From: Elias Rohrer Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:15:47 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Fixed some typos X-Git-Tag: v0.0.105~34^2~1 X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=689518520e9daadb7fddd2b836bc19815ef24921;p=rust-lightning Fixed some typos --- diff --git a/lightning/src/routing/router.rs b/lightning/src/routing/router.rs index e49844383..baa75ef16 100644 --- a/lightning/src/routing/router.rs +++ b/lightning/src/routing/router.rs @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // any ~sufficient (described later) value. // If succeed, remember which channels were used and how much liquidity they have available, // so that future paths don't rely on the same liquidity. - // 3. Prooceed to the next step if: + // 3. Proceed to the next step if: // - we hit the recommended target value; // - OR if we could not construct a new path. Any next attempt will fail too. // Otherwise, repeat step 2. @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // // We are not a faithful Dijkstra's implementation because we can change values which impact // earlier nodes while processing later nodes. Specifically, if we reach a channel with a lower - // liquidity limit (via htlc_maximum_msat, on-chain capacity or assumed liquidity limits) then + // liquidity limit (via htlc_maximum_msat, on-chain capacity or assumed liquidity limits) than // the value we are currently attempting to send over a path, we simply reduce the value being // sent along the path for any hops after that channel. This may imply that later fees (which // we've already tabulated) are lower because a smaller value is passing through the channels @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // This map allows paths to be aware of the channel use by other paths in the same call. // This would help to make a better path finding decisions and not "overbook" channels. // It is unaware of the directions (except for `outbound_capacity_msat` in `first_hops`). - let mut bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat = HashMap::with_capacity(network_nodes.len()); + let mut bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat = HashMap::with_capacity(network_nodes.len()); // Keeping track of how much value we already collected across other paths. Helps to decide: // - how much a new path should be transferring (upper bound); @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // Adds entry which goes from $src_node_id to $dest_node_id // over the channel with id $chan_id with fees described in // $directional_info. - // $next_hops_fee_msat represents the fees paid for using all the channel *after* this one, + // $next_hops_fee_msat represents the fees paid for using all the channels *after* this one, // since that value has to be transferred over this channel. // Returns whether this channel caused an update to `targets`. ( $chan_id: expr, $src_node_id: expr, $dest_node_id: expr, $directional_info: expr, $capacity_sats: expr, $chan_features: expr, $next_hops_fee_msat: expr, @@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // - for regular channels at channel announcement (TODO) // - for first and last hops early in get_route if $src_node_id != $dest_node_id.clone() { - let available_liquidity_msat = bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat.entry($chan_id.clone()).or_insert_with(|| { + let available_liquidity_msat = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat.entry($chan_id.clone()).or_insert_with(|| { let mut initial_liquidity_available_msat = None; if let Some(capacity_sats) = $capacity_sats { initial_liquidity_available_msat = Some(capacity_sats * 1000); @@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { } else if contributes_sufficient_value { // Note that low contribution here (limited by available_liquidity_msat) // might violate htlc_minimum_msat on the hops which are next along the - // payment path (upstream to the payee). To avoid that, we recompute path + // payment path (upstream to the payee). To avoid that, we recompute // path fees knowing the final path contribution after constructing it. let path_htlc_minimum_msat = compute_fees($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $directional_info.fees) .and_then(|fee_msat| fee_msat.checked_add($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat)) @@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // TODO: diversify by nodes (so that all paths aren't doomed if one node is offline). 'paths_collection: loop { // For every new path, start from scratch, except - // bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat, which will improve + // bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat, which will improve // the further iterations of path finding. Also don't erase first_hop_targets. targets.clear(); dist.clear(); @@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // on the same liquidity in future paths. let mut prevented_redundant_path_selection = false; for (payment_hop, _) in payment_path.hops.iter() { - let channel_liquidity_available_msat = bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&payment_hop.short_channel_id).unwrap(); + let channel_liquidity_available_msat = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&payment_hop.short_channel_id).unwrap(); let mut spent_on_hop_msat = value_contribution_msat; let next_hops_fee_msat = payment_hop.next_hops_fee_msat; spent_on_hop_msat += next_hops_fee_msat; @@ -1301,7 +1301,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // Decrease the available liquidity of a hop in the middle of the path. let victim_scid = payment_path.hops[(payment_path.hops.len() - 1) / 2].0.short_channel_id; log_trace!(logger, "Disabling channel {} for future path building iterations to avoid duplicates.", victim_scid); - let victim_liquidity = bookkeeped_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&victim_scid).unwrap(); + let victim_liquidity = bookkept_channels_liquidity_available_msat.get_mut(&victim_scid).unwrap(); *victim_liquidity = 0; }