X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Ffunctional_tests.rs;h=2b0533ae2d2f0adcec749c6e50ca043bce33879d;hb=b5169301d8d1b0c74c0b796be0e06acc122b766d;hp=998c561a81e7182b18d550a1984c537a84447735;hpb=afdcd1c19880a0e982184fbb576b392b45e1c795;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs index 998c561a..2b0533ae 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs @@ -19,18 +19,18 @@ use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCK use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint; use crate::sign::{ChannelSigner, EcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, SignerProvider}; use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentPurpose, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination, PaymentFailureReason}; -use crate::ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash}; -use crate::ln::channel::{commitment_tx_base_weight, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT, get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis, OutboundV1Channel, InboundV1Channel}; +use crate::ln::{ChannelId, PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash}; +use crate::ln::channel::{commitment_tx_base_weight, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT, get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis, OutboundV1Channel, InboundV1Channel, COINBASE_MATURITY}; use crate::ln::channelmanager::{self, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, RecipientOnionFields, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, ENABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, DISABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA}; use crate::ln::channel::{DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS, ChannelError}; use crate::ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils}; use crate::ln::chan_utils::{OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT, htlc_success_tx_weight, htlc_timeout_tx_weight, HTLCOutputInCommitment}; use crate::routing::gossip::{NetworkGraph, NetworkUpdate}; -use crate::routing::router::{Path, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, get_route}; +use crate::routing::router::{Path, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, get_route, RouteParameters}; use crate::ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, ChannelTypeFeatures, NodeFeatures}; use crate::ln::msgs; use crate::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, RoutingMessageHandler, ErrorAction}; -use crate::util::enforcing_trait_impls::EnforcingSigner; +use crate::util::test_channel_signer::TestChannelSigner; use crate::util::test_utils::{self, WatchtowerPersister}; use crate::util::errors::APIError; use crate::util::ser::{Writeable, ReadableArgs}; @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ fn test_update_fee_that_funder_cannot_afford() { const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 281474976710654; - // Get the EnforcingSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys + // Get the TestChannelSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys // needed to sign the new commitment tx and (2) sign the new commitment tx. let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_funding) = { let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap(); @@ -1049,7 +1049,9 @@ fn fake_network_test() { }); hops[1].fee_msat = chan_4.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_4.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[2].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000; hops[0].fee_msat = chan_3.0.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_3.0.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[1].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000; - let payment_preimage_1 = send_along_route(&nodes[1], Route { paths: vec![Path { hops, blinded_tail: None }], payment_params: None }, &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).0; + let payment_preimage_1 = send_along_route(&nodes[1], + Route { paths: vec![Path { hops, blinded_tail: None }], route_params: None }, + &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).0; let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(3); hops.push(RouteHop { @@ -1078,7 +1080,9 @@ fn fake_network_test() { }); hops[1].fee_msat = chan_2.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_2.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[2].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000; hops[0].fee_msat = chan_3.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_3.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[1].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000; - let payment_hash_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[1], Route { paths: vec![Path { hops, blinded_tail: None }], payment_params: None }, &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).1; + let payment_hash_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[1], + Route { paths: vec![Path { hops, blinded_tail: None }], route_params: None }, + &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).1; // Claim the rebalances... fail_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], payment_hash_2); @@ -1409,7 +1413,7 @@ fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() { const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = (1 << 48) - 1; - // Get the EnforcingSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys + // Get the TestChannelSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys // needed to sign the new commitment tx and (2) sign the new commitment tx. let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_secret, next_local_point, local_funding) = { let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap(); @@ -1505,7 +1509,7 @@ fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() { _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), }; nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), - format!("Attempting to fail HTLC due to fee spike buffer violation in channel {}. Rebalancing is required.", ::hex::encode(raa_msg.channel_id)), 1); + format!("Attempting to fail HTLC due to fee spike buffer violation in channel {}. Rebalancing is required.", raa_msg.channel_id), 1); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2); } @@ -5835,7 +5839,7 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() { // us to surface its failure to the user. chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2); assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0); - nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 1 HTLC updates in channel {}", hex::encode(chan.2)), 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 1 HTLC updates in channel {}", chan.2), 1); // Check that the payment failed to be sent out. let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); @@ -5923,7 +5927,7 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() { // to surface its failure to the user. The first payment should succeed. chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2); assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0); - nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 2 HTLC updates in channel {}", hex::encode(chan.2)), 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 2 HTLC updates in channel {}", chan.2), 1); // Check that the second payment failed to be sent out. let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); @@ -7137,8 +7141,11 @@ fn test_check_htlc_underpaying() { let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::new(); let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); - let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV).with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features()).unwrap(); - let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(), None, 10_000, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); + let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), + TEST_FINAL_CLTV).with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features()).unwrap(); + let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, 10_000); + let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &route_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(), + None, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]); let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(our_payment_hash, Some(100_000), 7200, None).unwrap(); nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash, @@ -7394,12 +7401,14 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() { let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 50).with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.invoice_features()).unwrap(); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::new(); let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); - let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(), None, - 3_000_000, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); + let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, 3_000_000); + let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &route_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(), None, + nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); let payment_preimage = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0; let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 50).with_bolt11_features(nodes[0].node.invoice_features()).unwrap(); - let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &nodes[1].network_graph.read_only(), None, - 3_000_000, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); + let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, 3_000_000); + let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &route_params, &nodes[1].network_graph.read_only(), None, + nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000); let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2); @@ -7639,7 +7648,7 @@ fn test_counterparty_raa_skip_no_crash() { // commitment transaction, we would have happily carried on and provided them the next // commitment transaction based on one RAA forward. This would probably eventually have led to // channel closure, but it would not have resulted in funds loss. Still, our - // EnforcingSigner would have panicked as it doesn't like jumps into the future. Here, we + // TestChannelSigner would have panicked as it doesn't like jumps into the future. Here, we // check simply that the channel is closed in response to such an RAA, but don't check whether // we decide to punish our counterparty for revoking their funds (as we don't currently // implement that). @@ -8003,7 +8012,7 @@ fn test_can_not_accept_unknown_inbound_channel() { let node_chanmgr = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfg, &[None, None]); let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfg, &node_chanmgr); - let unknown_channel_id = [0; 32]; + let unknown_channel_id = ChannelId::new_zero(); let api_res = nodes[0].node.accept_inbound_channel(&unknown_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 0); match api_res { Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => { @@ -8350,7 +8359,7 @@ fn test_update_err_monitor_lockdown() { let watchtower = { let new_monitor = { let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(outpoint).unwrap(); - let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor)>::read( + let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor)>::read( &mut io::Cursor::new(&monitor.encode()), (nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[0].keys_manager)).unwrap().1; assert!(new_monitor == *monitor); new_monitor @@ -8420,7 +8429,7 @@ fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() { let watchtower_alice = { let new_monitor = { let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(outpoint).unwrap(); - let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor)>::read( + let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor)>::read( &mut io::Cursor::new(&monitor.encode()), (nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[0].keys_manager)).unwrap().1; assert!(new_monitor == *monitor); new_monitor @@ -8451,7 +8460,7 @@ fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() { let watchtower_bob = { let new_monitor = { let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(outpoint).unwrap(); - let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor)>::read( + let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor)>::read( &mut io::Cursor::new(&monitor.encode()), (nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[0].keys_manager)).unwrap().1; assert!(new_monitor == *monitor); new_monitor @@ -9017,7 +9026,7 @@ fn test_error_chans_closed() { // A null channel ID should close all channels let _chan_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001); - nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: [0; 32], data: "ERR".to_owned() }); + nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: ChannelId::new_zero(), data: "ERR".to_owned() }); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2); check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString("ERR".to_string()) }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(); 2], 100000); @@ -9133,6 +9142,66 @@ fn test_invalid_funding_tx() { mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &spend_tx); } +#[test] +fn test_coinbase_funding_tx() { + // Miners are able to fund channels directly from coinbase transactions, however + // by consensus rules, outputs of a coinbase transaction are encumbered by a 100 + // block maturity timelock. To ensure that a (non-0conf) channel like this is enforceable + // on-chain, the minimum depth is updated to 100 blocks for coinbase funding transactions. + // + // Note that 0conf channels with coinbase funding transactions are unaffected and are + // immediately operational after opening. + let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); + let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); + let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + + nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap(); + let open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); + + nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel); + let accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + + nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel); + + // Create the coinbase funding transaction. + let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_coinbase_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42); + + nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap(); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0); + let funding_created = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); + + nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); + expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + + let funding_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + + nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + + expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); + assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); + + // Starting at height 0, we "confirm" the coinbase at height 1. + confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[0], &tx, 1); + // We connect 98 more blocks to have 99 confirmations for the coinbase transaction. + connect_blocks(&nodes[0], COINBASE_MATURITY - 2); + // Check that we have no pending message events (we have not queued a `channel_ready` yet). + assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); + // Now connect one more block which results in 100 confirmations of the coinbase transaction. + connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1); + // There should now be a `channel_ready` which can be handled. + let _ = &nodes[1].node.handle_channel_ready(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(&nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReady, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id())); + + confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[1], &tx, 1); + connect_blocks(&nodes[1], COINBASE_MATURITY - 2); + assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); + connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1); + expect_channel_ready_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm_second(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]); +} + fn do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(test_height_before_timelock: bool) { // In the first version of the chain::Confirm interface, after a refactor was made to not // broadcast CSV-locked transactions until their CSV lock is up, we wouldn't reliably broadcast