X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Fchannel.rs;h=66301c95bd6d378d828003ae9260a54eb9ade578;hb=84070e113857fb2842ce4b457375c9bc5ca4f74a;hp=cadb48b4955c39f546785d9f38936b9f15f91a9d;hpb=4ad00f4074bfaf3ae5e6aa816aaa488d473624ed;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channel.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channel.rs index cadb48b49..66301c95b 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/channel.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/channel.rs @@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ use crate::util::scid_utils::scid_from_parts; use crate::io; use crate::prelude::*; use core::{cmp,mem,fmt}; -use core::convert::TryInto; use core::ops::Deref; #[cfg(any(test, fuzzing, debug_assertions))] use crate::sync::Mutex; @@ -1072,6 +1071,7 @@ pub(super) struct MonitorRestoreUpdates { pub accepted_htlcs: Vec<(PendingHTLCInfo, u64)>, pub failed_htlcs: Vec<(HTLCSource, PaymentHash, HTLCFailReason)>, pub finalized_claimed_htlcs: Vec, + pub pending_update_adds: Vec, pub funding_broadcastable: Option, pub channel_ready: Option, pub announcement_sigs: Option, @@ -1189,9 +1189,9 @@ impl_writeable_tlv_based!(PendingChannelMonitorUpdate, { pub(super) enum ChannelPhase where SP::Target: SignerProvider { UnfundedOutboundV1(OutboundV1Channel), UnfundedInboundV1(InboundV1Channel), - #[cfg(dual_funding)] + #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] UnfundedOutboundV2(OutboundV2Channel), - #[cfg(dual_funding)] + #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] UnfundedInboundV2(InboundV2Channel), Funded(Channel), } @@ -1205,9 +1205,9 @@ impl<'a, SP: Deref> ChannelPhase where ChannelPhase::Funded(chan) => &chan.context, ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV1(chan) => &chan.context, ChannelPhase::UnfundedInboundV1(chan) => &chan.context, - #[cfg(dual_funding)] + #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV2(chan) => &chan.context, - #[cfg(dual_funding)] + #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] ChannelPhase::UnfundedInboundV2(chan) => &chan.context, } } @@ -1217,9 +1217,9 @@ impl<'a, SP: Deref> ChannelPhase where ChannelPhase::Funded(ref mut chan) => &mut chan.context, ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV1(ref mut chan) => &mut chan.context, ChannelPhase::UnfundedInboundV1(ref mut chan) => &mut chan.context, - #[cfg(dual_funding)] + #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV2(ref mut chan) => &mut chan.context, - #[cfg(dual_funding)] + #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] ChannelPhase::UnfundedInboundV2(ref mut chan) => &mut chan.context, } } @@ -2730,7 +2730,7 @@ impl ChannelContext where SP::Target: SignerProvider { feerate_per_kw = cmp::max(feerate_per_kw, feerate); } let feerate_plus_quarter = feerate_per_kw.checked_mul(1250).map(|v| v / 1000); - cmp::max(2530, feerate_plus_quarter.unwrap_or(u32::max_value())) + cmp::max(feerate_per_kw + 2530, feerate_plus_quarter.unwrap_or(u32::max_value())) } /// Get forwarding information for the counterparty. @@ -3501,7 +3501,7 @@ pub(crate) fn get_legacy_default_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(channe /// /// This is used both for outbound and inbound channels and has lower bound /// of `dust_limit_satoshis`. -#[cfg(dual_funding)] +#[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] fn get_v2_channel_reserve_satoshis(channel_value_satoshis: u64, dust_limit_satoshis: u64) -> u64 { // Fixed at 1% of channel value by spec. let (q, _) = channel_value_satoshis.overflowing_div(100); @@ -3524,7 +3524,7 @@ pub(crate) fn commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw: u32, num_htlcs: usize, channel_ } /// Context for dual-funded channels. -#[cfg(dual_funding)] +#[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] pub(super) struct DualFundingChannelContext { /// The amount in satoshis we will be contributing to the channel. pub our_funding_satoshis: u64, @@ -3541,7 +3541,7 @@ pub(super) struct DualFundingChannelContext { // Counterparty designates channel data owned by the another channel participant entity. pub(super) struct Channel where SP::Target: SignerProvider { pub context: ChannelContext, - #[cfg(dual_funding)] + #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] pub dual_funding_channel_context: Option, } @@ -4120,20 +4120,12 @@ impl Channel where Ok(self.get_announcement_sigs(node_signer, chain_hash, user_config, best_block.height, logger)) } - pub fn update_add_htlc( - &mut self, msg: &msgs::UpdateAddHTLC, mut pending_forward_status: PendingHTLCStatus, - create_pending_htlc_status: F, fee_estimator: &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator, logger: &L - ) -> Result<(), ChannelError> - where F: for<'a> Fn(&'a Self, PendingHTLCStatus, u16) -> PendingHTLCStatus, - FE::Target: FeeEstimator, L::Target: Logger, - { + pub fn update_add_htlc( + &mut self, msg: &msgs::UpdateAddHTLC, pending_forward_status: PendingHTLCStatus, + ) -> Result<(), ChannelError> { if !matches!(self.context.channel_state, ChannelState::ChannelReady(_)) { return Err(ChannelError::Close("Got add HTLC message when channel was not in an operational state".to_owned())); } - // We can't accept HTLCs sent after we've sent a shutdown. - if self.context.channel_state.is_local_shutdown_sent() { - pending_forward_status = create_pending_htlc_status(self, pending_forward_status, 0x4000|8); - } // If the remote has sent a shutdown prior to adding this HTLC, then they are in violation of the spec. if self.context.channel_state.is_remote_shutdown_sent() { return Err(ChannelError::Close("Got add HTLC message when channel was not in an operational state".to_owned())); @@ -4152,7 +4144,6 @@ impl Channel where } let inbound_stats = self.context.get_inbound_pending_htlc_stats(None); - let outbound_stats = self.context.get_outbound_pending_htlc_stats(None); if inbound_stats.pending_htlcs + 1 > self.context.holder_max_accepted_htlcs as u32 { return Err(ChannelError::Close(format!("Remote tried to push more than our max accepted HTLCs ({})", self.context.holder_max_accepted_htlcs))); } @@ -4181,34 +4172,6 @@ impl Channel where } } - let max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat = self.context.get_max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat(fee_estimator); - let (htlc_timeout_dust_limit, htlc_success_dust_limit) = if self.context.get_channel_type().supports_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx() { - (0, 0) - } else { - let dust_buffer_feerate = self.context.get_dust_buffer_feerate(None) as u64; - (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_timeout_tx_weight(self.context.get_channel_type()) / 1000, - dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_success_tx_weight(self.context.get_channel_type()) / 1000) - }; - let exposure_dust_limit_timeout_sats = htlc_timeout_dust_limit + self.context.counterparty_dust_limit_satoshis; - if msg.amount_msat / 1000 < exposure_dust_limit_timeout_sats { - let on_counterparty_tx_dust_htlc_exposure_msat = inbound_stats.on_counterparty_tx_dust_exposure_msat + outbound_stats.on_counterparty_tx_dust_exposure_msat + msg.amount_msat; - if on_counterparty_tx_dust_htlc_exposure_msat > max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat { - log_info!(logger, "Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", - on_counterparty_tx_dust_htlc_exposure_msat, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat); - pending_forward_status = create_pending_htlc_status(self, pending_forward_status, 0x1000|7); - } - } - - let exposure_dust_limit_success_sats = htlc_success_dust_limit + self.context.holder_dust_limit_satoshis; - if msg.amount_msat / 1000 < exposure_dust_limit_success_sats { - let on_holder_tx_dust_htlc_exposure_msat = inbound_stats.on_holder_tx_dust_exposure_msat + outbound_stats.on_holder_tx_dust_exposure_msat + msg.amount_msat; - if on_holder_tx_dust_htlc_exposure_msat > max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat { - log_info!(logger, "Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", - on_holder_tx_dust_htlc_exposure_msat, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat); - pending_forward_status = create_pending_htlc_status(self, pending_forward_status, 0x1000|7); - } - } - let pending_value_to_self_msat = self.context.value_to_self_msat + inbound_stats.pending_htlcs_value_msat - removed_outbound_total_msat; let pending_remote_value_msat = @@ -4242,23 +4205,7 @@ impl Channel where } else { 0 }; - if !self.context.is_outbound() { - // `Some(())` is for the fee spike buffer we keep for the remote. This deviates from - // the spec because the fee spike buffer requirement doesn't exist on the receiver's - // side, only on the sender's. Note that with anchor outputs we are no longer as - // sensitive to fee spikes, so we need to account for them. - let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(msg.amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::RemoteOffered); - let mut remote_fee_cost_incl_stuck_buffer_msat = self.context.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, Some(())); - if !self.context.get_channel_type().supports_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx() { - remote_fee_cost_incl_stuck_buffer_msat *= FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE; - } - if pending_remote_value_msat.saturating_sub(msg.amount_msat).saturating_sub(self.context.holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis * 1000).saturating_sub(anchor_outputs_value_msat) < remote_fee_cost_incl_stuck_buffer_msat { - // Note that if the pending_forward_status is not updated here, then it's because we're already failing - // the HTLC, i.e. its status is already set to failing. - log_info!(logger, "Attempting to fail HTLC due to fee spike buffer violation in channel {}. Rebalancing is required.", &self.context.channel_id()); - pending_forward_status = create_pending_htlc_status(self, pending_forward_status, 0x1000|7); - } - } else { + if self.context.is_outbound() { // Check that they won't violate our local required channel reserve by adding this HTLC. let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(msg.amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::RemoteOffered); let local_commit_tx_fee_msat = self.context.next_local_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, None); @@ -5251,13 +5198,16 @@ impl Channel where mem::swap(&mut failed_htlcs, &mut self.context.monitor_pending_failures); let mut finalized_claimed_htlcs = Vec::new(); mem::swap(&mut finalized_claimed_htlcs, &mut self.context.monitor_pending_finalized_fulfills); + let mut pending_update_adds = Vec::new(); + mem::swap(&mut pending_update_adds, &mut self.context.monitor_pending_update_adds); if self.context.channel_state.is_peer_disconnected() { self.context.monitor_pending_revoke_and_ack = false; self.context.monitor_pending_commitment_signed = false; return MonitorRestoreUpdates { raa: None, commitment_update: None, order: RAACommitmentOrder::RevokeAndACKFirst, - accepted_htlcs, failed_htlcs, finalized_claimed_htlcs, funding_broadcastable, channel_ready, announcement_sigs + accepted_htlcs, failed_htlcs, finalized_claimed_htlcs, pending_update_adds, + funding_broadcastable, channel_ready, announcement_sigs }; } @@ -5279,7 +5229,8 @@ impl Channel where if commitment_update.is_some() { "a" } else { "no" }, if raa.is_some() { "an" } else { "no" }, match order { RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst => "commitment", RAACommitmentOrder::RevokeAndACKFirst => "RAA"}); MonitorRestoreUpdates { - raa, commitment_update, order, accepted_htlcs, failed_htlcs, finalized_claimed_htlcs, funding_broadcastable, channel_ready, announcement_sigs + raa, commitment_update, order, accepted_htlcs, failed_htlcs, finalized_claimed_htlcs, + pending_update_adds, funding_broadcastable, channel_ready, announcement_sigs } } @@ -6143,6 +6094,86 @@ impl Channel where }) } + pub fn can_accept_incoming_htlc( + &self, msg: &msgs::UpdateAddHTLC, fee_estimator: &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator, logger: L + ) -> Result<(), (&'static str, u16)> + where + F::Target: FeeEstimator, + L::Target: Logger + { + if self.context.channel_state.is_local_shutdown_sent() { + return Err(("Shutdown was already sent", 0x4000|8)) + } + + let inbound_stats = self.context.get_inbound_pending_htlc_stats(None); + let outbound_stats = self.context.get_outbound_pending_htlc_stats(None); + let max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat = self.context.get_max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat(fee_estimator); + let (htlc_timeout_dust_limit, htlc_success_dust_limit) = if self.context.get_channel_type().supports_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx() { + (0, 0) + } else { + let dust_buffer_feerate = self.context.get_dust_buffer_feerate(None) as u64; + (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_timeout_tx_weight(self.context.get_channel_type()) / 1000, + dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_success_tx_weight(self.context.get_channel_type()) / 1000) + }; + let exposure_dust_limit_timeout_sats = htlc_timeout_dust_limit + self.context.counterparty_dust_limit_satoshis; + if msg.amount_msat / 1000 < exposure_dust_limit_timeout_sats { + let on_counterparty_tx_dust_htlc_exposure_msat = inbound_stats.on_counterparty_tx_dust_exposure_msat + outbound_stats.on_counterparty_tx_dust_exposure_msat + msg.amount_msat; + if on_counterparty_tx_dust_htlc_exposure_msat > max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat { + log_info!(logger, "Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", + on_counterparty_tx_dust_htlc_exposure_msat, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat); + return Err(("Exceeded our dust exposure limit on counterparty commitment tx", 0x1000|7)) + } + } + + let exposure_dust_limit_success_sats = htlc_success_dust_limit + self.context.holder_dust_limit_satoshis; + if msg.amount_msat / 1000 < exposure_dust_limit_success_sats { + let on_holder_tx_dust_htlc_exposure_msat = inbound_stats.on_holder_tx_dust_exposure_msat + outbound_stats.on_holder_tx_dust_exposure_msat + msg.amount_msat; + if on_holder_tx_dust_htlc_exposure_msat > max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat { + log_info!(logger, "Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", + on_holder_tx_dust_htlc_exposure_msat, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat); + return Err(("Exceeded our dust exposure limit on holder commitment tx", 0x1000|7)) + } + } + + let anchor_outputs_value_msat = if self.context.get_channel_type().supports_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx() { + ANCHOR_OUTPUT_VALUE_SATOSHI * 2 * 1000 + } else { + 0 + }; + + let mut removed_outbound_total_msat = 0; + for ref htlc in self.context.pending_outbound_htlcs.iter() { + if let OutboundHTLCState::AwaitingRemoteRevokeToRemove(OutboundHTLCOutcome::Success(_)) = htlc.state { + removed_outbound_total_msat += htlc.amount_msat; + } else if let OutboundHTLCState::AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke(OutboundHTLCOutcome::Success(_)) = htlc.state { + removed_outbound_total_msat += htlc.amount_msat; + } + } + + let pending_value_to_self_msat = + self.context.value_to_self_msat + inbound_stats.pending_htlcs_value_msat - removed_outbound_total_msat; + let pending_remote_value_msat = + self.context.channel_value_satoshis * 1000 - pending_value_to_self_msat; + + if !self.context.is_outbound() { + // `Some(())` is for the fee spike buffer we keep for the remote. This deviates from + // the spec because the fee spike buffer requirement doesn't exist on the receiver's + // side, only on the sender's. Note that with anchor outputs we are no longer as + // sensitive to fee spikes, so we need to account for them. + let htlc_candidate = HTLCCandidate::new(msg.amount_msat, HTLCInitiator::RemoteOffered); + let mut remote_fee_cost_incl_stuck_buffer_msat = self.context.next_remote_commit_tx_fee_msat(htlc_candidate, Some(())); + if !self.context.get_channel_type().supports_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx() { + remote_fee_cost_incl_stuck_buffer_msat *= FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE; + } + if pending_remote_value_msat.saturating_sub(msg.amount_msat).saturating_sub(self.context.holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis * 1000).saturating_sub(anchor_outputs_value_msat) < remote_fee_cost_incl_stuck_buffer_msat { + log_info!(logger, "Attempting to fail HTLC due to fee spike buffer violation in channel {}. Rebalancing is required.", &self.context.channel_id()); + return Err(("Fee spike buffer violation", 0x1000|7)); + } + } + + Ok(()) + } + pub fn get_cur_holder_commitment_transaction_number(&self) -> u64 { self.context.cur_holder_commitment_transaction_number + 1 } @@ -6220,6 +6251,26 @@ impl Channel where } } + /// On startup, its possible we detect some monitor updates have actually completed (and the + /// ChannelManager was simply stale). In that case, we should simply drop them, which we do + /// here after logging them. + pub fn on_startup_drop_completed_blocked_mon_updates_through(&mut self, logger: &L, loaded_mon_update_id: u64) { + let channel_id = self.context.channel_id(); + self.context.blocked_monitor_updates.retain(|update| { + if update.update.update_id <= loaded_mon_update_id { + log_info!( + logger, + "Dropping completed ChannelMonitorUpdate id {} on channel {} due to a stale ChannelManager", + update.update.update_id, + channel_id, + ); + false + } else { + true + } + }); + } + pub fn blocked_monitor_updates_pending(&self) -> usize { self.context.blocked_monitor_updates.len() } @@ -7673,7 +7724,7 @@ impl OutboundV1Channel where SP::Target: SignerProvider { let mut channel = Channel { context: self.context, - #[cfg(dual_funding)] + #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] dual_funding_channel_context: None, }; @@ -7963,7 +8014,7 @@ impl InboundV1Channel where SP::Target: SignerProvider { // `ChannelMonitor`. let mut channel = Channel { context: self.context, - #[cfg(dual_funding)] + #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] dual_funding_channel_context: None, }; let need_channel_ready = channel.check_get_channel_ready(0).is_some(); @@ -7974,15 +8025,15 @@ impl InboundV1Channel where SP::Target: SignerProvider { } // A not-yet-funded outbound (from holder) channel using V2 channel establishment. -#[cfg(dual_funding)] +#[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] pub(super) struct OutboundV2Channel where SP::Target: SignerProvider { pub context: ChannelContext, pub unfunded_context: UnfundedChannelContext, - #[cfg(dual_funding)] + #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] pub dual_funding_context: DualFundingChannelContext, } -#[cfg(dual_funding)] +#[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] impl OutboundV2Channel where SP::Target: SignerProvider { pub fn new( fee_estimator: &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator, entropy_source: &ES, signer_provider: &SP, @@ -8098,14 +8149,14 @@ impl OutboundV2Channel where SP::Target: SignerProvider { } // A not-yet-funded inbound (from counterparty) channel using V2 channel establishment. -#[cfg(dual_funding)] +#[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] pub(super) struct InboundV2Channel where SP::Target: SignerProvider { pub context: ChannelContext, pub unfunded_context: UnfundedChannelContext, pub dual_funding_context: DualFundingChannelContext, } -#[cfg(dual_funding)] +#[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] impl InboundV2Channel where SP::Target: SignerProvider { /// Creates a new dual-funded channel from a remote side's request for one. /// Assumes chain_hash has already been checked and corresponds with what we expect! @@ -8694,7 +8745,8 @@ impl Writeable for Channel where SP::Target: SignerProvider { (39, pending_outbound_blinding_points, optional_vec), (41, holding_cell_blinding_points, optional_vec), (43, malformed_htlcs, optional_vec), // Added in 0.0.119 - (45, self.context.local_initiated_shutdown, option), // Added in 0.0.122 + // 45 and 47 are reserved for async signing + (49, self.context.local_initiated_shutdown, option), // Added in 0.0.122 }); Ok(()) @@ -9034,7 +9086,8 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'c, ES: Deref, SP: Deref> ReadableArgs<(&'a ES, &'b SP, u32, &'c Ch (39, pending_outbound_blinding_points_opt, optional_vec), (41, holding_cell_blinding_points_opt, optional_vec), (43, malformed_htlcs, optional_vec), // Added in 0.0.119 - (45, local_initiated_shutdown, option), + // 45 and 47 are reserved for async signing + (49, local_initiated_shutdown, option), }); let (channel_keys_id, holder_signer) = if let Some(channel_keys_id) = channel_keys_id { @@ -9270,7 +9323,7 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'c, ES: Deref, SP: Deref> ReadableArgs<(&'a ES, &'b SP, u32, &'c Ch blocked_monitor_updates: blocked_monitor_updates.unwrap(), }, - #[cfg(dual_funding)] + #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))] dual_funding_channel_context: None, }) }