X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Ffunctional_tests.rs;h=240a5741b91c72fcc017254eac17038ee035909d;hb=48d73b3264a034f456e60540e438eb9a6aea14a6;hp=5e8edb3ca5e602adfac4ad94878dae7fa44e4e3a;hpb=1d37f56f8a9de6120198e723e5a2daaefcbcaf20;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs index 5e8edb3c..240a5741 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ use ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils}; use routing::router::{Route, RouteHop, get_route}; use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, NodeFeatures}; use ln::msgs; -use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler,RoutingMessageHandler,HTLCFailChannelUpdate, ErrorAction}; +use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler,RoutingMessageHandler,HTLCFailChannelUpdate, ErrorAction, OptionalField}; use util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingChannelKeys; use util::{byte_utils, test_utils}; use util::events::{Event, EventsProvider, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider}; @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ use bitcoin::hashes::Hash; use bitcoin::secp256k1::{Secp256k1, Message}; use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::{PublicKey,SecretKey}; +use regex; + use std::collections::{BTreeSet, HashMap, HashSet}; use std::default::Default; use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex}; @@ -77,10 +79,11 @@ fn test_insane_channel_opens() { nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &message_mutator(open_channel_message.clone())); let msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1); + let expected_regex = regex::Regex::new(expected_error_str).unwrap(); if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = msg_events[0] { match action { &ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. } => { - nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), expected_error_str.to_string(), 1); + nodes[1].logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), expected_regex, 1); }, _ => panic!("unexpected event!"), } @@ -91,23 +94,23 @@ fn test_insane_channel_opens() { use ln::channelmanager::MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT; // Test all mutations that would make the channel open message insane - insane_open_helper("funding value > 2^24", |mut msg| { msg.funding_satoshis = MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS; msg }); + insane_open_helper(format!("Funding must be smaller than {}. It was {}", MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS, MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS).as_str(), |mut msg| { msg.funding_satoshis = MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS; msg }); insane_open_helper("Bogus channel_reserve_satoshis", |mut msg| { msg.channel_reserve_satoshis = msg.funding_satoshis + 1; msg }); - insane_open_helper("push_msat larger than funding value", |mut msg| { msg.push_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000 + 1; msg }); + insane_open_helper(r"push_msat \d+ was larger than funding value \d+", |mut msg| { msg.push_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000 + 1; msg }); insane_open_helper("Peer never wants payout outputs?", |mut msg| { msg.dust_limit_satoshis = msg.funding_satoshis + 1 ; msg }); - insane_open_helper("Bogus; channel reserve is less than dust limit", |mut msg| { msg.dust_limit_satoshis = msg.channel_reserve_satoshis + 1; msg }); + insane_open_helper(r"Bogus; channel reserve \(\d+\) is less than dust limit \(\d+\)", |mut msg| { msg.dust_limit_satoshis = msg.channel_reserve_satoshis + 1; msg }); - insane_open_helper("Minimum htlc value is full channel value", |mut msg| { msg.htlc_minimum_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000; msg }); + insane_open_helper(r"Minimum htlc value \(\d+\) was larger than full channel value \(\d+\)", |mut msg| { msg.htlc_minimum_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000; msg }); insane_open_helper("They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period", |mut msg| { msg.to_self_delay = MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT + 1; msg }); - insane_open_helper("0 max_accpted_htlcs makes for a useless channel", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 0; msg }); + insane_open_helper("0 max_accepted_htlcs makes for a useless channel", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 0; msg }); - insane_open_helper("max_accpted_htlcs > 483", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 484; msg }); + insane_open_helper("max_accepted_htlcs was 484. It must not be larger than 483", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 484; msg }); } #[test] @@ -1270,7 +1273,7 @@ fn fake_network_test() { route_over_limit(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], 3000000); let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 0); - nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap(), 1); //TODO: Test that routes work again here as we've been notified that the channel is full @@ -1321,10 +1324,10 @@ fn holding_cell_htlc_counting() { { let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[1].net_graph_msg_handler; let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &Vec::new(), 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap(); - unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash_1, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err }, - assert_eq!(err, "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs")); + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash_1, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err))); assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); - nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs".to_string(), 1); + nodes[1].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs".to_string(), 1); } // This should also be true if we try to forward a payment. @@ -1540,16 +1543,16 @@ fn test_basic_channel_reserve() { let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None).err().unwrap(); match err { PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedRetrySafe(ref fails) => { - match fails[0] { - APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => - assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value"), + match &fails[0] { + &APIError::ChannelUnavailable{ref err} => + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)), _ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"), } }, _ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"), } assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); - nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value".to_string(), 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value".to_string(), 1); send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1]], max_can_send, max_can_send); } @@ -1609,7 +1612,7 @@ fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() { let chan_keys = local_chan.get_local_keys(); let pubkeys = chan_keys.pubkeys(); (pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint, pubkeys.payment_point, - chan_keys.commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER), chan_keys.commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2)) + chan_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER), chan_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2)) }; let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint, remote_payment_point, remote_secret1) = { let chan_lock = nodes[1].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap(); @@ -1617,7 +1620,7 @@ fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() { let chan_keys = remote_chan.get_local_keys(); let pubkeys = chan_keys.pubkeys(); (pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint, pubkeys.payment_point, - chan_keys.commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1)) + chan_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1)) }; // Assemble the set of keys we can use for signatures for our commitment_signed message. @@ -1691,8 +1694,7 @@ fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() { let local_chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap(); let local_chan = local_chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap(); let local_chan_keys = local_chan.get_local_keys(); - local_chan_keys.sign_remote_commitment(feerate_per_kw, &commit_tx, &commit_tx_keys, &[&accepted_htlc_info], - BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, &secp_ctx).unwrap() + local_chan_keys.sign_remote_commitment(feerate_per_kw, &commit_tx, &commit_tx_keys, &[&accepted_htlc_info], &secp_ctx).unwrap() }; let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned { @@ -1751,7 +1753,7 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_outbound_htlc_inbound_chan() { }; let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(1000); - unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err }, + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put them under remote channel reserve value")); assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put them under remote channel reserve value".to_string(), 1); @@ -1929,10 +1931,10 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() { { let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_0 + 1); assert!(route.paths[0].iter().rev().skip(1).all(|h| h.fee_msat == feemsat)); - unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err }, - assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept")); + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err))); assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); - nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1); } // channel reserve is bigger than their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat so loop to deplete @@ -1993,8 +1995,8 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() { let recv_value_2 = stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat_1 - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs; { let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_2 + 1); - unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err }, - assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value")); + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err))); assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); } @@ -2019,10 +2021,10 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() { // test with outbound holding cell amount > 0 { let (route, our_payment_hash, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_22+1); - unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err }, - assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value")); + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err))); assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); - nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value".to_string(), 2); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value".to_string(), 2); } let (route_22, our_payment_hash_22, our_payment_preimage_22) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(recv_value_22); @@ -2105,16 +2107,16 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() { let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None).err().unwrap(); match err { PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedRetrySafe(ref fails) => { - match fails[0] { - APIError::ChannelUnavailable{err} => - assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value"), + match &fails[0] { + &APIError::ChannelUnavailable{ref err} => + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err)), _ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"), } }, _ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"), } assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); - nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value".to_string(), 3); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us under local channel reserve value".to_string(), 3); } send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1], &nodes[2]][..], recv_value_3, recv_value_3); @@ -6055,6 +6057,7 @@ impl msgs::ChannelUpdate { flags: 0, cltv_expiry_delta: 0, htlc_minimum_msat: 0, + htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent, fee_base_msat: 0, fee_proportional_millionths: 0, excess_data: vec![], @@ -6403,10 +6406,10 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_value_below_minimum_msat() { let mut route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap(); route.paths[0][0].fee_msat = 100; - unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err }, - assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value")); + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err))); assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); - nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value".to_string(), 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send less than their minimum HTLC value".to_string(), 1); } #[test] @@ -6423,11 +6426,11 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_zero_value_msat() { let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new(); let mut route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap(); route.paths[0][0].fee_msat = 0; - unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err }, + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC")); assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); - nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC".to_string(), 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC".to_string(), 1); } #[test] @@ -6469,8 +6472,8 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_cltv_expiry_too_high() { let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler; let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 100000000, 500000001, &logger).unwrap(); - unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::RouteError { err }, - assert_eq!(err, "Channel CLTV overflowed?!")); + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::RouteError { ref err }, + assert_eq!(err, &"Channel CLTV overflowed?")); } #[test] @@ -6513,11 +6516,11 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_exceed_max_htlc_num_and_htlc_id_increment() let (_, our_payment_hash) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]); let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler; let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], 100000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap(); - unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err }, - assert_eq!(err, "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs")); + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err))); assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); - nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs".to_string(), 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot push more than their max accepted HTLCs".to_string(), 1); } #[test] @@ -6537,11 +6540,11 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_exceed_max_htlc_value_in_flight() { let net_graph_msg_handler = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler; let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new(); let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), None, &[], max_in_flight+1, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, &logger).unwrap(); - unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { err }, - assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept")); + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &None), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err))); assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); - nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot send value that would put us over the max HTLC value in flight our peer will accept".to_string(), 1); send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], max_in_flight, max_in_flight); } @@ -6573,7 +6576,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_amount_received_more_than_min() { nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]); assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty()); let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap(); - assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote side tried to send less than our minimum HTLC value"); + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote side tried to send less than our minimum HTLC value\. Lower limit: \(\d+\)\. Actual: \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); } @@ -6653,7 +6656,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_htlc_limit() { assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty()); let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap(); - assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to push more than our max accepted HTLCs"); + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to push more than our max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); } @@ -6678,7 +6681,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_in_flight_msat() { assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty()); let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap(); - assert_eq!(err_msg.data,"Remote HTLC add would put them over our max HTLC value"); + assert!(regex::Regex::new("Remote HTLC add would put them over our max HTLC value").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); } @@ -6752,7 +6755,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_repeated_id_ignore() { assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty()); let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap(); - assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote skipped HTLC ID"); + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote skipped HTLC ID \(skipped ID: \d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); } @@ -6785,7 +6788,7 @@ fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fulfill_htlc_before_commitment() { assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty()); let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap(); - assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC before it had been committed"); + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); } @@ -6818,7 +6821,7 @@ fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fail_htlc_before_commitment() { assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty()); let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap(); - assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC before it had been committed"); + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); } @@ -6852,7 +6855,7 @@ fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fail_malformed_htlc_before_commitment() assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty()); let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap(); - assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC before it had been committed"); + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); } @@ -6934,7 +6937,7 @@ fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_wrong_preimage() { assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty()); let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap(); - assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to fulfill HTLC with an incorrect preimage"); + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill HTLC \(\d+\) with an incorrect preimage").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); } @@ -7328,7 +7331,7 @@ fn test_upfront_shutdown_script() { node_0_shutdown.scriptpubkey = Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script().to_p2sh(); // Test we enforce upfront_scriptpbukey if by providing a diffrent one at closing that we disconnect peer nodes[2].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_0_shutdown); - assert_eq!(check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true).unwrap().data, "Got shutdown request with a scriptpubkey which did not match their previous scriptpubkey"); + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Got shutdown request with a scriptpubkey \([A-Fa-f0-9]+\) which did not match their previous scriptpubkey.").unwrap().is_match(check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true).unwrap().data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1); // We test that in case of peer committing upfront to a script, if it doesn't change at closing, we sign @@ -7409,7 +7412,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() { let keys_manager: Arc> = Arc::new(test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&nodes[0].node_seed, Network::Testnet)); if let Err(error) = Channel::new_outbound(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }, &keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 0, &low_our_to_self_config) { match error { - APIError::APIMisuseError { err } => { assert_eq!(err, "Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay putting user funds at risks"); }, + APIError::APIMisuseError { err } => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), } } else { assert!(false) } @@ -7420,7 +7423,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() { open_channel.to_self_delay = 200; if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }, &keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &low_our_to_self_config) { match error { - ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert_eq!(err, "Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay putting user funds at risks"); }, + ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), } } else { assert!(false); } @@ -7434,7 +7437,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() { if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events()[0] { match action { &ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } => { - assert_eq!(msg.data,"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period"); + assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(msg.data.as_str())); }, _ => { assert!(false); } } @@ -7446,7 +7449,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() { open_channel.to_self_delay = 200; if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }, &keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &high_their_to_self_config) { match error { - ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert_eq!(err, "They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period"); }, + ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), } } else { assert!(false); } @@ -8129,8 +8132,8 @@ fn test_counterparty_raa_skip_no_crash() { let local_keys = &guard.by_id.get_mut(&channel_id).unwrap().local_keys; const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = (1 << 48) - 1; let next_per_commitment_point = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(), - &SecretKey::from_slice(&local_keys.commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2)).unwrap()); - let per_commitment_secret = local_keys.commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER); + &SecretKey::from_slice(&local_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2)).unwrap()); + let per_commitment_secret = local_keys.release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER); nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::RevokeAndACK { channel_id, per_commitment_secret, next_per_commitment_point });