X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lightning%2Fsrc%2Frouting%2Frouter.rs;h=faf8c46142383ff679f075f4b5d33304dec992b6;hb=9e57364a891be67cb6756f3c4ce3eda69e77125f;hp=47a261786c370f8dbd9ae3904005b72b28a44e2a;hpb=5b230d9137ed03c0a6739378920947f5ee2f92b9;p=rust-lightning diff --git a/lightning/src/routing/router.rs b/lightning/src/routing/router.rs index 47a26178..faf8c461 100644 --- a/lightning/src/routing/router.rs +++ b/lightning/src/routing/router.rs @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ use bitcoin::secp256k1::key::PublicKey; use ln::channelmanager::ChannelDetails; -use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, NodeFeatures}; +use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, NodeFeatures, InvoiceFeatures}; use ln::msgs::{DecodeError, ErrorAction, LightningError, MAX_VALUE_MSAT}; use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, RoutingFees}; use util::ser::{Writeable, Readable}; @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ fn compute_fees(amount_msat: u64, channel_fees: RoutingFees) -> Option { /// The fees on channels from us to next-hops are ignored (as they are assumed to all be /// equal), however the enabled/disabled bit on such channels as well as the /// htlc_minimum_msat/htlc_maximum_msat *are* checked as they may change based on the receiving node. -pub fn get_route(our_node_id: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, payee: &PublicKey, first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, +pub fn get_route(our_node_id: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, payee: &PublicKey, payee_features: Option, first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, last_hops: &[&RouteHint], final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv: u32, logger: L) -> Result where L::Target: Logger { // TODO: Obviously *only* using total fee cost sucks. We should consider weighting by // uptime/success in using a node in the past. @@ -961,21 +961,27 @@ pub fn get_route(our_node_id: &PublicKey, network: &NetworkGraph, paye // Step (8). // Select the best route by lowest total fee. drawn_routes.sort_by_key(|paths| paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat()).sum::()); - let mut selected_paths = vec![]; + let mut selected_paths = Vec::>::new(); for payment_path in drawn_routes.first().unwrap() { selected_paths.push(payment_path.hops.iter().map(|payment_hop| payment_hop.route_hop.clone()).collect()); } + if let Some(features) = &payee_features { + for path in selected_paths.iter_mut() { + path.last_mut().unwrap().node_features = features.to_context(); + } + } + let route = Route { paths: selected_paths }; log_trace!(logger, "Got route: {}", log_route!(route)); - return Ok(route); + Ok(route) } #[cfg(test)] mod tests { use routing::router::{get_route, RouteHint, RoutingFees}; use routing::network_graph::{NetworkGraph, NetGraphMsgHandler}; - use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, NodeFeatures}; + use ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, InitFeatures, InvoiceFeatures, NodeFeatures}; use ln::msgs::{ErrorAction, LightningError, OptionalField, UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, ChannelAnnouncement, RoutingMessageHandler, NodeAnnouncement, UnsignedNodeAnnouncement, ChannelUpdate, UnsignedChannelUpdate}; use ln::channelmanager; @@ -1404,11 +1410,11 @@ mod tests { // Simple route to 2 via 1 - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 0, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send a payment of 0 msat"); } else { panic!(); } - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -1445,11 +1451,11 @@ mod tests { is_live: true, }]; - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "First hop cannot have our_node_id as a destination."); } else { panic!(); } - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); } @@ -1553,7 +1559,7 @@ mod tests { }); // Not possible to send 199_999_999, because the minimum on channel=2 is 200_000_000. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } @@ -1572,7 +1578,7 @@ mod tests { }); // A payment above the minimum should pass - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 199_999_999, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); } @@ -1649,7 +1655,8 @@ mod tests { excess_data: Vec::new() }); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); // Overpay fees to hit htlc_minimum_msat. let overpaid_fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat + route.paths[1][0].fee_msat; // TODO: this could be better balanced to overpay 10k and not 15k. @@ -1694,14 +1701,16 @@ mod tests { excess_data: Vec::new() }); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); // Fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it allows us to save fee. assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].short_channel_id, 12); let fees = route.paths[0][0].fee_msat; assert_eq!(fees, 5_000); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); // Not fine to overpay for htlc_minimum_msat if it requires paying more than fee on // the other channel. assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); @@ -1742,7 +1751,7 @@ mod tests { }); // If all the channels require some features we don't understand, route should fail - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } @@ -1758,7 +1767,7 @@ mod tests { inbound_capacity_msat: 0, is_live: true, }]; - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]); @@ -1789,7 +1798,7 @@ mod tests { add_or_update_node(&net_graph_msg_handler, &secp_ctx, &privkeys[7], unknown_features.clone(), 1); // If all nodes require some features we don't understand, route should fail - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a path to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } @@ -1805,7 +1814,7 @@ mod tests { inbound_capacity_msat: 0, is_live: true, }]; - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]); @@ -1833,7 +1842,7 @@ mod tests { let (_, our_id, _, nodes) = get_nodes(&secp_ctx); // Route to 1 via 2 and 3 because our channel to 1 is disabled - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[0], None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[0], None, None, &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 3); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -1869,7 +1878,7 @@ mod tests { inbound_capacity_msat: 0, is_live: true, }]; - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[7]); @@ -1942,12 +1951,12 @@ mod tests { let mut invalid_last_hops = last_hops(&nodes); invalid_last_hops.push(invalid_last_hop); { - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, &invalid_last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &invalid_last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Last hop cannot have a payee as a source."); } else { panic!(); } } - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, &last_hops(&nodes).iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops(&nodes).iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2006,7 +2015,7 @@ mod tests { is_live: true, }]; let mut last_hops = last_hops(&nodes); - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[3]); @@ -2026,7 +2035,7 @@ mod tests { last_hops[0].fees.base_msat = 1000; // Revert to via 6 as the fee on 8 goes up - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, &last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 4); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2060,7 +2069,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(route.paths[0][3].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::::new()); // We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly // ...but still use 8 for larger payments as 6 has a variable feerate - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, &last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[6], None, None, &last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 2000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 5); assert_eq!(route.paths[0][0].pubkey, nodes[1]); @@ -2133,7 +2142,7 @@ mod tests { inbound_capacity_msat: 100000, is_live: true, }]; - let route = get_route(&source_node_id, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), &target_node_id, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new())).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&source_node_id, &NetworkGraph::new(genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash()), &target_node_id, None, Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &last_hops.iter().collect::>(), 100, 42, Arc::new(test_utils::TestLogger::new())).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths[0].len(), 2); @@ -2220,14 +2229,16 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -2265,14 +2276,16 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 200_000_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), Some(&our_chans.iter().collect::>()), &Vec::new(), 200_000_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -2311,14 +2324,16 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -2380,14 +2395,16 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 15_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -2411,14 +2428,16 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 10_001, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route an exact amount we have should be fine. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 10_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let path = route.paths.last().unwrap(); assert_eq!(path.len(), 2); @@ -2517,14 +2536,16 @@ mod tests { }); { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 60_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route 49 sats (just a bit below the capacity). - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], None, &Vec::new(), 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 49_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -2537,7 +2558,8 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -2581,7 +2603,7 @@ mod tests { }); { - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, None, &Vec::new(), 50_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 1); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -2688,7 +2710,8 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), + &nodes[2], Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } @@ -2696,7 +2719,8 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 250 sats (just a bit below the capacity). // Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 250_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -2709,7 +2733,8 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route an exact amount is also fine - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 290_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -2859,7 +2884,8 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], None, &Vec::new(), 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 350_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } @@ -2867,7 +2893,8 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 300 sats (exact amount we can route). // Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths, 100 sats each. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], None, &Vec::new(), 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 300_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; @@ -3023,7 +3050,8 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 180 sats. // Our algorithm should provide us with these 2 paths. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], None, &Vec::new(), 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 180_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); let mut total_value_transferred_msat = 0; @@ -3188,14 +3216,16 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], None, &Vec::new(), 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 210_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } { // Now, attempt to route 200 sats (exact amount we can route). - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], None, &Vec::new(), 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[3], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 200_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; @@ -3304,7 +3334,8 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route more than available results in a failure. - if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { + if let Err(LightningError{err, action: ErrorAction::IgnoreError}) = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 150_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)) { assert_eq!(err, "Failed to find a sufficient route to the given destination"); } else { panic!(); } } @@ -3312,7 +3343,8 @@ mod tests { { // Now, attempt to route 125 sats (just a bit below the capacity of 3 channels). // Our algorithm should provide us with these 3 paths. - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 125_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 3); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3325,7 +3357,8 @@ mod tests { { // Attempt to route without the last small cheap channel - let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); + let route = get_route(&our_id, &net_graph_msg_handler.network_graph.read().unwrap(), &nodes[2], + Some(InvoiceFeatures::known()), None, &Vec::new(), 90_000, 42, Arc::clone(&logger)).unwrap(); assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2); let mut total_amount_paid_msat = 0; for path in &route.paths { @@ -3336,7 +3369,6 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(total_amount_paid_msat, 90_000); } } - } #[cfg(all(test, feature = "unstable"))] @@ -3367,7 +3399,7 @@ mod benches { seed *= 0xdeadbeef; let dst = graph.get_nodes().keys().skip(seed % graph.get_nodes().len()).next().unwrap(); let amt = seed as u64 % 1_000_000; - if get_route(src, &graph, dst, None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok() { + if get_route(src, &graph, dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok() { path_endpoints.push((src, dst, amt)); continue 'load_endpoints; } @@ -3378,7 +3410,7 @@ mod benches { let mut idx = 0; bench.iter(|| { let (src, dst, amt) = path_endpoints[idx % path_endpoints.len()]; - assert!(get_route(src, &graph, dst, None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok()); + assert!(get_route(src, &graph, dst, None, None, &[], amt, 42, &DummyLogger{}).is_ok()); idx += 1; }); }