From: Valentine Wallace Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 21:53:18 +0000 (-0500) Subject: Macro-ize checking that the total value of an MPP's parts is sane X-Git-Tag: v0.0.104~2^2~3 X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=063b7583c13e17e339fc9f3083ca3d54e2d2d050;p=rust-lightning Macro-ize checking that the total value of an MPP's parts is sane This DRY-ed code will be used in upcoming commits when we stop storing inbound payment data --- diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs index 1b0fa19e1..b9ee78499 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs @@ -2913,6 +2913,59 @@ impl ChannelMana } } + macro_rules! check_total_value { + ($payment_data_total_msat: expr, $payment_secret: expr, $payment_preimage: expr) => {{ + let mut total_value = 0; + let mut payment_received_generated = false; + let htlcs = channel_state.claimable_htlcs.entry(payment_hash) + .or_insert(Vec::new()); + if htlcs.len() == 1 { + if let OnionPayload::Spontaneous(_) = htlcs[0].onion_payload { + log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as we already had an existing keysend HTLC with the same payment hash", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0)); + fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc); + continue + } + } + htlcs.push(claimable_htlc); + for htlc in htlcs.iter() { + total_value += htlc.value; + match &htlc.onion_payload { + OnionPayload::Invoice(htlc_payment_data) => { + if htlc_payment_data.total_msat != $payment_data_total_msat { + log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the HTLCs had inconsistent total values (eg {} and {})", + log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), $payment_data_total_msat, htlc_payment_data.total_msat); + total_value = msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT; + } + if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT { break; } + }, + _ => unreachable!(), + } + } + if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT || total_value > $payment_data_total_msat { + log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the total value {} ran over expected value {} (or HTLCs were inconsistent)", + log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), total_value, $payment_data_total_msat); + for htlc in htlcs.iter() { + fail_htlc!(htlc); + } + } else if total_value == $payment_data_total_msat { + new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentReceived { + payment_hash, + purpose: events::PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { + payment_preimage: $payment_preimage, + payment_secret: $payment_secret, + }, + amt: total_value, + }); + payment_received_generated = true; + } else { + // Nothing to do - we haven't reached the total + // payment value yet, wait until we receive more + // MPP parts. + } + payment_received_generated + }} + } + // Check that the payment hash and secret are known. Note that we // MUST take care to handle the "unknown payment hash" and // "incorrect payment secret" cases here identically or we'd expose @@ -2962,54 +3015,9 @@ impl ChannelMana log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), payment_data.total_msat, inbound_payment.get().min_value_msat.unwrap()); fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc); } else { - let mut total_value = 0; - let htlcs = channel_state.claimable_htlcs.entry(payment_hash) - .or_insert(Vec::new()); - if htlcs.len() == 1 { - if let OnionPayload::Spontaneous(_) = htlcs[0].onion_payload { - log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing new HTLC with payment_hash {} as we already had an existing keysend HTLC with the same payment hash", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0)); - fail_htlc!(claimable_htlc); - continue - } - } - htlcs.push(claimable_htlc); - for htlc in htlcs.iter() { - total_value += htlc.value; - match &htlc.onion_payload { - OnionPayload::Invoice(htlc_payment_data) => { - if htlc_payment_data.total_msat != payment_data.total_msat { - log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the HTLCs had inconsistent total values (eg {} and {})", - log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), payment_data.total_msat, htlc_payment_data.total_msat); - total_value = msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT; - } - if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT { break; } - }, - _ => unreachable!(), - } - } - if total_value >= msgs::MAX_VALUE_MSAT || total_value > payment_data.total_msat { - log_trace!(self.logger, "Failing HTLCs with payment_hash {} as the total value {} ran over expected value {} (or HTLCs were inconsistent)", - log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), total_value, payment_data.total_msat); - for htlc in htlcs.iter() { - fail_htlc!(htlc); - } - } else if total_value == payment_data.total_msat { - new_events.push(events::Event::PaymentReceived { - payment_hash, - purpose: events::PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { - payment_preimage: inbound_payment.get().payment_preimage, - payment_secret: payment_data.payment_secret, - }, - amt: total_value, - }); - // Only ever generate at most one PaymentReceived - // per registered payment_hash, even if it isn't - // claimed. + let payment_received_generated = check_total_value!(payment_data.total_msat, payment_data.payment_secret, inbound_payment.get().payment_preimage); + if payment_received_generated { inbound_payment.remove_entry(); - } else { - // Nothing to do - we haven't reached the total - // payment value yet, wait until we receive more - // MPP parts. } } },