X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Fchannelmanager.rs;h=b2b28cdf365cce7ed07eda808089525c039ad015;hb=c80d9a74b5437dd7c82fab40806adeb995219fc2;hp=9017f3ffd98a4708274d2b005f6d17a91583e7aa;hpb=c558ccd6a92fa9034929769f55e65bf9c1336abd;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs index 9017f3ff..b2b28cdf 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ use crate::offers::merkle::SignError; use crate::offers::offer::{DerivedMetadata, Offer, OfferBuilder}; use crate::offers::parse::Bolt12SemanticError; use crate::offers::refund::{Refund, RefundBuilder}; -use crate::onion_message::{Destination, OffersMessage, OffersMessageHandler, PendingOnionMessage, new_pending_onion_message}; +use crate::onion_message::{Destination, MessageRouter, OffersMessage, OffersMessageHandler, PendingOnionMessage, new_pending_onion_message}; use crate::sign::{EntropySource, KeysManager, NodeSigner, Recipient, SignerProvider}; use crate::sign::ecdsa::WriteableEcdsaChannelSigner; use crate::util::config::{UserConfig, ChannelConfig, ChannelConfigUpdate}; @@ -1150,7 +1150,7 @@ where // | // |__`peer_state` // | -// |__`id_to_peer` +// |__`outpoint_to_peer` // | // |__`short_to_chan_info` // | @@ -1244,11 +1244,7 @@ where /// See `ChannelManager` struct-level documentation for lock order requirements. outbound_scid_aliases: Mutex>, - /// `channel_id` -> `counterparty_node_id`. - /// - /// Only `channel_id`s are allowed as keys in this map, and not `temporary_channel_id`s. As - /// multiple channels with the same `temporary_channel_id` to different peers can exist, - /// allowing `temporary_channel_id`s in this map would cause collisions for such channels. + /// Channel funding outpoint -> `counterparty_node_id`. /// /// Note that this map should only be used for `MonitorEvent` handling, to be able to access /// the corresponding channel for the event, as we only have access to the `channel_id` during @@ -1266,7 +1262,10 @@ where /// required to access the channel with the `counterparty_node_id`. /// /// See `ChannelManager` struct-level documentation for lock order requirements. - id_to_peer: Mutex>, + #[cfg(not(test))] + outpoint_to_peer: Mutex>, + #[cfg(test)] + pub(crate) outpoint_to_peer: Mutex>, /// SCIDs (and outbound SCID aliases) -> `counterparty_node_id`s and `channel_id`s. /// @@ -2006,7 +2005,9 @@ macro_rules! handle_error { macro_rules! update_maps_on_chan_removal { ($self: expr, $channel_context: expr) => {{ - $self.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap().remove(&$channel_context.channel_id()); + if let Some(outpoint) = $channel_context.get_funding_txo() { + $self.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap().remove(&outpoint); + } let mut short_to_chan_info = $self.short_to_chan_info.write().unwrap(); if let Some(short_id) = $channel_context.get_short_channel_id() { short_to_chan_info.remove(&short_id); @@ -2425,7 +2426,7 @@ where forward_htlcs: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()), claimable_payments: Mutex::new(ClaimablePayments { claimable_payments: HashMap::new(), pending_claiming_payments: HashMap::new() }), pending_intercepted_htlcs: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()), - id_to_peer: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()), + outpoint_to_peer: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()), short_to_chan_info: FairRwLock::new(HashMap::new()), our_network_pubkey: node_signer.get_node_id(Recipient::Node).unwrap(), @@ -2576,7 +2577,7 @@ where fn list_funded_channels_with_filter)) -> bool + Copy>(&self, f: Fn) -> Vec { // Allocate our best estimate of the number of channels we have in the `res` // Vec. Sadly the `short_to_chan_info` map doesn't cover channels without - // a scid or a scid alias, and the `id_to_peer` shouldn't be used outside + // a scid or a scid alias, and the `outpoint_to_peer` shouldn't be used outside // of the ChannelMonitor handling. Therefore reallocations may still occur, but is // unlikely as the `short_to_chan_info` map often contains 2 entries for // the same channel. @@ -2609,7 +2610,7 @@ where pub fn list_channels(&self) -> Vec { // Allocate our best estimate of the number of channels we have in the `res` // Vec. Sadly the `short_to_chan_info` map doesn't cover channels without - // a scid or a scid alias, and the `id_to_peer` shouldn't be used outside + // a scid or a scid alias, and the `outpoint_to_peer` shouldn't be used outside // of the ChannelMonitor handling. Therefore reallocations may still occur, but is // unlikely as the `short_to_chan_info` map often contains 2 entries for // the same channel. @@ -3748,9 +3749,10 @@ where let mut peer_state_lock = peer_state_mutex.lock().unwrap(); let peer_state = &mut *peer_state_lock; + let funding_txo; let (chan, msg_opt) = match peer_state.channel_by_id.remove(temporary_channel_id) { Some(ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV1(mut chan)) => { - let funding_txo = find_funding_output(&chan, &funding_transaction)?; + funding_txo = find_funding_output(&chan, &funding_transaction)?; let logger = WithChannelContext::from(&self.logger, &chan.context); let funding_res = chan.get_funding_created(funding_transaction, funding_txo, is_batch_funding, &&logger) @@ -3798,9 +3800,9 @@ where panic!("Generated duplicate funding txid?"); }, hash_map::Entry::Vacant(e) => { - let mut id_to_peer = self.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); - if id_to_peer.insert(chan.context.channel_id(), chan.context.get_counterparty_node_id()).is_some() { - panic!("id_to_peer map already contained funding txid, which shouldn't be possible"); + let mut outpoint_to_peer = self.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); + if outpoint_to_peer.insert(funding_txo, chan.context.get_counterparty_node_id()).is_some() { + panic!("outpoint_to_peer map already contained funding outpoint, which shouldn't be possible"); } e.insert(ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV1(chan)); } @@ -5610,6 +5612,7 @@ where } let preimage_update = ChannelMonitorUpdate { update_id: CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID, + counterparty_node_id: None, updates: vec![ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::PaymentPreimage { payment_preimage, }], @@ -5911,9 +5914,9 @@ where Some(cp_id) => cp_id.clone(), None => { // TODO: Once we can rely on the counterparty_node_id from the - // monitor event, this and the id_to_peer map should be removed. - let id_to_peer = self.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); - match id_to_peer.get(&funding_txo.to_channel_id()) { + // monitor event, this and the outpoint_to_peer map should be removed. + let outpoint_to_peer = self.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); + match outpoint_to_peer.get(&funding_txo) { Some(cp_id) => cp_id.clone(), None => return, } @@ -6265,50 +6268,61 @@ where let mut peer_state_lock = peer_state_mutex.lock().unwrap(); let peer_state = &mut *peer_state_lock; - let (chan, funding_msg_opt, monitor) = + let (mut chan, funding_msg_opt, monitor) = match peer_state.channel_by_id.remove(&msg.temporary_channel_id) { Some(ChannelPhase::UnfundedInboundV1(inbound_chan)) => { let logger = WithChannelContext::from(&self.logger, &inbound_chan.context); match inbound_chan.funding_created(msg, best_block, &self.signer_provider, &&logger) { Ok(res) => res, - Err((mut inbound_chan, err)) => { + Err((inbound_chan, err)) => { // We've already removed this inbound channel from the map in `PeerState` // above so at this point we just need to clean up any lingering entries // concerning this channel as it is safe to do so. - update_maps_on_chan_removal!(self, &inbound_chan.context); - let user_id = inbound_chan.context.get_user_id(); - let shutdown_res = inbound_chan.context.force_shutdown(false); - return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::from_finish_shutdown(format!("{}", err), - msg.temporary_channel_id, user_id, shutdown_res, None, inbound_chan.context.get_value_satoshis())); + debug_assert!(matches!(err, ChannelError::Close(_))); + // Really we should be returning the channel_id the peer expects based + // on their funding info here, but they're horribly confused anyway, so + // there's not a lot we can do to save them. + return Err(convert_chan_phase_err!(self, err, &mut ChannelPhase::UnfundedInboundV1(inbound_chan), &msg.temporary_channel_id).1); }, } }, - Some(ChannelPhase::Funded(_)) | Some(ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV1(_)) => { - return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close(format!("Got an unexpected funding_created message from peer with counterparty_node_id {}", counterparty_node_id), msg.temporary_channel_id)); + Some(mut phase) => { + let err_msg = format!("Got an unexpected funding_created message from peer with counterparty_node_id {}", counterparty_node_id); + let err = ChannelError::Close(err_msg); + return Err(convert_chan_phase_err!(self, err, &mut phase, &msg.temporary_channel_id).1); }, None => return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close(format!("Got a message for a channel from the wrong node! No such channel for the passed counterparty_node_id {}", counterparty_node_id), msg.temporary_channel_id)) }; - match peer_state.channel_by_id.entry(chan.context.channel_id()) { + let funded_channel_id = chan.context.channel_id(); + + macro_rules! fail_chan { ($err: expr) => { { + // Note that at this point we've filled in the funding outpoint on our + // channel, but its actually in conflict with another channel. Thus, if + // we call `convert_chan_phase_err` immediately (thus calling + // `update_maps_on_chan_removal`), we'll remove the existing channel + // from `outpoint_to_peer`. Thus, we must first unset the funding outpoint + // on the channel. + let err = ChannelError::Close($err.to_owned()); + chan.unset_funding_info(msg.temporary_channel_id); + return Err(convert_chan_phase_err!(self, err, chan, &funded_channel_id, UNFUNDED_CHANNEL).1); + } } } + + match peer_state.channel_by_id.entry(funded_channel_id) { hash_map::Entry::Occupied(_) => { - Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close( - "Already had channel with the new channel_id".to_owned(), - chan.context.channel_id() - )) + fail_chan!("Already had channel with the new channel_id"); }, hash_map::Entry::Vacant(e) => { - let mut id_to_peer_lock = self.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); - match id_to_peer_lock.entry(chan.context.channel_id()) { + let mut outpoint_to_peer_lock = self.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); + match outpoint_to_peer_lock.entry(monitor.get_funding_txo().0) { hash_map::Entry::Occupied(_) => { - return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close( - "The funding_created message had the same funding_txid as an existing channel - funding is not possible".to_owned(), - chan.context.channel_id())) + fail_chan!("The funding_created message had the same funding_txid as an existing channel - funding is not possible"); }, hash_map::Entry::Vacant(i_e) => { let monitor_res = self.chain_monitor.watch_channel(monitor.get_funding_txo().0, monitor); if let Ok(persist_state) = monitor_res { i_e.insert(chan.context.get_counterparty_node_id()); - mem::drop(id_to_peer_lock); + mem::drop(outpoint_to_peer_lock); // There's no problem signing a counterparty's funding transaction if our monitor // hasn't persisted to disk yet - we can't lose money on a transaction that we haven't @@ -6331,13 +6345,7 @@ where } else { let logger = WithChannelContext::from(&self.logger, &chan.context); log_error!(logger, "Persisting initial ChannelMonitor failed, implying the funding outpoint was duplicated"); - let channel_id = match funding_msg_opt { - Some(msg) => msg.channel_id, - None => chan.context.channel_id(), - }; - return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close( - "The funding_created message had the same funding_txid as an existing channel - funding is not possible".to_owned(), - channel_id)); + fail_chan!("Duplicate funding outpoint"); } } } @@ -7212,9 +7220,9 @@ where Some(cp_id) => Some(cp_id), None => { // TODO: Once we can rely on the counterparty_node_id from the - // monitor event, this and the id_to_peer map should be removed. - let id_to_peer = self.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); - id_to_peer.get(&funding_outpoint.to_channel_id()).cloned() + // monitor event, this and the outpoint_to_peer map should be removed. + let outpoint_to_peer = self.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); + outpoint_to_peer.get(&funding_outpoint).cloned() } }; if let Some(counterparty_node_id) = counterparty_node_id_opt { @@ -7483,32 +7491,43 @@ where /// /// # Privacy /// - /// Uses a one-hop [`BlindedPath`] for the offer with [`ChannelManager::get_our_node_id`] as the - /// introduction node and a derived signing pubkey for recipient privacy. As such, currently, - /// the node must be announced. Otherwise, there is no way to find a path to the introduction - /// node in order to send the [`InvoiceRequest`]. + /// Uses [`MessageRouter::create_blinded_paths`] to construct a [`BlindedPath`] for the offer. + /// However, if one is not found, uses a one-hop [`BlindedPath`] with + /// [`ChannelManager::get_our_node_id`] as the introduction node instead. In the latter case, + /// the node must be announced, otherwise, there is no way to find a path to the introduction in + /// order to send the [`InvoiceRequest`]. + /// + /// Also, uses a derived signing pubkey in the offer for recipient privacy. /// /// # Limitations /// /// Requires a direct connection to the introduction node in the responding [`InvoiceRequest`]'s /// reply path. /// + /// # Errors + /// + /// Errors if the parameterized [`Router`] is unable to create a blinded path for the offer. + /// /// This is not exported to bindings users as builder patterns don't map outside of move semantics. /// /// [`Offer`]: crate::offers::offer::Offer /// [`InvoiceRequest`]: crate::offers::invoice_request::InvoiceRequest pub fn create_offer_builder( &self, description: String - ) -> OfferBuilder { + ) -> Result, Bolt12SemanticError> { let node_id = self.get_our_node_id(); let expanded_key = &self.inbound_payment_key; let entropy = &*self.entropy_source; let secp_ctx = &self.secp_ctx; - let path = self.create_one_hop_blinded_path(); - OfferBuilder::deriving_signing_pubkey(description, node_id, expanded_key, entropy, secp_ctx) + let path = self.create_blinded_path().map_err(|_| Bolt12SemanticError::MissingPaths)?; + let builder = OfferBuilder::deriving_signing_pubkey( + description, node_id, expanded_key, entropy, secp_ctx + ) .chain_hash(self.chain_hash) - .path(path) + .path(path); + + Ok(builder) } /// Creates a [`RefundBuilder`] such that the [`Refund`] it builds is recognized by the @@ -7533,10 +7552,13 @@ where /// /// # Privacy /// - /// Uses a one-hop [`BlindedPath`] for the refund with [`ChannelManager::get_our_node_id`] as - /// the introduction node and a derived payer id for payer privacy. As such, currently, the - /// node must be announced. Otherwise, there is no way to find a path to the introduction node - /// in order to send the [`Bolt12Invoice`]. + /// Uses [`MessageRouter::create_blinded_paths`] to construct a [`BlindedPath`] for the refund. + /// However, if one is not found, uses a one-hop [`BlindedPath`] with + /// [`ChannelManager::get_our_node_id`] as the introduction node instead. In the latter case, + /// the node must be announced, otherwise, there is no way to find a path to the introduction in + /// order to send the [`Bolt12Invoice`]. + /// + /// Also, uses a derived payer id in the refund for payer privacy. /// /// # Limitations /// @@ -7545,14 +7567,17 @@ where /// /// # Errors /// - /// Errors if a duplicate `payment_id` is provided given the caveats in the aforementioned link - /// or if `amount_msats` is invalid. + /// Errors if: + /// - a duplicate `payment_id` is provided given the caveats in the aforementioned link, + /// - `amount_msats` is invalid, or + /// - the parameterized [`Router`] is unable to create a blinded path for the refund. /// /// This is not exported to bindings users as builder patterns don't map outside of move semantics. /// /// [`Refund`]: crate::offers::refund::Refund /// [`Bolt12Invoice`]: crate::offers::invoice::Bolt12Invoice /// [`Bolt12Invoice::payment_paths`]: crate::offers::invoice::Bolt12Invoice::payment_paths + /// [Avoiding Duplicate Payments]: #avoiding-duplicate-payments pub fn create_refund_builder( &self, description: String, amount_msats: u64, absolute_expiry: Duration, payment_id: PaymentId, retry_strategy: Retry, max_total_routing_fee_msat: Option @@ -7561,8 +7586,8 @@ where let expanded_key = &self.inbound_payment_key; let entropy = &*self.entropy_source; let secp_ctx = &self.secp_ctx; - let path = self.create_one_hop_blinded_path(); + let path = self.create_blinded_path().map_err(|_| Bolt12SemanticError::MissingPaths)?; let builder = RefundBuilder::deriving_payer_id( description, node_id, expanded_key, entropy, secp_ctx, amount_msats, payment_id )? @@ -7620,8 +7645,11 @@ where /// /// # Errors /// - /// Errors if a duplicate `payment_id` is provided given the caveats in the aforementioned link - /// or if the provided parameters are invalid for the offer. + /// Errors if: + /// - a duplicate `payment_id` is provided given the caveats in the aforementioned link, + /// - the provided parameters are invalid for the offer, + /// - the parameterized [`Router`] is unable to create a blinded reply path for the invoice + /// request. /// /// [`InvoiceRequest`]: crate::offers::invoice_request::InvoiceRequest /// [`InvoiceRequest::quantity`]: crate::offers::invoice_request::InvoiceRequest::quantity @@ -7654,9 +7682,8 @@ where None => builder, Some(payer_note) => builder.payer_note(payer_note), }; - let invoice_request = builder.build_and_sign()?; - let reply_path = self.create_one_hop_blinded_path(); + let reply_path = self.create_blinded_path().map_err(|_| Bolt12SemanticError::MissingPaths)?; let expiration = StaleExpiration::TimerTicks(1); self.pending_outbound_payments @@ -7705,6 +7732,11 @@ where /// node meeting the aforementioned criteria, but there's no guarantee that they will be /// received and no retries will be made. /// + /// # Errors + /// + /// Errors if the parameterized [`Router`] is unable to create a blinded payment path or reply + /// path for the invoice. + /// /// [`Bolt12Invoice`]: crate::offers::invoice::Bolt12Invoice pub fn request_refund_payment(&self, refund: &Refund) -> Result<(), Bolt12SemanticError> { let expanded_key = &self.inbound_payment_key; @@ -7716,9 +7748,9 @@ where match self.create_inbound_payment(Some(amount_msats), relative_expiry, None) { Ok((payment_hash, payment_secret)) => { - let payment_paths = vec![ - self.create_one_hop_blinded_payment_path(payment_secret), - ]; + let payment_paths = self.create_blinded_payment_paths(amount_msats, payment_secret) + .map_err(|_| Bolt12SemanticError::MissingPaths)?; + #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))] let builder = refund.respond_using_derived_keys( payment_paths, payment_hash, expanded_key, entropy @@ -7732,7 +7764,8 @@ where payment_paths, payment_hash, created_at, expanded_key, entropy )?; let invoice = builder.allow_mpp().build_and_sign(secp_ctx)?; - let reply_path = self.create_one_hop_blinded_path(); + let reply_path = self.create_blinded_path() + .map_err(|_| Bolt12SemanticError::MissingPaths)?; let mut pending_offers_messages = self.pending_offers_messages.lock().unwrap(); if refund.paths().is_empty() { @@ -7859,24 +7892,37 @@ where inbound_payment::get_payment_preimage(payment_hash, payment_secret, &self.inbound_payment_key) } - /// Creates a one-hop blinded path with [`ChannelManager::get_our_node_id`] as the introduction - /// node. - fn create_one_hop_blinded_path(&self) -> BlindedPath { + /// Creates a blinded path by delegating to [`MessageRouter::create_blinded_paths`]. + /// + /// Errors if the `MessageRouter` errors or returns an empty `Vec`. + fn create_blinded_path(&self) -> Result { + let recipient = self.get_our_node_id(); let entropy_source = self.entropy_source.deref(); let secp_ctx = &self.secp_ctx; - BlindedPath::one_hop_for_message(self.get_our_node_id(), entropy_source, secp_ctx).unwrap() + + let peers = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap() + .iter() + .filter(|(_, peer)| peer.lock().unwrap().latest_features.supports_onion_messages()) + .map(|(node_id, _)| *node_id) + .collect::>(); + + self.router + .create_blinded_paths(recipient, peers, entropy_source, secp_ctx) + .and_then(|paths| paths.into_iter().next().ok_or(())) } - /// Creates a one-hop blinded payment path with [`ChannelManager::get_our_node_id`] as the - /// introduction node. - fn create_one_hop_blinded_payment_path( - &self, payment_secret: PaymentSecret - ) -> (BlindedPayInfo, BlindedPath) { + /// Creates multi-hop blinded payment paths for the given `amount_msats` by delegating to + /// [`Router::create_blinded_payment_paths`]. + fn create_blinded_payment_paths( + &self, amount_msats: u64, payment_secret: PaymentSecret + ) -> Result, ()> { let entropy_source = self.entropy_source.deref(); let secp_ctx = &self.secp_ctx; + let first_hops = self.list_usable_channels(); let payee_node_id = self.get_our_node_id(); - let max_cltv_expiry = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS; + let max_cltv_expiry = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + CLTV_FAR_FAR_AWAY + + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS; let payee_tlvs = ReceiveTlvs { payment_secret, payment_constraints: PaymentConstraints { @@ -7884,10 +7930,9 @@ where htlc_minimum_msat: 1, }, }; - // TODO: Err for overflow? - BlindedPath::one_hop_for_payment( - payee_node_id, payee_tlvs, entropy_source, secp_ctx - ).unwrap() + self.router.create_blinded_payment_paths( + payee_node_id, first_hops, payee_tlvs, amount_msats, entropy_source, secp_ctx + ) } /// Gets a fake short channel id for use in receiving [phantom node payments]. These fake scids @@ -9127,7 +9172,7 @@ where let amount_msats = match InvoiceBuilder::::amount_msats( &invoice_request ) { - Ok(amount_msats) => Some(amount_msats), + Ok(amount_msats) => amount_msats, Err(error) => return Some(OffersMessage::InvoiceError(error.into())), }; let invoice_request = match invoice_request.verify(expanded_key, secp_ctx) { @@ -9137,64 +9182,69 @@ where return Some(OffersMessage::InvoiceError(error.into())); }, }; - let relative_expiry = DEFAULT_RELATIVE_EXPIRY.as_secs() as u32; - match self.create_inbound_payment(amount_msats, relative_expiry, None) { - Ok((payment_hash, payment_secret)) if invoice_request.keys.is_some() => { - let payment_paths = vec![ - self.create_one_hop_blinded_payment_path(payment_secret), - ]; - #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))] - let builder = invoice_request.respond_using_derived_keys( - payment_paths, payment_hash - ); - #[cfg(feature = "no-std")] - let created_at = Duration::from_secs( - self.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64 - ); - #[cfg(feature = "no-std")] - let builder = invoice_request.respond_using_derived_keys_no_std( - payment_paths, payment_hash, created_at - ); - match builder.and_then(|b| b.allow_mpp().build_and_sign(secp_ctx)) { - Ok(invoice) => Some(OffersMessage::Invoice(invoice)), - Err(error) => Some(OffersMessage::InvoiceError(error.into())), - } - }, - Ok((payment_hash, payment_secret)) => { - let payment_paths = vec![ - self.create_one_hop_blinded_payment_path(payment_secret), - ]; - #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))] - let builder = invoice_request.respond_with(payment_paths, payment_hash); - #[cfg(feature = "no-std")] - let created_at = Duration::from_secs( - self.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64 - ); - #[cfg(feature = "no-std")] - let builder = invoice_request.respond_with_no_std( - payment_paths, payment_hash, created_at - ); - let response = builder.and_then(|builder| builder.allow_mpp().build()) - .map_err(|e| OffersMessage::InvoiceError(e.into())) - .and_then(|invoice| - match invoice.sign(|invoice| self.node_signer.sign_bolt12_invoice(invoice)) { - Ok(invoice) => Ok(OffersMessage::Invoice(invoice)), - Err(SignError::Signing(())) => Err(OffersMessage::InvoiceError( - InvoiceError::from_string("Failed signing invoice".to_string()) - )), - Err(SignError::Verification(_)) => Err(OffersMessage::InvoiceError( - InvoiceError::from_string("Failed invoice signature verification".to_string()) - )), - }); - match response { - Ok(invoice) => Some(invoice), - Err(error) => Some(error), - } + let relative_expiry = DEFAULT_RELATIVE_EXPIRY.as_secs() as u32; + let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = match self.create_inbound_payment( + Some(amount_msats), relative_expiry, None + ) { + Ok((payment_hash, payment_secret)) => (payment_hash, payment_secret), + Err(()) => { + let error = Bolt12SemanticError::InvalidAmount; + return Some(OffersMessage::InvoiceError(error.into())); }, + }; + + let payment_paths = match self.create_blinded_payment_paths( + amount_msats, payment_secret + ) { + Ok(payment_paths) => payment_paths, Err(()) => { - Some(OffersMessage::InvoiceError(Bolt12SemanticError::InvalidAmount.into())) + let error = Bolt12SemanticError::MissingPaths; + return Some(OffersMessage::InvoiceError(error.into())); }, + }; + + #[cfg(feature = "no-std")] + let created_at = Duration::from_secs( + self.highest_seen_timestamp.load(Ordering::Acquire) as u64 + ); + + if invoice_request.keys.is_some() { + #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))] + let builder = invoice_request.respond_using_derived_keys( + payment_paths, payment_hash + ); + #[cfg(feature = "no-std")] + let builder = invoice_request.respond_using_derived_keys_no_std( + payment_paths, payment_hash, created_at + ); + match builder.and_then(|b| b.allow_mpp().build_and_sign(secp_ctx)) { + Ok(invoice) => Some(OffersMessage::Invoice(invoice)), + Err(error) => Some(OffersMessage::InvoiceError(error.into())), + } + } else { + #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))] + let builder = invoice_request.respond_with(payment_paths, payment_hash); + #[cfg(feature = "no-std")] + let builder = invoice_request.respond_with_no_std( + payment_paths, payment_hash, created_at + ); + let response = builder.and_then(|builder| builder.allow_mpp().build()) + .map_err(|e| OffersMessage::InvoiceError(e.into())) + .and_then(|invoice| + match invoice.sign(|invoice| self.node_signer.sign_bolt12_invoice(invoice)) { + Ok(invoice) => Ok(OffersMessage::Invoice(invoice)), + Err(SignError::Signing(())) => Err(OffersMessage::InvoiceError( + InvoiceError::from_string("Failed signing invoice".to_string()) + )), + Err(SignError::Verification(_)) => Err(OffersMessage::InvoiceError( + InvoiceError::from_string("Failed invoice signature verification".to_string()) + )), + }); + match response { + Ok(invoice) => Some(invoice), + Err(error) => Some(error), + } } }, OffersMessage::Invoice(invoice) => { @@ -10207,7 +10257,7 @@ where let channel_count: u64 = Readable::read(reader)?; let mut funding_txo_set = HashSet::with_capacity(cmp::min(channel_count as usize, 128)); let mut funded_peer_channels: HashMap>> = HashMap::with_capacity(cmp::min(channel_count as usize, 128)); - let mut id_to_peer = HashMap::with_capacity(cmp::min(channel_count as usize, 128)); + let mut outpoint_to_peer = HashMap::with_capacity(cmp::min(channel_count as usize, 128)); let mut short_to_chan_info = HashMap::with_capacity(cmp::min(channel_count as usize, 128)); let mut channel_closures = VecDeque::new(); let mut close_background_events = Vec::new(); @@ -10285,8 +10335,8 @@ where if let Some(short_channel_id) = channel.context.get_short_channel_id() { short_to_chan_info.insert(short_channel_id, (channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id(), channel.context.channel_id())); } - if channel.context.is_funding_broadcast() { - id_to_peer.insert(channel.context.channel_id(), channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id()); + if let Some(funding_txo) = channel.context.get_funding_txo() { + outpoint_to_peer.insert(funding_txo, channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id()); } match funded_peer_channels.entry(channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id()) { hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut entry) => { @@ -10329,6 +10379,7 @@ where &funding_txo.to_channel_id()); let monitor_update = ChannelMonitorUpdate { update_id: CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID, + counterparty_node_id: None, updates: vec![ChannelMonitorUpdateStep::ChannelForceClosed { should_broadcast: true }], }; close_background_events.push(BackgroundEvent::ClosedMonitorUpdateRegeneratedOnStartup((*funding_txo, monitor_update))); @@ -10620,7 +10671,7 @@ where // We only rebuild the pending payments map if we were most recently serialized by // 0.0.102+ for (_, monitor) in args.channel_monitors.iter() { - let counterparty_opt = id_to_peer.get(&monitor.get_funding_txo().0.to_channel_id()); + let counterparty_opt = outpoint_to_peer.get(&monitor.get_funding_txo().0); if counterparty_opt.is_none() { let logger = WithChannelMonitor::from(&args.logger, monitor); for (htlc_source, (htlc, _)) in monitor.get_pending_or_resolved_outbound_htlcs() { @@ -10913,7 +10964,7 @@ where // without the new monitor persisted - we'll end up right back here on // restart. let previous_channel_id = claimable_htlc.prev_hop.outpoint.to_channel_id(); - if let Some(peer_node_id) = id_to_peer.get(&previous_channel_id){ + if let Some(peer_node_id) = outpoint_to_peer.get(&claimable_htlc.prev_hop.outpoint) { let peer_state_mutex = per_peer_state.get(peer_node_id).unwrap(); let mut peer_state_lock = peer_state_mutex.lock().unwrap(); let peer_state = &mut *peer_state_lock; @@ -10991,7 +11042,7 @@ where forward_htlcs: Mutex::new(forward_htlcs), claimable_payments: Mutex::new(ClaimablePayments { claimable_payments, pending_claiming_payments: pending_claiming_payments.unwrap() }), outbound_scid_aliases: Mutex::new(outbound_scid_aliases), - id_to_peer: Mutex::new(id_to_peer), + outpoint_to_peer: Mutex::new(outpoint_to_peer), short_to_chan_info: FairRwLock::new(short_to_chan_info), fake_scid_rand_bytes: fake_scid_rand_bytes.unwrap(), @@ -11610,8 +11661,8 @@ mod tests { } #[test] - fn test_id_to_peer_coverage() { - // Test that the `ChannelManager:id_to_peer` contains channels which have been assigned + fn test_outpoint_to_peer_coverage() { + // Test that the `ChannelManager:outpoint_to_peer` contains channels which have been assigned // a `channel_id` (i.e. have had the funding tx created), and that they are removed once // the channel is successfully closed. let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); @@ -11625,42 +11676,42 @@ mod tests { let accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel); - let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 42); + let (temporary_channel_id, tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 42); let channel_id = ChannelId::from_bytes(tx.txid().to_byte_array()); { - // Ensure that the `id_to_peer` map is empty until either party has received the + // Ensure that the `outpoint_to_peer` map is empty until either party has received the // funding transaction, and have the real `channel_id`. - assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap().len(), 0); - assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap().len(), 0); + assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap().len(), 0); + assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap().len(), 0); } nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap(); { - // Assert that `nodes[0]`'s `id_to_peer` map is populated with the channel as soon as + // Assert that `nodes[0]`'s `outpoint_to_peer` map is populated with the channel as soon as // as it has the funding transaction. - let nodes_0_lock = nodes[0].node.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); + let nodes_0_lock = nodes[0].node.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); assert_eq!(nodes_0_lock.len(), 1); - assert!(nodes_0_lock.contains_key(&channel_id)); + assert!(nodes_0_lock.contains_key(&funding_output)); } - assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap().len(), 0); + assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap().len(), 0); let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msg); { - let nodes_0_lock = nodes[0].node.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); + let nodes_0_lock = nodes[0].node.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); assert_eq!(nodes_0_lock.len(), 1); - assert!(nodes_0_lock.contains_key(&channel_id)); + assert!(nodes_0_lock.contains_key(&funding_output)); } expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); { - // Assert that `nodes[1]`'s `id_to_peer` map is populated with the channel as soon as - // as it has the funding transaction. - let nodes_1_lock = nodes[1].node.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); + // Assert that `nodes[1]`'s `outpoint_to_peer` map is populated with the channel as + // soon as it has the funding transaction. + let nodes_1_lock = nodes[1].node.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); assert_eq!(nodes_1_lock.len(), 1); - assert!(nodes_1_lock.contains_key(&channel_id)); + assert!(nodes_1_lock.contains_key(&funding_output)); } check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); let funding_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); @@ -11679,23 +11730,23 @@ mod tests { let closing_signed_node_0 = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendClosingSigned, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[1].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &closing_signed_node_0); { - // Assert that the channel is kept in the `id_to_peer` map for both nodes until the + // Assert that the channel is kept in the `outpoint_to_peer` map for both nodes until the // channel can be fully closed by both parties (i.e. no outstanding htlcs exists, the // fee for the closing transaction has been negotiated and the parties has the other // party's signature for the fee negotiated closing transaction.) - let nodes_0_lock = nodes[0].node.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); + let nodes_0_lock = nodes[0].node.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); assert_eq!(nodes_0_lock.len(), 1); - assert!(nodes_0_lock.contains_key(&channel_id)); + assert!(nodes_0_lock.contains_key(&funding_output)); } { // At this stage, `nodes[1]` has proposed a fee for the closing transaction in the // `handle_closing_signed` call above. As `nodes[1]` has not yet received the signature // from `nodes[0]` for the closing transaction with the proposed fee, the channel is - // kept in the `nodes[1]`'s `id_to_peer` map. - let nodes_1_lock = nodes[1].node.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); + // kept in the `nodes[1]`'s `outpoint_to_peer` map. + let nodes_1_lock = nodes[1].node.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); assert_eq!(nodes_1_lock.len(), 1); - assert!(nodes_1_lock.contains_key(&channel_id)); + assert!(nodes_1_lock.contains_key(&funding_output)); } nodes[0].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendClosingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())); @@ -11703,24 +11754,24 @@ mod tests { // `nodes[0]` accepts `nodes[1]`'s proposed fee for the closing transaction, and // therefore has all it needs to fully close the channel (both signatures for the // closing transaction). - // Assert that the channel is removed from `nodes[0]`'s `id_to_peer` map as it can be + // Assert that the channel is removed from `nodes[0]`'s `outpoint_to_peer` map as it can be // fully closed by `nodes[0]`. - assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap().len(), 0); + assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap().len(), 0); - // Assert that the channel is still in `nodes[1]`'s `id_to_peer` map, as `nodes[1]` + // Assert that the channel is still in `nodes[1]`'s `outpoint_to_peer` map, as `nodes[1]` // doesn't have `nodes[0]`'s signature for the closing transaction yet. - let nodes_1_lock = nodes[1].node.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); + let nodes_1_lock = nodes[1].node.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap(); assert_eq!(nodes_1_lock.len(), 1); - assert!(nodes_1_lock.contains_key(&channel_id)); + assert!(nodes_1_lock.contains_key(&funding_output)); } let (_nodes_0_update, closing_signed_node_0) = get_closing_signed_broadcast!(nodes[0].node, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[1].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &closing_signed_node_0.unwrap()); { - // Assert that the channel has now been removed from both parties `id_to_peer` map once + // Assert that the channel has now been removed from both parties `outpoint_to_peer` map once // they both have everything required to fully close the channel. - assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.id_to_peer.lock().unwrap().len(), 0); + assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.outpoint_to_peer.lock().unwrap().len(), 0); } let (_nodes_1_update, _none) = get_closing_signed_broadcast!(nodes[1].node, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());