X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Fchannelmanager.rs;h=559c723f86440540d9adee2e75e8c890bd0f1da6;hb=35bb0f467645b3c756c0b998bb7ea052bac57581;hp=cd2c4011dd53c3142ed5e7e889d0a4b3f233dd8d;hpb=90b2f5e1aaa2a564d6ca4f5dd9991bcab1a30a05;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs index cd2c4011..559c723f 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs @@ -8469,7 +8469,7 @@ mod tests { // A MAX_UNFUNDED_CHANS_PER_PEER + 1 channel will be summarily rejected open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id = nodes[0].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg); - assert_eq!(get_err_msg!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id, + assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id, open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id); // Further, because all of our channels with nodes[0] are inbound, and none of them funded, @@ -8516,7 +8516,7 @@ mod tests { open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id = nodes[0].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); } nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&last_random_pk, &open_channel_msg); - assert_eq!(get_err_msg!(nodes[1], last_random_pk).channel_id, + assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &last_random_pk).channel_id, open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id); // Of course, however, outbound channels are always allowed @@ -8558,7 +8558,7 @@ mod tests { // Once we have MAX_UNFUNDED_CHANS_PER_PEER unfunded channels, new inbound channels will be // rejected. nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg); - assert_eq!(get_err_msg!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id, + assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id, open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id); // but we can still open an outbound channel. @@ -8567,7 +8567,7 @@ mod tests { // but even with such an outbound channel, additional inbound channels will still fail. nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg); - assert_eq!(get_err_msg!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id, + assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).channel_id, open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id); } @@ -8623,7 +8623,7 @@ mod tests { } _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), } - assert_eq!(get_err_msg!(nodes[1], last_random_pk).channel_id, + assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &last_random_pk).channel_id, open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id); // ...however if we accept the same channel 0conf it should work just fine. @@ -8665,7 +8665,7 @@ mod tests { _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), } - let error_msg = get_err_msg!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + let error_msg = get_err_msg(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &error_msg); let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());