X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Fmonitor_tests.rs;h=9cf3f4ca29a323b16f5d76114a9a413138f2633f;hb=4ab6c551a00ce167abfad2ea97310e8043e08375;hp=58878a9998c8a3b5aa2d87b8e14bc294c4574335;hpb=f80284cc88ccbac8168316eba887e51142623cc1;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs index 58878a99..9cf3f4ca 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs @@ -269,12 +269,12 @@ fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) { assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id); // This HTLC is immediately claimed, giving node B the preimage - let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000); + let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000); // This HTLC is allowed to time out, letting A claim it. However, in order to test claimable // balances more fully we also give B the preimage for this HTLC. - let (timeout_payment_preimage, timeout_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 4_000_000); + let (timeout_payment_preimage, timeout_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 4_000_000); // This HTLC will be dust, and not be claimable at all: - let (dust_payment_preimage, dust_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000); + let (dust_payment_preimage, dust_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000); let htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety @@ -1046,14 +1046,14 @@ fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_commitment_balances(confirm_htlc_spend_first: bo assert!(failed_payments.is_empty()); if let Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } = events[0] {} else { panic!(); } match &events[1] { - Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}, + Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, .. } => {}, _ => panic!(), } connect_blocks(&nodes[1], htlc_cltv_timeout + 1 - 10); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000); // Prior to channel closure, B considers the preimage HTLC as its own, and otherwise only // lists the two on-chain timeout-able HTLCs as claimable balances. @@ -1867,23 +1867,35 @@ fn test_yield_anchors_events() { let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(anchors_config), Some(anchors_config)]); let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); - let chan_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value( + let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value( &nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 500_000_000 - ).2; - route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000); - let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000); + ); + let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000); + let (payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 2_000_000); assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); + assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); *nodes[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap() *= 2; + connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1); - check_closed_broadcast!(&nodes[0], true); - assert!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().is_empty()); + assert!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast().is_empty()); + + connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1); + { + let txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast(); + assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1); + check_spends!(txn[0], funding_tx); + } get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id).provide_payment_preimage( - &payment_hash, &payment_preimage, &node_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, + &payment_hash_2, &payment_preimage_2, &node_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(node_cfgs[0].fee_estimator), &nodes[0].logger ); + get_monitor!(nodes[1], chan_id).provide_payment_preimage( + &payment_hash_1, &payment_preimage_1, &node_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, + &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(node_cfgs[1].fee_estimator), &nodes[1].logger + ); let mut holder_events = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(holder_events.len(), 1); @@ -1904,27 +1916,50 @@ fn test_yield_anchors_events() { assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2); let anchor_tx = txn.pop().unwrap(); let commitment_tx = txn.pop().unwrap(); + check_spends!(commitment_tx, funding_tx); check_spends!(anchor_tx, coinbase_tx, commitment_tx); (commitment_tx, anchor_tx) }, _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), }; + assert_eq!(commitment_tx.output[2].value, 1_000); // HTLC A -> B + assert_eq!(commitment_tx.output[3].value, 2_000); // HTLC B -> A + mine_transactions(&nodes[0], &[&commitment_tx, &anchor_tx]); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); + mine_transactions(&nodes[1], &[&commitment_tx, &anchor_tx]); + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); + + { + let mut txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.unique_txn_broadcast(); + assert_eq!(txn.len(), if nodes[1].connect_style.borrow().updates_best_block_first() { 3 } else { 2 }); + + let htlc_preimage_tx = txn.pop().unwrap(); + assert_eq!(htlc_preimage_tx.input.len(), 1); + assert_eq!(htlc_preimage_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout, 3); + check_spends!(htlc_preimage_tx, commitment_tx); + + let htlc_timeout_tx = txn.pop().unwrap(); + assert_eq!(htlc_timeout_tx.input.len(), 1); + assert_eq!(htlc_timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout, 2); + check_spends!(htlc_timeout_tx, commitment_tx); + + if let Some(commitment_tx) = txn.pop() { + check_spends!(commitment_tx, funding_tx); + } + } let mut holder_events = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events(); // Certain block `ConnectStyle`s cause an extra `ChannelClose` event to be emitted since the // best block is updated before the confirmed transactions are notified. - match *nodes[0].connect_style.borrow() { - ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirst|ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstReorgsOnlyTip|ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks => { - assert_eq!(holder_events.len(), 3); - if let Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::ChannelClose { .. }) = holder_events.remove(0) {} - else { panic!("unexpected event"); } - - }, - _ => assert_eq!(holder_events.len(), 2), - }; + if nodes[0].connect_style.borrow().updates_best_block_first() { + assert_eq!(holder_events.len(), 3); + if let Event::BumpTransaction(BumpTransactionEvent::ChannelClose { .. }) = holder_events.remove(0) {} + else { panic!("unexpected event"); } + } else { + assert_eq!(holder_events.len(), 2); + } let mut htlc_txs = Vec::with_capacity(2); for event in holder_events { match event { @@ -1958,6 +1993,9 @@ fn test_yield_anchors_events() { // Clear the remaining events as they're not relevant to what we're testing. nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); + nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); + nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); + nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); } #[test] @@ -2231,7 +2269,7 @@ fn test_anchors_aggregated_revoked_htlc_tx() { assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); let spendable_output_events = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(spendable_output_events.len(), 2); - for (idx, event) in spendable_output_events.iter().enumerate() { + for event in spendable_output_events.iter() { if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs, channel_id } = event { assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1); assert!(vec![chan_b.2, chan_a.2].contains(&channel_id.unwrap()));