X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Ffunctional_tests.rs;h=bf3f8c1d56ab0cce2290e467cd08fef85a2a0ce8;hb=19191b450c8f07e7b703ec83eabaa0d268757bd7;hp=370e94e636a9d4f817163b0e11f2a80ca9b650ed;hpb=2c4f16d5e39e6d4e90d1b9836cceaad11810fbaa;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs index 370e94e6..bf3f8c1d 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ use ln::channel::{COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC}; use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA}; use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError}; use ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils}; -use ln::chan_utils::HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT; +use ln::chan_utils::{HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT, HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT, HTLCOutputInCommitment}; use routing::network_graph::{NetworkUpdate, RoutingFees}; use routing::router::{Payee, Route, RouteHop, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteParameters, find_route, get_route}; use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures}; @@ -584,9 +584,10 @@ fn test_update_fee_that_funder_cannot_afford() { let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); - let channel_value = 1888; + let channel_value = 1977; let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, 700000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); let channel_id = chan.2; + let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new(); let feerate = 260; { @@ -621,16 +622,70 @@ fn test_update_fee_that_funder_cannot_afford() { *feerate_lock = feerate + 2; } nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred(); - check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot afford to send new feerate at {}", feerate + 2), 1); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0); + + const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 281474976710654; + + // Get the EnforcingSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys + // needed to sign the new commitment tx and (2) sign the new commitment tx. + let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_funding) = { + let chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap(); + let local_chan = chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap(); + let chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer(); + let pubkeys = chan_signer.pubkeys(); + (pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint, + pubkeys.funding_pubkey) + }; + let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint,remote_point, remote_funding) = { + let chan_lock = nodes[1].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap(); + let remote_chan = chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap(); + let chan_signer = remote_chan.get_signer(); + let pubkeys = chan_signer.pubkeys(); + (pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint, + chan_signer.get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1, &secp_ctx), + pubkeys.funding_pubkey) + }; + + // Assemble the set of keys we can use for signatures for our commitment_signed message. + let commit_tx_keys = chan_utils::TxCreationKeys::derive_new(&secp_ctx, &remote_point, &remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, + &remote_htlc_basepoint, &local_revocation_basepoint, &local_htlc_basepoint).unwrap(); + + let res = { + let local_chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap(); + let local_chan = local_chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap(); + let local_chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer(); + let mut htlcs: Vec<(HTLCOutputInCommitment, ())> = vec![]; + let commitment_tx = CommitmentTransaction::new_with_auxiliary_htlc_data( + INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1, + 700, + 999, + false, local_funding, remote_funding, + commit_tx_keys.clone(), + feerate + 124, + &mut htlcs, + &local_chan.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable() + ); + local_chan_signer.sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, &secp_ctx).unwrap() + }; + + let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned { + channel_id: chan.2, + signature: res.0, + htlc_signatures: res.1 + }; - let update2_msg = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); + let update_fee = msgs::UpdateFee { + channel_id: chan.2, + feerate_per_kw: feerate + 124, + }; - nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update2_msg.update_fee.unwrap()); + nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fee); //While producing the commitment_signed response after handling a received update_fee request the //check to see if the funder, who sent the update_fee request, can afford the new fee (funder_balance >= fee+channel_reserve) //Should produce and error. - nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update2_msg.commitment_signed); + nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commit_signed_msg); nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee".to_string(), 1); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true); @@ -1152,7 +1207,7 @@ fn test_duplicate_htlc_different_direction_onchain() { let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 900_000); let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 800_000); - let node_a_payment_secret = nodes[0].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, None, 7200, 0).unwrap(); + let node_a_payment_secret = nodes[0].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, None, 7200).unwrap(); send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[0]]], 800_000, payment_hash, node_a_payment_secret); // Provide preimage to node 0 by claiming payment @@ -4965,7 +5020,7 @@ fn test_duplicate_payment_hash_one_failure_one_success() { let (our_payment_preimage, duplicate_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 900000); - let payment_secret = nodes[3].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(duplicate_payment_hash, None, 7200, 0).unwrap(); + let payment_secret = nodes[3].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(duplicate_payment_hash, None, 7200).unwrap(); // We reduce the final CLTV here by a somewhat arbitrary constant to keep it under the one-byte // script push size limit so that the below script length checks match // ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT. @@ -5168,30 +5223,30 @@ fn do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(deliver_last_raa: bool, anno let (_, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], ds_dust_limit*1000); // 2nd HTLC: - send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_1, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_1, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee + send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_1, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_1, None, 7200).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee // 3rd HTLC: - send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_2, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_2, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee + send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_2, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_2, None, 7200).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee // 4th HTLC: let (_, payment_hash_3, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000); // 5th HTLC: let (_, payment_hash_4, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000); let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], 1000000); // 6th HTLC: - send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_3, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_3, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); + send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_3, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_3, None, 7200).unwrap()); // 7th HTLC: - send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_4, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_4, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); + send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_4, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_4, None, 7200).unwrap()); // 8th HTLC: let (_, payment_hash_5, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000); // 9th HTLC: let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], ds_dust_limit*1000); - send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_5, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_5, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee + send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_5, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_5, None, 7200).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee // 10th HTLC: let (_, payment_hash_6, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee // 11th HTLC: let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], 1000000); - send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_6, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_6, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); + send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_6, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_6, None, 7200).unwrap()); // Double-check that six of the new HTLC were added // We now have six HTLCs pending over the dust limit and six HTLCs under the dust limit (ie, @@ -7156,7 +7211,7 @@ fn test_check_htlc_underpaying() { let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payee, nodes[0].network_graph, None, 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap(); let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]); - let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(our_payment_hash, Some(100_000), 7200, 0).unwrap(); + let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(our_payment_hash, Some(100_000), 7200).unwrap(); nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap(); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); @@ -8010,7 +8065,7 @@ fn test_preimage_storage() { create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id; { - let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 7200, 42); + let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 7200); let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000); nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap(); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); @@ -8027,8 +8082,7 @@ fn test_preimage_storage() { match events[0] { Event::PaymentReceived { ref purpose, .. } => { match &purpose { - PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, user_payment_id, .. } => { - assert_eq!(*user_payment_id, 42); + PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, .. } => { claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage.unwrap()); }, _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment") @@ -8048,11 +8102,11 @@ fn test_secret_timeout() { create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id; - let (payment_hash, payment_secret_1) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2, 0); + let (payment_hash, payment_secret_1) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2); // We should fail to register the same payment hash twice, at least until we've connected a // block with time 7200 + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1. - if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2, 0) { + if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2) { assert_eq!(err, "Duplicate payment hash"); } else { panic!(); } let mut block = { @@ -8067,16 +8121,16 @@ fn test_secret_timeout() { } }; connect_block(&nodes[1], &block); - if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2, 0) { + if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2) { assert_eq!(err, "Duplicate payment hash"); } else { panic!(); } // If we then connect the second block, we should be able to register the same payment hash - // again with a different user_payment_id (this time getting a new payment secret). + // again (this time getting a new payment secret). block.header.prev_blockhash = block.header.block_hash(); block.header.time += 1; connect_block(&nodes[1], &block); - let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2, 42).unwrap(); + let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2).unwrap(); assert_ne!(payment_secret_1, our_payment_secret); { @@ -8094,9 +8148,8 @@ fn test_secret_timeout() { let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); match events[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, user_payment_id }, .. } => { + Event::PaymentReceived { purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret }, .. } => { assert!(payment_preimage.is_none()); - assert_eq!(user_payment_id, 42); assert_eq!(payment_secret, our_payment_secret); // We don't actually have the payment preimage with which to claim this payment! }, @@ -8116,7 +8169,7 @@ fn test_bad_secret_hash() { let random_payment_hash = PaymentHash([42; 32]); let random_payment_secret = PaymentSecret([43; 32]); - let (our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2, 0); + let (our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2); let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000); // All the below cases should end up being handled exactly identically, so we macro the @@ -9139,3 +9192,175 @@ fn test_keysend_payments_to_private_node() { pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &path, 10000, payment_hash, None, event, true, Some(test_preimage)); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &path, test_preimage); } + +/// The possible events which may trigger a `max_dust_htlc_exposure` breach +#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq)] +enum ExposureEvent { + /// Breach occurs at HTLC forwarding (see `send_htlc`) + AtHTLCForward, + /// Breach occurs at HTLC reception (see `update_add_htlc`) + AtHTLCReception, + /// Breach occurs at outbound update_fee (see `send_update_fee`) + AtUpdateFeeOutbound, +} + +fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_event: ExposureEvent, on_holder_tx: bool) { + // Test that we properly reject dust HTLC violating our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat` + // policy. + // + // At HTLC forward (`send_payment()`), if the sum of the trimmed-to-dust HTLC inbound and + // trimmed-to-dust HTLC outbound balance and this new payment as included on next + // counterparty commitment are above our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`, we'll reject the + // update. At HTLC reception (`update_add_htlc()`), if the sum of the trimmed-to-dust HTLC + // inbound and trimmed-to-dust HTLC outbound balance and this new received HTLC as included + // on next counterparty commitment are above our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`, we'll fail + // the update. Note, we return a `temporary_channel_failure` (0x1000 | 7), as the channel + // might be available again for HTLC processing once the dust bandwidth has cleared up. + + let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); + let mut config = test_default_channel_config(); + config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat = 5_000_000; // default setting value + let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config), None]); + let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + + nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None).unwrap(); + let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); + open_channel.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 50_000_000; + open_channel.max_accepted_htlcs = 60; + if on_holder_tx { + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis = 546; + } + nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel); + let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &accept_channel); + + let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], 1_000_000, 42); + + if on_holder_tx { + if let Some(mut chan) = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get_mut(&temporary_channel_id) { + chan.holder_dust_limit_satoshis = 546; + } + } + + nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, tx.clone()).unwrap(); + nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id())); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); + + nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + + let (funding_locked, channel_id) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx); + let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_locked); + update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update); + + let dust_buffer_feerate = { + let chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap(); + let chan = chan_lock.by_id.get(&channel_id).unwrap(); + chan.get_dust_buffer_feerate(None) as u64 + }; + let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000; + let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat; + + let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000; + let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat; + + let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx: u64 = 25; + let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx; + + if on_holder_tx { + if dust_outbound_balance { + // Outbound dust threshold: 2223 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + holder's `dust_limit_satoshis`) + // Outbound dust balance: 4372 sats + // Note, we need sent payment to be above outbound dust threshold on counterparty_tx of 2132 sats + for i in 0..dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx { + let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat); + if let Err(_) = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)) { panic!("Unexpected event at dust HTLC {}", i); } + } + } else { + // Inbound dust threshold: 2324 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + holder's `dust_limit_satoshis`) + // Inbound dust balance: 4372 sats + // Note, we need sent payment to be above outbound dust threshold on counterparty_tx of 2031 sats + for _ in 0..dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx { + route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat); + } + } + } else { + if dust_outbound_balance { + // Outbound dust threshold: 2132 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`) + // Outbound dust balance: 5000 sats + for i in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx { + let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat); + if let Err(_) = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)) { panic!("Unexpected event at dust HTLC {}", i); } + } + } else { + // Inbound dust threshold: 2031 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`) + // Inbound dust balance: 5000 sats + for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx { + route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat); + } + } + } + + let dust_overflow = dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * (dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx + 1); + if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward { + let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], if on_holder_tx { dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat }); + let mut config = UserConfig::default(); + // With default dust exposure: 5000 sats + if on_holder_tx { + let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1); + let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat; + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat))); + } else { + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat))); + } + } else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception { + let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], if on_holder_tx { dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat }); + nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap(); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); + let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); + assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); + let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0)); + nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]); + // With default dust exposure: 5000 sats + if on_holder_tx { + // Outbound dust balance: 6399 sats + let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1); + let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat; + nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1); + } else { + // Outbound dust balance: 5200 sats + nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1); + } + } else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound { + let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 2_500_000); + if let Err(_) = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)) { panic!("Unexpected event at update_fee-swallowed HTLC", ); } + { + let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap(); + *feerate_lock = *feerate_lock * 10; + } + nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred(); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), "Cannot afford to send new feerate at 2530 without infringing max dust htlc exposure".to_string(), 1); + } + + let _ = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); + let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); + added_monitors.clear(); +} + +#[test] +fn test_max_dust_htlc_exposure() { + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true); +}