X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Fln%2Freorg_tests.rs;h=b745453a3c6799e012ddf3368be4136ef4831653;hb=297390a882222ca044756f71cb3da3d639dae8d6;hp=be756840adc7ce2a26961193c85d87e1010b18ba;hpb=7a78998552b1d3c2d97f337a7d5aaf7fe1aa70b4;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/reorg_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/reorg_tests.rs index be756840..b745453a 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/reorg_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/reorg_tests.rs @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ //! Further functional tests which test blockchain reorganizations. +use crate::chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator; use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{ANTI_REORG_DELAY, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS}; use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint; use crate::chain::Confirm; -use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEventsProvider, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination}; -use crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager; +use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEventsProvider, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination, MessageSendEvent}; use crate::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, Init}; use crate::util::test_utils; use crate::util::ser::Writeable; @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ fn do_test_onchain_htlc_reorg(local_commitment: bool, claim: bool) { connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 2*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[1].best_block_info().1); connect_blocks(&nodes[2], 2*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[2].best_block_info().1); - let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1_000_000); + let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1_000_000); // Provide preimage to node 2 by claiming payment nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage); @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ fn do_test_onchain_htlc_reorg(local_commitment: bool, claim: bool) { connect_block(&nodes[2], &create_dummy_block(nodes[2].best_block_hash(), 42, node_1_commitment_txn.clone())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true); // We should get a BroadcastChannelUpdate (and *only* a BroadcstChannelUpdate) - check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed); + check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000); let node_2_commitment_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0); assert_eq!(node_2_commitment_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: 1 offered HTLC-Claim check_spends!(node_2_commitment_txn[0], node_1_commitment_txn[0]); @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ fn do_test_onchain_htlc_reorg(local_commitment: bool, claim: bool) { }; check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true); // We should get a BroadcastChannelUpdate (and *only* a BroadcstChannelUpdate) - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000); // Connect ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 2 blocks, giving us a confirmation count of ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1. connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 2); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0); @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ fn test_counterparty_revoked_reorg() { // on any of the HTLCs, at least until we get six confirmations (which we won't get). mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true); // Connect up to one block before the revoked transaction would be considered final, then do a @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ fn test_counterparty_revoked_reorg() { // Connect the HTLC claim transaction for HTLC 3 mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &unrevoked_local_txn[2]); - expect_payment_sent!(nodes[1], payment_preimage_3); + expect_payment_sent(&nodes[1], payment_preimage_3, None, true, false); assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); // Connect blocks to confirm the unrevoked commitment transaction @@ -244,10 +244,12 @@ fn do_test_unconf_chan(reload_node: bool, reorg_after_reload: bool, use_funding_ // around freeing background events which store monitor updates during block_[dis]connected. let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); + let persister; + let new_chain_monitor; + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]); - let persister: test_utils::TestPersister; - let new_chain_monitor: test_utils::TestChainMonitor; - let nodes_0_deserialized: ChannelManager<&test_utils::TestChainMonitor, &test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &test_utils::TestRouter, &test_utils::TestLogger>; + let nodes_0_deserialized; + let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); *nodes[0].connect_style.borrow_mut() = connect_style; @@ -350,10 +352,12 @@ fn do_test_unconf_chan(reload_node: bool, reorg_after_reload: bool, use_funding_ if reorg_after_reload || !reload_node { handle_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1, true, "Channel closed because of an exception: Funding transaction was un-confirmed. Locked at 6 confs, now have 0 confs."); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString(format!("Channel closed because of an exception: {}", expected_err)) }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString(format!("Channel closed because of an exception: {}", expected_err)) } + , [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000); } - check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: expected_err.to_owned() }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: expected_err.to_owned() }, + [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000); assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 1); nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clear(); @@ -420,8 +424,8 @@ fn test_set_outpoints_partial_claiming() { let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000); - let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000); - let (payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, _) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000); + let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000); + let (payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000); // Remote commitment txn with 4 outputs: to_local, to_remote, 2 outgoing HTLC let remote_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2); @@ -444,7 +448,7 @@ fn test_set_outpoints_partial_claiming() { // Connect blocks on node A commitment transaction mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &remote_txn[0]); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true); - check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed); + check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); // Verify node A broadcast tx claiming both HTLCs { @@ -459,7 +463,7 @@ fn test_set_outpoints_partial_claiming() { // Connect blocks on node B connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); // Verify node B broadcast 2 HTLC-timeout txn let partial_claim_tx = { @@ -536,11 +540,11 @@ fn do_test_to_remote_after_local_detection(style: ConnectStyle) { assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty()); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed); + check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000); assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty()); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000); assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); @@ -574,8 +578,9 @@ fn do_test_to_remote_after_local_detection(style: ConnectStyle) { let mut node_a_spendable = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(node_a_spendable.len(), 1); - if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs } = node_a_spendable.pop().unwrap() { + if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs, channel_id } = node_a_spendable.pop().unwrap() { assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1); + assert_eq!(channel_id, Some(chan_id)); let spend_tx = nodes[0].keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(), Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, None, &Secp256k1::new()).unwrap(); check_spends!(spend_tx, remote_txn_b[0]); @@ -594,8 +599,9 @@ fn do_test_to_remote_after_local_detection(style: ConnectStyle) { let mut node_b_spendable = nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(node_b_spendable.len(), 1); - if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs } = node_b_spendable.pop().unwrap() { + if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs, channel_id } = node_b_spendable.pop().unwrap() { assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1); + assert_eq!(channel_id, Some(chan_id)); let spend_tx = nodes[1].keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(), Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, None, &Secp256k1::new()).unwrap(); check_spends!(spend_tx, remote_txn_a[0]); @@ -612,3 +618,139 @@ fn test_to_remote_after_local_detection() { do_test_to_remote_after_local_detection(ConnectStyle::TransactionsFirstReorgsOnlyTip); do_test_to_remote_after_local_detection(ConnectStyle::FullBlockViaListen); } + +#[test] +fn test_htlc_preimage_claim_holder_commitment_after_counterparty_commitment_reorg() { + // We detect a counterparty commitment confirm onchain, followed by a reorg and a confirmation + // of a holder commitment. Then, if we learn of the preimage for an HTLC in both commitments, + // test that we only claim the currently confirmed commitment. + let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); + let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]); + let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + + let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1); + + // Route an HTLC which we will claim onchain with the preimage. + let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000); + + // Force close with the latest counterparty commitment, confirm it, and reorg it with the latest + // holder commitment. + nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap(); + check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[0], 1, true); + check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1); + check_closed_event(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false, &[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000); + + nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap(); + check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[1], 1, true); + check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 1); + check_closed_event(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false, &[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000); + + let mut txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast(); + assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1); + let commitment_tx_a = txn.pop().unwrap(); + check_spends!(commitment_tx_a, funding_tx); + + let mut txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast(); + assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1); + let commitment_tx_b = txn.pop().unwrap(); + check_spends!(commitment_tx_b, funding_tx); + + mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &commitment_tx_a); + mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx_a); + + disconnect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1); + disconnect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1); + + mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &commitment_tx_b); + mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx_b); + + // Provide the preimage now, such that we only claim from the holder commitment (since it's + // currently confirmed) and not the counterparty's. + get_monitor!(nodes[1], chan_id).provide_payment_preimage( + &payment_hash, &payment_preimage, &nodes[1].tx_broadcaster, + &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator(nodes[1].fee_estimator), &nodes[1].logger + ); + + let mut txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast(); + assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1); + let htlc_success_tx = txn.pop().unwrap(); + check_spends!(htlc_success_tx, commitment_tx_b); +} + +#[test] +fn test_htlc_preimage_claim_prev_counterparty_commitment_after_current_counterparty_commitment_reorg() { + // We detect a counterparty commitment confirm onchain, followed by a reorg and a + // confirmation of the previous (still unrevoked) counterparty commitment. Then, if we learn + // of the preimage for an HTLC in both commitments, test that we only claim the currently + // confirmed commitment. + let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2); + let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs); + let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]); + let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); + + let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1); + + // Route an HTLC which we will claim onchain with the preimage. + let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000); + + // Obtain the current commitment, which will become the previous after a fee update. + let prev_commitment_a = &get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_id)[0]; + + *nodes[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap() *= 4; + nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred(); + check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1); + let mut msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); + assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1); + let (update_fee, commit_sig) = if let MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id, mut updates } = msg_events.pop().unwrap() { + assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); + (updates.update_fee.take().unwrap(), updates.commitment_signed) + } else { + panic!("Unexpected message send event"); + }; + + // Handle the fee update on the other side, but don't send the last RAA such that the previous + // commitment is still valid (unrevoked). + nodes[1].node().handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fee); + let _last_revoke_and_ack = commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], commit_sig, false, true, false, true); + + // Force close with the latest commitment, confirm it, and reorg it with the previous commitment. + nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap(); + check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[0], 1, true); + check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1); + check_closed_event(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false, &[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000); + + let mut txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast(); + assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1); + let current_commitment_a = txn.pop().unwrap(); + assert_ne!(current_commitment_a.txid(), prev_commitment_a.txid()); + check_spends!(current_commitment_a, funding_tx); + + mine_transaction(&nodes[0], ¤t_commitment_a); + mine_transaction(&nodes[1], ¤t_commitment_a); + + check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[1], 1, true); + check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 1); + check_closed_event(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false, &[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000); + + disconnect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1); + disconnect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1); + + mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &prev_commitment_a); + mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &prev_commitment_a); + + // Provide the preimage now, such that we only claim from the previous commitment (since it's + // currently confirmed) and not the latest. + get_monitor!(nodes[1], chan_id).provide_payment_preimage( + &payment_hash, &payment_preimage, &nodes[1].tx_broadcaster, + &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator(nodes[1].fee_estimator), &nodes[1].logger + ); + + let mut txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast(); + assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1); + let htlc_preimage_tx = txn.pop().unwrap(); + check_spends!(htlc_preimage_tx, prev_commitment_a); + // Make sure it was indeed a preimage claim and not a revocation claim since the previous + // commitment (still unrevoked) is the currently confirmed closing transaction. + assert_eq!(htlc_preimage_tx.input[0].witness.second_to_last().unwrap(), &payment_preimage.0[..]); +}