X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Ffunctional_test_utils.rs;h=f86c4f03dab77673db176ed5ee95c80354a9f5ef;hb=987ab9512ce1e98fbd8c99339515a3ac972ce231;hp=31aa24b706ff8f7520985dccbef1f99081c8bb70;hpb=226c43cc931c8a4c141567606e72712a5c6f378b;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs index 31aa24b7..f86c4f03 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ macro_rules! get_feerate { let mut per_peer_state_lock; let mut peer_state_lock; let chan = get_channel_ref!($node, $counterparty_node, per_peer_state_lock, peer_state_lock, $channel_id); - chan.get_feerate() + chan.get_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight() } } } @@ -1394,22 +1394,11 @@ impl SendEvent { } #[macro_export] +/// Don't use this, use the identically-named function instead. macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions { - ($node: expr, $expected_failures: expr) => {{ - let expected_failures = $expected_failures; - let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); - match events[0] { - $crate::util::events::Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { }, - _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events), - }; - - let count = expected_failures.len() + 1; - assert_eq!(events.len(), count); - - if expected_failures.len() > 0 { - expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(events, expected_failures) - } - }} + ($node: expr, $expected_failures: expr) => { + $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions($node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), &$expected_failures); + } } #[macro_export] @@ -1427,27 +1416,49 @@ macro_rules! expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations { }} } +/// Checks that an [`Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable`] is available in the given events and, if +/// there are any [`Event::HTLCHandlingFailed`] events their [`HTLCDestination`] is included in the +/// `expected_failures` set. +pub fn expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions(events: Vec, expected_failures: &[HTLCDestination]) { + match events[0] { + Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { }, + _ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events), + }; + + let count = expected_failures.len() + 1; + assert_eq!(events.len(), count); + + if expected_failures.len() > 0 { + expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(events, expected_failures) + } +} + #[macro_export] /// Clears (and ignores) a PendingHTLCsForwardable event +/// +/// Don't use this, call [`expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions()`] with an empty failure +/// set instead. macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore { - ($node: expr) => {{ - expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions!($node, vec![]); - }}; + ($node: expr) => { + $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions($node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), &[]); + } } #[macro_export] /// Clears (and ignores) PendingHTLCsForwardable and HTLCHandlingFailed events +/// +/// Don't use this, call [`expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions()`] instead. macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore { - ($node: expr, $expected_failures: expr) => {{ - expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions!($node, $expected_failures); - }}; + ($node: expr, $expected_failures: expr) => { + $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions($node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), &$expected_failures); + } } #[macro_export] /// Handles a PendingHTLCsForwardable event macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable { ($node: expr) => {{ - expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!($node); + $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions($node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), &[]); $node.node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); // Ensure process_pending_htlc_forwards is idempotent. @@ -1459,7 +1470,7 @@ macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable { /// Handles a PendingHTLCsForwardable and HTLCHandlingFailed event macro_rules! expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed { ($node: expr, $expected_failures: expr) => {{ - expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!($node, $expected_failures); + $crate::ln::functional_test_utils::expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_conditions($node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), &$expected_failures); $node.node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); // Ensure process_pending_htlc_forwards is idempotent. @@ -1857,20 +1868,13 @@ pub fn expect_payment_failed_conditions_event<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd, 'e>( ) { if conditions.expected_mpp_parts_remain { assert_eq!(payment_failed_events.len(), 1); } else { assert_eq!(payment_failed_events.len(), 2); } let expected_payment_id = match &payment_failed_events[0] { - Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, path, retry, payment_id, failure, short_channel_id, + Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, payment_id, failure, #[cfg(test)] error_code, #[cfg(test)] error_data, .. } => { assert_eq!(*payment_hash, expected_payment_hash, "unexpected payment_hash"); assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, expected_payment_failed_permanently, "unexpected payment_failed_permanently value"); - assert!(retry.is_some(), "expected retry.is_some()"); - assert_eq!(retry.as_ref().unwrap().final_value_msat, path.last().unwrap().fee_msat, "Retry amount should match last hop in path"); - assert_eq!(retry.as_ref().unwrap().payment_params.payee_pubkey, path.last().unwrap().pubkey, "Retry payee node_id should match last hop in path"); - if let Some(scid) = short_channel_id { - assert!(retry.as_ref().unwrap().payment_params.previously_failed_channels.contains(&scid)); - } - #[cfg(test)] { assert!(error_code.is_some(), "expected error_code.is_some() = true");