X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Ffunctional_tests.rs;h=f144dbd9ad61faab79d73e82def57ef91cfd7106;hb=04d0cca87293f5a47812d19920686755892f8446;hp=6d509f8f07b62edf442810a1c9e216f238f6a034;hpb=46b68c517dba57bde545ea8e56b47fe3af768579;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs index 6d509f8f..f144dbd9 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs @@ -12,20 +12,19 @@ //! claim outputs on-chain. use chain; -use chain::{Confirm, Listen, Watch, ChannelMonitorUpdateErr}; +use chain::{Confirm, Listen, Watch}; use chain::channelmonitor; use chain::channelmonitor::{ChannelMonitor, CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, ANTI_REORG_DELAY}; use chain::transaction::OutPoint; use chain::keysinterface::BaseSign; use ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash}; -use ln::channel::{COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC}; +use ln::channel::{COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT}; use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelManager, ChannelManagerReadArgs, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA}; use ln::channel::{Channel, ChannelError}; use ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils}; -use ln::chan_utils::HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT; +use ln::chan_utils::{HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT, HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT, HTLCOutputInCommitment}; use routing::network_graph::{NetworkUpdate, RoutingFees}; -use routing::router::{Payee, Route, RouteHop, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, get_route, get_keysend_route}; -use routing::scorer::Scorer; +use routing::router::{Payee, Route, RouteHop, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteParameters, find_route, get_route}; use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures}; use ln::msgs; use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, RoutingMessageHandler, ErrorAction}; @@ -585,11 +584,19 @@ fn test_update_fee_that_funder_cannot_afford() { let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); - let channel_value = 1888; - let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, 700000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + let channel_value = 5000; + let push_sats = 700; + let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, push_sats * 1000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); let channel_id = chan.2; - - let feerate = 260; + let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new(); + let bs_channel_reserve_sats = Channel::::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(channel_value); + + // Calculate the maximum feerate that A can afford. Note that we don't send an update_fee + // CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER HTLCs before actually running out of local balance, so we + // calculate two different feerates here - the expected local limit as well as the expected + // remote limit. + let feerate = ((channel_value - bs_channel_reserve_sats - push_sats) * 1000 / (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT + CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER as u64 * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC)) as u32; + let non_buffer_feerate = ((channel_value - bs_channel_reserve_sats - push_sats) * 1000 / COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT) as u32; { let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap(); *feerate_lock = feerate; @@ -602,36 +609,88 @@ fn test_update_fee_that_funder_cannot_afford() { commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], update_msg.commitment_signed, false); - //Confirm that the new fee based on the last local commitment txn is what we expected based on the feerate of 260 set above. - //This value results in a fee that is exactly what the funder can afford (277 sat + 1000 sat channel reserve) + // Confirm that the new fee based on the last local commitment txn is what we expected based on the feerate set above. { let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], channel_id)[0].clone(); - //We made sure neither party's funds are below the dust limit so -2 non-HTLC txns from number of outputs - let num_htlcs = commitment_tx.output.len() - 2; - let total_fee: u64 = feerate as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT + (num_htlcs as u64) * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000; + //We made sure neither party's funds are below the dust limit and there are no HTLCs here + assert_eq!(commitment_tx.output.len(), 2); + let total_fee: u64 = commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 0) / 1000; let mut actual_fee = commitment_tx.output.iter().fold(0, |acc, output| acc + output.value); actual_fee = channel_value - actual_fee; assert_eq!(total_fee, actual_fee); } - //Add 2 to the previous fee rate to the final fee increases by 1 (with no HTLCs the fee is essentially - //fee_rate*(724/1000) so the increment of 1*0.724 is rounded back down) { + // Increment the feerate by a small constant, accounting for rounding errors let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap(); - *feerate_lock = feerate + 2; + *feerate_lock += 4; } nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred(); - check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot afford to send new feerate at {}", feerate + 4), 1); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0); - let update2_msg = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); + const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 281474976710654; - nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update2_msg.update_fee.unwrap()); + // Get the EnforcingSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys + // needed to sign the new commitment tx and (2) sign the new commitment tx. + let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_funding) = { + let chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap(); + let local_chan = chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap(); + let chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer(); + let pubkeys = chan_signer.pubkeys(); + (pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint, + pubkeys.funding_pubkey) + }; + let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint,remote_point, remote_funding) = { + let chan_lock = nodes[1].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap(); + let remote_chan = chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap(); + let chan_signer = remote_chan.get_signer(); + let pubkeys = chan_signer.pubkeys(); + (pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint, + chan_signer.get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1, &secp_ctx), + pubkeys.funding_pubkey) + }; + + // Assemble the set of keys we can use for signatures for our commitment_signed message. + let commit_tx_keys = chan_utils::TxCreationKeys::derive_new(&secp_ctx, &remote_point, &remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, + &remote_htlc_basepoint, &local_revocation_basepoint, &local_htlc_basepoint).unwrap(); + + let res = { + let local_chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap(); + let local_chan = local_chan_lock.by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap(); + let local_chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer(); + let mut htlcs: Vec<(HTLCOutputInCommitment, ())> = vec![]; + let commitment_tx = CommitmentTransaction::new_with_auxiliary_htlc_data( + INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1, + push_sats, + channel_value - push_sats - commit_tx_fee_msat(non_buffer_feerate + 4, 0) / 1000, + false, local_funding, remote_funding, + commit_tx_keys.clone(), + non_buffer_feerate + 4, + &mut htlcs, + &local_chan.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable() + ); + local_chan_signer.sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, &secp_ctx).unwrap() + }; + + let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned { + channel_id: chan.2, + signature: res.0, + htlc_signatures: res.1 + }; + + let update_fee = msgs::UpdateFee { + channel_id: chan.2, + feerate_per_kw: non_buffer_feerate + 4, + }; + + nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fee); //While producing the commitment_signed response after handling a received update_fee request the //check to see if the funder, who sent the update_fee request, can afford the new fee (funder_balance >= fee+channel_reserve) //Should produce and error. - nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update2_msg.commitment_signed); + nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commit_signed_msg); nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee".to_string(), 1); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true); @@ -919,7 +978,7 @@ fn fake_network_test() { }); hops[1].fee_msat = chan_4.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_4.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[2].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000; hops[0].fee_msat = chan_3.0.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_3.0.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[1].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000; - let payment_preimage_1 = send_along_route(&nodes[1], Route { paths: vec![hops] }, &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).0; + let payment_preimage_1 = send_along_route(&nodes[1], Route { paths: vec![hops], payee: None }, &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).0; let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(3); hops.push(RouteHop { @@ -948,7 +1007,7 @@ fn fake_network_test() { }); hops[1].fee_msat = chan_2.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_2.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[2].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000; hops[0].fee_msat = chan_3.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_3.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[1].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000; - let payment_hash_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[1], Route { paths: vec![hops] }, &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).1; + let payment_hash_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[1], Route { paths: vec![hops], payee: None }, &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).1; // Claim the rebalances... fail_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], payment_hash_2); @@ -1153,7 +1212,7 @@ fn test_duplicate_htlc_different_direction_onchain() { let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 900_000); let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 800_000); - let node_a_payment_secret = nodes[0].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, None, 7200, 0).unwrap(); + let node_a_payment_secret = nodes[0].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, None, 7200).unwrap(); send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[0]]], 800_000, payment_hash, node_a_payment_secret); // Provide preimage to node 0 by claiming payment @@ -1208,7 +1267,7 @@ fn test_duplicate_htlc_different_direction_onchain() { MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {}, MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action: msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } } => { assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); - assert_eq!(msg.data, "Commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain."); + assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain."); }, MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => { assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty()); @@ -1392,21 +1451,21 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_outbound_htlc_inbound_chan() { // sending any above-dust amount would result in a channel reserve violation. // In this test we check that we would be prevented from sending an HTLC in // this situation. - let feerate_per_kw = 253; - chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) }; - chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) }; + let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap(); let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); let mut push_amt = 100_000_000; - push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT + COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000 * 1000; + push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64); push_amt -= Channel::::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000; let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); // Sending exactly enough to hit the reserve amount should be accepted - let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000); + for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT { + let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000); + } // However one more HTLC should be significantly over the reserve amount and fail. let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1_000_000); @@ -1419,30 +1478,36 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_violation_outbound_htlc_inbound_chan() { #[test] fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_outbound_channel() { let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); - // Set the fee rate for the channel very high, to the point where the funder - // receiving 1 update_add_htlc would result in them closing the channel due - // to channel reserve violation. This close could also happen if the fee went - // up a more realistic amount, but many HTLCs were outstanding at the time of - // the update_add_htlc. - chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) }; - chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(6000) }; + let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap(); let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); - let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); - let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1000); + // Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a + // channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment + // transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)). + let mut push_amt = 100_000_000; + push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64); + push_amt -= Channel::::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000; + let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + + // Send four HTLCs to cover the initial push_msat buffer we're required to include + for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT { + let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000); + } + + let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 700_000); // Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc() let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new(); let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap(); let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1; let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap(); - let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 1000, &Some(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap(); + let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 700_000, &Some(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap(); let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash); let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC { channel_id: chan.2, - htlc_id: 1, - amount_msat: htlc_msat + 1, + htlc_id: MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, + amount_msat: htlc_msat, payment_hash: payment_hash, cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv, onion_routing_packet: onion_packet, @@ -1463,9 +1528,7 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_outbound_chan() { // Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an outbound channel, they don't count when // calculating our commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken). let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); - let feerate_per_kw = 253; - chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) }; - chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator = test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(feerate_per_kw) }; + let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap(); let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]); @@ -1475,7 +1538,7 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_outbound_chan() { // channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment // transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)). let mut push_amt = 100_000_000; - push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (COMMITMENT_TX_BASE_WEIGHT) / 1000 * 1000; + push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64); push_amt -= Channel::::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000; create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, push_amt, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); @@ -1486,12 +1549,52 @@ fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_outbound_chan() { // commitment transaction fee. let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_amt); + // Send four HTLCs to cover the initial push_msat buffer we're required to include + for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT { + let (_, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000); + } + // One more than the dust amt should fail, however. let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], dust_amt + 1); unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send value that would put counterparty balance under holder-announced channel reserve value")); } +#[test] +fn test_chan_init_feerate_unaffordability() { + // Test that we will reject channel opens which do not leave enough to pay for any HTLCs due to + // channel reserve and feerate requirements. + let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); + let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap(); + let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); + let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + + // Set the push_msat amount such that nodes[0] will not be able to afford to add even a single + // HTLC. + let mut push_amt = 100_000_000; + push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64); + assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt + 1, 42, None).unwrap_err(), + APIError::APIMisuseError { err: "Funding amount (356) can't even pay fee for initial commitment transaction fee of 357.".to_string() }); + + // During open, we don't have a "counterparty channel reserve" to check against, so that + // requirement only comes into play on the open_channel handling side. + push_amt -= Channel::::get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000) * 1000; + nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt, 42, None).unwrap(); + let mut open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); + open_channel_msg.push_msat += 1; + nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel_msg); + + let msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); + assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1); + match msg_events[0] { + MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => { + assert_eq!(msg.data, "Insufficient funding amount for initial reserve"); + }, + _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), + } +} + #[test] fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_inbound_chan() { // Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an inbound channel, they don't count when @@ -1905,7 +2008,7 @@ fn channel_reserve_in_flight_removes() { nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_removes.commitment_signed); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); - expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1); + expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1); nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.msgs[0]); nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.commitment_msg); @@ -1934,7 +2037,7 @@ fn channel_reserve_in_flight_removes() { nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_cs.commitment_signed); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); - expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_2); + expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_2); nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); @@ -1947,6 +2050,7 @@ fn channel_reserve_in_flight_removes() { // resolve the second HTLC from A's point of view. nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]); let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); // Now that B doesn't have the second RAA anymore, but A still does, send a payment from B back @@ -1976,6 +2080,7 @@ fn channel_reserve_in_flight_removes() { nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]); let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed); @@ -2655,11 +2760,11 @@ fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() { check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); - assert_eq!(events.len(), 3); + assert_eq!(events.len(), 5); let mut first_claimed = false; for event in events { match event { - Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash } => { + Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => { if payment_preimage == our_payment_preimage && payment_hash == payment_hash_1 { assert!(!first_claimed); first_claimed = true; @@ -2668,6 +2773,7 @@ fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() { assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2); } }, + Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {}, Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), } @@ -3018,7 +3124,7 @@ fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use match events[if deliver_bs_raa { 2 } else { 1 }] { MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { msg: msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, ref data } }, node_id: _ } => { assert_eq!(channel_id, chan_2.2); - assert_eq!(data.as_str(), "Commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain."); + assert_eq!(data.as_str(), "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain."); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), } @@ -3302,13 +3408,13 @@ fn test_dup_events_on_peer_disconnect() { check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); let claim_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &claim_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]); - expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage); + expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage); nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false); nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false); reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false)); - assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); + expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]); } #[test] @@ -3348,9 +3454,9 @@ fn test_simple_peer_disconnect() { reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 0), (false, false)); { let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); - assert_eq!(events.len(), 2); + assert_eq!(events.len(), 3); match events[0] { - Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash } => { + Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => { assert_eq!(payment_preimage, payment_preimage_3); assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_3); }, @@ -3363,6 +3469,10 @@ fn test_simple_peer_disconnect() { }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), } + match events[2] { + Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {}, + _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), + } } claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_4); @@ -3514,7 +3624,7 @@ fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1); match events_4[0] { - Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash } => { + Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => { assert_eq!(payment_preimage_1, *payment_preimage); assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash); }, @@ -3552,15 +3662,7 @@ fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken if messages_delivered < 2 { reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false)); if messages_delivered < 1 { - let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); - assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1); - match events_4[0] { - Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash } => { - assert_eq!(payment_preimage_1, *payment_preimage); - assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash); - }, - _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), - } + expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1); } else { assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); } @@ -3578,10 +3680,18 @@ fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false)); } + if messages_delivered == 1 || messages_delivered == 2 { + expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]); + } + nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false); nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false); reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false)); + if messages_delivered > 2 { + expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]); + } + // Channel should still work fine... let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000); let payment_preimage_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 1000000).0; @@ -3689,7 +3799,7 @@ fn test_funding_peer_disconnect() { nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.handle_channel_update(&as_update).unwrap(); let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000); - let (payment_preimage, _, _) = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 1000000); + let payment_preimage = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 1000000).0; claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage); // Check that after deserialization and reconnection we can still generate an identical @@ -3790,7 +3900,7 @@ fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_dual_htlc() { let events_3 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1); match events_3[0] { - Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash } => { + Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => { assert_eq!(*payment_preimage, payment_preimage_1); assert_eq!(*payment_hash, payment_hash_1); }, @@ -3893,6 +4003,7 @@ fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_dual_htlc() { assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2); } @@ -3912,7 +4023,7 @@ fn do_test_htlc_timeout(send_partial_mpp: bool) { // indicates there are more HTLCs coming. let cur_height = CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1; // route_payment calls send_payment, which adds 1 to the current height. So we do the same here to match. let payment_id = PaymentId([42; 32]); - nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), 200000, cur_height, payment_id, &None).unwrap(); + nodes[0].node.send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &route.payee, &our_payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), 200000, cur_height, payment_id, &None).unwrap(); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); @@ -3995,7 +4106,7 @@ fn do_test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts(forwarded_htlc: bool) { } check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0); - connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS); + connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS); assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1); @@ -4100,145 +4211,6 @@ fn test_no_txn_manager_serialize_deserialize() { send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000); } -fn do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(persist_manager_post_event: bool) { - // When a Channel is closed, any outbound HTLCs which were relayed through it are simply - // dropped when the Channel is. From there, the ChannelManager relies on the ChannelMonitor - // having a copy of the relevant fail-/claim-back data and processes the HTLC fail/claim when - // the ChannelMonitor tells it to. - // - // If, due to an on-chain event, an HTLC is failed/claimed, we should avoid providing the - // ChannelManager the HTLC event until after the monitor is re-persisted. This should prevent a - // duplicate HTLC fail/claim (e.g. via a PaymentPathFailed event). - let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); - let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); - let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); - let persister: test_utils::TestPersister; - let new_chain_monitor: test_utils::TestChainMonitor; - let nodes_0_deserialized: ChannelManager; - let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); - - let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); - - // Route a payment, but force-close the channel before the HTLC fulfill message arrives at - // nodes[0]. - let (payment_preimage, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 10000000); - nodes[0].node.force_close_channel(&nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].channel_id).unwrap(); - check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true); - check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed); - - nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false); - nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false); - - // Connect blocks until the CLTV timeout is up so that we get an HTLC-Timeout transaction - connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1); - let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0); - assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 3); - assert_eq!(node_txn[0], node_txn[1]); - check_spends!(node_txn[1], funding_tx); - check_spends!(node_txn[2], node_txn[1]); - - assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage)); - check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - - let mut header = BlockHeader { version: 0x20000000, prev_blockhash: nodes[1].best_block_hash(), merkle_root: Default::default(), time: 42, bits: 42, nonce: 42 }; - connect_block(&nodes[1], &Block { header, txdata: vec![node_txn[1].clone()]}); - check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true); - check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed); - let claim_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0); - - header.prev_blockhash = nodes[0].best_block_hash(); - connect_block(&nodes[0], &Block { header, txdata: vec![node_txn[1].clone()]}); - - // Now connect the HTLC claim transaction with the ChainMonitor-generated ChannelMonitor update - // returning TemporaryFailure. This should cause the claim event to never make its way to the - // ChannelManager. - chanmon_cfgs[0].persister.chain_sync_monitor_persistences.lock().unwrap().clear(); - chanmon_cfgs[0].persister.set_update_ret(Err(ChannelMonitorUpdateErr::TemporaryFailure)); - - header.prev_blockhash = nodes[0].best_block_hash(); - let claim_block = Block { header, txdata: claim_txn }; - connect_block(&nodes[0], &claim_block); - - let funding_txo = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 }; - let mon_updates: Vec<_> = chanmon_cfgs[0].persister.chain_sync_monitor_persistences.lock().unwrap() - .get_mut(&funding_txo).unwrap().drain().collect(); - assert_eq!(mon_updates.len(), 1); - assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.release_pending_monitor_events().is_empty()); - assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); - - // If we persist the ChannelManager here, we should get the PaymentSent event after - // deserialization. - let mut chan_manager_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new()); - if !persist_manager_post_event { - nodes[0].node.write(&mut chan_manager_serialized).unwrap(); - } - - // Now persist the ChannelMonitor and inform the ChainMonitor that we're done, generating the - // payment sent event. - chanmon_cfgs[0].persister.set_update_ret(Ok(())); - let mut chan_0_monitor_serialized = test_utils::TestVecWriter(Vec::new()); - get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id).write(&mut chan_0_monitor_serialized).unwrap(); - nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.channel_monitor_updated(funding_txo, mon_updates[0]).unwrap(); - expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage); - - // If we persist the ChannelManager after we get the PaymentSent event, we shouldn't get it - // twice. - if persist_manager_post_event { - nodes[0].node.write(&mut chan_manager_serialized).unwrap(); - } - - // Now reload nodes[0]... - persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new(); - let keys_manager = &chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager; - new_chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(nodes[0].chain_source), nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), nodes[0].logger, node_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister, keys_manager); - nodes[0].chain_monitor = &new_chain_monitor; - let mut chan_0_monitor_read = &chan_0_monitor_serialized.0[..]; - let (_, mut chan_0_monitor) = <(BlockHash, ChannelMonitor)>::read( - &mut chan_0_monitor_read, keys_manager).unwrap(); - assert!(chan_0_monitor_read.is_empty()); - - let (_, nodes_0_deserialized_tmp) = { - let mut channel_monitors = HashMap::new(); - channel_monitors.insert(chan_0_monitor.get_funding_txo().0, &mut chan_0_monitor); - <(BlockHash, ChannelManager)> - ::read(&mut io::Cursor::new(&chan_manager_serialized.0[..]), ChannelManagerReadArgs { - default_config: Default::default(), - keys_manager, - fee_estimator: node_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, - chain_monitor: nodes[0].chain_monitor, - tx_broadcaster: nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.clone(), - logger: nodes[0].logger, - channel_monitors, - }).unwrap() - }; - nodes_0_deserialized = nodes_0_deserialized_tmp; - - assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.watch_channel(chan_0_monitor.get_funding_txo().0, chan_0_monitor).is_ok()); - check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); - nodes[0].node = &nodes_0_deserialized; - - if persist_manager_post_event { - assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); - } else { - expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage); - } - - // Note that if we re-connect the block which exposed nodes[0] to the payment preimage (but - // which the current ChannelMonitor has not seen), the ChannelManager's de-duplication of - // payment events should kick in, leaving us with no pending events here. - let height = nodes[0].blocks.lock().unwrap().len() as u32 - 1; - nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.block_connected(&claim_block, height); - assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); -} - -#[test] -fn test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload() { - do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(true); - do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(false); -} - #[test] fn test_manager_serialize_deserialize_events() { // This test makes sure the events field in ChannelManager survives de/serialization @@ -4585,7 +4557,7 @@ fn test_claim_sizeable_push_msat() { let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); - let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 99000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 98_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); nodes[1].node.force_close_channel(&chan.2).unwrap(); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); @@ -4614,7 +4586,7 @@ fn test_claim_on_remote_sizeable_push_msat() { let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); - let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 99000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 98_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); nodes[0].node.force_close_channel(&chan.2).unwrap(); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); @@ -5097,7 +5069,7 @@ fn test_duplicate_payment_hash_one_failure_one_success() { let (our_payment_preimage, duplicate_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 900000); - let payment_secret = nodes[3].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(duplicate_payment_hash, None, 7200, 0).unwrap(); + let payment_secret = nodes[3].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(duplicate_payment_hash, None, 7200).unwrap(); // We reduce the final CLTV here by a somewhat arbitrary constant to keep it under the one-byte // script push size limit so that the below script length checks match // ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT. @@ -5198,7 +5170,7 @@ fn test_duplicate_payment_hash_one_failure_one_success() { let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); match events[0] { - Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash } => { + Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => { assert_eq!(*payment_preimage, our_payment_preimage); assert_eq!(*payment_hash, duplicate_payment_hash); } @@ -5300,30 +5272,30 @@ fn do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(deliver_last_raa: bool, anno let (_, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], ds_dust_limit*1000); // 2nd HTLC: - send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_1, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_1, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee + send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_1, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_1, None, 7200).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee // 3rd HTLC: - send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_2, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_2, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee + send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_2, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_2, None, 7200).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee // 4th HTLC: let (_, payment_hash_3, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000); // 5th HTLC: let (_, payment_hash_4, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000); let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], 1000000); // 6th HTLC: - send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_3, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_3, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); + send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_3, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_3, None, 7200).unwrap()); // 7th HTLC: - send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_4, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_4, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); + send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_4, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_4, None, 7200).unwrap()); // 8th HTLC: let (_, payment_hash_5, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000); // 9th HTLC: let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], ds_dust_limit*1000); - send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_5, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_5, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee + send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_5, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_5, None, 7200).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee // 10th HTLC: let (_, payment_hash_6, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee // 11th HTLC: let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], 1000000); - send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_6, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_6, None, 7200, 0).unwrap()); + send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_6, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_6, None, 7200).unwrap()); // Double-check that six of the new HTLC were added // We now have six HTLCs pending over the dust limit and six HTLCs under the dust limit (ie, @@ -5593,7 +5565,7 @@ fn test_key_derivation_params() { let seed = [42; 32]; let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, Network::Testnet); let chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &chanmon_cfgs[0].persister, &keys_manager); - let node = NodeCfg { chain_source: &chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source, logger: &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, tx_broadcaster: &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, fee_estimator: &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, chain_monitor, keys_manager: &keys_manager, node_seed: seed, features: InitFeatures::known() }; + let node = NodeCfg { chain_source: &chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source, logger: &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, tx_broadcaster: &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, fee_estimator: &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, chain_monitor, keys_manager: &keys_manager, network_graph: &chanmon_cfgs[0].network_graph, node_seed: seed, features: InitFeatures::known() }; let mut node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs); node_cfgs.remove(0); node_cfgs.insert(0, node); @@ -5699,24 +5671,16 @@ fn do_htlc_claim_local_commitment_only(use_dust: bool) { let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); - let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 }); + let (payment_preimage, _, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 }); // Claim the payment, but don't deliver A's commitment_signed, resulting in the HTLC only being // present in B's local commitment transaction, but none of A's commitment transactions. - assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage)); + assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage)); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); let bs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]); - let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); - assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); - match events[0] { - Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash } => { - assert_eq!(payment_preimage, our_payment_preimage); - assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash); - }, - _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), - } + expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage); nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.commitment_signed); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); @@ -5983,7 +5947,7 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() { let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_can_send); // Send a payment which passes reserve checks but gets stuck in the holding cell. - nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap(); + let our_payment_id = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap(); chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan.2); assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, max_can_send); @@ -6008,7 +5972,8 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() { let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); match &events[0] { - &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, retry: _, ref error_code, ref error_data } => { + &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data, .. } => { + assert_eq!(our_payment_id, *payment_id.as_ref().unwrap()); assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash); assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false); assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true); @@ -6066,7 +6031,7 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() { nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route_1, payment_hash_1, &Some(payment_secret_1)).unwrap(); chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan.2); assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, amt_1); - nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route_2, payment_hash_2, &Some(payment_secret_2)).unwrap(); + let payment_id_2 = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route_2, payment_hash_2, &Some(payment_secret_2)).unwrap(); chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], chan.2); assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, amt_1 + amt_2); @@ -6092,7 +6057,8 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() { let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); match &events[0] { - &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, retry: _, ref error_code, ref error_data } => { + &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data, .. } => { + assert_eq!(payment_id_2, *payment_id.as_ref().unwrap()); assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash); assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false); assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true); @@ -6136,15 +6102,7 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() { let update_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]); commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], update_msgs.commitment_signed, false, true); - let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); - assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); - match events[0] { - Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash } => { - assert_eq!(*payment_preimage, payment_preimage_1); - assert_eq!(*payment_hash, payment_hash_1); - } - _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), - } + expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1); } // Test that if we fail to forward an HTLC that is being freed from the holding cell that the @@ -7120,7 +7078,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() { let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); // We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in Channel::new_outbound() - if let Err(error) = Channel::new_outbound(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), 1000000, 1000000, 0, &low_our_to_self_config) { + if let Err(error) = Channel::new_outbound(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), 1000000, 1000000, 0, &low_our_to_self_config, 0) { match error { APIError::APIMisuseError { err } => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), @@ -7131,7 +7089,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() { nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap(); let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); open_channel.to_self_delay = 200; - if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &low_our_to_self_config) { + if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &low_our_to_self_config, 0) { match error { ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), @@ -7160,7 +7118,7 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() { nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap(); let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); open_channel.to_self_delay = 200; - if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &high_their_to_self_config) { + if let Err(error) = Channel::new_from_req(&&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel, 0, &high_their_to_self_config, 0) { match error { ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), @@ -7298,11 +7256,11 @@ fn test_check_htlc_underpaying() { // Create some initial channels create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); - let scorer = Scorer::new(0); - let payee = Payee::new(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); - let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payee, &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, None, 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap(); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); + let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payee, nodes[0].network_graph, None, 10_000, TEST_FINAL_CLTV, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap(); let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]); - let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(our_payment_hash, Some(100_000), 7200, 0).unwrap(); + let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(our_payment_hash, Some(100_000), 7200).unwrap(); nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, our_payment_hash, &Some(our_payment_secret)).unwrap(); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); @@ -7697,14 +7655,14 @@ fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() { let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); // Lock HTLC in both directions (using a slightly lower CLTV delay to provide timely RBF bumps) - let payee = Payee::new(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); - let scorer = Scorer::new(0); - let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payee, &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, - None, 3_000_000, 50, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap(); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payee, &nodes[0].network_graph, None, + 3_000_000, 50, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap(); let payment_preimage = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0; - let payee = Payee::new(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); - let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payee, &nodes[1].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, - None, 3_000_000, 50, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap(); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); + let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payee, nodes[1].network_graph, None, + 3_000_000, 50, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap(); send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000); let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2); @@ -8046,6 +8004,42 @@ fn test_bump_txn_sanitize_tracking_maps() { } } +#[test] +fn test_channel_conf_timeout() { + // Tests that, for inbound channels, we give up on them if the funding transaction does not + // confirm within 2016 blocks, as recommended by BOLT 2. + let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); + let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); + let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + + let _funding_tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 100_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); + + // The outbound node should wait forever for confirmation: + // This matches `channel::FUNDING_CONF_DEADLINE_BLOCKS` and BOLT 2's suggested timeout, thus is + // copied here instead of directly referencing the constant. + connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 2016); + assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); + + // The inbound node should fail the channel after exactly 2016 blocks + connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 2015); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0); + assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); + + connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::FundingTimedOut); + let close_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); + assert_eq!(close_ev.len(), 1); + match close_ev[0] { + MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, ref node_id } => { + assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because funding transaction failed to confirm within 2016 blocks"); + }, + _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), + } +} + #[test] fn test_override_channel_config() { let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); @@ -8120,7 +8114,7 @@ fn test_preimage_storage() { create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id; { - let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 7200, 42); + let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 7200); let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000); nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap(); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); @@ -8137,8 +8131,7 @@ fn test_preimage_storage() { match events[0] { Event::PaymentReceived { ref purpose, .. } => { match &purpose { - PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, user_payment_id, .. } => { - assert_eq!(*user_payment_id, 42); + PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, .. } => { claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage.unwrap()); }, _ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment") @@ -8158,11 +8151,11 @@ fn test_secret_timeout() { create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()).0.contents.short_channel_id; - let (payment_hash, payment_secret_1) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2, 0); + let (payment_hash, payment_secret_1) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2); // We should fail to register the same payment hash twice, at least until we've connected a // block with time 7200 + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1. - if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2, 0) { + if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2) { assert_eq!(err, "Duplicate payment hash"); } else { panic!(); } let mut block = { @@ -8177,16 +8170,16 @@ fn test_secret_timeout() { } }; connect_block(&nodes[1], &block); - if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2, 0) { + if let Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2) { assert_eq!(err, "Duplicate payment hash"); } else { panic!(); } // If we then connect the second block, we should be able to register the same payment hash - // again with a different user_payment_id (this time getting a new payment secret). + // again (this time getting a new payment secret). block.header.prev_blockhash = block.header.block_hash(); block.header.time += 1; connect_block(&nodes[1], &block); - let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2, 42).unwrap(); + let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, Some(100_000), 2).unwrap(); assert_ne!(payment_secret_1, our_payment_secret); { @@ -8204,9 +8197,8 @@ fn test_secret_timeout() { let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); match events[0] { - Event::PaymentReceived { purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, user_payment_id }, .. } => { + Event::PaymentReceived { purpose: PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret }, .. } => { assert!(payment_preimage.is_none()); - assert_eq!(user_payment_id, 42); assert_eq!(payment_secret, our_payment_secret); // We don't actually have the payment preimage with which to claim this payment! }, @@ -8226,7 +8218,7 @@ fn test_bad_secret_hash() { let random_payment_hash = PaymentHash([42; 32]); let random_payment_secret = PaymentSecret([43; 32]); - let (our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2, 0); + let (our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2); let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000); // All the below cases should end up being handled exactly identically, so we macro the @@ -8969,15 +8961,16 @@ fn test_invalid_funding_tx() { assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[0], tx); nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clear(); + let expected_err = "funding tx had wrong script/value or output index"; confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[1], &tx, 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: expected_err.to_string() }); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1); if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action } = &events_2[0] { assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); if let msgs::ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { msg } = action { - assert_eq!(msg.data, "funding tx had wrong script/value or output index"); + assert_eq!(msg.data, "Channel closed because of an exception: ".to_owned() + expected_err); } else { panic!(); } } else { panic!(); } assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0); @@ -9190,13 +9183,16 @@ fn test_keysend_payments_to_public_node() { let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); - let network_graph = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph; + let network_graph = nodes[0].network_graph; let payer_pubkey = nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(); let payee_pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(); - let scorer = Scorer::new(0); - let route = get_keysend_route( - &payer_pubkey, &network_graph, &payee_pubkey, None, &vec![], 10000, 40, nodes[0].logger, &scorer - ).unwrap(); + let params = RouteParameters { + payee: Payee::for_keysend(payee_pubkey), + final_value_msat: 10000, + final_cltv_expiry_delta: 40, + }; + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let route = find_route(&payer_pubkey, ¶ms, network_graph, None, nodes[0].logger, &scorer).unwrap(); let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]); let (payment_hash, _) = nodes[0].node.send_spontaneous_payment(&route, Some(test_preimage)).unwrap(); @@ -9222,12 +9218,17 @@ fn test_keysend_payments_to_private_node() { nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&payer_pubkey, &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::known() }); let _chan = create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); - let network_graph = &nodes[0].net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph; + let params = RouteParameters { + payee: Payee::for_keysend(payee_pubkey), + final_value_msat: 10000, + final_cltv_expiry_delta: 40, + }; + let network_graph = nodes[0].network_graph; let first_hops = nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels(); - let scorer = Scorer::new(0); - let route = get_keysend_route( - &payer_pubkey, &network_graph, &payee_pubkey, Some(&first_hops.iter().collect::>()), - &vec![], 10000, 40, nodes[0].logger, &scorer + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let route = find_route( + &payer_pubkey, ¶ms, network_graph, Some(&first_hops.iter().collect::>()), + nodes[0].logger, &scorer ).unwrap(); let test_preimage = PaymentPreimage([42; 32]); @@ -9240,3 +9241,175 @@ fn test_keysend_payments_to_private_node() { pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &path, 10000, payment_hash, None, event, true, Some(test_preimage)); claim_payment(&nodes[0], &path, test_preimage); } + +/// The possible events which may trigger a `max_dust_htlc_exposure` breach +#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq)] +enum ExposureEvent { + /// Breach occurs at HTLC forwarding (see `send_htlc`) + AtHTLCForward, + /// Breach occurs at HTLC reception (see `update_add_htlc`) + AtHTLCReception, + /// Breach occurs at outbound update_fee (see `send_update_fee`) + AtUpdateFeeOutbound, +} + +fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_event: ExposureEvent, on_holder_tx: bool) { + // Test that we properly reject dust HTLC violating our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat` + // policy. + // + // At HTLC forward (`send_payment()`), if the sum of the trimmed-to-dust HTLC inbound and + // trimmed-to-dust HTLC outbound balance and this new payment as included on next + // counterparty commitment are above our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`, we'll reject the + // update. At HTLC reception (`update_add_htlc()`), if the sum of the trimmed-to-dust HTLC + // inbound and trimmed-to-dust HTLC outbound balance and this new received HTLC as included + // on next counterparty commitment are above our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`, we'll fail + // the update. Note, we return a `temporary_channel_failure` (0x1000 | 7), as the channel + // might be available again for HTLC processing once the dust bandwidth has cleared up. + + let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); + let mut config = test_default_channel_config(); + config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat = 5_000_000; // default setting value + let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config), None]); + let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + + nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None).unwrap(); + let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); + open_channel.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 50_000_000; + open_channel.max_accepted_htlcs = 60; + if on_holder_tx { + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis = 546; + } + nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &open_channel); + let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); + nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &accept_channel); + + let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], 1_000_000, 42); + + if on_holder_tx { + if let Some(mut chan) = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap().by_id.get_mut(&temporary_channel_id) { + chan.holder_dust_limit_satoshis = 546; + } + } + + nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, tx.clone()).unwrap(); + nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id())); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); + + nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + + let (funding_locked, channel_id) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx); + let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_locked); + update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update); + + let dust_buffer_feerate = { + let chan_lock = nodes[0].node.channel_state.lock().unwrap(); + let chan = chan_lock.by_id.get(&channel_id).unwrap(); + chan.get_dust_buffer_feerate(None) as u64 + }; + let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000; + let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat; + + let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000; + let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat; + + let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx: u64 = 25; + let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx; + + if on_holder_tx { + if dust_outbound_balance { + // Outbound dust threshold: 2223 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + holder's `dust_limit_satoshis`) + // Outbound dust balance: 4372 sats + // Note, we need sent payment to be above outbound dust threshold on counterparty_tx of 2132 sats + for i in 0..dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx { + let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat); + if let Err(_) = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)) { panic!("Unexpected event at dust HTLC {}", i); } + } + } else { + // Inbound dust threshold: 2324 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + holder's `dust_limit_satoshis`) + // Inbound dust balance: 4372 sats + // Note, we need sent payment to be above outbound dust threshold on counterparty_tx of 2031 sats + for _ in 0..dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx { + route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat); + } + } + } else { + if dust_outbound_balance { + // Outbound dust threshold: 2132 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`) + // Outbound dust balance: 5000 sats + for i in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx { + let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat); + if let Err(_) = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)) { panic!("Unexpected event at dust HTLC {}", i); } + } + } else { + // Inbound dust threshold: 2031 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`) + // Inbound dust balance: 5000 sats + for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx { + route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat); + } + } + } + + let dust_overflow = dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * (dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx + 1); + if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward { + let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], if on_holder_tx { dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat }); + let mut config = UserConfig::default(); + // With default dust exposure: 5000 sats + if on_holder_tx { + let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1); + let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat; + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat))); + } else { + unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err }, assert_eq!(err, &format!("Cannot send value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat))); + } + } else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception { + let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], if on_holder_tx { dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat }); + nodes[1].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap(); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); + let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); + assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); + let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0)); + nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]); + // With default dust exposure: 5000 sats + if on_holder_tx { + // Outbound dust balance: 6399 sats + let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1); + let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat; + nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1); + } else { + // Outbound dust balance: 5200 sats + nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx", dust_overflow, config.channel_options.max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1); + } + } else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound { + let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 2_500_000); + if let Err(_) = nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)) { panic!("Unexpected event at update_fee-swallowed HTLC", ); } + { + let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap(); + *feerate_lock = *feerate_lock * 10; + } + nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred(); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), "Cannot afford to send new feerate at 2530 without infringing max dust htlc exposure".to_string(), 1); + } + + let _ = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); + let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); + added_monitors.clear(); +} + +#[test] +fn test_max_dust_htlc_exposure() { + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false); + do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true); +}