input.previous_output.vout, preimage: Some(payment_preimage), @@ -3116,6 +3441,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { txid: tx.txid(), transaction: Some(tx.clone()), height, + block_hash: Some(*block_hash), event: OnchainEvent::HTLCUpdate { source, payment_hash, htlc_value_satoshis: Some(amount_msat / 1000), @@ -3130,7 +3456,7 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { } /// Check if any transaction broadcasted is paying fund back to some address we can assume to own - fn is_paying_spendable_output(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, logger: &L) where L::Target: Logger { + fn is_paying_spendable_output(&mut self, tx: &Transaction, height: u32, block_hash: &BlockHash, logger: &L) where L::Target: Logger { let mut spendable_output = None; for (i, outp) in tx.output.iter().enumerate() { // There is max one spendable output for any channel tx, including ones generated by us if i > ::core::u16::MAX as usize { @@ -3189,7 +3515,8 @@ impl ChannelMonitorImpl { let entry = OnchainEventEntry { txid: tx.txid(), transaction: Some(tx.clone()), - height: height, + height, + block_hash: Some(*block_hash), event: OnchainEvent::MaturingOutput { descriptor: spendable_output.clone() }, }; log_info!(logger, "Received spendable output {}, spendable at height {}", log_spendable!(spendable_output), entry.confirmation_threshold()); @@ -3231,7 +3558,7 @@ where self.0.best_block_updated(header, height, &*self.1, &*self.2, &*self.3); } - fn get_relevant_txids(&self) -> Vec { + fn get_relevant_txids(&self) -> Vec<(Txid, Option)> { self.0.get_relevant_txids() } } @@ -3539,27 +3866,26 @@ mod tests { use crate::chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator; use super::ChannelMonitorUpdateStep; - use ::{check_added_monitors, check_closed_broadcast, check_closed_event, check_spends, get_local_commitment_txn, get_monitor, get_route_and_payment_hash, unwrap_send_err}; - use chain::{BestBlock, Confirm}; - use chain::channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor; - use chain::package::{weight_offered_htlc, weight_received_htlc, weight_revoked_offered_htlc, weight_revoked_received_htlc, WEIGHT_REVOKED_OUTPUT}; - use chain::transaction::OutPoint; - use chain::keysinterface::InMemorySigner; - use ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash}; - use ln::chan_utils; - use ln::chan_utils::{HTLCOutputInCommitment, ChannelPublicKeys, ChannelTransactionParameters, HolderCommitmentTransaction, CounterpartyChannelTransactionParameters}; - use ln::channelmanager::PaymentSendFailure; - use ln::features::InitFeatures; - use ln::functional_test_utils::*; - use ln::script::ShutdownScript; - use util::errors::APIError; - use util::events::{ClosureReason, MessageSendEventsProvider}; - use util::test_utils::{TestLogger, TestBroadcaster, TestFeeEstimator}; - use util::ser::{ReadableArgs, Writeable}; - use sync::{Arc, Mutex}; - use io; + use crate::{check_added_monitors, check_closed_broadcast, check_closed_event, check_spends, get_local_commitment_txn, get_monitor, get_route_and_payment_hash, unwrap_send_err}; + use crate::chain::{BestBlock, Confirm}; + use crate::chain::channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor; + use crate::chain::package::{weight_offered_htlc, weight_received_htlc, weight_revoked_offered_htlc, weight_revoked_received_htlc, WEIGHT_REVOKED_OUTPUT}; + use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint; + use crate::chain::keysinterface::InMemorySigner; + use crate::ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash}; + use crate::ln::chan_utils; + use crate::ln::chan_utils::{HTLCOutputInCommitment, ChannelPublicKeys, ChannelTransactionParameters, HolderCommitmentTransaction, CounterpartyChannelTransactionParameters}; + use crate::ln::channelmanager::{self, PaymentSendFailure, PaymentId}; + use crate::ln::functional_test_utils::*; + use crate::ln::script::ShutdownScript; + use crate::util::errors::APIError; + use crate::util::events::{ClosureReason, MessageSendEventsProvider}; + use crate::util::test_utils::{TestLogger, TestBroadcaster, TestFeeEstimator}; + use crate::util::ser::{ReadableArgs, Writeable}; + use crate::sync::{Arc, Mutex}; + use crate::io; use bitcoin::{PackedLockTime, Sequence, TxMerkleNode, Witness}; - use prelude::*; + use crate::prelude::*; fn do_test_funding_spend_refuses_updates(use_local_txn: bool) { // Previously, monitor updates were allowed freely even after a funding-spend transaction @@ -3578,9 +3904,9 @@ mod tests { let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]); let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); let channel = create_announced_chan_between_nodes( - &nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + &nodes, 0, 1, channelmanager::provided_init_features(), channelmanager::provided_init_features()); create_announced_chan_between_nodes( - &nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + &nodes, 1, 2, channelmanager::provided_init_features(), channelmanager::provided_init_features()); // Rebalance somewhat send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 10_000_000); @@ -3614,7 +3940,7 @@ mod tests { // If the ChannelManager tries to update the channel, however, the ChainMonitor will pass // the update through to the ChannelMonitor which will refuse it (as the channel is closed). let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 100_000); - unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert!(err.contains("ChannelMonitor storage failure"))); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2); // After the failure we generate a close-channel monitor update