X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fdebug_sync.rs;h=b7466776a6e70f0f7720fdcadd3ade48a945089c;hb=2e7d924d9ba7255e787c6fff1f38e39dc8c9a0e8;hp=b31ceacea15852def4203b037d8e36216094f5c4;hpb=cb1d795559611929264a1f5fa16a76283df5f2b4;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/debug_sync.rs b/lightning/src/debug_sync.rs index b31ceace..b7466776 100644 --- a/lightning/src/debug_sync.rs +++ b/lightning/src/debug_sync.rs @@ -2,11 +2,9 @@ pub use ::alloc::sync::Arc; use core::ops::{Deref, DerefMut}; use core::time::Duration; -use std::collections::HashSet; use std::cell::RefCell; use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering}; - use std::sync::Mutex as StdMutex; use std::sync::MutexGuard as StdMutexGuard; use std::sync::RwLock as StdRwLock; @@ -14,8 +12,15 @@ use std::sync::RwLockReadGuard as StdRwLockReadGuard; use std::sync::RwLockWriteGuard as StdRwLockWriteGuard; use std::sync::Condvar as StdCondvar; +use prelude::HashMap; + #[cfg(feature = "backtrace")] -use backtrace::Backtrace; +use {prelude::hash_map, backtrace::Backtrace, std::sync::Once}; + +#[cfg(not(feature = "backtrace"))] +struct Backtrace{} +#[cfg(not(feature = "backtrace"))] +impl Backtrace { fn new() -> Backtrace { Backtrace {} } } pub type LockResult = Result; @@ -44,34 +49,77 @@ impl Condvar { thread_local! { /// We track the set of locks currently held by a reference to their `LockMetadata` - static LOCKS_HELD: RefCell>> = RefCell::new(HashSet::new()); + static LOCKS_HELD: RefCell>> = RefCell::new(HashMap::new()); } static LOCK_IDX: AtomicUsize = AtomicUsize::new(0); +#[cfg(feature = "backtrace")] +static mut LOCKS: Option>>> = None; +#[cfg(feature = "backtrace")] +static LOCKS_INIT: Once = Once::new(); + /// Metadata about a single lock, by id, the set of things locked-before it, and the backtrace of /// when the Mutex itself was constructed. struct LockMetadata { lock_idx: u64, - locked_before: StdMutex>>, - #[cfg(feature = "backtrace")] - lock_construction_bt: Backtrace, + locked_before: StdMutex>, + _lock_construction_bt: Backtrace, } -impl PartialEq for LockMetadata { - fn eq(&self, o: &LockMetadata) -> bool { self.lock_idx == o.lock_idx } + +struct LockDep { + lock: Arc, + /// lockdep_trace is unused unless we're building with `backtrace`, so we mark it _ + _lockdep_trace: Backtrace, } -impl Eq for LockMetadata {} -impl std::hash::Hash for LockMetadata { - fn hash(&self, hasher: &mut H) { hasher.write_u64(self.lock_idx); } + +#[cfg(feature = "backtrace")] +fn get_construction_location(backtrace: &Backtrace) -> String { + // Find the first frame that is after `debug_sync` (or that is in our tests) and use + // that as the mutex construction site. Note that the first few frames may be in + // the `backtrace` crate, so we have to ignore those. + let sync_mutex_constr_regex = regex::Regex::new(r"lightning.*debug_sync.*new").unwrap(); + let mut found_debug_sync = false; + for frame in backtrace.frames() { + for symbol in frame.symbols() { + let symbol_name = symbol.name().unwrap().as_str().unwrap(); + if !sync_mutex_constr_regex.is_match(symbol_name) { + if found_debug_sync { + if let Some(col) = symbol.colno() { + return format!("{}:{}:{}", symbol.filename().unwrap().display(), symbol.lineno().unwrap(), col); + } else { + // Windows debug symbols don't support column numbers, so fall back to + // line numbers only if no `colno` is available + return format!("{}:{}", symbol.filename().unwrap().display(), symbol.lineno().unwrap()); + } + } + } else { found_debug_sync = true; } + } + } + panic!("Couldn't find mutex construction callsite"); } impl LockMetadata { - fn new() -> LockMetadata { - LockMetadata { - locked_before: StdMutex::new(HashSet::new()), - lock_idx: LOCK_IDX.fetch_add(1, Ordering::Relaxed) as u64, - #[cfg(feature = "backtrace")] - lock_construction_bt: Backtrace::new(), + fn new() -> Arc { + let backtrace = Backtrace::new(); + let lock_idx = LOCK_IDX.fetch_add(1, Ordering::Relaxed) as u64; + + let res = Arc::new(LockMetadata { + locked_before: StdMutex::new(HashMap::new()), + lock_idx, + _lock_construction_bt: backtrace, + }); + + #[cfg(feature = "backtrace")] + { + let lock_constr_location = get_construction_location(&res._lock_construction_bt); + LOCKS_INIT.call_once(|| { unsafe { LOCKS = Some(StdMutex::new(HashMap::new())); } }); + let mut locks = unsafe { LOCKS.as_ref() }.unwrap().lock().unwrap(); + match locks.entry(lock_constr_location) { + hash_map::Entry::Occupied(e) => return Arc::clone(e.get()), + hash_map::Entry::Vacant(e) => { e.insert(Arc::clone(&res)); }, + } } + res } // Returns whether we were a recursive lock (only relevant for read) @@ -81,28 +129,37 @@ impl LockMetadata { // For each lock which is currently locked, check that no lock's locked-before // set includes the lock we're about to lock, which would imply a lockorder // inversion. - for locked in held.borrow().iter() { - if read && *locked == *this { + for (locked_idx, _locked) in held.borrow().iter() { + if read && *locked_idx == this.lock_idx { // Recursive read locks are explicitly allowed return; } } - for locked in held.borrow().iter() { - if !read && *locked == *this { - panic!("Tried to lock a lock while it was held!"); + for (locked_idx, locked) in held.borrow().iter() { + if !read && *locked_idx == this.lock_idx { + // With `feature = "backtrace"` set, we may be looking at different instances + // of the same lock. + debug_assert!(cfg!(feature = "backtrace"), "Tried to acquire a lock while it was held!"); } - for locked_dep in locked.locked_before.lock().unwrap().iter() { - if *locked_dep == *this { + for (locked_dep_idx, _locked_dep) in locked.locked_before.lock().unwrap().iter() { + if *locked_dep_idx == this.lock_idx && *locked_dep_idx != locked.lock_idx { #[cfg(feature = "backtrace")] - panic!("Tried to violate existing lockorder.\nMutex that should be locked after the current lock was created at the following backtrace.\nNote that to get a backtrace for the lockorder violation, you should set RUST_BACKTRACE=1\n{:?}", locked.lock_construction_bt); + panic!("Tried to violate existing lockorder.\nMutex that should be locked after the current lock was created at the following backtrace.\nNote that to get a backtrace for the lockorder violation, you should set RUST_BACKTRACE=1\nLock being taken constructed at: {} ({}):\n{:?}\nLock constructed at: {} ({})\n{:?}\n\nLock dep created at:\n{:?}\n\n", + get_construction_location(&this._lock_construction_bt), this.lock_idx, this._lock_construction_bt, + get_construction_location(&locked._lock_construction_bt), locked.lock_idx, locked._lock_construction_bt, + _locked_dep._lockdep_trace); #[cfg(not(feature = "backtrace"))] panic!("Tried to violate existing lockorder. Build with the backtrace feature for more info."); } } // Insert any already-held locks in our locked-before set. - this.locked_before.lock().unwrap().insert(Arc::clone(locked)); + let mut locked_before = this.locked_before.lock().unwrap(); + if !locked_before.contains_key(&locked.lock_idx) { + let lockdep = LockDep { lock: Arc::clone(locked), _lockdep_trace: Backtrace::new() }; + locked_before.insert(lockdep.lock.lock_idx, lockdep); + } } - held.borrow_mut().insert(Arc::clone(this)); + held.borrow_mut().insert(this.lock_idx, Arc::clone(this)); inserted = true; }); inserted @@ -116,10 +173,14 @@ impl LockMetadata { // Since a try-lock will simply fail if the lock is held already, we do not // consider try-locks to ever generate lockorder inversions. However, if a try-lock // succeeds, we do consider it to have created lockorder dependencies. - for locked in held.borrow().iter() { - this.locked_before.lock().unwrap().insert(Arc::clone(locked)); + let mut locked_before = this.locked_before.lock().unwrap(); + for (locked_idx, locked) in held.borrow().iter() { + if !locked_before.contains_key(locked_idx) { + let lockdep = LockDep { lock: Arc::clone(locked), _lockdep_trace: Backtrace::new() }; + locked_before.insert(*locked_idx, lockdep); + } } - held.borrow_mut().insert(Arc::clone(this)); + held.borrow_mut().insert(this.lock_idx, Arc::clone(this)); }); } } @@ -149,7 +210,7 @@ impl<'a, T: Sized> MutexGuard<'a, T> { impl Drop for MutexGuard<'_, T> { fn drop(&mut self) { LOCKS_HELD.with(|held| { - held.borrow_mut().remove(&self.mutex.deps); + held.borrow_mut().remove(&self.mutex.deps.lock_idx); }); } } @@ -170,7 +231,7 @@ impl DerefMut for MutexGuard<'_, T> { impl Mutex { pub fn new(inner: T) -> Mutex { - Mutex { inner: StdMutex::new(inner), deps: Arc::new(LockMetadata::new()) } + Mutex { inner: StdMutex::new(inner), deps: LockMetadata::new() } } pub fn lock<'a>(&'a self) -> LockResult> { @@ -220,7 +281,7 @@ impl Drop for RwLockReadGuard<'_, T> { return; } LOCKS_HELD.with(|held| { - held.borrow_mut().remove(&self.lock.deps); + held.borrow_mut().remove(&self.lock.deps.lock_idx); }); } } @@ -236,7 +297,7 @@ impl Deref for RwLockWriteGuard<'_, T> { impl Drop for RwLockWriteGuard<'_, T> { fn drop(&mut self) { LOCKS_HELD.with(|held| { - held.borrow_mut().remove(&self.lock.deps); + held.borrow_mut().remove(&self.lock.deps.lock_idx); }); } } @@ -249,7 +310,7 @@ impl DerefMut for RwLockWriteGuard<'_, T> { impl RwLock { pub fn new(inner: T) -> RwLock { - RwLock { inner: StdRwLock::new(inner), deps: Arc::new(LockMetadata::new()) } + RwLock { inner: StdRwLock::new(inner), deps: LockMetadata::new() } } pub fn read<'a>(&'a self) -> LockResult> { @@ -271,94 +332,101 @@ impl RwLock { } } -#[test] -#[should_panic] -fn recursive_lock_fail() { - let mutex = Mutex::new(()); - let _a = mutex.lock().unwrap(); - let _b = mutex.lock().unwrap(); -} +pub type FairRwLock = RwLock; -#[test] -fn recursive_read() { - let lock = RwLock::new(()); - let _a = lock.read().unwrap(); - let _b = lock.read().unwrap(); -} +mod tests { + use super::{RwLock, Mutex}; -#[test] -#[should_panic] -fn lockorder_fail() { - let a = Mutex::new(()); - let b = Mutex::new(()); - { - let _a = a.lock().unwrap(); - let _b = b.lock().unwrap(); - } - { - let _b = b.lock().unwrap(); - let _a = a.lock().unwrap(); + #[test] + #[should_panic] + #[cfg(not(feature = "backtrace"))] + fn recursive_lock_fail() { + let mutex = Mutex::new(()); + let _a = mutex.lock().unwrap(); + let _b = mutex.lock().unwrap(); } -} -#[test] -#[should_panic] -fn write_lockorder_fail() { - let a = RwLock::new(()); - let b = RwLock::new(()); - { - let _a = a.write().unwrap(); - let _b = b.write().unwrap(); + #[test] + fn recursive_read() { + let lock = RwLock::new(()); + let _a = lock.read().unwrap(); + let _b = lock.read().unwrap(); } - { - let _b = b.write().unwrap(); - let _a = a.write().unwrap(); - } -} -#[test] -#[should_panic] -fn read_lockorder_fail() { - let a = RwLock::new(()); - let b = RwLock::new(()); - { - let _a = a.read().unwrap(); - let _b = b.read().unwrap(); - } - { - let _b = b.read().unwrap(); - let _a = a.read().unwrap(); + #[test] + #[should_panic] + fn lockorder_fail() { + let a = Mutex::new(()); + let b = Mutex::new(()); + { + let _a = a.lock().unwrap(); + let _b = b.lock().unwrap(); + } + { + let _b = b.lock().unwrap(); + let _a = a.lock().unwrap(); + } } -} -#[test] -fn read_recurisve_no_lockorder() { - // Like the above, but note that no lockorder is implied when we recursively read-lock a - // RwLock, causing this to pass just fine. - let a = RwLock::new(()); - let b = RwLock::new(()); - let _outer = a.read().unwrap(); - { - let _a = a.read().unwrap(); - let _b = b.read().unwrap(); + #[test] + #[should_panic] + fn write_lockorder_fail() { + let a = RwLock::new(()); + let b = RwLock::new(()); + { + let _a = a.write().unwrap(); + let _b = b.write().unwrap(); + } + { + let _b = b.write().unwrap(); + let _a = a.write().unwrap(); + } } - { - let _b = b.read().unwrap(); - let _a = a.read().unwrap(); + + #[test] + #[should_panic] + fn read_lockorder_fail() { + let a = RwLock::new(()); + let b = RwLock::new(()); + { + let _a = a.read().unwrap(); + let _b = b.read().unwrap(); + } + { + let _b = b.read().unwrap(); + let _a = a.read().unwrap(); + } } -} -#[test] -#[should_panic] -fn read_write_lockorder_fail() { - let a = RwLock::new(()); - let b = RwLock::new(()); - { - let _a = a.write().unwrap(); - let _b = b.read().unwrap(); + #[test] + fn read_recursive_no_lockorder() { + // Like the above, but note that no lockorder is implied when we recursively read-lock a + // RwLock, causing this to pass just fine. + let a = RwLock::new(()); + let b = RwLock::new(()); + let _outer = a.read().unwrap(); + { + let _a = a.read().unwrap(); + let _b = b.read().unwrap(); + } + { + let _b = b.read().unwrap(); + let _a = a.read().unwrap(); + } } - { - let _b = b.read().unwrap(); - let _a = a.write().unwrap(); + + #[test] + #[should_panic] + fn read_write_lockorder_fail() { + let a = RwLock::new(()); + let b = RwLock::new(()); + { + let _a = a.write().unwrap(); + let _b = b.read().unwrap(); + } + { + let _b = b.read().unwrap(); + let _a = a.write().unwrap(); + } } }