X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Ffunctional_tests.rs;h=9b57ebe0bced8278b41529882f5b6c9b73067008;hb=c620944f16e63448c9c4c541c1390e498888b7df;hp=060097c5f4a30abe18139ebb9ab14800a38d50f3;hpb=4074909f04e8e6d28dcfe6b5a3cae2418658ffb7;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs index 060097c5..9b57ebe0 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs @@ -12,8 +12,7 @@ //! claim outputs on-chain. use chain; -use chain::Listen; -use chain::Watch; +use chain::{Confirm, Listen, Watch}; use chain::channelmonitor; use chain::channelmonitor::{ChannelMonitor, CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, ANTI_REORG_DELAY}; use chain::transaction::OutPoint; @@ -1040,7 +1039,8 @@ fn do_test_shutdown_rebroadcast(recv_count: u8) { nodes[0].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &node_1_2nd_shutdown); node_0_2nd_shutdown } else { - assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); + let node_0_chan_update = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelUpdate, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); + assert_eq!(node_0_chan_update.contents.flags & 2, 0); // "disabled" flag must not be set as we just reconnected. nodes[0].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &node_1_2nd_shutdown); get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()) }; @@ -1699,8 +1699,8 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_outbound_htlc_inbound_chan() { // sending any above-dust amount would result in a channel reserve violation. // In this test we check that we would be prevented from sending an HTLC in // this situation. - chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 6000 }; - chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 6000 }; + chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) }; + chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) }; let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); @@ -1721,8 +1721,8 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_outbound_channel() { // to channel reserve violation. This close could also happen if the fee went // up a more realistic amount, but many HTLCs were outstanding at the time of // the update_add_htlc. - chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 6000 }; - chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 6000 }; + chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) }; + chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) }; let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); @@ -1879,11 +1879,12 @@ fn test_inbound_outbound_capacity_is_not_zero() { assert_eq!(channels0.len(), 1); assert_eq!(channels1.len(), 1); - assert_eq!(channels0[0].inbound_capacity_msat, 95000000); - assert_eq!(channels1[0].outbound_capacity_msat, 95000000); + let reserve = Channel::::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100000); + assert_eq!(channels0[0].inbound_capacity_msat, 95000000 - reserve*1000); + assert_eq!(channels1[0].outbound_capacity_msat, 95000000 - reserve*1000); - assert_eq!(channels0[0].outbound_capacity_msat, 100000 * 1000 - 95000000); - assert_eq!(channels1[0].inbound_capacity_msat, 100000 * 1000 - 95000000); + assert_eq!(channels0[0].outbound_capacity_msat, 100000 * 1000 - 95000000 - reserve*1000); + assert_eq!(channels1[0].inbound_capacity_msat, 100000 * 1000 - 95000000 - reserve*1000); } fn commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate: u32, num_htlcs: u64) -> u64 { @@ -1894,7 +1895,11 @@ fn commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate: u32, num_htlcs: u64) -> u64 { fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() { let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3); let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs); - let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]); + // When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count. + // It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here. + let mut config = test_default_channel_config(); + config.channel_options.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 239; + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]); let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 190000, 1001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 190000, 1001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); @@ -1915,7 +1920,7 @@ fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() { }} } - let feemsat = 239; // somehow we know? + let feemsat = 239; // set above let total_fee_msat = (nodes.len() - 2) as u64 * feemsat; let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_1.2); @@ -3001,10 +3006,16 @@ fn do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(connect_style: ConnectStyle) { connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1); { - // B will rebroadcast its own holder commitment transaction here...just because + // B may rebroadcast its own holder commitment transaction here, as a safeguard against + // some incredibly unlikely partial-eclipse-attack scenarios. That said, because the + // original commitment_tx[0] (also spending chan_2.3) has reached ANTI_REORG_DELAY B really + // shouldn't broadcast anything here, and in some connect style scenarios we do not. let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0); - assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); - check_spends!(node_txn[0], chan_2.3); + if node_txn.len() == 1 { + check_spends!(node_txn[0], chan_2.3); + } else { + assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 0); + } } expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); @@ -4356,7 +4367,7 @@ fn test_no_txn_manager_serialize_deserialize() { nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.read().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap(); logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new(); - fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }; + fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }; persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new(); let keys_manager = &chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager; new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), &logger, &fee_estimator, &persister, keys_manager); @@ -4571,7 +4582,7 @@ fn test_manager_serialize_deserialize_events() { let mut chan_0_monitor_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new()); nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.read().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap(); - fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }; + fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }; logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new(); persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new(); let keys_manager = &chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager; @@ -4659,7 +4670,7 @@ fn test_simple_manager_serialize_deserialize() { nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.monitors.read().unwrap().iter().next().unwrap().1.write(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap(); logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new(); - fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }; + fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }; persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new(); let keys_manager = &chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager; new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), &logger, &fee_estimator, &persister, keys_manager); @@ -4739,7 +4750,7 @@ fn test_manager_serialize_deserialize_inconsistent_monitor() { } logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new(); - fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }; + fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }; persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new(); let keys_manager = &chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager; new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), &logger, &fee_estimator, &persister, keys_manager); @@ -5337,7 +5348,12 @@ fn test_duplicate_payment_hash_one_failure_one_success() { // we forward one of the payments onwards to D. let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4); let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs); - let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]); + // When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count. + // It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here. + let mut config = test_default_channel_config(); + config.channel_options.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196; + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, + &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]); let mut nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); @@ -5524,7 +5540,12 @@ fn do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(deliver_last_raa: bool, anno // And test where C fails back to A/B when D announces its latest commitment transaction let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(6); let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(6, &chanmon_cfgs); - let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(6, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None, None, None]); + // When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count. + // It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here. + let mut config = test_default_channel_config(); + config.channel_options.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196; + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(6, &node_cfgs, + &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]); let nodes = create_network(6, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new(); @@ -6374,7 +6395,11 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() { fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free_multihop() { let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3); let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs); - let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]); + // When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count. + // It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here. + let mut config = test_default_channel_config(); + config.channel_options.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196; + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]); let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); let chan_0_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); let chan_1_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 95000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); @@ -7592,7 +7617,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() { let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); // We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in Channel::new_outbound() - if let Err(error) = Channel::new_outbound(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 0, &low_our_to_self_config) { + if let Err(error) = Channel::new_outbound(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 0, &low_our_to_self_config) { match error { APIError::APIMisuseError { err } => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), @@ -7603,7 +7628,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() { nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap(); let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); open_channel.to_self_delay = 200; - if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &low_our_to_self_config) { + if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &low_our_to_self_config) { match error { ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), @@ -7629,7 +7654,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() { nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap(); let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); open_channel.to_self_delay = 200; - if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &high_their_to_self_config) { + if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &high_their_to_self_config) { match error { ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), @@ -7679,7 +7704,7 @@ fn test_data_loss_protect() { let mut chain_monitor = <(BlockHash, ChannelMonitor)>::read(&mut ::std::io::Cursor::new(previous_chain_monitor_state.0), keys_manager).unwrap().1; chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet); tx_broadcaster = test_utils::TestBroadcaster{txn_broadcasted: Mutex::new(Vec::new()), blocks: Arc::new(Mutex::new(Vec::new()))}; - fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: 253 }; + fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }; persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new(); monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &tx_broadcaster, &logger, &fee_estimator, &persister, keys_manager); node_state_0 = { @@ -9279,3 +9304,86 @@ fn test_invalid_funding_tx() { } else { panic!(); } assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0); } + +fn do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(test_height_before_timelock: bool) { + // In the first version of the chain::Confirm interface, after a refactor was made to not + // broadcast CSV-locked transactions until their CSV lock is up, we wouldn't reliably broadcast + // transactions after a `transactions_confirmed` call. Specifically, if the chain, provided via + // `best_block_updated` is at height N, and a transaction output which we wish to spend at + // height N-1 (due to a CSV to height N-1) is provided at height N, we will not broadcast the + // spending transaction until height N+1 (or greater). This was due to the way + // `ChannelMonitor::transactions_confirmed` worked, only checking if we should broadcast a + // spending transaction at the height the input transaction was confirmed at, not whether we + // should broadcast a spending transaction at the current height. + // A second, similar, issue involved failing HTLCs backwards - because we only provided the + // height at which transactions were confirmed to `OnchainTx::update_claims_view`, it wasn't + // aware that the anti-reorg-delay had, in fact, already expired, waiting to fail-backwards + // until we learned about an additional block. + // + // As an additional check, if `test_height_before_timelock` is set, we instead test that we + // aren't broadcasting transactions too early (ie not broadcasting them at all). + let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3); + let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs); + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]); + let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + *nodes[0].connect_style.borrow_mut() = ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks; + + create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + let (chan_announce, _, channel_id, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + let (_, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1_000_000); + nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), false); + nodes[2].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false); + + nodes[1].node.force_close_channel(&channel_id).unwrap(); + check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); + let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0); + assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); + + let conf_height = nodes[1].best_block_info().1; + if !test_height_before_timelock { + connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 24 * 6); + } + nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.transactions_confirmed( + &nodes[1].get_block_header(conf_height), &[(0, &node_txn[0])], conf_height); + if test_height_before_timelock { + // If we confirmed the close transaction, but timelocks have not yet expired, we should not + // generate any events or broadcast any transactions + assert!(nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().is_empty()); + assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); + } else { + // We should broadcast an HTLC transaction spending our funding transaction first + let spending_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0); + assert_eq!(spending_txn.len(), 2); + assert_eq!(spending_txn[0], node_txn[0]); + check_spends!(spending_txn[1], node_txn[0]); + // We should also generate a SpendableOutputs event with the to_self output (as its + // timelock is up). + let descriptor_spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager); + assert_eq!(descriptor_spend_txn.len(), 1); + + // If we also discover that the HTLC-Timeout transaction was confirmed some time ago, we + // should immediately fail-backwards the HTLC to the previous hop, without waiting for an + // additional block built on top of the current chain. + nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.transactions_confirmed( + &nodes[1].get_block_header(conf_height + 1), &[(0, &spending_txn[1])], conf_height + 1); + expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); + + let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty()); + assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty()); + assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1); + assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty()); + assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none()); + nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]); + commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, true, true); + expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false); + expect_payment_failure_chan_update!(nodes[0], chan_announce.contents.short_channel_id, true); + } +} +#[test] +fn test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast() { + do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(false); + do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(true); +}