X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fevents%2Fmod.rs;h=665fd0ed23a51ae27b7c260b33717ac9690f74db;hb=0a0c54cc3122be58a034bcd699e9df34fd734678;hp=18d2929178f7f1b7a6b44c3c926d2e8a42c62d6f;hpb=e1e79031bef6ab2d3be4347677a1cccc81c55fef;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/events/mod.rs b/lightning/src/events/mod.rs index 18d29291..665fd0ed 100644 --- a/lightning/src/events/mod.rs +++ b/lightning/src/events/mod.rs @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ pub mod bump_transaction; #[cfg(anchors)] pub use bump_transaction::BumpTransactionEvent; -use crate::chain::keysinterface::SpendableOutputDescriptor; +use crate::sign::SpendableOutputDescriptor; use crate::ln::channelmanager::{InterceptId, PaymentId, RecipientOnionFields}; use crate::ln::channel::FUNDING_CONF_DEADLINE_BLOCKS; use crate::ln::features::ChannelTypeFeatures; @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ use crate::routing::gossip::NetworkUpdate; use crate::util::errors::APIError; use crate::util::ser::{BigSize, FixedLengthReader, Writeable, Writer, MaybeReadable, Readable, RequiredWrapper, UpgradableRequired, WithoutLength}; use crate::util::string::UntrustedString; -use crate::routing::router::{RouteHop, RouteParameters}; +use crate::routing::router::{BlindedTail, Path, RouteHop, RouteParameters}; use bitcoin::{PackedLockTime, Transaction, OutPoint}; #[cfg(anchors)] @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ pub enum ClosureReason { /// Be careful about printing the peer_msg, a well-crafted message could exploit /// a security vulnerability in the terminal emulator or the logging subsystem. /// To be safe, use `Display` on `UntrustedString` - /// + /// /// [`UntrustedString`]: crate::util::string::UntrustedString peer_msg: UntrustedString, }, @@ -232,8 +232,11 @@ pub enum HTLCDestination { /// /// Some of the reasons may include: /// * HTLC Timeouts - /// * Expected MPP amount has already been reached - /// * Claimable amount does not match expected amount + /// * Excess HTLCs for a payment that we have already fully received, over-paying for the + /// payment, + /// * The counterparty node modified the HTLC in transit, + /// * A probing attack where an intermediary node is trying to detect if we are the ultimate + /// recipient for a payment. FailedPayment { /// The payment hash of the payment we attempted to process. payment_hash: PaymentHash @@ -272,6 +275,43 @@ impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum!(InterceptNextHop, }; ); +/// The reason the payment failed. Used in [`Event::PaymentFailed`]. +#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, PartialEq, Eq)] +pub enum PaymentFailureReason { + /// The intended recipient rejected our payment. + RecipientRejected, + /// The user chose to abandon this payment by calling [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]. + /// + /// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::abandon_payment + UserAbandoned, + /// We exhausted all of our retry attempts while trying to send the payment, or we + /// exhausted the [`Retry::Timeout`] if the user set one. If at any point a retry + /// attempt failed while being forwarded along the path, an [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`] will + /// have come before this. + /// + /// [`Retry::Timeout`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::Retry::Timeout + RetriesExhausted, + /// The payment expired while retrying, based on the provided + /// [`PaymentParameters::expiry_time`]. + /// + /// [`PaymentParameters::expiry_time`]: crate::routing::router::PaymentParameters::expiry_time + PaymentExpired, + /// We failed to find a route while retrying the payment. + RouteNotFound, + /// This error should generally never happen. This likely means that there is a problem with + /// your router. + UnexpectedError, +} + +impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum!(PaymentFailureReason, + (0, RecipientRejected) => {}, + (2, UserAbandoned) => {}, + (4, RetriesExhausted) => {}, + (6, PaymentExpired) => {}, + (8, RouteNotFound) => {}, + (10, UnexpectedError) => {}, ; +); + /// An Event which you should probably take some action in response to. /// /// Note that while Writeable and Readable are implemented for Event, you probably shouldn't use @@ -337,7 +377,7 @@ pub enum Event { /// This field will always be filled in when the event was generated by LDK versions /// 0.0.113 and above. /// - /// [phantom nodes]: crate::chain::keysinterface::PhantomKeysManager + /// [phantom nodes]: crate::sign::PhantomKeysManager receiver_node_id: Option, /// The hash for which the preimage should be handed to the ChannelManager. Note that LDK will /// not stop you from registering duplicate payment hashes for inbound payments. @@ -385,7 +425,7 @@ pub enum Event { /// This field will always be filled in when the event was generated by LDK versions /// 0.0.113 and above. /// - /// [phantom nodes]: crate::chain::keysinterface::PhantomKeysManager + /// [phantom nodes]: crate::sign::PhantomKeysManager receiver_node_id: Option, /// The payment hash of the claimed payment. Note that LDK will not stop you from /// registering duplicate payment hashes for inbound payments. @@ -443,6 +483,9 @@ pub enum Event { /// /// [`ChannelManager::send_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::send_payment payment_hash: PaymentHash, + /// The reason the payment failed. This is only `None` for events generated or serialized + /// by versions prior to 0.0.115. + reason: Option, }, /// Indicates that a path for an outbound payment was successful. /// @@ -455,12 +498,14 @@ pub enum Event { payment_id: PaymentId, /// The hash that was given to [`ChannelManager::send_payment`]. /// + /// This will be `Some` for all payments which completed on LDK 0.0.104 or later. + /// /// [`ChannelManager::send_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::send_payment payment_hash: Option, /// The payment path that was successful. /// /// May contain a closed channel if the HTLC sent along the path was fulfilled on chain. - path: Vec, + path: Path, }, /// Indicates an outbound HTLC we sent failed, likely due to an intermediary node being unable to /// handle the HTLC. @@ -475,6 +520,8 @@ pub enum Event { PaymentPathFailed { /// The `payment_id` passed to [`ChannelManager::send_payment`]. /// + /// This will be `Some` for all payment paths which failed on LDK 0.0.103 or later. + /// /// [`ChannelManager::send_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::send_payment /// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::abandon_payment payment_id: Option, @@ -492,7 +539,7 @@ pub enum Event { /// [`NetworkGraph`]: crate::routing::gossip::NetworkGraph failure: PathFailure, /// The payment path that failed. - path: Vec, + path: Path, /// The channel responsible for the failed payment path. /// /// Note that for route hints or for the first hop in a path this may be an SCID alias and @@ -518,7 +565,7 @@ pub enum Event { /// [`ChannelManager::send_probe`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::send_probe payment_hash: PaymentHash, /// The payment path that was successful. - path: Vec, + path: Path, }, /// Indicates that a probe payment we sent failed at an intermediary node on the path. ProbeFailed { @@ -531,7 +578,7 @@ pub enum Event { /// [`ChannelManager::send_probe`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::send_probe payment_hash: PaymentHash, /// The payment path that failed. - path: Vec, + path: Path, /// The channel responsible for the failed probe. /// /// Note that for route hints or for the first hop in a path this may be an SCID alias and @@ -841,7 +888,8 @@ impl Writeable for Event { (1, None::, option), // network_update in LDK versions prior to 0.0.114 (2, payment_failed_permanently, required), (3, false, required), // all_paths_failed in LDK versions prior to 0.0.114 - (5, *path, vec_type), + (4, path.blinded_tail, option), + (5, path.hops, vec_type), (7, short_channel_id, option), (9, None::, option), // retry in LDK versions prior to 0.0.115 (11, payment_id, option), @@ -909,13 +957,15 @@ impl Writeable for Event { write_tlv_fields!(writer, { (0, payment_id, required), (2, payment_hash, option), - (4, *path, vec_type) + (4, path.hops, vec_type), + (6, path.blinded_tail, option), }) }, - &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash } => { + &Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref reason } => { 15u8.write(writer)?; write_tlv_fields!(writer, { (0, payment_id, required), + (1, reason, option), (2, payment_hash, required), }) }, @@ -938,7 +988,8 @@ impl Writeable for Event { write_tlv_fields!(writer, { (0, payment_id, required), (2, payment_hash, required), - (4, *path, vec_type) + (4, path.hops, vec_type), + (6, path.blinded_tail, option), }) }, &Event::ProbeFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref path, ref short_channel_id } => { @@ -946,8 +997,9 @@ impl Writeable for Event { write_tlv_fields!(writer, { (0, payment_id, required), (2, payment_hash, required), - (4, *path, vec_type), + (4, path.hops, vec_type), (6, short_channel_id, option), + (8, path.blinded_tail, option), }) }, &Event::HTLCHandlingFailed { ref prev_channel_id, ref failed_next_destination } => { @@ -1078,6 +1130,7 @@ impl MaybeReadable for Event { let mut payment_hash = PaymentHash([0; 32]); let mut payment_failed_permanently = false; let mut network_update = None; + let mut blinded_tail: Option = None; let mut path: Option> = Some(vec![]); let mut short_channel_id = None; let mut payment_id = None; @@ -1086,6 +1139,7 @@ impl MaybeReadable for Event { (0, payment_hash, required), (1, network_update, upgradable_option), (2, payment_failed_permanently, required), + (4, blinded_tail, option), (5, path, vec_type), (7, short_channel_id, option), (11, payment_id, option), @@ -1097,7 +1151,7 @@ impl MaybeReadable for Event { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, failure, - path: path.unwrap(), + path: Path { hops: path.unwrap(), blinded_tail }, short_channel_id, #[cfg(test)] error_code, @@ -1200,18 +1254,16 @@ impl MaybeReadable for Event { }, 13u8 => { let f = || { - let mut payment_id = PaymentId([0; 32]); - let mut payment_hash = None; - let mut path: Option> = Some(vec![]); - read_tlv_fields!(reader, { + _init_and_read_tlv_fields!(reader, { (0, payment_id, required), (2, payment_hash, option), (4, path, vec_type), + (6, blinded_tail, option), }); Ok(Some(Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { - payment_id, + payment_id: payment_id.0.unwrap(), payment_hash, - path: path.unwrap(), + path: Path { hops: path.unwrap(), blinded_tail }, })) }; f() @@ -1220,13 +1272,16 @@ impl MaybeReadable for Event { let f = || { let mut payment_hash = PaymentHash([0; 32]); let mut payment_id = PaymentId([0; 32]); + let mut reason = None; read_tlv_fields!(reader, { (0, payment_id, required), + (1, reason, upgradable_option), (2, payment_hash, required), }); Ok(Some(Event::PaymentFailed { payment_id, payment_hash, + reason, })) }; f() @@ -1258,38 +1313,33 @@ impl MaybeReadable for Event { }, 21u8 => { let f = || { - let mut payment_id = PaymentId([0; 32]); - let mut payment_hash = PaymentHash([0; 32]); - let mut path: Option> = Some(vec![]); - read_tlv_fields!(reader, { + _init_and_read_tlv_fields!(reader, { (0, payment_id, required), (2, payment_hash, required), (4, path, vec_type), + (6, blinded_tail, option), }); Ok(Some(Event::ProbeSuccessful { - payment_id, - payment_hash, - path: path.unwrap(), + payment_id: payment_id.0.unwrap(), + payment_hash: payment_hash.0.unwrap(), + path: Path { hops: path.unwrap(), blinded_tail }, })) }; f() }, 23u8 => { let f = || { - let mut payment_id = PaymentId([0; 32]); - let mut payment_hash = PaymentHash([0; 32]); - let mut path: Option> = Some(vec![]); - let mut short_channel_id = None; - read_tlv_fields!(reader, { + _init_and_read_tlv_fields!(reader, { (0, payment_id, required), (2, payment_hash, required), (4, path, vec_type), (6, short_channel_id, option), + (8, blinded_tail, option), }); Ok(Some(Event::ProbeFailed { - payment_id, - payment_hash, - path: path.unwrap(), + payment_id: payment_id.0.unwrap(), + payment_hash: payment_hash.0.unwrap(), + path: Path { hops: path.unwrap(), blinded_tail }, short_channel_id, })) };