X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Ffunctional_tests.rs;h=4defbaaa2931d061ca7bb399d45cb0178a7240ee;hb=9bdce47f0e0516e37c89c09f1975dfc06b5870b1;hp=60fa9c805052925194866182b327591fc5a0e2b0;hpb=dc8479a6202ea84489e51cba020a600f0a2b9695;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs index 60fa9c80..4defbaaa 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs @@ -9457,12 +9457,7 @@ fn test_forwardable_regen() { claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage_2); } -#[test] -fn test_dup_htlc_second_fail_panic() { - // Previously, if we received two HTLCs back-to-back, where the second overran the expected - // value for the payment, we'd fail back both HTLCs after generating a `PaymentReceived` event. - // Then, if the user failed the second payment, they'd hit a "tried to fail an already failed - // HTLC" debug panic. This tests for this behavior, checking that only one HTLC is auto-failed. +fn do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(test_for_second_fail_panic: bool) { let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); @@ -9472,14 +9467,9 @@ fn test_dup_htlc_second_fail_panic() { let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()) .with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); - let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); - let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); - let route = get_route( - &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(), - Some(&nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().iter().collect::>()), - 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); + let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap(); - let (_, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[1]); + let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[1]); { nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap(); @@ -9507,26 +9497,153 @@ fn test_dup_htlc_second_fail_panic() { // the first HTLC delivered above. } - // Now we go fail back the first HTLC from the user end. expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]); nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); - nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash); - expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]); - nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); + if test_for_second_fail_panic { + // Now we go fail back the first HTLC from the user end. + nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash); - check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); - assert_eq!(fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 2); + expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]); + nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); + + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); + let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + assert_eq!(fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 2); + + nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]); + nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[1]); + commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false); + + let failure_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); + assert_eq!(failure_events.len(), 2); + if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[0] {} else { panic!(); } + if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[1] {} else { panic!(); } + } else { + // Let the second HTLC fail and claim the first + expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]); + nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); + + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); + let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]); + commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false); + + expect_payment_failed_conditions!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain()); + + claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage); + } +} + +#[test] +fn test_dup_htlc_second_fail_panic() { + // Previously, if we received two HTLCs back-to-back, where the second overran the expected + // value for the payment, we'd fail back both HTLCs after generating a `PaymentReceived` event. + // Then, if the user failed the second payment, they'd hit a "tried to fail an already failed + // HTLC" debug panic. This tests for this behavior, checking that only one HTLC is auto-failed. + do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(true); +} + +#[test] +fn test_dup_htlc_second_rejected() { + // Test that if we receive a second HTLC for an MPP payment that overruns the payment amount we + // simply reject the second HTLC but are still able to claim the first HTLC. + do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(false); +} + +#[test] +fn test_inconsistent_mpp_params() { + // Test that if we recieve two HTLCs with different payment parameters we fail back the first + // such HTLC and allow the second to stay. + let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4); + let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs); + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]); + let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + + create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 3, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 100_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + + let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()) + .with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); + let mut route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, 15_000_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV).unwrap(); + assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); + route.paths.sort_by(|path_a, _| { + // Sort the path so that the path through nodes[1] comes first + if path_a[0].pubkey == nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id() { + core::cmp::Ordering::Less } else { core::cmp::Ordering::Greater } + }); + let payment_params_opt = Some(payment_params); + + let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[3]); + + let cur_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1; + let payment_id = PaymentId([42; 32]); + { + nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &payment_params_opt, &our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret), 15_000_000, cur_height, payment_id, &None).unwrap(); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + + let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); + assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); + pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, our_payment_hash, Some(our_payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), false, None); + } + assert!(nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); + + { + nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[1], &payment_params_opt, &our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret), 14_000_000, cur_height, payment_id, &None).unwrap(); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + + let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); + assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); + let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap()); + + nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]); + commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false); - nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]); - nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[1]); - commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false); + expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1); + + let mut events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); + assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); + let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap()); + + nodes[3].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 0); + commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[2], payment_event.commitment_msg, true, true); + + // At this point, nodes[3] should notice the two HTLCs don't contain the same total payment + // amount. It will assume the second is a privacy attack (no longer particularly relevant + // post-payment_secrets) and fail back the new HTLC. + } + expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[3]); + nodes[3].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); + expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[3]); + nodes[3].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards(); + + check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1); + + let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[3], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()); + nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]); + commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[3], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false); + + expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1); + + let fail_updates_2 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_2.update_fail_htlcs[0]); + commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[2], fail_updates_2.commitment_signed, false); + + expect_payment_failed_conditions!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain()); + + nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[1], &payment_params_opt, &our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret), 15_000_000, cur_height, payment_id, &None).unwrap(); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + + let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); + assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); + pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, our_payment_hash, Some(our_payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), true, None); - let failure_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); - assert_eq!(failure_events.len(), 2); - if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[0] {} else { panic!(); } - if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[1] {} else { panic!(); } + claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, our_payment_preimage); } #[test]