X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Frouting%2Frouter.rs;h=e49844383bbceee091e9d42b7262416109b2d484;hb=565559005ec241d8f4f45a373652eb4ee4e13b9c;hp=d6adb889d5060fe7e4122ba42e733a5e6615584a;hpb=fe8c10db95124e3238b7469bdabb00afc7c5bdd6;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/routing/router.rs b/lightning/src/routing/router.rs index d6adb889..e4984438 100644 --- a/lightning/src/routing/router.rs +++ b/lightning/src/routing/router.rs @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::PublicKey; use ln::channelmanager::ChannelDetails; use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures}; use ln::msgs::{DecodeError, ErrorAction, LightningError, MAX_VALUE_MSAT}; -use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, RoutingFees, NodeId}; +use routing::scoring::Score; +use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NodeId, RoutingFees}; use util::ser::{Writeable, Readable}; use util::logger::{Level, Logger}; @@ -69,19 +70,34 @@ pub struct Route { /// given path is variable, keeping the length of any path to less than 20 should currently /// ensure it is viable. pub paths: Vec>, + /// The `payee` parameter passed to [`find_route`]. + /// This is used by `ChannelManager` to track information which may be required for retries, + /// provided back to you via [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]. + /// + /// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed + pub payee: Option, +} + +pub(crate) trait RoutePath { + /// Gets the fees for a given path, excluding any excess paid to the recipient. + fn get_path_fees(&self) -> u64; +} +impl RoutePath for Vec { + fn get_path_fees(&self) -> u64 { + // Do not count last hop of each path since that's the full value of the payment + self.split_last().map(|(_, path_prefix)| path_prefix).unwrap_or(&[]) + .iter().map(|hop| &hop.fee_msat) + .sum() + } } impl Route { /// Returns the total amount of fees paid on this [`Route`]. /// /// This doesn't include any extra payment made to the recipient, which can happen in excess of - /// the amount passed to [`get_route`]'s `final_value_msat`. + /// the amount passed to [`find_route`]'s `params.final_value_msat`. pub fn get_total_fees(&self) -> u64 { - // Do not count last hop of each path since that's the full value of the payment - return self.paths.iter() - .flat_map(|path| path.split_last().map(|(_, path_prefix)| path_prefix).unwrap_or(&[])) - .map(|hop| &hop.fee_msat) - .sum(); + self.paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_path_fees()).sum() } /// Returns the total amount paid on this [`Route`], excluding the fees. @@ -105,7 +121,9 @@ impl Writeable for Route { hop.write(writer)?; } } - write_tlv_fields!(writer, {}); + write_tlv_fields!(writer, { + (1, self.payee, option), + }); Ok(()) } } @@ -123,8 +141,101 @@ impl Readable for Route { } paths.push(hops); } - read_tlv_fields!(reader, {}); - Ok(Route { paths }) + let mut payee = None; + read_tlv_fields!(reader, { + (1, payee, option), + }); + Ok(Route { paths, payee }) + } +} + +/// Parameters needed to find a [`Route`] for paying a [`Payee`]. +/// +/// Passed to [`find_route`] and also provided in [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`] for retrying a failed +/// payment path. +/// +/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed +#[derive(Clone, Debug)] +pub struct RouteParameters { + /// The recipient of the failed payment path. + pub payee: Payee, + + /// The amount in msats sent on the failed payment path. + pub final_value_msat: u64, + + /// The CLTV on the final hop of the failed payment path. + pub final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32, +} + +impl_writeable_tlv_based!(RouteParameters, { + (0, payee, required), + (2, final_value_msat, required), + (4, final_cltv_expiry_delta, required), +}); + +/// The recipient of a payment. +#[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, PartialEq, Eq)] +pub struct Payee { + /// The node id of the payee. + pub pubkey: PublicKey, + + /// Features supported by the payee. + /// + /// May be set from the payee's invoice or via [`for_keysend`]. May be `None` if the invoice + /// does not contain any features. + /// + /// [`for_keysend`]: Self::for_keysend + pub features: Option, + + /// Hints for routing to the payee, containing channels connecting the payee to public nodes. + pub route_hints: Vec, + + /// Expiration of a payment to the payee, in seconds relative to the UNIX epoch. + pub expiry_time: Option, +} + +impl_writeable_tlv_based!(Payee, { + (0, pubkey, required), + (2, features, option), + (4, route_hints, vec_type), + (6, expiry_time, option), +}); + +impl Payee { + /// Creates a payee with the node id of the given `pubkey`. + pub fn from_node_id(pubkey: PublicKey) -> Self { + Self { + pubkey, + features: None, + route_hints: vec![], + expiry_time: None, + } + } + + /// Creates a payee with the node id of the given `pubkey` to use for keysend payments. + pub fn for_keysend(pubkey: PublicKey) -> Self { + Self::from_node_id(pubkey).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::for_keysend()) + } + + /// Includes the payee's features. + /// + /// (C-not exported) since bindings don't support move semantics + pub fn with_features(self, features: InvoiceFeatures) -> Self { + Self { features: Some(features), ..self } + } + + /// Includes hints for routing to the payee. + /// + /// (C-not exported) since bindings don't support move semantics + pub fn with_route_hints(self, route_hints: Vec) -> Self { + Self { route_hints, ..self } + } + + /// Includes a payment expiration in seconds relative to the UNIX epoch. + /// + /// (C-not exported) since bindings don't support move semantics + pub fn with_expiry_time(self, expiry_time: u64) -> Self { + Self { expiry_time: Some(expiry_time), ..self } } } @@ -132,6 +243,28 @@ impl Readable for Route { #[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, Eq, PartialEq)] pub struct RouteHint(pub Vec); + +impl Writeable for RouteHint { + fn write(&self, writer: &mut W) -> Result<(), io::Error> { + (self.0.len() as u64).write(writer)?; + for hop in self.0.iter() { + hop.write(writer)?; + } + Ok(()) + } +} + +impl Readable for RouteHint { + fn read(reader: &mut R) -> Result { + let hop_count: u64 = Readable::read(reader)?; + let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(cmp::min(hop_count, 16) as usize); + for _ in 0..hop_count { + hops.push(Readable::read(reader)?); + } + Ok(Self(hops)) + } +} + /// A channel descriptor for a hop along a payment path. #[derive(Clone, Debug, Hash, Eq, PartialEq)] pub struct RouteHintHop { @@ -149,6 +282,15 @@ pub struct RouteHintHop { pub htlc_maximum_msat: Option, } +impl_writeable_tlv_based!(RouteHintHop, { + (0, src_node_id, required), + (1, htlc_minimum_msat, option), + (2, short_channel_id, required), + (3, htlc_maximum_msat, option), + (4, fees, required), + (6, cltv_expiry_delta, required), +}); + #[derive(Eq, PartialEq)] struct RouteGraphNode { node_id: NodeId, @@ -163,12 +305,19 @@ struct RouteGraphNode { /// The effective htlc_minimum_msat at this hop. If a later hop on the path had a higher HTLC /// minimum, we use it, plus the fees required at each earlier hop to meet it. path_htlc_minimum_msat: u64, + /// All penalties incurred from this hop on the way to the destination, as calculated using + /// channel scoring. + path_penalty_msat: u64, } impl cmp::Ord for RouteGraphNode { fn cmp(&self, other: &RouteGraphNode) -> cmp::Ordering { - let other_score = cmp::max(other.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, other.path_htlc_minimum_msat); - let self_score = cmp::max(self.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, self.path_htlc_minimum_msat); + let other_score = cmp::max(other.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, other.path_htlc_minimum_msat) + .checked_add(other.path_penalty_msat) + .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); + let self_score = cmp::max(self.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, self.path_htlc_minimum_msat) + .checked_add(self.path_penalty_msat) + .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); other_score.cmp(&self_score).then_with(|| other.node_id.cmp(&self.node_id)) } } @@ -221,6 +370,9 @@ struct PathBuildingHop<'a> { /// A mirror of the same field in RouteGraphNode. Note that this is only used during the graph /// walk and may be invalid thereafter. path_htlc_minimum_msat: u64, + /// All penalties incurred from this channel on the way to the destination, as calculated using + /// channel scoring. + path_penalty_msat: u64, /// If we've already processed a node as the best node, we shouldn't process it again. Normally /// we'd just ignore it if we did as all channels would have a higher new fee, but because we /// may decrease the amounts in use as we walk the graph, the actual calculated fee may @@ -349,44 +501,54 @@ fn compute_fees(amount_msat: u64, channel_fees: RoutingFees) -> Option { } } -/// Gets a keysend route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee). This is needed because -/// keysend payments do not have an invoice from which to pull the payee's supported features, which -/// makes it tricky to otherwise supply the `payee_features` parameter of `get_route`. -pub fn get_keysend_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, payee: - &PublicKey, first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, last_hops: &[&RouteHint], - final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv: u32, logger: L) -> Result where L::Target: Logger { - let invoice_features = InvoiceFeatures::for_keysend(); - get_route(our_node_pubkey, network, payee, Some(invoice_features), first_hops, last_hops, - final_value_msat, final_cltv, logger) -} - -/// Gets a route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee). +/// Finds a route from us (payer) to the given target node (payee). /// -/// If the payee provided features in their invoice, they should be provided via payee_features. +/// If the payee provided features in their invoice, they should be provided via `params.payee`. /// Without this, MPP will only be used if the payee's features are available in the network graph. /// -/// Private routing paths between a public node and the target may be included in `last_hops`. -/// Currently, only the last hop in each path is considered. +/// Private routing paths between a public node and the target may be included in `params.payee`. +/// +/// If some channels aren't announced, it may be useful to fill in `first_hops` with the results +/// from [`ChannelManager::list_usable_channels`]. If it is filled in, the view of our local +/// channels from [`NetworkGraph`] will be ignored, and only those in `first_hops` will be used. /// -/// If some channels aren't announced, it may be useful to fill in a first_hops with the -/// results from a local ChannelManager::list_usable_channels() call. If it is filled in, our -/// view of our local channels (from net_graph_msg_handler) will be ignored, and only those -/// in first_hops will be used. +/// The fees on channels from us to the next hop are ignored as they are assumed to all be equal. +/// However, the enabled/disabled bit on such channels as well as the `htlc_minimum_msat` / +/// `htlc_maximum_msat` *are* checked as they may change based on the receiving node. /// -/// Panics if first_hops contains channels without short_channel_ids -/// (ChannelManager::list_usable_channels will never include such channels). +/// # Note /// -/// The fees on channels from us to next-hops are ignored (as they are assumed to all be -/// equal), however the enabled/disabled bit on such channels as well as the -/// htlc_minimum_msat/htlc_maximum_msat *are* checked as they may change based on the receiving node. -pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, payee: &PublicKey, payee_features: Option, first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, - last_hops: &[&RouteHint], final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv: u32, logger: L) -> Result where L::Target: Logger { - let payee_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&payee); +/// May be used to re-compute a [`Route`] when handling a [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]. Any +/// adjustments to the [`NetworkGraph`] and channel scores should be made prior to calling this +/// function. +/// +/// # Panics +/// +/// Panics if first_hops contains channels without short_channel_ids; +/// [`ChannelManager::list_usable_channels`] will never include such channels. +/// +/// [`ChannelManager::list_usable_channels`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::list_usable_channels +/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed +pub fn find_route( + our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, params: &RouteParameters, network: &NetworkGraph, + first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, logger: L, scorer: &S +) -> Result +where L::Target: Logger { + get_route( + our_node_pubkey, ¶ms.payee, network, first_hops, params.final_value_msat, + params.final_cltv_expiry_delta, logger, scorer + ) +} + +pub(crate) fn get_route( + our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, payee: &Payee, network: &NetworkGraph, + first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32, + logger: L, scorer: &S +) -> Result +where L::Target: Logger { + let payee_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&payee.pubkey); let our_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&our_node_pubkey); - // TODO: Obviously *only* using total fee cost sucks. We should consider weighting by - // uptime/success in using a node in the past. if payee_node_id == our_node_id { return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot generate a route to ourselves".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}); } @@ -399,10 +561,10 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, return Err(LightningError{err: "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}); } - for route in last_hops.iter() { + for route in payee.route_hints.iter() { for hop in &route.0 { - if hop.src_node_id == *payee { - return Err(LightningError{err: "Last hop cannot have a payee as a source.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}); + if hop.src_node_id == payee.pubkey { + return Err(LightningError{err: "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source.".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}); } } } @@ -483,15 +645,15 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // Allow MPP only if we have a features set from somewhere that indicates the payee supports // it. If the payee supports it they're supposed to include it in the invoice, so that should // work reliably. - let allow_mpp = if let Some(features) = &payee_features { + let allow_mpp = if let Some(features) = &payee.features { features.supports_basic_mpp() } else if let Some(node) = network_nodes.get(&payee_node_id) { if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() { node_info.features.supports_basic_mpp() } else { false } } else { false }; - log_trace!(logger, "Searching for a route from payer {} to payee {} {} MPP", our_node_pubkey, payee, - if allow_mpp { "with" } else { "without" }); + log_trace!(logger, "Searching for a route from payer {} to payee {} {} MPP", our_node_pubkey, + payee.pubkey, if allow_mpp { "with" } else { "without" }); // Step (1). // Prepare the data we'll use for payee-to-payer search by @@ -550,7 +712,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // - when we want to stop looking for new paths. let mut already_collected_value_msat = 0; - log_trace!(logger, "Building path from {} (payee) to {} (us/payer) for value {} msat.", payee, our_node_pubkey, final_value_msat); + log_trace!(logger, "Building path from {} (payee) to {} (us/payer) for value {} msat.", payee.pubkey, our_node_pubkey, final_value_msat); macro_rules! add_entry { // Adds entry which goes from $src_node_id to $dest_node_id @@ -560,7 +722,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // since that value has to be transferred over this channel. // Returns whether this channel caused an update to `targets`. ( $chan_id: expr, $src_node_id: expr, $dest_node_id: expr, $directional_info: expr, $capacity_sats: expr, $chan_features: expr, $next_hops_fee_msat: expr, - $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr ) => { { + $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr ) => { { // We "return" whether we updated the path at the end, via this: let mut did_add_update_path_to_src_node = false; // Channels to self should not be used. This is more of belt-and-suspenders, because in @@ -645,11 +807,10 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // might violate htlc_minimum_msat on the hops which are next along the // payment path (upstream to the payee). To avoid that, we recompute path // path fees knowing the final path contribution after constructing it. - let path_htlc_minimum_msat = match compute_fees($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $directional_info.fees) - .map(|fee_msat| fee_msat.checked_add($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat)) { - Some(Some(value_msat)) => cmp::max(value_msat, $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat), - _ => u64::max_value() - }; + let path_htlc_minimum_msat = compute_fees($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $directional_info.fees) + .and_then(|fee_msat| fee_msat.checked_add($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat)) + .map(|fee_msat| cmp::max(fee_msat, $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat)) + .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); let hm_entry = dist.entry($src_node_id); let old_entry = hm_entry.or_insert_with(|| { // If there was previously no known way to access @@ -679,6 +840,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, total_fee_msat: u64::max_value(), htlc_minimum_msat: $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, + path_penalty_msat: u64::max_value(), was_processed: false, #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))] value_contribution_msat, @@ -730,12 +892,16 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, } } + let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat.checked_add( + scorer.channel_penalty_msat($chan_id.clone(), amount_to_transfer_over_msat, Some(*available_liquidity_msat), + &$src_node_id, &$dest_node_id)).unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); let new_graph_node = RouteGraphNode { node_id: $src_node_id, lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node: total_fee_msat, lowest_fee_to_node: $next_hops_fee_msat as u64 + hop_use_fee_msat, value_contribution_msat: value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, + path_penalty_msat, }; // Update the way of reaching $src_node_id with the given $chan_id (from $dest_node_id), @@ -754,8 +920,12 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // but it may require additional tracking - we don't want to double-count // the fees included in $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, but also // can't use something that may decrease on future hops. - let old_cost = cmp::max(old_entry.total_fee_msat, old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat); - let new_cost = cmp::max(total_fee_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat); + let old_cost = cmp::max(old_entry.total_fee_msat, old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat) + .checked_add(old_entry.path_penalty_msat) + .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); + let new_cost = cmp::max(total_fee_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat) + .checked_add(path_penalty_msat) + .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); if !old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost { targets.push(new_graph_node); @@ -770,6 +940,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, old_entry.channel_fees = $directional_info.fees; old_entry.htlc_minimum_msat = $directional_info.htlc_minimum_msat; old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat = path_htlc_minimum_msat; + old_entry.path_penalty_msat = path_penalty_msat; #[cfg(any(test, feature = "fuzztarget"))] { old_entry.value_contribution_msat = value_contribution_msat; @@ -798,7 +969,10 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // with a lower htlc_maximum_msat instead of the one we'd // already decided to use. debug_assert!(path_htlc_minimum_msat < old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat); - debug_assert!(value_contribution_msat < old_entry.value_contribution_msat); + debug_assert!( + value_contribution_msat + path_penalty_msat < + old_entry.value_contribution_msat + old_entry.path_penalty_msat + ); } } } @@ -816,7 +990,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // meaning how much will be paid in fees after this node (to the best of our knowledge). // This data can later be helpful to optimize routing (pay lower fees). macro_rules! add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node { - ( $node: expr, $node_id: expr, $fee_to_target_msat: expr, $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr ) => { + ( $node: expr, $node_id: expr, $fee_to_target_msat: expr, $next_hops_value_contribution: expr, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: expr, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat: expr ) => { let skip_node = if let Some(elem) = dist.get_mut(&$node_id) { let was_processed = elem.was_processed; elem.was_processed = true; @@ -832,7 +1006,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, if !skip_node { if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&$node_id) { for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels { - add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id, $node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat); + add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id, $node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat); } } @@ -851,7 +1025,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, if first_hops.is_none() || chan.node_two != our_node_id { if let Some(two_to_one) = chan.two_to_one.as_ref() { if two_to_one.enabled { - add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_two, chan.node_one, two_to_one, chan.capacity_sats, &chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat); + add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_two, chan.node_one, two_to_one, chan.capacity_sats, &chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat); } } } @@ -859,7 +1033,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, if first_hops.is_none() || chan.node_one != our_node_id{ if let Some(one_to_two) = chan.one_to_two.as_ref() { if one_to_two.enabled { - add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_one, chan.node_two, one_to_two, chan.capacity_sats, &chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat); + add_entry!(chan_id, chan.node_one, chan.node_two, one_to_two, chan.capacity_sats, &chan.features, $fee_to_target_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution, $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $next_hops_path_penalty_msat); } } } @@ -886,7 +1060,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // place where it could be added. if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&payee_node_id) { for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels { - let added = add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id, payee_node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, 0, path_value_msat, 0); + let added = add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id, payee_node_id, dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64); log_trace!(logger, "{} direct route to payee via SCID {}", if added { "Added" } else { "Skipped" }, first_hop); } } @@ -900,7 +1074,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // If not, targets.pop() will not even let us enter the loop in step 2. None => {}, Some(node) => { - add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0); + add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, payee_node_id, 0, path_value_msat, 0, 0u64); }, } @@ -908,7 +1082,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // If a caller provided us with last hops, add them to routing targets. Since this happens // earlier than general path finding, they will be somewhat prioritized, although currently // it matters only if the fees are exactly the same. - for route in last_hops.iter().filter(|route| !route.0.is_empty()) { + for route in payee.route_hints.iter().filter(|route| !route.0.is_empty()) { let first_hop_in_route = &(route.0)[0]; let have_hop_src_in_graph = // Only add the hops in this route to our candidate set if either @@ -920,11 +1094,12 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // We start building the path from reverse, i.e., from payee // to the first RouteHintHop in the path. let hop_iter = route.0.iter().rev(); - let prev_hop_iter = core::iter::once(payee).chain( + let prev_hop_iter = core::iter::once(&payee.pubkey).chain( route.0.iter().skip(1).rev().map(|hop| &hop.src_node_id)); let mut hop_used = true; let mut aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat: u64 = 0; let mut aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat: u64 = 0; + let mut aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat: u64 = 0; for (idx, (hop, prev_hop_id)) in hop_iter.zip(prev_hop_iter).enumerate() { // BOLT 11 doesn't allow inclusion of features for the last hop hints, which @@ -938,16 +1113,28 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, fees: hop.fees, }; - let reqd_channel_cap = if let Some (val) = final_value_msat.checked_add(match idx { - 0 => 999, - _ => aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat.checked_add(999).unwrap_or(u64::max_value()) - }) { Some( val / 1000 ) } else { break; }; // converting from msat or breaking if max ~ infinity + // We want a value of final_value_msat * ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR but we + // need it to increment at each hop by the fee charged at later hops. Further, + // we need to ensure we round up when we divide to get satoshis. + let channel_cap_msat = final_value_msat + .checked_mul(ROUTE_CAPACITY_PROVISION_FACTOR).and_then(|v| v.checked_add(aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat)) + .unwrap_or(u64::max_value()); + let channel_cap_sat = match channel_cap_msat.checked_add(999) { + None => break, // We overflowed above, just ignore this route hint + Some(val) => Some(val / 1000), + }; + + let src_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id); + let dest_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id); + aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat = aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat + .checked_add(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, final_value_msat, None, &src_node_id, &dest_node_id)) + .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); // We assume that the recipient only included route hints for routes which had // sufficient value to route `final_value_msat`. Note that in the case of "0-value" // invoices where the invoice does not specify value this may not be the case, but // better to include the hints than not. - if !add_entry!(hop.short_channel_id, NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id), NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id), directional_info, reqd_channel_cap, &empty_channel_features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat) { + if !add_entry!(hop.short_channel_id, src_node_id, dest_node_id, directional_info, channel_cap_sat, &empty_channel_features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat) { // If this hop was not used then there is no use checking the preceding hops // in the RouteHint. We can break by just searching for a direct channel between // last checked hop and first_hop_targets @@ -957,7 +1144,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // Searching for a direct channel between last checked hop and first_hop_targets if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id)) { for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels { - add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id , NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id), dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat); + add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id , NodeId::from_pubkey(&prev_hop_id), dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat); } } @@ -991,7 +1178,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // path. if let Some(first_channels) = first_hop_targets.get(&NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id)) { for (ref first_hop, ref features, ref outbound_capacity_msat, _) in first_channels { - add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id , NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id), dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat); + add_entry!(first_hop, our_node_id , NodeId::from_pubkey(&hop.src_node_id), dummy_directional_info, Some(outbound_capacity_msat / 1000), features, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat); } } } @@ -1014,7 +1201,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, // Both these cases (and other cases except reaching recommended_value_msat) mean that // paths_collection will be stopped because found_new_path==false. // This is not necessarily a routing failure. - 'path_construction: while let Some(RouteGraphNode { node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, .. }) = targets.pop() { + 'path_construction: while let Some(RouteGraphNode { node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat, .. }) = targets.pop() { // Since we're going payee-to-payer, hitting our node as a target means we should stop // traversing the graph and arrange the path out of what we found. @@ -1072,7 +1259,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, } ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.fee_msat = value_contribution_msat; ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.hop_use_fee_msat = 0; - ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.cltv_expiry_delta = final_cltv; + ordered_hops.last_mut().unwrap().0.cltv_expiry_delta = final_cltv_expiry_delta; log_trace!(logger, "Found a path back to us from the target with {} hops contributing up to {} msat: {:?}", ordered_hops.len(), value_contribution_msat, ordered_hops); @@ -1140,7 +1327,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, match network_nodes.get(&node_id) { None => {}, Some(node) => { - add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat); + add_entries_to_cheapest_to_target_node!(node, node_id, lowest_fee_to_node, value_contribution_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat, path_penalty_msat); }, } } @@ -1273,7 +1460,7 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, }).collect()); } - if let Some(features) = &payee_features { + if let Some(features) = &payee.features { for path in selected_paths.iter_mut() { if let Ok(route_hop) = path.last_mut().unwrap() { route_hop.node_features = features.to_context(); @@ -1281,15 +1468,19 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, } } - let route = Route { paths: selected_paths.into_iter().map(|path| path.into_iter().collect()).collect::, _>>()? }; - log_info!(logger, "Got route to {}: {}", payee, log_route!(route)); + let route = Route { + paths: selected_paths.into_iter().map(|path| path.into_iter().collect()).collect::, _>>()?, + payee: Some(payee.clone()), + }; + log_info!(logger, "Got route to {}: {}", payee.pubkey, log_route!(route)); Ok(route) } #[cfg(test)] mod tests { - use routing::router::{get_route, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees}; - use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler}; + use routing::scoring::Score; + use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler, NodeId}; + use routing::router::{get_route, Payee, Route, RouteHint, RouteHintHop, RouteHop, RoutingFees}; use chain::transaction::OutPoint; use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures}; use ln::msgs::{ErrorAction, LightningError, OptionalField, UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, ChannelAnnouncement, RoutingMessageHandler, @@ -1297,6 +1488,8 @@ mod tests { use ln::channelmanager; use util::test_utils; use util::ser::Writeable; + #[cfg(c_bindings)] + use util::ser::Writer; use bitcoin::hashes::sha256d::Hash as Sha256dHash; use bitcoin::hashes::Hash; @@ -1327,7 +1520,8 @@ mod tests { funding_txo: Some(OutPoint { txid: bitcoin::Txid::from_slice(&[0; 32]).unwrap(), index: 0 }), short_channel_id, channel_value_satoshis: 0, - user_id: 0, + user_channel_id: 0, + balance_msat: 0, outbound_capacity_msat, inbound_capacity_msat: 42, unspendable_punishment_reserve: None, @@ -1340,7 +1534,7 @@ mod tests { // Using the same keys for LN and BTC ids fn add_channel( - net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler, Arc>, + net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler, Arc, Arc>, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1, node_1_privkey: &SecretKey, node_2_privkey: &SecretKey, features: ChannelFeatures, short_channel_id: u64 ) { let node_id_1 = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_1_privkey); @@ -1372,7 +1566,7 @@ mod tests { } fn update_channel( - net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler, Arc>, + net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler, Arc, Arc>, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1, node_privkey: &SecretKey, update: UnsignedChannelUpdate ) { let msghash = hash_to_message!(&Sha256dHash::hash(&update.encode()[..])[..]); @@ -1388,7 +1582,7 @@ mod tests { } fn add_or_update_node( - net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler, Arc>, + net_graph_msg_handler: &NetGraphMsgHandler, Arc, Arc>, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1, node_privkey: &SecretKey, features: NodeFeatures, timestamp: u32 ) { let node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, node_privkey); @@ -1442,12 +1636,18 @@ mod tests { } } - fn build_graph() -> (Secp256k1, NetGraphMsgHandler, sync::Arc>, sync::Arc, sync::Arc) { + fn build_graph() -> ( + Secp256k1, + sync::Arc, + NetGraphMsgHandler, sync::Arc, sync::Arc>, + sync::Arc, + sync::Arc, + ) { let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new(); let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new()); let chain_monitor = Arc::new(test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet)); - let network_graph = NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()); - let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(network_graph, None, Arc::clone(&logger)); + let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash())); + let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger)); // Build network from our_id to node6: // // -1(1)2- node0 -1(3)2- @@ -1745,21 +1945,23 @@ mod tests { add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[5], NodeFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(6)), 0); - (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) + (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) } #[test] fn simple_route_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // Simple route to 2 via 1 - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat"); } else { panic!(); } - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -1779,25 +1981,29 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn invalid_first_hop_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // Simple route to 2 via 1 let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(2), our_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 100000)]; - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "First hop cannot have our_node_pubkey as a destination."); } else { panic!(); } - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); } #[test] fn htlc_minimum_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // Simple route to 2 via 1 @@ -1894,7 +2100,7 @@ mod tests { }); // Not possible to send 199_999_999, because the minimum on channel=2 is 200_000_000. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } @@ -1913,14 +2119,16 @@ mod tests { }); // A payment above the minimum should pass - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); } #[test] fn htlc_minimum_overpay_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // A route to node#2 via two paths. // One path allows transferring 35-40 sats, another one also allows 35-40 sats. @@ -1990,8 +2198,7 @@ mod tests { excess_data: Vec::new() }); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); // Overpay fees to hit htlc_minimum_msat. let overpaid_fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat + route.paths[1][0].fee_msat; // TODO: this could be better balanced to overpay 10k and not 15k. @@ -2036,16 +2243,14 @@ mod tests { excess_data: Vec::new() }); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); // Fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it allows us to save fee. assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 12); let fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat; assert_eq!(fees, 5_000); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); // Not fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it requires paying more than fee on // the other channel. assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); @@ -2056,8 +2261,10 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn disable_channels_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // // Disable channels 4 and 12 by flags=2 update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], UnsignedChannelUpdate { @@ -2086,13 +2293,13 @@ mod tests { }); // If all the channels require some features we don't understand, route should fail - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } // If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)]; - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]); @@ -2112,8 +2319,10 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn disable_node_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // Disable nodes 1, 2, and 8 by requiring unknown feature bits let unknown_features = NodeFeatures::known().set_unknown_feature_required(); @@ -2122,13 +2331,13 @@ mod tests { add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], unknown_features.clone(), 1); // If all nodes require some features we don't understand, route should fail - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } // If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)]; - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]); @@ -2152,11 +2361,13 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn our_chans_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // Route to 1 via 2 and 3 because our channel to 1 is disabled - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[0], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[0]); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2181,8 +2392,9 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].channel_features.le_flags(), &id_to_feature_flags(3)); // If we specify a channel to node7, that overrides our local channel view and that gets used + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]); let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[7].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)]; - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]); @@ -2278,8 +2490,9 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn partial_route_hint_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // Simple test across 2, 3, 5, and 4 via a last_hop channel // Tests the behaviour when the RouteHint contains a suboptimal hop. @@ -2301,12 +2514,14 @@ mod tests { let mut invalid_last_hops = last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes); invalid_last_hops.push(invalid_last_hop); { - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &invalid_last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { - assert_eq!(err, "Last hop cannot have a payee as a source."); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(invalid_last_hops); + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { + assert_eq!(err, "Route hint cannot have the payee as the source."); } else { panic!(); } } - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes).iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_multi_private_channels(&nodes)); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2373,12 +2588,14 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn ignores_empty_last_hops_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(empty_last_hop(&nodes)); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // Test handling of an empty RouteHint passed in Invoice. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &empty_last_hop(&nodes).iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2453,8 +2670,10 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn multi_hint_last_hops_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(multi_hint_last_hops(&nodes)); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // Test through channels 2, 3, 5, 8. // Test shows that multiple hop hints are considered. @@ -2484,7 +2703,7 @@ mod tests { excess_data: Vec::new() }); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &multi_hint_last_hops(&nodes).iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2557,12 +2776,14 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn last_hops_with_public_channel_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops_with_public_channel(&nodes)); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // This test shows that public routes can be present in the invoice // which would be handled in the same manner. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops_with_public_channel(&nodes).iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2605,13 +2826,15 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn our_chans_last_hop_connect_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // Simple test with outbound channel to 4 to test that last_hops and first_hops connect let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), nodes[3].clone(), InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), 250_000_000)]; let mut last_hops = last_hops(&nodes); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops.clone()); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[3]); @@ -2631,7 +2854,8 @@ mod tests { last_hops[0].0[0].fees.base_msat = 1000; // Revert to via 6 as the fee on 8 goes up - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2665,7 +2889,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly // ...but still use 8 for larger payments as 6 has a variable feerate - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2723,8 +2947,10 @@ mod tests { htlc_minimum_msat: None, htlc_maximum_msat: last_hop_htlc_max, }]); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(target_node_id).with_route_hints(vec![last_hops]); let our_chans = vec![get_channel_details(Some(42), middle_node_id, InitFeatures::from_le_bytes(vec![0b11]), outbound_capacity_msat)]; - get_route(&source_node_id, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), &target_node_id, None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &vec![&last_hops], route_val, 42, Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new())) + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + get_route(&source_node_id, &payee, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), route_val, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer) } #[test] @@ -2775,8 +3001,10 @@ mod tests { fn available_amount_while_routing_test() { // Tests whether we choose the correct available channel amount while routing. - let (secp_ctx, mut net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, mut net_graph_msg_handler, chain_monitor, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // We will use a simple single-path route from // our node to node2 via node0: channels {1, 3}. @@ -2839,16 +3067,15 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -2876,16 +3103,15 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -2924,16 +3150,15 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -2995,16 +3220,15 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -3028,16 +3252,15 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -3050,8 +3273,10 @@ mod tests { fn available_liquidity_last_hop_test() { // Check that available liquidity properly limits the path even when only // one of the latter hops is limited. - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // Path via {node7, node2, node4} is channels {12, 13, 6, 11}. // {12, 13, 11} have the capacities of 100, {6} has a capacity of 50. @@ -3136,16 +3361,15 @@ mod tests { }); { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route 49 sats (just a bit below the capacity). - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3158,8 +3382,7 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3173,8 +3396,10 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn ignore_fee_first_hop_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]); // Path via node0 is channels {1, 3}. Limit them to 100 and 50 sats (total limit 50). update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate { @@ -3203,7 +3428,7 @@ mod tests { }); { - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3217,8 +3442,10 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn simple_mpp_route_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // We need a route consisting of 3 paths: // From our node to node2 via node0, node7, node1 (three paths one hop each). @@ -3310,8 +3537,8 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, - &nodes[2], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } @@ -3319,8 +3546,7 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 250 sats (just a bit below the capacity). // Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3333,8 +3559,7 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3348,8 +3573,10 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn long_mpp_route_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // We need a route consisting of 3 paths: // From our node to node3 via {node0, node2}, {node7, node2, node4} and {node7, node2}. @@ -3484,8 +3711,8 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } @@ -3493,8 +3720,7 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 300 sats (exact amount we can route). // Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths, 100 sats each. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; @@ -3509,8 +3735,10 @@ mod tests { #[test] fn mpp_cheaper_route_test() { - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // This test checks that if we have two cheaper paths and one more expensive path, // so that liquidity-wise any 2 of 3 combination is sufficient, @@ -3650,8 +3878,7 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 180 sats. // Our algorithm should provide us with these 2 paths. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); let mut total_value_transferred_msat = 0; @@ -3675,8 +3902,10 @@ mod tests { // This test makes sure that MPP algorithm properly takes into account // fees charged on the channels, by making the fees impactful: // if the fee is not properly accounted for, the behavior is different. - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[3]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // We need a route consisting of 2 paths: // From our node to node3 via {node0, node2} and {node7, node2, node4}. @@ -3816,16 +4045,15 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route 200 sats (exact amount we can route). - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[3], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; @@ -3836,15 +4064,115 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(total_amount_paid_msat, 200_000); assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 150_000); } + } + #[test] + fn mpp_with_last_hops() { + // Previously, if we tried to send an MPP payment to a destination which was only reachable + // via a single last-hop route hint, we'd fail to route if we first collected routes + // totaling close but not quite enough to fund the full payment. + // + // This was because we considered last-hop hints to have exactly the sought payment amount + // instead of the amount we were trying to collect, needlessly limiting our path searching + // at the very first hop. + // + // Specifically, this interacted with our "all paths must fund at least 5% of total target" + // criterion to cause us to refuse all routes at the last hop hint which would be considered + // to only have the remaining to-collect amount in available liquidity. + // + // This bug appeared in production in some specific channel configurations. + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(PublicKey::from_slice(&[02; 33]).unwrap()).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()) + .with_route_hints(vec![RouteHint(vec![RouteHintHop { + src_node_id: nodes[2], + short_channel_id: 42, + fees: RoutingFees { base_msat: 0, proportional_millionths: 0 }, + cltv_expiry_delta: 42, + htlc_minimum_msat: None, + htlc_maximum_msat: None, + }])]); + + // Keep only two paths from us to nodes[2], both with a 99sat HTLC maximum, with one with + // no fee and one with a 1msat fee. Previously, trying to route 100 sats to nodes[2] here + // would first use the no-fee route and then fail to find a path along the second route as + // we think we can only send up to 1 additional sat over the last-hop but refuse to as its + // under 5% of our payment amount. + update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate { + chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(), + short_channel_id: 1, + timestamp: 2, + flags: 0, + cltv_expiry_delta: u16::max_value(), + htlc_minimum_msat: 0, + htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Present(99_000), + fee_base_msat: u32::max_value(), + fee_proportional_millionths: u32::max_value(), + excess_data: Vec::new() + }); + update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate { + chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(), + short_channel_id: 2, + timestamp: 2, + flags: 0, + cltv_expiry_delta: u16::max_value(), + htlc_minimum_msat: 0, + htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Present(99_000), + fee_base_msat: u32::max_value(), + fee_proportional_millionths: u32::max_value(), + excess_data: Vec::new() + }); + update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[1], UnsignedChannelUpdate { + chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(), + short_channel_id: 4, + timestamp: 2, + flags: 0, + cltv_expiry_delta: (4 << 8) | 1, + htlc_minimum_msat: 0, + htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent, + fee_base_msat: 1, + fee_proportional_millionths: 0, + excess_data: Vec::new() + }); + update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], UnsignedChannelUpdate { + chain_hash: genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash(), + short_channel_id: 13, + timestamp: 2, + flags: 0|2, // Channel disabled + cltv_expiry_delta: (13 << 8) | 1, + htlc_minimum_msat: 0, + htlc_maximum_msat: OptionalField::Absent, + fee_base_msat: 0, + fee_proportional_millionths: 2000000, + excess_data: Vec::new() + }); + + // Get a route for 100 sats and check that we found the MPP route no problem and didn't + // overpay at all. + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); + assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); + // Paths are somewhat randomly ordered, but: + // * the first is channel 2 (1 msat fee) -> channel 4 -> channel 42 + // * the second is channel 1 (0 fee, but 99 sat maximum) -> channel 3 -> channel 42 + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 2); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 1); + assert_eq!(route.paths[0][2].fee_msat, 1_000); + assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].short_channel_id, 1); + assert_eq!(route.paths[1][0].fee_msat, 0); + assert_eq!(route.paths[1][2].fee_msat, 99_000); + assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 1); + assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100_000); } #[test] fn drop_lowest_channel_mpp_route_test() { // This test checks that low-capacity channel is dropped when after // path finding we realize that we found more capacity than we need. - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // We need a route consisting of 3 paths: // From our node to node2 via node0, node7, node1 (three paths one hop each). @@ -3935,8 +4263,8 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } @@ -3944,8 +4272,7 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 125 sats (just a bit below the capacity of 3 channels). // Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3958,8 +4285,7 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route without the last small cheap channel - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], - Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3999,9 +4325,11 @@ mod tests { // "previous hop" being set to node 3, creating a loop in the path. let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new(); let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new()); - let network_graph = NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()); - let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(network_graph, None, Arc::clone(&logger)); + let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash())); + let net_graph_msg_handler = NetGraphMsgHandler::new(Arc::clone(&network_graph), None, Arc::clone(&logger)); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]); add_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, &privkeys[1], ChannelFeatures::from_le_bytes(id_to_feature_flags(6)), 6); update_channel(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &our_privkey, UnsignedChannelUpdate { @@ -4094,7 +4422,7 @@ mod tests { { // Now ensure the route flows simply over nodes 1 and 4 to 6. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[6], None, None, &Vec::new(), 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3); @@ -4127,8 +4455,10 @@ mod tests { // Test that if, while walking the graph, we find a hop that has exactly enough liquidity // for us, including later hop fees, we take it. In the first version of our MPP algorithm // we calculated fees on a higher value, resulting in us ignoring such paths. - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]); // We modify the graph to set the htlc_maximum of channel 2 to below the value we wish to // send. @@ -4161,7 +4491,7 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 90 sats, which is exactly 90 sats at the last hop, plus the // 200% fee charged channel 13 in the 1-to-2 direction. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); @@ -4187,8 +4517,10 @@ mod tests { // htlc_maximum_msat, we don't end up undershooting a later htlc_minimum_msat. In the // initial version of MPP we'd accept such routes but reject them while recalculating fees, // resulting in us thinking there is no possible path, even if other paths exist. - let (secp_ctx, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, net_graph_msg_handler, _, logger) = build_graph(); let (our_privkey, our_id, privkeys, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[2]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); // We modify the graph to set the htlc_minimum of channel 2 and 4 as needed - channel 2 // gets an htlc_maximum_msat of 80_000 and channel 4 an htlc_minimum_msat of 90_000. We @@ -4222,7 +4554,7 @@ mod tests { // Now, attempt to route 90 sats, hitting the htlc_minimum on channel 4, but // overshooting the htlc_maximum on channel 2. Thus, we should pick the (absurdly // expensive) channels 12-13 path. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph, &nodes[2], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); @@ -4254,12 +4586,14 @@ mod tests { let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); let logger = Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new()); let network_graph = NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[0]).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); { - let route = get_route(&our_id, &network_graph, &nodes[0], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&[ + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&[ &get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 200_000), &get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 10_000), - ]), &[], 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1); @@ -4268,10 +4602,10 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].fee_msat, 100_000); } { - let route = get_route(&our_id, &network_graph, &nodes[0], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&[ + let route = get_route(&our_id, &payee, &network_graph, Some(&[ &get_channel_details(Some(3), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000), &get_channel_details(Some(2), nodes[0], InitFeatures::known(), 50_000), - ]), &[], 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + ]), 100_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[1].len(), 1); @@ -4286,6 +4620,116 @@ mod tests { } } + #[test] + fn prefers_shorter_route_with_higher_fees() { + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes)); + + // Without penalizing each hop 100 msats, a longer path with lower fees is chosen. + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let route = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, + Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer + ).unwrap(); + let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::>(); + + assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 100); + assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100); + assert_eq!(path, vec![2, 4, 6, 11, 8]); + + // Applying a 100 msat penalty to each hop results in taking channels 7 and 10 to nodes[6] + // from nodes[2] rather than channel 6, 11, and 8, even though the longer path is cheaper. + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(100); + let route = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, + Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer + ).unwrap(); + let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::>(); + + assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 300); + assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100); + assert_eq!(path, vec![2, 4, 7, 10]); + } + + struct BadChannelScorer { + short_channel_id: u64, + } + + #[cfg(c_bindings)] + impl Writeable for BadChannelScorer { + fn write(&self, _w: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::io::Error> { unimplemented!() } + } + impl Score for BadChannelScorer { + fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, short_channel_id: u64, _send_amt: u64, _chan_amt: Option, _source: &NodeId, _target: &NodeId) -> u64 { + if short_channel_id == self.short_channel_id { u64::max_value() } else { 0 } + } + + fn payment_path_failed(&mut self, _path: &[&RouteHop], _short_channel_id: u64) {} + fn payment_path_successful(&mut self, _path: &[&RouteHop]) {} + } + + struct BadNodeScorer { + node_id: NodeId, + } + + #[cfg(c_bindings)] + impl Writeable for BadNodeScorer { + fn write(&self, _w: &mut W) -> Result<(), ::io::Error> { unimplemented!() } + } + + impl Score for BadNodeScorer { + fn channel_penalty_msat(&self, _short_channel_id: u64, _send_amt: u64, _chan_amt: Option, _source: &NodeId, target: &NodeId) -> u64 { + if *target == self.node_id { u64::max_value() } else { 0 } + } + + fn payment_path_failed(&mut self, _path: &[&RouteHop], _short_channel_id: u64) {} + fn payment_path_successful(&mut self, _path: &[&RouteHop]) {} + } + + #[test] + fn avoids_routing_through_bad_channels_and_nodes() { + let (secp_ctx, network_graph, _, _, logger) = build_graph(); + let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(nodes[6]).with_route_hints(last_hops(&nodes)); + + // A path to nodes[6] exists when no penalties are applied to any channel. + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); + let route = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, + Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer + ).unwrap(); + let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::>(); + + assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 100); + assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100); + assert_eq!(path, vec![2, 4, 6, 11, 8]); + + // A different path to nodes[6] exists if channel 6 cannot be routed over. + let scorer = BadChannelScorer { short_channel_id: 6 }; + let route = get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, + Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer + ).unwrap(); + let path = route.paths[0].iter().map(|hop| hop.short_channel_id).collect::>(); + + assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 300); + assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 100); + assert_eq!(path, vec![2, 4, 7, 10]); + + // A path to nodes[6] does not exist if nodes[2] cannot be routed through. + let scorer = BadNodeScorer { node_id: NodeId::from_pubkey(&nodes[2]) }; + match get_route( + &our_id, &payee, &network_graph, None, 100, 42, + Arc::clone(&logger), &scorer + ) { + Err(LightningError { err, .. } ) => { + assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination"); + }, + Ok(_) => panic!("Expected error"), + } + } + #[test] fn total_fees_single_path() { let route = Route { @@ -4306,6 +4750,7 @@ mod tests { short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 225, cltv_expiry_delta: 0 }, ]], + payee: None, }; assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 250); @@ -4338,6 +4783,7 @@ mod tests { short_channel_id: 0, fee_msat: 150, cltv_expiry_delta: 0 }, ]], + payee: None, }; assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 200); @@ -4349,7 +4795,7 @@ mod tests { // In an earlier version of `Route::get_total_fees` and `Route::get_total_amount`, they // would both panic if the route was completely empty. We test to ensure they return 0 // here, even though its somewhat nonsensical as a route. - let route = Route { paths: Vec::new() }; + let route = Route { paths: Vec::new(), payee: None }; assert_eq!(route.get_total_fees(), 0); assert_eq!(route.get_total_amount(), 0); @@ -4377,6 +4823,7 @@ mod tests { }, }; let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap(); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds... let mut seed = random_init_seed() as usize; @@ -4386,9 +4833,10 @@ mod tests { seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0; let src = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap(); seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0; - let dst = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap(); + let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap(); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst); let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000; - if get_route(src, &graph, dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new()).is_ok() { + if get_route(src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() { continue 'load_endpoints; } } @@ -4406,6 +4854,7 @@ mod tests { }, }; let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap(); + let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds... let mut seed = random_init_seed() as usize; @@ -4415,9 +4864,10 @@ mod tests { seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0; let src = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap(); seed = seed.overflowing_mul(0xdeadbeef).0; - let dst = &PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap(); + let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap(); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); let amt = seed as u64 % 200_000_000; - if get_route(src, &graph, dst, Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new()).is_ok() { + if get_route(src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &test_utils::TestLogger::new(), &scorer).is_ok() { continue 'load_endpoints; } } @@ -4455,6 +4905,7 @@ pub(crate) mod test_utils { #[cfg(all(test, feature = "unstable", not(feature = "no-std")))] mod benches { use super::*; + use routing::scoring::Scorer; use util::logger::{Logger, Record}; use test::Bencher; @@ -4469,6 +4920,7 @@ mod benches { let mut d = test_utils::get_route_file().unwrap(); let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap(); let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone(); + let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds... let mut path_endpoints = Vec::new(); @@ -4479,8 +4931,9 @@ mod benches { let src = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap(); seed *= 0xdeadbeef; let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap(); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst); let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000; - if get_route(&src, &graph, &dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok() { + if get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok() { path_endpoints.push((src, dst, amt)); continue 'load_endpoints; } @@ -4491,7 +4944,8 @@ mod benches { let mut idx = 0; bench.iter(|| { let (src, dst, amt) = path_endpoints[idx % path_endpoints.len()]; - assert!(get_route(&src, &graph, &dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok()); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst); + assert!(get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok()); idx += 1; }); } @@ -4501,6 +4955,7 @@ mod benches { let mut d = test_utils::get_route_file().unwrap(); let graph = NetworkGraph::read(&mut d).unwrap(); let nodes = graph.read_only().nodes().clone(); + let scorer = Scorer::with_fixed_penalty(0); // First, get 100 (source, destination) pairs for which route-getting actually succeeds... let mut path_endpoints = Vec::new(); @@ -4511,8 +4966,9 @@ mod benches { let src = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap(); seed *= 0xdeadbeef; let dst = PublicKey::from_slice(nodes.keys().skip(seed % nodes.len()).next().unwrap().as_slice()).unwrap(); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000; - if get_route(&src, &graph, &dst, Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok() { + if get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok() { path_endpoints.push((src, dst, amt)); continue 'load_endpoints; } @@ -4523,7 +4979,8 @@ mod benches { let mut idx = 0; bench.iter(|| { let (src, dst, amt) = path_endpoints[idx % path_endpoints.len()]; - assert!(get_route(&src, &graph, &dst, Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok()); + let payee = Payee::from_node_id(dst).with_features(InvoiceFeatures::known()); + assert!(get_route(&src, &payee, &graph, None, amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}, &scorer).is_ok()); idx += 1; }); }