From: Matt Corallo Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:28:20 +0000 (-0400) Subject: Macro out one-monitor-added check in network tests (thanks @yuntai) X-Git-Tag: v0.0.12~299^2~8 X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2b9ee0995fea869569fd8cb15a392735291f9e3e;p=rust-lightning Macro out one-monitor-added check in network tests (thanks @yuntai) Originally suggested by Yuntai Kyong in some new tests. --- diff --git a/src/ln/channelmanager.rs b/src/ln/channelmanager.rs index 9818f9d9c..6286344f5 100644 --- a/src/ln/channelmanager.rs +++ b/src/ln/channelmanager.rs @@ -2693,36 +2693,28 @@ mod tests { } } + macro_rules! check_added_monitors { + ($node: expr, $count: expr) => { + { + let mut added_monitors = $node.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); + assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), $count); + added_monitors.clear(); + } + } + } + macro_rules! commitment_signed_dance { ($node_a: expr, $node_b: expr, $commitment_signed: expr, $fail_backwards: expr) => { { - { - let added_monitors = $node_a.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert!(added_monitors.is_empty()); - } + check_added_monitors!($node_a, 0); let (as_revoke_and_ack, as_commitment_signed) = $node_a.node.handle_commitment_signed(&$node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &$commitment_signed).unwrap(); - { - let mut added_monitors = $node_a.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - added_monitors.clear(); - } - { - let added_monitors = $node_b.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert!(added_monitors.is_empty()); - } + check_added_monitors!($node_a, 1); + check_added_monitors!($node_b, 0); assert!($node_b.node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&$node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack).unwrap().is_none()); - { - let mut added_monitors = $node_b.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - added_monitors.clear(); - } + check_added_monitors!($node_b, 1); let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_none) = $node_b.node.handle_commitment_signed(&$node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &as_commitment_signed.unwrap()).unwrap(); assert!(bs_none.is_none()); - { - let mut added_monitors = $node_b.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - added_monitors.clear(); - } + check_added_monitors!($node_b, 1); if $fail_backwards { assert!($node_a.node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); } @@ -2760,11 +2752,7 @@ mod tests { let mut payment_event = { origin_node.node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).unwrap(); - { - let mut added_monitors = origin_node.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - added_monitors.clear(); - } + check_added_monitors!(origin_node, 1); let mut events = origin_node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); @@ -2776,11 +2764,7 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(node.node.get_our_node_id(), payment_event.node_id); node.node.handle_update_add_htlc(&prev_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]).unwrap(); - { - let added_monitors = node.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 0); - } - + check_added_monitors!(node, 0); commitment_signed_dance!(node, prev_node, payment_event.commitment_msg, false); let events_1 = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); @@ -2804,11 +2788,7 @@ mod tests { _ => panic!("Unexpected event"), } } else { - { - let mut added_monitors = node.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - added_monitors.clear(); - } + check_added_monitors!(node, 1); payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events_2.remove(0)); assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1); } @@ -2821,25 +2801,17 @@ mod tests { fn claim_payment_along_route(origin_node: &Node, expected_route: &[&Node], skip_last: bool, our_payment_preimage: [u8; 32]) { assert!(expected_route.last().unwrap().node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage)); - { - let mut added_monitors = expected_route.last().unwrap().chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - added_monitors.clear(); - } + check_added_monitors!(expected_route.last().unwrap(), 1); let mut next_msgs: Option<(msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC, msgs::CommitmentSigned)> = None; macro_rules! update_fulfill_dance { ($node: expr, $prev_node: expr, $last_node: expr) => { { $node.node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&$prev_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &next_msgs.as_ref().unwrap().0).unwrap(); - { - let mut added_monitors = $node.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - if $last_node { - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 0); - } else { - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - } - added_monitors.clear(); + if $last_node { + check_added_monitors!($node, 0); + } else { + check_added_monitors!($node, 1); } commitment_signed_dance!($node, $prev_node, next_msgs.as_ref().unwrap().1, false); } @@ -2930,11 +2902,7 @@ mod tests { fn fail_payment_along_route(origin_node: &Node, expected_route: &[&Node], skip_last: bool, our_payment_hash: [u8; 32]) { assert!(expected_route.last().unwrap().node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash)); - { - let mut added_monitors = expected_route.last().unwrap().chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - added_monitors.clear(); - } + check_added_monitors!(expected_route.last().unwrap(), 1); let mut next_msgs: Option<(msgs::UpdateFailHTLC, msgs::CommitmentSigned)> = None; macro_rules! update_fail_dance { @@ -3341,11 +3309,7 @@ mod tests { ($node: expr, $prev_node: expr, $preimage: expr) => { { assert!($node.node.claim_funds($preimage)); - { - let mut added_monitors = $node.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - added_monitors.clear(); - } + check_added_monitors!($node, 1); let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); @@ -3505,11 +3469,7 @@ mod tests { let mut payment_event = { nodes[0].node.send_payment(route, our_payment_hash).unwrap(); - { - let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - added_monitors.clear(); - } + check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(); assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); @@ -3534,20 +3494,10 @@ mod tests { payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events_2.remove(0)); assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1); - { - let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - added_monitors.clear(); - } - + check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]).unwrap(); nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg).unwrap(); - - { - let mut added_monitors = nodes[2].chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - added_monitors.clear(); - } + check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1); // nodes[2] now has the latest commitment transaction, but hasn't revoked its previous // state or updated nodes[1]' state. Now force-close and broadcast that commitment/HTLC @@ -3647,28 +3597,20 @@ mod tests { for msg in reestablish_1 { resp_1.push(node_b.node.handle_channel_reestablish(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &msg).unwrap()); } - { - let mut added_monitors = node_b.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - if pending_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.0 != 0 { - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - } else { - assert!(added_monitors.is_empty()); - } - added_monitors.clear(); + if pending_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.0 != 0 { + check_added_monitors!(node_b, 1); + } else { + check_added_monitors!(node_b, 0); } let mut resp_2 = Vec::new(); for msg in reestablish_2 { resp_2.push(node_a.node.handle_channel_reestablish(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &msg).unwrap()); } - { - let mut added_monitors = node_a.chan_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap(); - if pending_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.1 != 0 { - assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1); - } else { - assert!(added_monitors.is_empty()); - } - added_monitors.clear(); + if pending_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.1 != 0 { + check_added_monitors!(node_a, 1); + } else { + check_added_monitors!(node_a, 0); } // We dont yet support both needing updates, as that would require a different commitment dance: