X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Ffunctional_tests.rs;h=3f9e263fcf7c19a5bf460f7d7c12387b8407ec91;hb=d189cf0e82e3219882506e033aba1019646bfe15;hp=465d6288d9d3e764662edb2276d7bb5bef477cb3;hpb=195e666953afef108ed4c47abba8b6414f8f15fc;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs index 465d6288..3f9e263f 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID, CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint; use crate::sign::{ecdsa::EcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, OutputSpender, SignerProvider}; use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentPurpose, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination, PaymentFailureReason}; -use crate::ln::{ChannelId, PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash}; +use crate::ln::types::{ChannelId, PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash}; use crate::ln::channel::{commitment_tx_base_weight, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT, get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis, OutboundV1Channel, InboundV1Channel, COINBASE_MATURITY, ChannelPhase}; use crate::ln::channelmanager::{self, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, RecipientOnionFields, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, ENABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, DISABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA}; use crate::ln::channel::{DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS, ChannelError}; @@ -61,6 +61,38 @@ use crate::ln::chan_utils::CommitmentTransaction; use super::channel::UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_AGE_LIMIT_TICKS; +#[test] +fn test_channel_resumption_fail_post_funding() { + // If we fail to exchange funding with a peer prior to it disconnecting we'll resume the + // channel open on reconnect, however if we do exchange funding we do not currently support + // replaying it and here test that the channel closes. + let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); + let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); + let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + + nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 0, 42, None, None).unwrap(); + let open_chan = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); + nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan); + let accept_chan = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_chan); + + let (temp_chan_id, tx, funding_output) = + create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 42); + let new_chan_id = ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint(funding_output); + nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temp_chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx).unwrap(); + + nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); + check_closed_events(&nodes[0], &[ExpectedCloseEvent::from_id_reason(new_chan_id, true, ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer)]); + + // After ddf75afd16 we'd panic on reconnection if we exchanged funding info, so test that + // explicitly here. + nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { + features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None + }, true).unwrap(); + assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(), Vec::new()); +} + #[test] fn test_insane_channel_opens() { // Stand up a network of 2 nodes @@ -1401,8 +1433,9 @@ fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() { let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height + 1; let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap(); + let recipient_onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret); let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], - 3460001, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap(); + 3460001, &recipient_onion_fields, cur_height, &None).unwrap(); let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash).unwrap(); let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC { channel_id: chan.2, @@ -1598,8 +1631,9 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_outbound_channel() { let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap(); let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height + 1; let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap(); + let recipient_onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret); let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], - 700_000, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap(); + 700_000, &recipient_onion_fields, cur_height, &None).unwrap(); let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash).unwrap(); let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC { channel_id: chan.2, @@ -1777,8 +1811,9 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_inbound_chan() { let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap(); let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height + 1; let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route_2.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap(); + let recipient_onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields::spontaneous_empty(); let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads( - &route_2.paths[0], recv_value_2, RecipientOnionFields::spontaneous_empty(), cur_height, &None).unwrap(); + &route_2.paths[0], recv_value_2, &recipient_onion_fields, cur_height, &None).unwrap(); let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash_1).unwrap(); let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC { channel_id: chan.2, @@ -2433,11 +2468,11 @@ fn channel_monitor_network_test() { #[test] fn test_justice_tx_htlc_timeout() { // Test justice txn built on revoked HTLC-Timeout tx, against both sides - let mut alice_config = UserConfig::default(); + let mut alice_config = test_default_channel_config(); alice_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true; alice_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false; alice_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 5; - let mut bob_config = UserConfig::default(); + let mut bob_config = test_default_channel_config(); bob_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true; bob_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false; bob_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 3; @@ -2496,11 +2531,11 @@ fn test_justice_tx_htlc_timeout() { #[test] fn test_justice_tx_htlc_success() { // Test justice txn built on revoked HTLC-Success tx, against both sides - let mut alice_config = UserConfig::default(); + let mut alice_config = test_default_channel_config(); alice_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true; alice_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false; alice_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 5; - let mut bob_config = UserConfig::default(); + let mut bob_config = test_default_channel_config(); bob_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true; bob_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false; bob_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 3; @@ -3501,8 +3536,9 @@ fn fail_backward_pending_htlc_upon_channel_failure() { let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new(); let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap(); let current_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height + 1; + let recipient_onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret); let (onion_payloads, _amount_msat, cltv_expiry) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads( - &route.paths[0], 50_000, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), current_height, &None).unwrap(); + &route.paths[0], 50_000, &recipient_onion_fields, current_height, &None).unwrap(); let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap(); let onion_routing_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash).unwrap(); @@ -3734,10 +3770,10 @@ fn test_peer_disconnected_before_funding_broadcasted() { nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred(); } - // Ensure that the channel is closed with `ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed` - // when the peers are disconnected and do not reconnect before the funding - // transaction is broadcasted. - check_closed_event!(&nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, true + // Ensure that the channel is closed with `ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer` and a + // `DiscardFunding` event when the peers are disconnected and do not reconnect before the + // funding transaction is broadcasted. + check_closed_event!(&nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer, true , [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000); check_closed_event!(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer, false , [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000); @@ -6487,8 +6523,9 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_htlc_limit() { let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap(); let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height + 1; let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::signing_only(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap(); + let recipient_onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret); let (onion_payloads, _htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads( - &route.paths[0], send_amt, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap(); + &route.paths[0], send_amt, &recipient_onion_fields, cur_height, &None).unwrap(); let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash).unwrap(); let mut msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC { @@ -8222,8 +8259,9 @@ fn test_onion_value_mpp_set_calculation() { let height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1; let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&session_priv).unwrap(); let mut onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::new(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap(); + let recipient_onion_fields = RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret); let (mut onion_payloads, _, _) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 100_000, - RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), height + 1, &None).unwrap(); + &recipient_onion_fields, height + 1, &None).unwrap(); // Edit amt_to_forward to simulate the sender having set // the final amount and the routing node taking less fee if let msgs::OutboundOnionPayload::Receive { @@ -9872,7 +9910,7 @@ enum ExposureEvent { AtUpdateFeeOutbound, } -fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_event: ExposureEvent, on_holder_tx: bool, multiplier_dust_limit: bool) { +fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_event: ExposureEvent, on_holder_tx: bool, multiplier_dust_limit: bool, apply_excess_fee: bool) { // Test that we properly reject dust HTLC violating our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat` // policy. // @@ -9887,12 +9925,33 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); let mut config = test_default_channel_config(); + + // We hard-code the feerate values here but they're re-calculated furter down and asserted. + // If the values ever change below these constants should simply be updated. + const AT_FEE_OUTBOUND_HTLCS: u64 = 20; + let nondust_htlc_count_in_limit = + if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound { + AT_FEE_OUTBOUND_HTLCS + } else { 0 }; + let initial_feerate = if apply_excess_fee { 253 * 2 } else { 253 }; + let expected_dust_buffer_feerate = initial_feerate + 2530; + let mut commitment_tx_cost = commit_tx_fee_msat(initial_feerate - 253, nondust_htlc_count_in_limit, &ChannelTypeFeatures::empty()); + commitment_tx_cost += + if on_holder_tx { + htlc_success_tx_weight(&ChannelTypeFeatures::empty()) + } else { + htlc_timeout_tx_weight(&ChannelTypeFeatures::empty()) + } * (initial_feerate as u64 - 253) / 1000 * nondust_htlc_count_in_limit; + { + let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap(); + *feerate_lock = initial_feerate; + } config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure = if multiplier_dust_limit { // Default test fee estimator rate is 253 sat/kw, so we set the multiplier to 5_000_000 / 253 // to get roughly the same initial value as the default setting when this test was // originally written. - MaxDustHTLCExposure::FeeRateMultiplier(5_000_000 / 253) - } else { MaxDustHTLCExposure::FixedLimitMsat(5_000_000) }; // initial default setting value + MaxDustHTLCExposure::FeeRateMultiplier((5_000_000 + commitment_tx_cost) / 253) + } else { MaxDustHTLCExposure::FixedLimitMsat(5_000_000 + commitment_tx_cost) }; let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config), None]); let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); @@ -9936,6 +9995,11 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &channel_ready); update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update); + { + let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap(); + *feerate_lock = 253; + } + // Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send. let (mut route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000); @@ -9945,8 +10009,9 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap(); let chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&channel_id).unwrap(); (chan.context().get_dust_buffer_feerate(None) as u64, - chan.context().get_max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator(nodes[0].fee_estimator))) + chan.context().get_max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat(253)) }; + assert_eq!(dust_buffer_feerate, expected_dust_buffer_feerate as u64); let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_timeout_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 + open_channel.common_fields.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000; let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat; @@ -9956,8 +10021,13 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_success_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 + open_channel.common_fields.dust_limit_satoshis - if multiplier_dust_limit { 3 } else { 2 }) * 1000; let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat; + // This test was written with a fixed dust value here, which we retain, but assert that it is, + // indeed, dust on both transactions. let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx: u64 = 4; - let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx; + let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = 1_250_000; + let calcd_dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_timeout_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 + open_channel.common_fields.dust_limit_satoshis - if multiplier_dust_limit { 3 } else { 2 }) * 1000; + assert!(dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat < dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat); + assert!(dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat < calcd_dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat); if on_holder_tx { if dust_outbound_balance { @@ -10027,7 +10097,7 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e // Outbound dust balance: 5200 sats nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel", format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", - dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * (dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1) + dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 4, + dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx + commitment_tx_cost + 4, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1); } } else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound { @@ -10035,7 +10105,7 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e // For the multiplier dust exposure limit, since it scales with feerate, // we need to add a lot of HTLCs that will become dust at the new feerate // to cross the threshold. - for _ in 0..20 { + for _ in 0..AT_FEE_OUTBOUND_HTLCS { let (_, payment_hash, payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash(&nodes[1], Some(1_000), None); nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap(); @@ -10054,27 +10124,123 @@ fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_e added_monitors.clear(); } -fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(multiplier_dust_limit: bool) { - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true, multiplier_dust_limit); - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true, multiplier_dust_limit); - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true, multiplier_dust_limit); - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false, multiplier_dust_limit); - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false, multiplier_dust_limit); - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false, multiplier_dust_limit); - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true, multiplier_dust_limit); - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false, multiplier_dust_limit); - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true, multiplier_dust_limit); - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false, multiplier_dust_limit); - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false, multiplier_dust_limit); - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true, multiplier_dust_limit); +fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(multiplier_dust_limit: bool, apply_excess_fee: bool) { + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee); + if !multiplier_dust_limit && !apply_excess_fee { + // Because non-dust HTLC transaction fees are included in the dust exposure, trying to + // increase the fee to hit a higher dust exposure with a + // `MaxDustHTLCExposure::FeeRateMultiplier` is no longer super practical, so we skip these + // in the `multiplier_dust_limit` case. + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true, multiplier_dust_limit, apply_excess_fee); + } } #[test] fn test_max_dust_htlc_exposure() { - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(false); - do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(true); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(false, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(false, true); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(true, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(true, true); } +#[test] +fn test_nondust_htlc_fees_are_dust() { + // Test that the transaction fees paid in nondust HTLCs count towards our dust limit + let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3); + let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs); + + let mut config = test_default_channel_config(); + // Set the dust limit to the default value + config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure = + MaxDustHTLCExposure::FeeRateMultiplier(10_000); + // Make sure the HTLC limits don't get in the way + config.channel_handshake_limits.min_max_accepted_htlcs = 400; + config.channel_handshake_config.our_max_accepted_htlcs = 400; + config.channel_handshake_config.our_htlc_minimum_msat = 1; + + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config), Some(config), Some(config)]); + let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + + // Create a channel from 1 -> 0 but immediately push all of the funds towards 0 + let chan_id_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 0).2; + while nodes[1].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat > 0 { + send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], nodes[1].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat); + } + + // First get the channel one HTLC_VALUE HTLC away from the dust limit by sending dust HTLCs + // repeatedly until we run out of space. + const HTLC_VALUE: u64 = 1_000_000; // Doesn't matter, tune until the test passes + let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], HTLC_VALUE).0; + + while nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_minimum_msat == 0 { + route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], HTLC_VALUE); + } + assert_ne!(nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat, 0, + "We don't want to run out of ability to send because of some non-dust limit"); + assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].pending_outbound_htlcs.len() < 10, + "We should be able to fill our dust limit without too many HTLCs"); + + let dust_limit = nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_minimum_msat; + claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage); + assert_ne!(nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_minimum_msat, 0, + "Make sure we are able to send once we clear one HTLC"); + + // At this point we have somewhere between dust_limit and dust_limit * 2 left in our dust + // exposure limit, and we want to max that out using non-dust HTLCs. + let commitment_tx_per_htlc_cost = + htlc_success_tx_weight(&ChannelTypeFeatures::empty()) * 253; + let max_htlcs_remaining = dust_limit * 2 / commitment_tx_per_htlc_cost; + assert!(max_htlcs_remaining < 30, + "We should be able to fill our dust limit without too many HTLCs"); + for i in 0..max_htlcs_remaining + 1 { + assert_ne!(i, max_htlcs_remaining); + if nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].next_outbound_htlc_limit_msat < dust_limit { + // We found our limit, and it was less than max_htlcs_remaining! + // At this point we can only send dust HTLCs as any non-dust HTLCs will overuse our + // remaining dust exposure. + break; + } + route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], dust_limit * 2); + } + + // At this point non-dust HTLCs are no longer accepted from node 0 -> 1, we also check that + // such HTLCs can't be routed over the same channel either. + create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 0); + let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = + get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[2], nodes[1], dust_limit * 2); + let onion = RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret); + nodes[2].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash, onion, PaymentId([0; 32])).unwrap(); + check_added_monitors(&nodes[2], 1); + let send = SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[2]); + + nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &send.msgs[0]); + commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[2], send.commitment_msg, false, true); + + expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]); + check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1); + let node_id_1 = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(); + expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!( + nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), + &[HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(node_id_1), channel_id: chan_id_1 }] + ); + + let fail = get_htlc_update_msgs(&nodes[0], &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()); + nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail.update_fail_htlcs[0]); + commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[0], fail.commitment_signed, false); + expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[2], payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new()); +} + + #[test] fn test_non_final_funding_tx() { let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); @@ -10110,14 +10276,9 @@ fn test_non_final_funding_tx() { }, _ => panic!() } - let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); - assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); - match events[0] { - Event::ChannelClosed { channel_id, .. } => { - assert_eq!(channel_id, temp_channel_id); - }, - _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), - } + let err = "Error in transaction funding: Misuse error: Funding transaction absolute timelock is non-final".to_owned(); + check_closed_events(&nodes[0], &[ExpectedCloseEvent::from_id_reason(temp_channel_id, false, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err })]); + assert_eq!(get_err_msg(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).data, "Failed to fund channel"); } #[test]