X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Fchannelmanager.rs;h=bddcd4c9b8117b7884228161757028d118dc7af0;hb=beef584cf39497090636c2206e20f1b56ffccb92;hp=7bd395f999aa30da89dbdd1521dfbf8a864d7c3f;hpb=aa334d57532fba574ae2db6f94f980982d58d395;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs index 7bd395f9..bddcd4c9 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs @@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ pub enum PendingHTLCRouting { /// For HTLCs received by LDK, these will ultimately bubble back up as /// [`RecipientOnionFields::custom_tlvs`]. custom_tlvs: Vec<(u64, Vec)>, + /// Set if this HTLC is the final hop in a multi-hop blinded path. + requires_blinded_error: bool, }, } @@ -221,6 +223,7 @@ impl PendingHTLCRouting { match self { Self::Forward { blinded: Some(BlindedForward { failure, .. }), .. } => Some(*failure), Self::Receive { requires_blinded_error: true, .. } => Some(BlindedFailure::FromBlindedNode), + Self::ReceiveKeysend { requires_blinded_error: true, .. } => Some(BlindedFailure::FromBlindedNode), _ => None, } } @@ -4523,7 +4526,10 @@ where (incoming_cltv_expiry, OnionPayload::Invoice { _legacy_hop_data }, Some(payment_data), phantom_shared_secret, onion_fields) }, - PendingHTLCRouting::ReceiveKeysend { payment_data, payment_preimage, payment_metadata, incoming_cltv_expiry, custom_tlvs } => { + PendingHTLCRouting::ReceiveKeysend { + payment_data, payment_preimage, payment_metadata, + incoming_cltv_expiry, custom_tlvs, requires_blinded_error: _ + } => { let onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields { payment_secret: payment_data.as_ref().map(|data| data.payment_secret), payment_metadata, @@ -5740,7 +5746,7 @@ where fn claim_funds_internal(&self, source: HTLCSource, payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage, forwarded_htlc_value_msat: Option, skimmed_fee_msat: Option, from_onchain: bool, startup_replay: bool, next_channel_counterparty_node_id: Option, - next_channel_outpoint: OutPoint, next_channel_id: ChannelId, + next_channel_outpoint: OutPoint, next_channel_id: ChannelId, next_user_channel_id: Option, ) { match source { HTLCSource::OutboundRoute { session_priv, payment_id, path, .. } => { @@ -5759,11 +5765,10 @@ where }, HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(hop_data) => { let prev_channel_id = hop_data.channel_id; + let prev_user_channel_id = hop_data.user_channel_id; let completed_blocker = RAAMonitorUpdateBlockingAction::from_prev_hop_data(&hop_data); #[cfg(debug_assertions)] let claiming_chan_funding_outpoint = hop_data.outpoint; - #[cfg(debug_assertions)] - let claiming_channel_id = hop_data.channel_id; let res = self.claim_funds_from_hop(hop_data, payment_preimage, |htlc_claim_value_msat, definitely_duplicate| { let chan_to_release = @@ -5821,7 +5826,7 @@ where BackgroundEvent::MonitorUpdatesComplete { channel_id, .. } => - *channel_id == claiming_channel_id, + *channel_id == prev_channel_id, } }), "{:?}", *background_events); } @@ -5845,12 +5850,14 @@ where "skimmed_fee_msat must always be included in total_fee_earned_msat"); Some(MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::EmitEventAndFreeOtherChannel { event: events::Event::PaymentForwarded { - total_fee_earned_msat, - claim_from_onchain_tx: from_onchain, prev_channel_id: Some(prev_channel_id), next_channel_id: Some(next_channel_id), - outbound_amount_forwarded_msat: forwarded_htlc_value_msat, + prev_user_channel_id, + next_user_channel_id, + total_fee_earned_msat, skimmed_fee_msat, + claim_from_onchain_tx: from_onchain, + outbound_amount_forwarded_msat: forwarded_htlc_value_msat, }, downstream_counterparty_and_funding_outpoint: chan_to_release, }) @@ -6105,73 +6112,82 @@ where // happening and return an error. N.B. that we create channel with an outbound SCID of zero so // that we can delay allocating the SCID until after we're sure that the checks below will // succeed. - let mut channel = match peer_state.inbound_channel_request_by_id.remove(temporary_channel_id) { + let res = match peer_state.inbound_channel_request_by_id.remove(temporary_channel_id) { Some(unaccepted_channel) => { let best_block_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height; InboundV1Channel::new(&self.fee_estimator, &self.entropy_source, &self.signer_provider, counterparty_node_id.clone(), &self.channel_type_features(), &peer_state.latest_features, &unaccepted_channel.open_channel_msg, user_channel_id, &self.default_configuration, best_block_height, - &self.logger, accept_0conf).map_err(|e| { - let err_str = e.to_string(); - log_error!(logger, "{}", err_str); - - APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err: err_str } - }) - } + &self.logger, accept_0conf).map_err(|err| MsgHandleErrInternal::from_chan_no_close(err, *temporary_channel_id)) + }, _ => { let err_str = "No such channel awaiting to be accepted.".to_owned(); log_error!(logger, "{}", err_str); - Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err: err_str }) + return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err: err_str }); } - }?; + }; - if accept_0conf { - // This should have been correctly configured by the call to InboundV1Channel::new. - debug_assert!(channel.context.minimum_depth().unwrap() == 0); - } else if channel.context.get_channel_type().requires_zero_conf() { - let send_msg_err_event = events::MessageSendEvent::HandleError { - node_id: channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id(), - action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage{ - msg: msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: temporary_channel_id.clone(), data: "No zero confirmation channels accepted".to_owned(), } + match res { + Err(err) => { + mem::drop(peer_state_lock); + mem::drop(per_peer_state); + match handle_error!(self, Result::<(), MsgHandleErrInternal>::Err(err), *counterparty_node_id) { + Ok(_) => unreachable!("`handle_error` only returns Err as we've passed in an Err"), + Err(e) => { + return Err(APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err: e.err }); + }, } - }; - peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(send_msg_err_event); - let err_str = "Please use accept_inbound_channel_from_trusted_peer_0conf to accept channels with zero confirmations.".to_owned(); - log_error!(logger, "{}", err_str); + } + Ok(mut channel) => { + if accept_0conf { + // This should have been correctly configured by the call to InboundV1Channel::new. + debug_assert!(channel.context.minimum_depth().unwrap() == 0); + } else if channel.context.get_channel_type().requires_zero_conf() { + let send_msg_err_event = events::MessageSendEvent::HandleError { + node_id: channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id(), + action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage{ + msg: msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: temporary_channel_id.clone(), data: "No zero confirmation channels accepted".to_owned(), } + } + }; + peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(send_msg_err_event); + let err_str = "Please use accept_inbound_channel_from_trusted_peer_0conf to accept channels with zero confirmations.".to_owned(); + log_error!(logger, "{}", err_str); - return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err: err_str }); - } else { - // If this peer already has some channels, a new channel won't increase our number of peers - // with unfunded channels, so as long as we aren't over the maximum number of unfunded - // channels per-peer we can accept channels from a peer with existing ones. - if is_only_peer_channel && peers_without_funded_channels >= MAX_UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_PEERS { - let send_msg_err_event = events::MessageSendEvent::HandleError { - node_id: channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id(), - action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage{ - msg: msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: temporary_channel_id.clone(), data: "Have too many peers with unfunded channels, not accepting new ones".to_owned(), } - } - }; - peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(send_msg_err_event); - let err_str = "Too many peers with unfunded channels, refusing to accept new ones".to_owned(); - log_error!(logger, "{}", err_str); + return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err: err_str }); + } else { + // If this peer already has some channels, a new channel won't increase our number of peers + // with unfunded channels, so as long as we aren't over the maximum number of unfunded + // channels per-peer we can accept channels from a peer with existing ones. + if is_only_peer_channel && peers_without_funded_channels >= MAX_UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_PEERS { + let send_msg_err_event = events::MessageSendEvent::HandleError { + node_id: channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id(), + action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage{ + msg: msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: temporary_channel_id.clone(), data: "Have too many peers with unfunded channels, not accepting new ones".to_owned(), } + } + }; + peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(send_msg_err_event); + let err_str = "Too many peers with unfunded channels, refusing to accept new ones".to_owned(); + log_error!(logger, "{}", err_str); - return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err: err_str }); - } - } + return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err: err_str }); + } + } - // Now that we know we have a channel, assign an outbound SCID alias. - let outbound_scid_alias = self.create_and_insert_outbound_scid_alias(); - channel.context.set_outbound_scid_alias(outbound_scid_alias); + // Now that we know we have a channel, assign an outbound SCID alias. + let outbound_scid_alias = self.create_and_insert_outbound_scid_alias(); + channel.context.set_outbound_scid_alias(outbound_scid_alias); - peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { - node_id: channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id(), - msg: channel.accept_inbound_channel(), - }); + peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { + node_id: channel.context.get_counterparty_node_id(), + msg: channel.accept_inbound_channel(), + }); - peer_state.channel_by_id.insert(temporary_channel_id.clone(), ChannelPhase::UnfundedInboundV1(channel)); + peer_state.channel_by_id.insert(temporary_channel_id.clone(), ChannelPhase::UnfundedInboundV1(channel)); - Ok(()) + Ok(()) + }, + } } /// Gets the number of peers which match the given filter and do not have any funded, outbound, @@ -6824,6 +6840,7 @@ where fn internal_update_fulfill_htlc(&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC) -> Result<(), MsgHandleErrInternal> { let funding_txo; + let next_user_channel_id; let (htlc_source, forwarded_htlc_value, skimmed_fee_msat) = { let per_peer_state = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap(); let peer_state_mutex = per_peer_state.get(counterparty_node_id) @@ -6853,6 +6870,7 @@ where // outbound HTLC is claimed. This is guaranteed to all complete before we // process the RAA as messages are processed from single peers serially. funding_txo = chan.context.get_funding_txo().expect("We won't accept a fulfill until funded"); + next_user_channel_id = chan.context.get_user_id(); res } else { return try_chan_phase_entry!(self, Err(ChannelError::Close( @@ -6864,7 +6882,7 @@ where }; self.claim_funds_internal(htlc_source, msg.payment_preimage.clone(), Some(forwarded_htlc_value), skimmed_fee_msat, false, false, Some(*counterparty_node_id), - funding_txo, msg.channel_id + funding_txo, msg.channel_id, Some(next_user_channel_id), ); Ok(()) @@ -7366,7 +7384,7 @@ where log_trace!(logger, "Claiming HTLC with preimage {} from our monitor", preimage); self.claim_funds_internal(htlc_update.source, preimage, htlc_update.htlc_value_satoshis.map(|v| v * 1000), None, true, - false, counterparty_node_id, funding_outpoint, channel_id); + false, counterparty_node_id, funding_outpoint, channel_id, None); } else { log_trace!(logger, "Failing HTLC with hash {} from our monitor", &htlc_update.payment_hash); let receiver = HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: counterparty_node_id, channel_id }; @@ -7374,7 +7392,7 @@ where self.fail_htlc_backwards_internal(&htlc_update.source, &htlc_update.payment_hash, &reason, receiver); } }, - MonitorEvent::HolderForceClosed(_funding_outpoint) => { + MonitorEvent::HolderForceClosed(_) | MonitorEvent::HolderForceClosedWithInfo { .. } => { let counterparty_node_id_opt = match counterparty_node_id { Some(cp_id) => Some(cp_id), None => { @@ -7392,7 +7410,12 @@ where let pending_msg_events = &mut peer_state.pending_msg_events; if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(chan_phase_entry) = peer_state.channel_by_id.entry(channel_id) { if let ChannelPhase::Funded(mut chan) = remove_channel_phase!(self, chan_phase_entry) { - failed_channels.push(chan.context.force_shutdown(false, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed)); + let reason = if let MonitorEvent::HolderForceClosedWithInfo { reason, .. } = monitor_event { + reason + } else { + ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed + }; + failed_channels.push(chan.context.force_shutdown(false, reason.clone())); if let Ok(update) = self.get_channel_update_for_broadcast(&chan) { pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { msg: update @@ -7401,7 +7424,7 @@ where pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id: chan.context.get_counterparty_node_id(), action: msgs::ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { - msg: Some(msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: chan.context.channel_id(), data: "Channel force-closed".to_owned() }) + msg: Some(msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: chan.context.channel_id(), data: reason.to_string() }) }, }); } @@ -7755,6 +7778,8 @@ macro_rules! create_refund_builder { ($self: ident, $builder: ty) => { .absolute_expiry(absolute_expiry) .path(path); + let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop($self); + let expiration = StaleExpiration::AbsoluteTimeout(absolute_expiry); $self.pending_outbound_payments .add_new_awaiting_invoice( @@ -7870,6 +7895,8 @@ where let invoice_request = builder.build_and_sign()?; let reply_path = self.create_blinded_path().map_err(|_| Bolt12SemanticError::MissingPaths)?; + let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(self); + let expiration = StaleExpiration::TimerTicks(1); self.pending_outbound_payments .add_new_awaiting_invoice( @@ -7937,6 +7964,8 @@ where return Err(Bolt12SemanticError::UnsupportedChain); } + let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(self); + match self.create_inbound_payment(Some(amount_msats), relative_expiry, None) { Ok((payment_hash, payment_secret)) => { let payment_paths = self.create_blinded_payment_paths(amount_msats, payment_secret) @@ -9236,8 +9265,6 @@ where } fn handle_error(&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &msgs::ErrorMessage) { - let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(self); - match &msg.data as &str { "cannot co-op close channel w/ active htlcs"| "link failed to shutdown" => @@ -9250,34 +9277,45 @@ where // We're not going to bother handling this in a sensible way, instead simply // repeating the Shutdown message on repeat until morale improves. if !msg.channel_id.is_zero() { - let per_peer_state = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap(); - let peer_state_mutex_opt = per_peer_state.get(counterparty_node_id); - if peer_state_mutex_opt.is_none() { return; } - let mut peer_state = peer_state_mutex_opt.unwrap().lock().unwrap(); - if let Some(ChannelPhase::Funded(chan)) = peer_state.channel_by_id.get(&msg.channel_id) { - if let Some(msg) = chan.get_outbound_shutdown() { - peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown { - node_id: *counterparty_node_id, - msg, - }); - } - peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::HandleError { - node_id: *counterparty_node_id, - action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendWarningMessage { - msg: msgs::WarningMessage { - channel_id: msg.channel_id, - data: "You appear to be exhibiting LND bug 6039, we'll keep sending you shutdown messages until you handle them correctly".to_owned() - }, - log_level: Level::Trace, + PersistenceNotifierGuard::optionally_notify( + self, + || -> NotifyOption { + let per_peer_state = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap(); + let peer_state_mutex_opt = per_peer_state.get(counterparty_node_id); + if peer_state_mutex_opt.is_none() { return NotifyOption::SkipPersistNoEvents; } + let mut peer_state = peer_state_mutex_opt.unwrap().lock().unwrap(); + if let Some(ChannelPhase::Funded(chan)) = peer_state.channel_by_id.get(&msg.channel_id) { + if let Some(msg) = chan.get_outbound_shutdown() { + peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown { + node_id: *counterparty_node_id, + msg, + }); + } + peer_state.pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::HandleError { + node_id: *counterparty_node_id, + action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendWarningMessage { + msg: msgs::WarningMessage { + channel_id: msg.channel_id, + data: "You appear to be exhibiting LND bug 6039, we'll keep sending you shutdown messages until you handle them correctly".to_owned() + }, + log_level: Level::Trace, + } + }); + // This can happen in a fairly tight loop, so we absolutely cannot trigger + // a `ChannelManager` write here. + return NotifyOption::SkipPersistHandleEvents; } - }); - } + NotifyOption::SkipPersistNoEvents + } + ); } return; } _ => {} } + let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(self); + if msg.channel_id.is_zero() { let channel_ids: Vec = { let per_peer_state = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap(); @@ -9760,6 +9798,7 @@ impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum!(PendingHTLCRouting, }, (2, ReceiveKeysend) => { (0, payment_preimage, required), + (1, requires_blinded_error, (default_value, false)), (2, incoming_cltv_expiry, required), (3, payment_metadata, option), (4, payment_data, option), // Added in 0.0.116 @@ -11371,7 +11410,9 @@ where // don't remember in the `ChannelMonitor` where we got a preimage from, but if the // channel is closed we just assume that it probably came from an on-chain claim. channel_manager.claim_funds_internal(source, preimage, Some(downstream_value), None, - downstream_closed, true, downstream_node_id, downstream_funding, downstream_channel_id); + downstream_closed, true, downstream_node_id, downstream_funding, + downstream_channel_id, None + ); } //TODO: Broadcast channel update for closed channels, but only after we've made a