X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Frouting%2Frouter.rs;h=655a53c2dfeab3007c4660f74f04a67022066db6;hb=a316ef45960314cdfe03ab57695c1aee5d9189a6;hp=dc2f8fd1196a1848af7390af2bc7642c9265f1df;hpb=963f8d93b58ebf5d5ee1d6e3e3654c11a4597a0f;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/routing/router.rs b/lightning/src/routing/router.rs index dc2f8fd1..655a53c2 100644 --- a/lightning/src/routing/router.rs +++ b/lightning/src/routing/router.rs @@ -18,9 +18,10 @@ use ln::channelmanager::ChannelDetails; use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures}; use ln::msgs::{DecodeError, ErrorAction, LightningError, MAX_VALUE_MSAT}; use routing::scoring::Score; -use routing::network_graph::{DirectedChannelInfoWithUpdate, EffectiveCapacity, NetworkGraph, NodeId, RoutingFees}; +use routing::network_graph::{DirectedChannelInfoWithUpdate, EffectiveCapacity, NetworkGraph, ReadOnlyNetworkGraph, NodeId, RoutingFees}; use util::ser::{Writeable, Readable}; use util::logger::{Level, Logger}; +use util::chacha20::ChaCha20; use io; use prelude::*; @@ -176,6 +177,9 @@ impl_writeable_tlv_based!(RouteParameters, { /// Maximum total CTLV difference we allow for a full payment path. pub const DEFAULT_MAX_TOTAL_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA: u32 = 1008; +/// The median hop CLTV expiry delta currently seen in the network. +const MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA: u32 = 40; + /// The recipient of a payment. #[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, PartialEq, Eq)] pub struct PaymentParameters { @@ -258,7 +262,6 @@ impl PaymentParameters { #[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, Eq, PartialEq)] pub struct RouteHint(pub Vec); - impl Writeable for RouteHint { fn write(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> { (self.0.len() as u64).write(writer)?; @@ -329,11 +332,9 @@ struct RouteGraphNode { impl cmp::Ord for RouteGraphNode { fn cmp(&self, other: &RouteGraphNode) -> cmp::Ordering { let other_score = cmp::max(other.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, other.path_htlc_minimum_msat) - .checked_add(other.path_penalty_msat) - .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); + .saturating_add(other.path_penalty_msat); let self_score = cmp::max(self.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, self.path_htlc_minimum_msat) - .checked_add(self.path_penalty_msat) - .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); + .saturating_add(self.path_penalty_msat); other_score.cmp(&self_score).then_with(|| other.node_id.cmp(&self.node_id)) } } @@ -423,7 +424,7 @@ impl<'a> CandidateRouteHop<'a> { /// so that we can choose cheaper paths (as per Dijkstra's algorithm). /// Fee values should be updated only in the context of the whole path, see update_value_and_recompute_fees. /// These fee values are useful to choose hops as we traverse the graph "payee-to-payer". -#[derive(Clone, Debug)] +#[derive(Clone)] struct PathBuildingHop<'a> { // Note that this should be dropped in favor of loading it from CandidateRouteHop, but doing so // is a larger refactor and will require careful performance analysis. @@ -455,7 +456,7 @@ struct PathBuildingHop<'a> { /// decrease as well. Thus, we have to explicitly track which nodes have been processed and /// avoid processing them again. was_processed: bool, - #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, feature = "fuzztarget")))] + #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))] // In tests, we apply further sanity checks on cases where we skip nodes we already processed // to ensure it is specifically in cases where the fee has gone down because of a decrease in // value_contribution_msat, which requires tracking it here. See comments below where it is @@ -463,6 +464,22 @@ struct PathBuildingHop<'a> { value_contribution_msat: u64, } +impl<'a> core::fmt::Debug for PathBuildingHop<'a> { + fn fmt(&self, f: &mut core::fmt::Formatter) -> Result<(), core::fmt::Error> { + f.debug_struct("PathBuildingHop") + .field("node_id", &self.node_id) + .field("short_channel_id", &self.candidate.short_channel_id()) + .field("total_fee_msat", &self.total_fee_msat) + .field("next_hops_fee_msat", &self.next_hops_fee_msat) + .field("hop_use_fee_msat", &self.hop_use_fee_msat) + .field("total_fee_msat - (next_hops_fee_msat + hop_use_fee_msat)", &(&self.total_fee_msat - (&self.next_hops_fee_msat + &self.hop_use_fee_msat))) + .field("path_penalty_msat", &self.path_penalty_msat) + .field("path_htlc_minimum_msat", &self.path_htlc_minimum_msat) + .field("cltv_expiry_delta", &self.candidate.cltv_expiry_delta()) + .finish() + } +} + // Instantiated with a list of hops with correct data in them collected during path finding, // an instance of this struct should be further modified only via given methods. #[derive(Clone)] @@ -476,6 +493,10 @@ impl<'a> PaymentPath<'a> { self.hops.last().unwrap().0.fee_msat } + fn get_path_penalty_msat(&self) -> u64 { + self.hops.first().map(|h| h.0.path_penalty_msat).unwrap_or(u64::max_value()) + } + fn get_total_fee_paid_msat(&self) -> u64 { if self.hops.len() < 1 { return 0; @@ -490,6 +511,10 @@ impl<'a> PaymentPath<'a> { return result; } + fn get_cost_msat(&self) -> u64 { + self.get_total_fee_paid_msat().saturating_add(self.get_path_penalty_msat()) + } + // If the amount transferred by the path is updated, the fees should be adjusted. Any other way // to change fees may result in an inconsistency. // @@ -577,6 +602,17 @@ fn compute_fees(amount_msat: u64, channel_fees: RoutingFees) -> Option { } } +/// The default `features` we assume for a node in a route, when no `features` are known about that +/// specific node. +/// +/// Default features are: +/// * variable_length_onion_optional +fn default_node_features() -> NodeFeatures { + let mut features = NodeFeatures::empty(); + features.set_variable_length_onion_optional(); + features +} + /// Finds a route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee). /// /// If the payee provided features in their invoice, they should be provided via `params.payee`. @@ -607,19 +643,26 @@ fn compute_fees(amount_msat: u64, channel_fees: RoutingFees) -> Option { /// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed pub fn find_route( our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, route_params: &RouteParameters, network: &NetworkGraph, - first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, logger: L, scorer: &S + first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, logger: L, scorer: &S, random_seed_bytes: &[u8; 32] ) -> Result where L::Target: Logger { - get_route( - our_node_pubkey, &route_params.payment_params, network, first_hops, route_params.final_value_msat, - route_params.final_cltv_expiry_delta, logger, scorer - ) + let network_graph = network.read_only(); + match get_route( + our_node_pubkey, &route_params.payment_params, &network_graph, first_hops, route_params.final_value_msat, + route_params.final_cltv_expiry_delta, logger, scorer, random_seed_bytes + ) { + Ok(mut route) => { + add_random_cltv_offset(&mut route, &route_params.payment_params, &network_graph, random_seed_bytes); + Ok(route) + }, + Err(err) => Err(err), + } } pub(crate) fn get_route( - our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, payment_params: &PaymentParameters, network: &NetworkGraph, - first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32, - logger: L, scorer: &S + our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, payment_params: &PaymentParameters, network_graph: &ReadOnlyNetworkGraph, + first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32, + logger: L, scorer: &S, random_seed_bytes: &[u8; 32] ) -> Result where L::Target: Logger { let payee_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&payment_params.payee_pubkey); @@ -644,6 +687,9 @@ where L::Target: Logger { } } } + if payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta <= final_cltv_expiry_delta { + return Err(LightningError{err: "Can't find a route where the maximum total CLTV expiry delta is below the final CLTV expiry.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}); + } // The general routing idea is the following: // 1. Fill first/last hops communicated by the caller. @@ -656,12 +702,13 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // - OR if we could not construct a new path. Any next attempt will fail too. // Otherwise, repeat step 2. // 4. See if we managed to collect paths which aggregately are able to transfer target value - // (not recommended value). If yes, proceed. If not, fail routing. - // 5. Randomly combine paths into routes having enough to fulfill the payment. (TODO: knapsack) - // 6. Of all the found paths, select only those with the lowest total fee. - // 7. The last path in every selected route is likely to be more than we need. + // (not recommended value). + // 5. If yes, proceed. If not, fail routing. + // 6. Randomly combine paths into routes having enough to fulfill the payment. (TODO: knapsack) + // 7. Of all the found paths, select only those with the lowest total fee. + // 8. The last path in every selected route is likely to be more than we need. // Reduce its value-to-transfer and recompute fees. - // 8. Choose the best route by the lowest total fee. + // 9. Choose the best route by the lowest total fee. // As for the actual search algorithm, // we do a payee-to-payer pseudo-Dijkstra's sorting by each node's distance from the payee @@ -705,7 +752,6 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // to use as the A* heuristic beyond just the cost to get one node further than the current // one. - let network_graph = network.read_only(); let network_channels = network_graph.channels(); let network_nodes = network_graph.nodes(); @@ -719,8 +765,9 @@ where L::Target: Logger { node_info.features.supports_basic_mpp() } else { false } } else { false }; - log_trace!(logger, "Searching for a route from payer {} to payee {} {} MPP", our_node_pubkey, - payment_params.payee_pubkey, if allow_mpp { "with" } else { "without" }); + log_trace!(logger, "Searching for a route from payer {} to payee {} {} MPP and {} first hops {}overriding the network graph", our_node_pubkey, + payment_params.payee_pubkey, if allow_mpp { "with" } else { "without" }, + first_hops.map(|hops| hops.len()).unwrap_or(0), if first_hops.is_some() { "" } else { "not " }); // Step (1). // Prepare the data we'll use for payee-to-payer search by @@ -781,6 +828,29 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // - when we want to stop looking for new paths. let mut already_collected_value_msat = 0; + for (_, channels) in first_hop_targets.iter_mut() { + // Sort the first_hops channels to the same node(s) in priority order of which channel we'd + // most like to use. + // + // First, if channels are below `recommended_value_msat`, sort them in descending order, + // preferring larger channels to avoid splitting the payment into more MPP parts than is + // required. + // + // Second, because simply always sorting in descending order would always use our largest + // available outbound capacity, needlessly fragmenting our available channel capacities, + // sort channels above `recommended_value_msat` in ascending order, preferring channels + // which have enough, but not too much, capacity for the payment. + channels.sort_unstable_by(|chan_a, chan_b| { + if chan_b.outbound_capacity_msat < recommended_value_msat || chan_a.outbound_capacity_msat < recommended_value_msat { + // Sort in descending order + chan_b.outbound_capacity_msat.cmp(&chan_a.outbound_capacity_msat) + } else { + // Sort in ascending order + chan_a.outbound_capacity_msat.cmp(&chan_b.outbound_capacity_msat) + } + }); + } + log_trace!(logger, "Building path from {} (payee) to {} (us/payer) for value {} msat.", payment_params.payee_pubkey, our_node_pubkey, final_value_msat); macro_rules! add_entry { @@ -803,7 +873,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { .entry(short_channel_id) .or_insert_with(|| $candidate.effective_capacity().as_msat()); - // It is tricky to substract $next_hops_fee_msat from available liquidity here. + // It is tricky to subtract $next_hops_fee_msat from available liquidity here. // It may be misleading because we might later choose to reduce the value transferred // over these channels, and the channel which was insufficient might become sufficient. // Worst case: we drop a good channel here because it can't cover the high following @@ -836,10 +906,14 @@ where L::Target: Logger { let contributes_sufficient_value = available_value_contribution_msat >= minimal_value_contribution_msat; // Do not consider candidates that exceed the maximum total cltv expiry limit. - let max_total_cltv_expiry_delta = payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta; + // In order to already account for some of the privacy enhancing random CLTV + // expiry delta offset we add on top later, we subtract a rough estimate + // (2*MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA) here. + let max_total_cltv_expiry_delta = (payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta - final_cltv_expiry_delta) + .checked_sub(2*MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA) + .unwrap_or(payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta - final_cltv_expiry_delta); let hop_total_cltv_delta = ($next_hops_cltv_delta as u32) - .checked_add($candidate.cltv_expiry_delta()) - .unwrap_or(u32::max_value()); + .saturating_add($candidate.cltv_expiry_delta()); let doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit = hop_total_cltv_delta <= max_total_cltv_expiry_delta; let value_contribution_msat = cmp::min(available_value_contribution_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution); @@ -853,14 +927,20 @@ where L::Target: Logger { let over_path_minimum_msat = amount_to_transfer_over_msat >= $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat() && amount_to_transfer_over_msat >= $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat; + #[allow(unused_comparisons)] // $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat is 0 in some calls so rustc complains + let may_overpay_to_meet_path_minimum_msat = + ((amount_to_transfer_over_msat < $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat() && + recommended_value_msat > $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat()) || + (amount_to_transfer_over_msat < $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat && + recommended_value_msat > $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat)); + // If HTLC minimum is larger than the amount we're going to transfer, we shouldn't - // bother considering this channel. - // Since we're choosing amount_to_transfer_over_msat as maximum possible, it can - // be only reduced later (not increased), so this channel should just be skipped - // as not sufficient. - if !over_path_minimum_msat && doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit { + // bother considering this channel. If retrying with recommended_value_msat may + // allow us to hit the HTLC minimum limit, set htlc_minimum_limit so that we go + // around again with a higher amount. + if contributes_sufficient_value && doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit && may_overpay_to_meet_path_minimum_msat { hit_minimum_limit = true; - } else if contributes_sufficient_value && doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit { + } else if contributes_sufficient_value && doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit && over_path_minimum_msat { // Note that low contribution here (limited by available_liquidity_msat) // might violate htlc_minimum_msat on the hops which are next along the // payment path (upstream to the payee). To avoid that, we recompute @@ -876,8 +956,8 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // semi-dummy record just to compute the fees to reach the source node. // This will affect our decision on selecting short_channel_id // as a way to reach the $dest_node_id. - let mut fee_base_msat = u32::max_value(); - let mut fee_proportional_millionths = u32::max_value(); + let mut fee_base_msat = 0; + let mut fee_proportional_millionths = 0; if let Some(Some(fees)) = network_nodes.get(&$src_node_id).map(|node| node.lowest_inbound_channel_fees) { fee_base_msat = fees.base_msat; fee_proportional_millionths = fees.proportional_millionths; @@ -896,14 +976,14 @@ where L::Target: Logger { path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat: u64::max_value(), was_processed: false, - #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, feature = "fuzztarget")))] + #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))] value_contribution_msat, } }); #[allow(unused_mut)] // We only use the mut in cfg(test) let mut should_process = !old_entry.was_processed; - #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, feature = "fuzztarget")))] + #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))] { // In test/fuzzing builds, we do extra checks to make sure the skipping // of already-seen nodes only happens in cases we expect (see below). @@ -946,9 +1026,9 @@ where L::Target: Logger { } } - let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat.checked_add( - scorer.channel_penalty_msat(short_channel_id, amount_to_transfer_over_msat, *available_liquidity_msat, - &$src_node_id, &$dest_node_id)).unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); + let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat.saturating_add( + scorer.channel_penalty_msat(short_channel_id, amount_to_transfer_over_msat, + *available_liquidity_msat, &$src_node_id, &$dest_node_id)); let new_graph_node = RouteGraphNode { node_id: $src_node_id, lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node: total_fee_msat, @@ -976,11 +1056,9 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // the fees included in $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, but also // can't use something that may decrease on future hops. let old_cost = cmp::max(old_entry.total_fee_msat, old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat) - .checked_add(old_entry.path_penalty_msat) - .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); + .saturating_add(old_entry.path_penalty_msat); let new_cost = cmp::max(total_fee_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat) - .checked_add(path_penalty_msat) - .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); + .saturating_add(path_penalty_msat); if !old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost { targets.push(new_graph_node); @@ -992,13 +1070,13 @@ where L::Target: Logger { old_entry.fee_msat = 0; // This value will be later filled with hop_use_fee_msat of the following channel old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat = path_htlc_minimum_msat; old_entry.path_penalty_msat = path_penalty_msat; - #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, feature = "fuzztarget")))] + #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))] { old_entry.value_contribution_msat = value_contribution_msat; } did_add_update_path_to_src_node = true; } else if old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost { - #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, feature = "fuzztarget")))] + #[cfg(all(not(feature = "_bench_unstable"), any(test, fuzzing)))] { // If we're skipping processing a node which was previously // processed even though we found another path to it with a @@ -1034,7 +1112,8 @@ where L::Target: Logger { } } } - let empty_node_features = NodeFeatures::empty(); + let default_node_features = default_node_features(); + // Find ways (channels with destination) to reach a given node and store them // in the corresponding data structures (routing graph etc). // $fee_to_target_msat represents how much it costs to reach to this node from the payee, @@ -1065,7 +1144,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { let features = if let Some(node_info) = $node.announcement_info.as_ref() { &node_info.features } else { - &empty_node_features + &default_node_features }; if !features.requires_unknown_bits() { @@ -1164,12 +1243,10 @@ where L::Target: Logger { .unwrap_or_else(|| CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { hint: hop }); let capacity_msat = candidate.effective_capacity().as_msat(); aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat = aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat - .checked_add(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, final_value_msat, capacity_msat, &source, &target)) - .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); + .saturating_add(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, final_value_msat, capacity_msat, &source, &target)); aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta = aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta - .checked_add(hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32) - .unwrap_or_else(|| u32::max_value()); + .saturating_add(hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32); if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta) { // If this hop was not used then there is no use checking the preceding hops @@ -1247,7 +1324,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // traversing the graph and arrange the path out of what we found. if node_id == our_node_id { let mut new_entry = dist.remove(&our_node_id).unwrap(); - let mut ordered_hops = vec!((new_entry.clone(), NodeFeatures::empty())); + let mut ordered_hops = vec!((new_entry.clone(), default_node_features.clone())); 'path_walk: loop { let mut features_set = false; @@ -1265,14 +1342,12 @@ where L::Target: Logger { if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() { ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = node_info.features.clone(); } else { - ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = NodeFeatures::empty(); + ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().1 = default_node_features.clone(); } } else { - // We should be able to fill in features for everything except the last - // hop, if the last hop was provided via a BOLT 11 invoice (though we - // should be able to extend it further as BOLT 11 does have feature - // flags for the last hop node itself). - assert!(ordered_hops.last().unwrap().0.node_id == payee_node_id); + // We can fill in features for everything except hops which were + // provided via the invoice we're paying. We could guess based on the + // recipient's features but for now we simply avoid guessing at all. } } @@ -1294,13 +1369,13 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // so that fees paid for a HTLC forwarding on the current channel are // associated with the previous channel (where they will be subtracted). ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.fee_msat = new_entry.hop_use_fee_msat; - ordered_hops.push((new_entry.clone(), NodeFeatures::empty())); + ordered_hops.push((new_entry.clone(), default_node_features.clone())); } ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.fee_msat = value_contribution_msat; ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.hop_use_fee_msat = 0; - log_trace!(logger, "Found a path back to us from the target with {} hops contributing up to {} msat: {:?}", - ordered_hops.len(), value_contribution_msat, ordered_hops); + log_trace!(logger, "Found a path back to us from the target with {} hops contributing up to {} msat: \n {:#?}", + ordered_hops.len(), value_contribution_msat, ordered_hops.iter().map(|h| &(h.0)).collect::>()); let mut payment_path = PaymentPath {hops: ordered_hops}; @@ -1337,7 +1412,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // If we weren't capped by hitting a liquidity limit on a channel in the path, // we'll probably end up picking the same path again on the next iteration. // Decrease the available liquidity of a hop in the middle of the path. - let victim_scid = payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len() - 1) / 2].0.candidate.short_channel_id(); + let victim_scid = payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len()) / 2].0.candidate.short_channel_id(); log_trace!(logger, "Disabling channel {} for future path building iterations to avoid duplicates.", victim_scid); let victim_liquidity = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&victim_scid).unwrap(); *victim_liquidity = 0; @@ -1409,24 +1484,31 @@ where L::Target: Logger { } // Sort by total fees and take the best paths. - payment_paths.sort_by_key(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat()); + payment_paths.sort_unstable_by_key(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat()); if payment_paths.len() > 50 { payment_paths.truncate(50); } // Draw multiple sufficient routes by randomly combining the selected paths. let mut drawn_routes = Vec::new(); - for i in 0..payment_paths.len() { + let mut prng = ChaCha20::new(random_seed_bytes, &[0u8; 12]); + let mut random_index_bytes = [0u8; ::core::mem::size_of::()]; + + let num_permutations = payment_paths.len(); + for _ in 0..num_permutations { let mut cur_route = Vec::::new(); let mut aggregate_route_value_msat = 0; // Step (6). - // TODO: real random shuffle - // Currently just starts with i_th and goes up to i-1_th in a looped way. - let cur_payment_paths = [&payment_paths[i..], &payment_paths[..i]].concat(); + // Do a Fisher-Yates shuffle to create a random permutation of the payment paths + for cur_index in (1..payment_paths.len()).rev() { + prng.process_in_place(&mut random_index_bytes); + let random_index = usize::from_be_bytes(random_index_bytes).wrapping_rem(cur_index+1); + payment_paths.swap(cur_index, random_index); + } // Step (7). - for payment_path in cur_payment_paths { + for payment_path in &payment_paths { cur_route.push(payment_path.clone()); aggregate_route_value_msat += payment_path.get_value_msat(); if aggregate_route_value_msat > final_value_msat { @@ -1436,12 +1518,16 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // also makes routing more reliable. let mut overpaid_value_msat = aggregate_route_value_msat - final_value_msat; - // First, drop some expensive low-value paths entirely if possible. - // Sort by value so that we drop many really-low values first, since - // fewer paths is better: the payment is less likely to fail. - // TODO: this could also be optimized by also sorting by feerate_per_sat_routed, - // so that the sender pays less fees overall. And also htlc_minimum_msat. - cur_route.sort_by_key(|path| path.get_value_msat()); + // First, we drop some expensive low-value paths entirely if possible, since fewer + // paths is better: the payment is less likely to fail. In order to do so, we sort + // by value and fall back to total fees paid, i.e., in case of equal values we + // prefer lower cost paths. + cur_route.sort_unstable_by(|a, b| { + a.get_value_msat().cmp(&b.get_value_msat()) + // Reverse ordering for cost, so we drop higher-cost paths first + .then_with(|| b.get_cost_msat().cmp(&a.get_cost_msat())) + }); + // We should make sure that at least 1 path left. let mut paths_left = cur_route.len(); cur_route.retain(|path| { @@ -1465,13 +1551,14 @@ where L::Target: Logger { assert!(cur_route.len() > 0); // Step (8). - // Now, substract the overpaid value from the most-expensive path. + // Now, subtract the overpaid value from the most-expensive path. // TODO: this could also be optimized by also sorting by feerate_per_sat_routed, // so that the sender pays less fees overall. And also htlc_minimum_msat. - cur_route.sort_by_key(|path| { path.hops.iter().map(|hop| hop.0.candidate.fees().proportional_millionths as u64).sum::() }); + cur_route.sort_unstable_by_key(|path| { path.hops.iter().map(|hop| hop.0.candidate.fees().proportional_millionths as u64).sum::() }); let expensive_payment_path = cur_route.first_mut().unwrap(); - // We already dropped all the small channels above, meaning all the - // remaining channels are larger than remaining overpaid_value_msat. + + // We already dropped all the small value paths above, meaning all the + // remaining paths are larger than remaining overpaid_value_msat. // Thus, this can't be negative. let expensive_path_new_value_msat = expensive_payment_path.get_value_msat() - overpaid_value_msat; expensive_payment_path.update_value_and_recompute_fees(expensive_path_new_value_msat); @@ -1482,8 +1569,8 @@ where L::Target: Logger { } // Step (9). - // Select the best route by lowest total fee. - drawn_routes.sort_by_key(|paths| paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat()).sum::()); + // Select the best route by lowest total cost. + drawn_routes.sort_unstable_by_key(|paths| paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_cost_msat()).sum::()); let mut selected_paths = Vec::>>::new(); for payment_path in drawn_routes.first().unwrap() { let mut path = payment_path.hops.iter().map(|(payment_hop, node_features)| { @@ -1520,17 +1607,105 @@ where L::Target: Logger { Ok(route) } +// When an adversarial intermediary node observes a payment, it may be able to infer its +// destination, if the remaining CLTV expiry delta exactly matches a feasible path in the network +// graph. In order to improve privacy, this method obfuscates the CLTV expiry deltas along the +// payment path by adding a randomized 'shadow route' offset to the final hop. +fn add_random_cltv_offset(route: &mut Route, payment_params: &PaymentParameters, network_graph: &ReadOnlyNetworkGraph, random_seed_bytes: &[u8; 32]) { + let network_channels = network_graph.channels(); + let network_nodes = network_graph.nodes(); + + for path in route.paths.iter_mut() { + let mut shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset: u32 = 0; + + // Remember the last three nodes of the random walk and avoid looping back on them. + // Init with the last three nodes from the actual path, if possible. + let mut nodes_to_avoid: [NodeId; 3] = [NodeId::from_pubkey(&path.last().unwrap().pubkey), + NodeId::from_pubkey(&path.get(path.len().saturating_sub(2)).unwrap().pubkey), + NodeId::from_pubkey(&path.get(path.len().saturating_sub(3)).unwrap().pubkey)]; + + // Choose the last publicly known node as the starting point for the random walk. + let mut cur_hop: Option = None; + let mut path_nonce = [0u8; 12]; + if let Some(starting_hop) = path.iter().rev() + .find(|h| network_nodes.contains_key(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&h.pubkey))) { + cur_hop = Some(NodeId::from_pubkey(&starting_hop.pubkey)); + path_nonce.copy_from_slice(&cur_hop.unwrap().as_slice()[..12]); + } + + // Init PRNG with the path-dependant nonce, which is static for private paths. + let mut prng = ChaCha20::new(random_seed_bytes, &path_nonce); + let mut random_path_bytes = [0u8; ::core::mem::size_of::()]; + + // Pick a random path length in [1 .. 3] + prng.process_in_place(&mut random_path_bytes); + let random_walk_length = usize::from_be_bytes(random_path_bytes).wrapping_rem(3).wrapping_add(1); + + for random_hop in 0..random_walk_length { + // If we don't find a suitable offset in the public network graph, we default to + // MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA. + let mut random_hop_offset = MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA; + + if let Some(cur_node_id) = cur_hop { + if let Some(cur_node) = network_nodes.get(&cur_node_id) { + // Randomly choose the next unvisited hop. + prng.process_in_place(&mut random_path_bytes); + if let Some(random_channel) = usize::from_be_bytes(random_path_bytes) + .checked_rem(cur_node.channels.len()) + .and_then(|index| cur_node.channels.get(index)) + .and_then(|id| network_channels.get(id)) { + random_channel.as_directed_from(&cur_node_id).map(|(dir_info, next_id)| { + if !nodes_to_avoid.iter().any(|x| x == next_id) { + nodes_to_avoid[random_hop] = *next_id; + dir_info.direction().map(|channel_update_info| { + random_hop_offset = channel_update_info.cltv_expiry_delta.into(); + cur_hop = Some(*next_id); + }); + } + }); + } + } + } + + shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset = shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset + .checked_add(random_hop_offset) + .unwrap_or(shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset); + } + + // Limit the total offset to reduce the worst-case locked liquidity timevalue + const MAX_SHADOW_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA_OFFSET: u32 = 3*144; + shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset = cmp::min(shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset, MAX_SHADOW_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA_OFFSET); + + // Limit the offset so we never exceed the max_total_cltv_expiry_delta. To improve plausibility, + // we choose the limit to be the largest possible multiple of MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA. + let path_total_cltv_expiry_delta: u32 = path.iter().map(|h| h.cltv_expiry_delta).sum(); + let mut max_path_offset = payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta - path_total_cltv_expiry_delta; + max_path_offset = cmp::max( + max_path_offset - (max_path_offset % MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA), + max_path_offset % MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA); + shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset = cmp::min(shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset, max_path_offset); + + // Add 'shadow' CLTV offset to the final hop + if let Some(last_hop) = path.last_mut() { + last_hop.cltv_expiry_delta = last_hop.cltv_expiry_delta + .checked_add(shadow_ctlv_expiry_delta_offset).unwrap_or(last_hop.cltv_expiry_delta); + } + } +} + #[cfg(test)] mod tests { - use routing::scoring::{ProbabilisticScorer, ProbabilisticScoringParameters, Score}; use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler, NodeId}; - use routing::router::{get_route, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees}; + use routing::router::{get_route, add_random_cltv_offset, default_node_features, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees, DEFAULT_MAX_TOTAL_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA}; + use routing::scoring::Score; use chain::transaction::OutPoint; + use chain::keysinterface::KeysInterface; use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures}; use ln::msgs::{ErrorAction, LightningError, OptionalField, UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, ChannelAnnouncement, RoutingMessageHandler, NodeAnnouncement, UnsignedNodeAnnouncement, ChannelUpdate, UnsignedChannelUpdate}; use ln::channelmanager; use util::test_utils; + use util::chacha20::ChaCha20; use util::ser::Writeable; #[cfg(c_bindings)] use util::ser::Writer; @@ -1562,7 +1737,9 @@ mod tests { forwarding_info: None, }, funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }), + channel_type: None, short_channel_id, + inbound_scid_alias: None, channel_value_satoshis: 0, user_channel_id: 0, balance_msat: 0, @@ -1654,7 +1831,7 @@ mod tests { fn get_nodes(secp_ctx: &Secp256k1) -> (SecretKey, PublicKey, Vec, Vec) { let privkeys: Vec = (2..10).map(|i| { - SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02}", i).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap() + SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02x}", i).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap() }).collect(); let pubkeys = privkeys.iter().map(|secret| PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, secret)).collect(); @@ -1998,14 +2175,16 @@ mod tests { let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // Simple route to 2 via 1 - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat"); } else { panic!(); } - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2029,16 +2208,19 @@ mod tests { let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // Simple route to 2 via 1 let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(2), our_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 100000)]; - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = + get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "First hop cannot have our_node_pubkey as a destination."); } else { panic!(); } - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); } @@ -2048,6 +2230,8 @@ mod tests { let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // Simple route to 2 via 1 @@ -2144,7 +2328,7 @@ mod tests { }); // Not possible to send 199_999_999, because the minimum on channel=2 is 200_000_000. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } @@ -2163,7 +2347,7 @@ mod tests { }); // A payment above the minimum should pass - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); } @@ -2173,6 +2357,8 @@ mod tests { let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // A route to node#2 via two paths. // One path allows transferring 35-40 sats, another one also allows 35-40 sats. @@ -2242,7 +2428,7 @@ mod tests { excess_data: Vec::new() }); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); // Overpay fees to hit htlc_minimum_msat. let overpaid_fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat + route.paths[1][0].fee_msat; // TODO: this could be better balanced to overpay 10k and not 15k. @@ -2287,14 +2473,14 @@ mod tests { excess_data: Vec::new() }); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); // Fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it allows us to save fee. assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 12); let fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat; assert_eq!(fees, 5_000); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); // Not fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it requires paying more than fee on // the other channel. assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); @@ -2309,6 +2495,8 @@ mod tests { let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // // Disable channels 4 and 12 by flags=2 update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], UnsignedChannelUpdate { @@ -2337,13 +2525,13 @@ mod tests { }); // If all the channels require some features we don't understand, route should fail - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } // If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)]; - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]); @@ -2367,21 +2555,24 @@ mod tests { let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // Disable nodes 1, 2, and 8 by requiring unknown feature bits - let unknown_features = NodeFeatures::known().set_unknown_feature_required(); + let mut unknown_features = NodeFeatures::known(); + unknown_features.set_unknown_feature_required(); add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[0], unknown_features.clone(), 1); add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], unknown_features.clone(), 1); add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], unknown_features.clone(), 1); // If all nodes require some features we don't understand, route should fail - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } // If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)]; - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]); @@ -2408,10 +2599,12 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // Route to 1 via 2 and 3 because our channel to 1 is disabled let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0]); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2438,7 +2631,7 @@ mod tests { // If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]); let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)]; - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]); @@ -2537,6 +2730,8 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // Simple test across 2, 3, 5, and 4 via a last_hop channel // Tests the behaviour when the RouteHint contains a suboptimal hop. @@ -2559,13 +2754,13 @@ mod tests { invalid_last_hops.push(invalid_last_hop); { let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(invalid_last_hops); - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source."); } else { panic!(); } } let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes)); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2602,7 +2797,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } @@ -2636,10 +2831,12 @@ mod tests { let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(empty_last_hop(&nodes)); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // Test handling of an empty RouteHint passed in Invoice. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2676,18 +2873,20 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } - fn multi_hint_last_hops(nodes: &Vec) -> Vec { + /// Builds a trivial last-hop hint that passes through the two nodes given, with channel 0xff00 + /// and 0xff01. + fn multi_hop_last_hops_hint(hint_hops: [PublicKey; 2]) -> Vec { let zero_fees = RoutingFees { base_msat: 0, proportional_millionths: 0, }; vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop { - src_node_id: nodes[2], - short_channel_id: 5, + src_node_id: hint_hops[0], + short_channel_id: 0xff00, fees: RoutingFees { base_msat: 100, proportional_millionths: 0, @@ -2696,19 +2895,12 @@ mod tests { htlc_minimum_msat: None, htlc_maximum_msat: None, }, RouteHintHop { - src_node_id: nodes[3], - short_channel_id: 8, + src_node_id: hint_hops[1], + short_channel_id: 0xff01, fees: zero_fees, cltv_expiry_delta: (8 << 4) | 1, htlc_minimum_msat: None, htlc_maximum_msat: None, - }]), RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop { - src_node_id: nodes[5], - short_channel_id: 10, - fees: zero_fees, - cltv_expiry_delta: (10 << 4) | 1, - htlc_minimum_msat: None, - htlc_maximum_msat: None, }])] } @@ -2716,9 +2908,12 @@ mod tests { fn multi_hint_last_hops_test() { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); - let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(multi_hint_last_hops(&nodes)); + let last_hops = multi_hop_last_hops_hint([nodes[2], nodes[3]]); + let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone()); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); - // Test through channels 2, 3, 5, 8. + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); + // Test through channels 2, 3, 0xff00, 0xff01. // Test shows that multiple hop hints are considered. // Disabling channels 6 & 7 by flags=2 @@ -2747,7 +2942,7 @@ mod tests { excess_data: Vec::new() }); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2765,17 +2960,89 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4)); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].pubkey, nodes[3]); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, 5); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[0].short_channel_id); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, 129); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4)); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[6]); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 8); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[1].short_channel_id); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly + } + + #[test] + fn private_multi_hint_last_hops_test() { + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + + let non_announced_privkey = SecretKey::from_slice(&hex::decode(format!("{:02x}", 0xf0).repeat(32)).unwrap()[..]).unwrap(); + let non_announced_pubkey = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &non_announced_privkey); + + let last_hops = multi_hop_last_hops_hint([nodes[2], non_announced_pubkey]); + let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone()); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + // Test through channels 2, 3, 0xff00, 0xff01. + // Test shows that multiple hop hints are considered. + + // Disabling channels 6 & 7 by flags=2 + update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[2], UnsignedChannelUpdate { + chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(), + short_channel_id: 6, + timestamp: 2, + flags: 2, // to disable + cltv_expiry_delta: 0, + htlc_minimum_msat: 0, + htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent, + fee_base_msat: 0, + fee_proportional_millionths: 0, + excess_data: Vec::new() + }); + update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[2], UnsignedChannelUpdate { + chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(), + short_channel_id: 7, + timestamp: 2, + flags: 2, // to disable + cltv_expiry_delta: 0, + htlc_minimum_msat: 0, + htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent, + fee_base_msat: 0, + fee_proportional_millionths: 0, + excess_data: Vec::new() + }); + + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &[42u8; 32]).unwrap(); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4); + + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 200); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].cltv_expiry_delta, 65); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2)); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(2)); + + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].pubkey, nodes[2]); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 4); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 81); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3)); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(4)); + + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].pubkey, non_announced_pubkey); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[0].short_channel_id); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 0); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].cltv_expiry_delta, 129); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly + + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].pubkey, nodes[6]); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, last_hops[0].0[1].short_channel_id); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } @@ -2824,10 +3091,12 @@ mod tests { let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_with_public_channel(&nodes)); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // This test shows that public routes can be present in the invoice // which would be handled in the same manner. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2864,7 +3133,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 100); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } @@ -2873,12 +3142,14 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // Simple test with outbound channel to 4 to test that last_hops and first_hops connect let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[3].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)]; let mut last_hops = last_hops(&nodes); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone()); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[3]); @@ -2892,14 +3163,14 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 8); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 100); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly last_hops[0].0[0].fees.base_msat = 1000; // Revert to via 6 as the fee on 8 goes up let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2929,11 +3200,11 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].short_channel_id, 10); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].fee_msat, 100); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly // ...but still use 8 for larger payments as 6 has a variable feerate - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2970,7 +3241,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].short_channel_id, 8); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].fee_msat, 2000); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet assert_eq!(route.paths[0][4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } @@ -2994,7 +3265,10 @@ mod tests { let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(target_node_id).with_route_hints(vec![last_hops]); let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), middle_node_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), outbound_capacity_msat)]; let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); - get_route(&source_node_id, &payment_params, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), route_val, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer) + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); + get_route(&source_node_id, &payment_params, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()).read_only(), + Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), route_val, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) } #[test] @@ -3019,7 +3293,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].short_channel_id, 8); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].fee_msat, 1000000); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].cltv_expiry_delta, 42); - assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), &[0; 0]); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].node_features.le_flags(), default_node_features().le_flags()); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet assert_eq!(route.paths[0][1].channel_features.le_flags(), &[0; 0]); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly } @@ -3048,6 +3322,8 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, mut net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // We will use a simple single-path route from @@ -3112,14 +3388,14 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( - &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -3148,14 +3424,14 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( - &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -3195,14 +3471,14 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( - &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -3265,14 +3541,14 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( - &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -3297,14 +3573,14 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( - &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -3320,6 +3596,8 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // Path via {node7, node2, node4} is channels {12, 13, 6, 11}. @@ -3406,14 +3684,14 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( - &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route 49 sats (just a bit below the capacity). - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3426,7 +3704,7 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3443,6 +3721,8 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]); // Path via node0 is channels {1, 3}. Limit them to 100 and 50 sats (total limit 50). @@ -3472,7 +3752,7 @@ mod tests { }); { - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3489,6 +3769,8 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // We need a route consisting of 3 paths: @@ -3582,7 +3864,7 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( - &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } @@ -3590,7 +3872,7 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 250 sats (just a bit below the capacity). // Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3603,7 +3885,7 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3620,6 +3902,8 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // We need a route consisting of 3 paths: @@ -3756,7 +4040,7 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( - &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } @@ -3764,7 +4048,7 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 300 sats (exact amount we can route). // Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths, 100 sats each. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; @@ -3782,6 +4066,8 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // This test checks that if we have two cheaper paths and one more expensive path, @@ -3922,7 +4208,7 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 180 sats. // Our algorithm should provide us with these 2 paths. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); let mut total_value_transferred_msat = 0; @@ -3949,6 +4235,8 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // We need a route consisting of 2 paths: @@ -4090,14 +4378,14 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( - &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route 200 sats (exact amount we can route). - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; @@ -4128,6 +4416,8 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(PublicKey::from_slice(&[02; 33]).unwrap()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()) .with_route_hints(vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop { src_node_id: nodes[2], @@ -4194,7 +4484,7 @@ mod tests { // Get a route for 100 sats and check that we found the MPP route no problem and didn't // overpay at all. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); // Paths are somewhat randomly ordered, but: // * the first is channel 2 (1 msat fee) -> channel 4 -> channel 42 @@ -4216,6 +4506,8 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // We need a route consisting of 3 paths: @@ -4308,7 +4600,7 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( - &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } @@ -4316,7 +4608,7 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 125 sats (just a bit below the capacity of 3 channels). // Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -4329,7 +4621,7 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route without the last small cheap channel - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -4369,10 +4661,12 @@ mod tests { // "previous hop" being set to node 3, creating a loop in the path. let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new(); let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new()); - let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash())); - let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger)); + let network = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash())); + let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network), None, Arc::clone(&logger)); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]); add_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, &privkeys[1], ChannelFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(6)), 6); @@ -4466,7 +4760,7 @@ mod tests { { // Now ensure the route flows simply over nodes 1 and 4 to 6. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network.read_only(), None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3); @@ -4502,6 +4796,8 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]); // We modify the graph to set the htlc_maximum of channel 2 to below the value we wish to @@ -4535,7 +4831,7 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 90 sats, which is exactly 90 sats at the last hop, plus the // 200% fee charged channel 13 in the 1-to-2 direction. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); @@ -4564,6 +4860,8 @@ mod tests { let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // We modify the graph to set the htlc_minimum of channel 2 and 4 as needed - channel 2 @@ -4598,7 +4896,7 @@ mod tests { // Now, attempt to route 90 sats, hitting the htlc_minimum on channel 4, but // overshooting the htlc_maximum on channel 2. Thus, we should pick the (absurdly // expensive) channels 12-13 path. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); @@ -4632,12 +4930,14 @@ mod tests { let network_graph = NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); { - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&[ + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&[ &get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 200_000), &get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 10_000), - ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1); @@ -4646,10 +4946,10 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100_000); } { - let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, Some(&[ + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&[ &get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000), &get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000), - ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[1].len(), 1); @@ -4662,6 +4962,32 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].short_channel_id, 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].fee_msat, 50_000); } + + { + // If we have a bunch of outbound channels to the same node, where most are not + // sufficient to pay the full payment, but one is, we should default to just using the + // one single channel that has sufficient balance, avoiding MPP. + // + // If we have several options above the 3xpayment value threshold, we should pick the + // smallest of them, avoiding further fragmenting our available outbound balance to + // this node. + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), Some(&[ + &get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000), + &get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000), + &get_channel_details(Some(5), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000), + &get_channel_details(Some(6), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 300_000), + &get_channel_details(Some(7), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000), + &get_channel_details(Some(8), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000), + &get_channel_details(Some(9), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000), + &get_channel_details(Some(4), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 1_000_000), + ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); + assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1); + + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[0]); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 6); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100_000); + } } #[test] @@ -4672,9 +4998,11 @@ mod tests { // Without penalizing each hop 100 msats, a longer path with lower fees is chosen. let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let route = get_route( - &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, - Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer + &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, + Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes ).unwrap(); let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::>(); @@ -4686,8 +5014,8 @@ mod tests { // from nodes[2] rather than channel 6, 11, and 8, even though the longer path is cheaper. let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(100); let route = get_route( - &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, - Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer + &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, + Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes ).unwrap(); let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::>(); @@ -4733,15 +5061,18 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn avoids_routing_through_bad_channels_and_nodes() { - let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes)); + let network_graph = network.read_only(); // A path to nodes[6] exists when no penalties are applied to any channel. let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); let route = get_route( &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, - Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer + Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes ).unwrap(); let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::>(); @@ -4753,7 +5084,7 @@ mod tests { let scorer = BadChannelScorer { short_channel_id: 6 }; let route = get_route( &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, - Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer + Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes ).unwrap(); let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::>(); @@ -4765,7 +5096,7 @@ mod tests { let scorer = BadNodeScorer { node_id: NodeId::from_pubkey(&nodes[2]) }; match get_route( &our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, - Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer + Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes ) { Err(LightningError { err, .. } ) => { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination"); @@ -4847,8 +5178,9 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn limits_total_cltv_delta() { - let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let network_graph = network.read_only(); let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); @@ -4856,7 +5188,9 @@ mod tests { let feasible_max_total_cltv_delta = 1008; let feasible_payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes)) .with_max_total_cltv_expiry_delta(feasible_max_total_cltv_delta); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &feasible_payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &feasible_payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 0, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::>(); assert_ne!(path.len(), 0); @@ -4864,7 +5198,7 @@ mod tests { let fail_max_total_cltv_delta = 23; let fail_payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes)) .with_max_total_cltv_expiry_delta(fail_max_total_cltv_delta); - match get_route(&our_id, &fail_payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) + match get_route(&our_id, &fail_payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 0, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { Err(LightningError { err, .. } ) => { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination"); @@ -4873,6 +5207,106 @@ mod tests { } } + #[test] + fn adds_and_limits_cltv_offset() { + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + + let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes)); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); + assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); + + let cltv_expiry_deltas_before = route.paths[0].iter().map(|h| h.cltv_expiry_delta).collect::>(); + + // Check whether the offset added to the last hop by default is in [1 .. DEFAULT_MAX_TOTAL_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA] + let mut route_default = route.clone(); + add_random_cltv_offset(&mut route_default, &payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), &random_seed_bytes); + let cltv_expiry_deltas_default = route_default.paths[0].iter().map(|h| h.cltv_expiry_delta).collect::>(); + assert_eq!(cltv_expiry_deltas_before.split_last().unwrap().1, cltv_expiry_deltas_default.split_last().unwrap().1); + assert!(cltv_expiry_deltas_default.last() > cltv_expiry_deltas_before.last()); + assert!(cltv_expiry_deltas_default.last().unwrap() <= &DEFAULT_MAX_TOTAL_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA); + + // Check that no offset is added when we restrict the max_total_cltv_expiry_delta + let mut route_limited = route.clone(); + let limited_max_total_cltv_expiry_delta = cltv_expiry_deltas_before.iter().sum(); + let limited_payment_params = payment_params.with_max_total_cltv_expiry_delta(limited_max_total_cltv_expiry_delta); + add_random_cltv_offset(&mut route_limited, &limited_payment_params, &network_graph.read_only(), &random_seed_bytes); + let cltv_expiry_deltas_limited = route_limited.paths[0].iter().map(|h| h.cltv_expiry_delta).collect::>(); + assert_eq!(cltv_expiry_deltas_before, cltv_expiry_deltas_limited); + } + + #[test] + fn adds_plausible_cltv_offset() { + let (secp_ctx, network, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let network_graph = network.read_only(); + let network_nodes = network_graph.nodes(); + let network_channels = network_graph.channels(); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_penalty(0); + let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3]); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[4u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); + + let mut route = get_route(&our_id, &payment_params, &network_graph, None, 100, 0, + Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).unwrap(); + add_random_cltv_offset(&mut route, &payment_params, &network_graph, &random_seed_bytes); + + let mut path_plausibility = vec![]; + + for p in route.paths { + // 1. Select random observation point + let mut prng = ChaCha20::new(&random_seed_bytes, &[0u8; 12]); + let mut random_bytes = [0u8; ::core::mem::size_of::()]; + + prng.process_in_place(&mut random_bytes); + let random_path_index = usize::from_be_bytes(random_bytes).wrapping_rem(p.len()); + let observation_point = NodeId::from_pubkey(&p.get(random_path_index).unwrap().pubkey); + + // 2. Calculate what CLTV expiry delta we would observe there + let observed_cltv_expiry_delta: u32 = p[random_path_index..].iter().map(|h| h.cltv_expiry_delta).sum(); + + // 3. Starting from the observation point, find candidate paths + let mut candidates: VecDeque<(NodeId, Vec)> = VecDeque::new(); + candidates.push_back((observation_point, vec![])); + + let mut found_plausible_candidate = false; + + 'candidate_loop: while let Some((cur_node_id, cur_path_cltv_deltas)) = candidates.pop_front() { + if let Some(remaining) = observed_cltv_expiry_delta.checked_sub(cur_path_cltv_deltas.iter().sum::()) { + if remaining == 0 || remaining.wrapping_rem(40) == 0 || remaining.wrapping_rem(144) == 0 { + found_plausible_candidate = true; + break 'candidate_loop; + } + } + + if let Some(cur_node) = network_nodes.get(&cur_node_id) { + for channel_id in &cur_node.channels { + if let Some(channel_info) = network_channels.get(&channel_id) { + if let Some((dir_info, next_id)) = channel_info.as_directed_from(&cur_node_id) { + if let Some(channel_update_info) = dir_info.direction() { + let next_cltv_expiry_delta = channel_update_info.cltv_expiry_delta as u32; + if cur_path_cltv_deltas.iter().sum::() + .saturating_add(next_cltv_expiry_delta) <= observed_cltv_expiry_delta { + let mut new_path_cltv_deltas = cur_path_cltv_deltas.clone(); + new_path_cltv_deltas.push(next_cltv_expiry_delta); + candidates.push_back((*next_id, new_path_cltv_deltas)); + } + } + } + } + } + } + } + + path_plausibility.push(found_plausible_candidate); + } + assert!(path_plausibility.iter().all(|x| *x)); + } + #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))] pub(super) fn random_init_seed() -> u64 { // Because the default HashMap in std pulls OS randomness, we can use it as a (bad) RNG. @@ -4887,6 +5321,8 @@ mod tests { #[test] #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))] fn generate_routes() { + use routing::scoring::{ProbabilisticScorer, ProbabilisticScoringParameters}; + let mut d = match super::test_utils::get_route_file() { Ok(f) => f, Err(e) => { @@ -4895,6 +5331,8 @@ mod tests { }, }; let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap(); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds... let mut seed = random_init_seed() as usize; @@ -4909,7 +5347,7 @@ mod tests { let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000; let params = ProbabilisticScoringParameters::default(); let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &graph); - if get_route(src, &payment_params, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() { + if get_route(src, &payment_params, &graph.read_only(), None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).is_ok() { continue 'load_endpoints; } } @@ -4919,6 +5357,8 @@ mod tests { #[test] #[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))] fn generate_routes_mpp() { + use routing::scoring::{ProbabilisticScorer, ProbabilisticScoringParameters}; + let mut d = match super::test_utils::get_route_file() { Ok(f) => f, Err(e) => { @@ -4927,6 +5367,8 @@ mod tests { }, }; let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap(); + let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&[0u8; 32], Network::Testnet); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds... let mut seed = random_init_seed() as usize; @@ -4941,7 +5383,7 @@ mod tests { let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000; let params = ProbabilisticScoringParameters::default(); let scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &graph); - if get_route(src, &payment_params, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() { + if get_route(src, &payment_params, &graph.read_only(), None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).is_ok() { continue 'load_endpoints; } } @@ -4982,6 +5424,7 @@ mod benches { use bitcoin::hashes::Hash; use bitcoin::secp256k1::{PublicKey, Secp256k1, SecretKey}; use chain::transaction::OutPoint; + use chain::keysinterface::{KeysManager,KeysInterface}; use ln::channelmanager::{ChannelCounterparty, ChannelDetails}; use ln::features::{InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures}; use routing::scoring::{FixedPenaltyScorer, ProbabilisticScorer, ProbabilisticScoringParameters, Scorer}; @@ -5017,7 +5460,9 @@ mod benches { funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }), + channel_type: None, short_channel_id: Some(1), + inbound_scid_alias: None, channel_value_satoshis: 10_000_000, user_channel_id: 0, balance_msat: 10_000_000, @@ -5082,12 +5527,14 @@ mod benches { ) { let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone(); let payer = payer_pubkey(); + let keys_manager = KeysManager::new(&[0u8; 32], 42, 42); + let random_seed_bytes = keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes(); // First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds... let mut routes = Vec::new(); let mut route_endpoints = Vec::new(); let mut seed: usize = 0xdeadbeef; - 'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..100 { + 'load_endpoints: for _ in 0..150 { loop { seed *= 0xdeadbeef; let src = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap(); @@ -5096,7 +5543,7 @@ mod benches { let params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(dst).with_features(features.clone()); let first_hop = first_hop(src); let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000; - if let Ok(route) = get_route(&payer, ¶ms, &graph, Some(&[&first_hop]), amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer) { + if let Ok(route) = get_route(&payer, ¶ms, &graph.read_only(), Some(&[&first_hop]), amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes) { routes.push(route); route_endpoints.push((first_hop, params, amt)); continue 'load_endpoints; @@ -5119,11 +5566,20 @@ mod benches { } } + // Because we've changed channel scores, its possible we'll take different routes to the + // selected destinations, possibly causing us to fail because, eg, the newly-selected path + // requires a too-high CLTV delta. + route_endpoints.retain(|(first_hop, params, amt)| { + get_route(&payer, params, &graph.read_only(), Some(&[first_hop]), *amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).is_ok() + }); + route_endpoints.truncate(100); + assert_eq!(route_endpoints.len(), 100); + // ...then benchmark finding paths between the nodes we learned. let mut idx = 0; bench.iter(|| { let (first_hop, params, amt) = &route_endpoints[idx % route_endpoints.len()]; - assert!(get_route(&payer, params, &graph, Some(&[first_hop]), *amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok()); + assert!(get_route(&payer, params, &graph.read_only(), Some(&[first_hop]), *amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer, &random_seed_bytes).is_ok()); idx += 1; }); }