X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Fpayment_tests.rs;h=0a9b0cb05a7cc28491d37d37735c39a68c4628e8;hb=bfff6fda6e2e6183285be59a999d5b74feb08779;hp=0db815a708532f590d5d7821d2f0bc156e03ad8f;hpb=51d9ee35e53534bb2d907fc105699114134736a5;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs index 0db815a7..0a9b0cb0 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs @@ -11,15 +11,15 @@ //! serialization ordering between ChannelManager/ChannelMonitors and ensuring we can still retry //! payments thereafter. -use crate::chain::{ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, Confirm, Listen, Watch}; +use crate::chain::{ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, Confirm, Listen}; use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{ANTI_REORG_DELAY, HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS}; use crate::sign::EntropySource; -use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint; use crate::events::{ClosureReason, Event, HTLCDestination, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentFailureReason, PaymentPurpose}; use crate::ln::channel::{EXPIRE_PREV_CONFIG_TICKS, commit_tx_fee_msat, get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis, ANCHOR_OUTPUT_VALUE_SATOSHI}; use crate::ln::channelmanager::{BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, MPP_TIMEOUT_TICKS, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA, PaymentId, PaymentSendFailure, RecentPaymentDetails, RecipientOnionFields, HTLCForwardInfo, PendingHTLCRouting, PendingAddHTLCInfo}; use crate::ln::features::{Bolt11InvoiceFeatures, ChannelTypeFeatures}; -use crate::ln::{msgs, ChannelId, PaymentHash, PaymentSecret, PaymentPreimage}; +use crate::ln::msgs; +use crate::ln::types::{ChannelId, PaymentHash, PaymentSecret, PaymentPreimage}; use crate::ln::msgs::ChannelMessageHandler; use crate::ln::onion_utils; use crate::ln::outbound_payment::{IDEMPOTENCY_TIMEOUT_TICKS, Retry}; @@ -277,10 +277,12 @@ fn mpp_retry_overpay() { // Can't use claim_payment_along_route as it doesn't support overpayment, so we break out the // individual steps here. + nodes[3].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage); let extra_fees = vec![0, total_overpaid_amount]; - let expected_total_fee_msat = do_claim_payment_along_route_with_extra_penultimate_hop_fees( - &nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], &extra_fees[..], false, - payment_preimage); + let expected_route = &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]][..], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]][..]]; + let args = ClaimAlongRouteArgs::new(&nodes[0], &expected_route[..], payment_preimage) + .with_expected_min_htlc_overpay(extra_fees); + let expected_total_fee_msat = pass_claimed_payment_along_route(args); expect_payment_sent!(&nodes[0], payment_preimage, Some(expected_total_fee_msat)); } @@ -1028,16 +1030,15 @@ fn test_completed_payment_not_retryable_on_reload() { do_test_completed_payment_not_retryable_on_reload(false); } - -fn do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(persist_manager_post_event: bool, confirm_commitment_tx: bool, payment_timeout: bool) { +fn do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_doesnt_fail_on_reload(persist_manager_post_event: bool, confirm_commitment_tx: bool, payment_timeout: bool) { // When a Channel is closed, any outbound HTLCs which were relayed through it are simply - // dropped when the Channel is. From there, the ChannelManager relies on the ChannelMonitor - // having a copy of the relevant fail-/claim-back data and processes the HTLC fail/claim when - // the ChannelMonitor tells it to. + // dropped. From there, the ChannelManager relies on the ChannelMonitor having a copy of the + // relevant fail-/claim-back data and processes the HTLC fail/claim when the ChannelMonitor tells + // it to. // - // If, due to an on-chain event, an HTLC is failed/claimed, we should avoid providing the - // ChannelManager the HTLC event until after the monitor is re-persisted. This should prevent a - // duplicate HTLC fail/claim (e.g. via a PaymentPathFailed event). + // If, due to an on-chain event, an HTLC is failed/claimed, we provide the + // ChannelManager with the HTLC event without waiting for ChannelMonitor persistence. + // This might generate duplicate HTLC fail/claim (e.g. via a PaymentPathFailed event) on reload. let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); let persister; @@ -1110,14 +1111,9 @@ fn do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(persist_manager_post_event: bool, co connect_block(&nodes[0], &claim_block); } - let funding_txo = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 }; - let mon_updates: Vec<_> = chanmon_cfgs[0].persister.chain_sync_monitor_persistences.lock().unwrap() - .get_mut(&funding_txo).unwrap().drain().collect(); - // If we are using chain::Confirm instead of chain::Listen, we will get the same update twice. - // If we're testing connection idempotency we may get substantially more. - assert!(mon_updates.len() >= 1); - assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.release_pending_monitor_events().is_empty()); - assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); + // Note that we skip persisting ChannelMonitors. We should still be generating the payment sent + // event without ChannelMonitor persistence. If we reset to a previous state on reload, the block + // should be replayed and we'll regenerate the event. // If we persist the ChannelManager here, we should get the PaymentSent event after // deserialization. @@ -1126,13 +1122,7 @@ fn do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(persist_manager_post_event: bool, co chan_manager_serialized = nodes[0].node.encode(); } - // Now persist the ChannelMonitor and inform the ChainMonitor that we're done, generating the - // payment sent event. - chanmon_cfgs[0].persister.set_update_ret(ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed); let chan_0_monitor_serialized = get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id).encode(); - for update in mon_updates { - nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.channel_monitor_updated(funding_txo, update).unwrap(); - } if payment_timeout { expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false); } else { @@ -1166,13 +1156,13 @@ fn do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(persist_manager_post_event: bool, co } #[test] -fn test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload() { - do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(true, true, true); - do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(true, true, false); - do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(true, false, false); - do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(false, true, true); - do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(false, true, false); - do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_fails_on_reload(false, false, false); +fn test_dup_htlc_onchain_doesnt_fail_on_reload() { + do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_doesnt_fail_on_reload(true, true, true); + do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_doesnt_fail_on_reload(true, true, false); + do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_doesnt_fail_on_reload(true, false, false); + do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_doesnt_fail_on_reload(false, true, true); + do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_doesnt_fail_on_reload(false, true, false); + do_test_dup_htlc_onchain_doesnt_fail_on_reload(false, false, false); } #[test] @@ -2140,9 +2130,11 @@ fn do_accept_underpaying_htlcs_config(num_mpp_parts: usize) { assert_eq!(skimmed_fee_msat * num_mpp_parts as u64, counterparty_skimmed_fee_msat); assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap()); match purpose { - crate::events::PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage: ev_payment_preimage, - payment_secret: ev_payment_secret, .. } => - { + crate::events::PaymentPurpose::Bolt11InvoicePayment { + payment_preimage: ev_payment_preimage, + payment_secret: ev_payment_secret, + .. + } => { assert_eq!(payment_preimage, ev_payment_preimage.unwrap()); assert_eq!(payment_secret, *ev_payment_secret); }, @@ -2155,9 +2147,10 @@ fn do_accept_underpaying_htlcs_config(num_mpp_parts: usize) { let mut expected_paths = Vec::new(); for _ in 0..num_mpp_parts { expected_paths_vecs.push(vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])); } for i in 0..num_mpp_parts { expected_paths.push(&expected_paths_vecs[i][..]); } - let total_fee_msat = do_claim_payment_along_route_with_extra_penultimate_hop_fees( - &nodes[0], &expected_paths[..], &vec![skimmed_fee_msat as u32; num_mpp_parts][..], false, - payment_preimage); + expected_paths[0].last().unwrap().node.claim_funds(payment_preimage); + let args = ClaimAlongRouteArgs::new(&nodes[0], &expected_paths[..], payment_preimage) + .with_expected_extra_fees(vec![skimmed_fee_msat as u32; num_mpp_parts]); + let total_fee_msat = pass_claimed_payment_along_route(args); // The sender doesn't know that the penultimate hop took an extra fee. expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], payment_preimage, Some(Some(total_fee_msat - skimmed_fee_msat * num_mpp_parts as u64)), true, true); @@ -3722,7 +3715,7 @@ fn do_test_custom_tlvs(spontaneous: bool, even_tlvs: bool, known_tlvs: bool) { match (known_tlvs, even_tlvs) { (true, _) => { nodes[1].node.claim_funds_with_known_custom_tlvs(our_payment_preimage); - let expected_total_fee_msat = pass_claimed_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1]]], &[0; 1], false, our_payment_preimage); + let expected_total_fee_msat = pass_claimed_payment_along_route(ClaimAlongRouteArgs::new(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1]]], our_payment_preimage)); expect_payment_sent!(&nodes[0], our_payment_preimage, Some(expected_total_fee_msat)); }, (false, false) => { @@ -3810,14 +3803,11 @@ fn test_retry_custom_tlvs() { check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); - let payment_claimable = pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1_000_000, - payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), true, None).unwrap(); - match payment_claimable { - Event::PaymentClaimable { onion_fields, .. } => { - assert_eq!(&onion_fields.unwrap().custom_tlvs()[..], &custom_tlvs[..]); - }, - _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), - }; + let path = &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]; + let args = PassAlongPathArgs::new(&nodes[0], path, 1_000_000, payment_hash, events.pop().unwrap()) + .with_payment_secret(payment_secret) + .with_custom_tlvs(custom_tlvs); + do_pass_along_path(args); claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], false, payment_preimage); }