From: Matt Corallo Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2019 22:01:29 +0000 (-0500) Subject: Simplify and expand logging in is_resolving_htlc_output X-Git-Tag: v0.0.12~246^2 X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=90ce97198cf37c589c11eb2091d09c7805b2c026;p=rust-lightning Simplify and expand logging in is_resolving_htlc_output This clarifies all the conditions we can hit and also ensures they are all logged in a clear and consistent manner. --- diff --git a/fuzz/fuzz_targets/full_stack_target.rs b/fuzz/fuzz_targets/full_stack_target.rs index a9ee47c8..21acf277 100644 --- a/fuzz/fuzz_targets/full_stack_target.rs +++ b/fuzz/fuzz_targets/full_stack_target.rs @@ -853,6 +853,6 @@ mod tests { assert_eq!(log_entries.get(&("lightning::ln::peer_handler".to_string(), "Handling UpdateHTLCs event in peer_handler for node 030200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 with 1 adds, 0 fulfills, 0 fails for channel 3f00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000".to_string())), Some(&3)); // 7 assert_eq!(log_entries.get(&("lightning::ln::peer_handler".to_string(), "Handling UpdateHTLCs event in peer_handler for node 030000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 with 0 adds, 1 fulfills, 0 fails for channel 3d00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000".to_string())), Some(&1)); // 8 assert_eq!(log_entries.get(&("lightning::ln::peer_handler".to_string(), "Handling UpdateHTLCs event in peer_handler for node 030000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 with 0 adds, 0 fulfills, 1 fails for channel 3d00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000".to_string())), Some(&2)); // 9 - assert_eq!(log_entries.get(&("lightning::ln::channelmonitor".to_string(), "Input spending 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fb:0 resolves HTLC with payment hash ff00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 from remote commitment tx".to_string())), Some(&1)); // 10 + assert_eq!(log_entries.get(&("lightning::ln::channelmonitor".to_string(), "Input spending remote commitment tx (00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fb:0) in 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000042 resolves outbound HTLC with payment hash ff00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 with timeout".to_string())), Some(&1)); // 10 } } diff --git a/src/ln/channelmonitor.rs b/src/ln/channelmonitor.rs index 04b324e2..ea3e2792 100644 --- a/src/ln/channelmonitor.rs +++ b/src/ln/channelmonitor.rs @@ -1836,22 +1836,48 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { 'outer_loop: for input in &tx.input { let mut payment_data = None; + let revocation_sig_claim = (input.witness.len() == 3 && input.witness[2].len() == OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT && input.witness[1].len() == 33) + || (input.witness.len() == 3 && input.witness[2].len() == ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT && input.witness[1].len() == 33); + let accepted_preimage_claim = input.witness.len() == 5 && input.witness[4].len() == ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT; + let offered_preimage_claim = input.witness.len() == 3 && input.witness[2].len() == OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT; + + macro_rules! log_claim { + ($source: expr, $local_tx: expr, $outbound_htlc: expr, $payment_hash: expr, $source_avail: expr) => { + // We found the output in question, but aren't failing it backwards + // as we have no corresponding source. This implies either it is an + // inbound HTLC or an outbound HTLC on a revoked transaction. + if ($local_tx && revocation_sig_claim) || + ($outbound_htlc && !$source_avail && (accepted_preimage_claim || offered_preimage_claim)) { + log_error!(self, "Input spending {} ({}:{}) in {} resolves {} HTLC with payment hash {} with {}!", + $source, input.previous_output.txid, input.previous_output.vout, tx.txid(), + if $outbound_htlc { "outbound" } else { "inbound" }, log_bytes!($payment_hash.0), + if revocation_sig_claim { "revocation sig" } else { "preimage claim after we'd passed the HTLC resolution back" }); + } else { + log_info!(self, "Input spending {} ({}:{}) in {} resolves {} HTLC with payment hash {} with {}", + $source, input.previous_output.txid, input.previous_output.vout, tx.txid(), + if $outbound_htlc { "outbound" } else { "inbound" }, log_bytes!($payment_hash.0), + if revocation_sig_claim { "revocation sig" } else if accepted_preimage_claim || offered_preimage_claim { "preimage" } else { "timeout" }); + } + } + } macro_rules! scan_commitment { - ($htlc_outputs: expr, $htlc_sources: expr, $source: expr) => { + ($htlc_outputs: expr, $htlc_sources: expr, $source: expr, $local_tx: expr) => { for &(ref payment_hash, ref source, ref vout) in $htlc_sources.iter() { if &Some(input.previous_output.vout) == vout { - log_trace!(self, "Input spending {}:{} resolves HTLC with payment hash {} from {}", input.previous_output.txid, input.previous_output.vout, log_bytes!(payment_hash.0), $source); + log_claim!($source, $local_tx, true, payment_hash, true); + // We have a resolution of an HTLC either from one of our latest + // local commitment transactions or an unrevoked remote commitment + // transaction. This implies we either learned a preimage, the HTLC + // has timed out, or we screwed up. In any case, we should now + // resolve the source HTLC with the original sender. payment_data = Some((source.clone(), *payment_hash)); } } if payment_data.is_none() { for htlc_output in $htlc_outputs { - if input.previous_output.vout == htlc_output.transaction_output_index && !htlc_output.offered { - log_info!(self, "Input spending {}:{} in {} resolves inbound HTLC with timeout from {}", input.previous_output.txid, input.previous_output.vout, tx.txid(), $source); - continue 'outer_loop; - } else if input.previous_output.vout == htlc_output.transaction_output_index && tx.lock_time > 0 { - log_info!(self, "Input spending {}:{} in {} resolves offered HTLC with HTLC-timeout from {}", input.previous_output.txid, input.previous_output.vout, tx.txid(), $source); + if input.previous_output.vout == htlc_output.transaction_output_index { + log_claim!($source, $local_tx, $local_tx == htlc_output.offered, htlc_output.payment_hash, false); continue 'outer_loop; } } @@ -1863,31 +1889,28 @@ impl ChannelMonitor { if input.previous_output.txid == current_local_signed_commitment_tx.txid { scan_commitment!(current_local_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, _)| a), current_local_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_sources, - "our latest local commitment tx"); + "our latest local commitment tx", true); } } if let Some(ref prev_local_signed_commitment_tx) = self.prev_local_signed_commitment_tx { if input.previous_output.txid == prev_local_signed_commitment_tx.txid { scan_commitment!(prev_local_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_outputs.iter().map(|&(ref a, _, _)| a), prev_local_signed_commitment_tx.htlc_sources, - "our previous local commitment tx"); + "our previous local commitment tx", true); } } if let Some(&(ref htlc_outputs, ref htlc_sources)) = self.remote_claimable_outpoints.get(&input.previous_output.txid) { - scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs, htlc_sources, "remote commitment tx"); + scan_commitment!(htlc_outputs, htlc_sources, "remote commitment tx", false); } - // If tx isn't solving htlc output from local/remote commitment tx and htlc isn't outbound we don't need - // to broadcast solving backward + // Check that scan_commitment, above, decided there is some source worth relaying an + // HTLC resolution backwards to and figure out whether we learned a preimage from it. if let Some((source, payment_hash)) = payment_data { let mut payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([0; 32]); - if (input.witness.len() == 3 && input.witness[2].len() == OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT && input.witness[1].len() == 33) - || (input.witness.len() == 3 && input.witness[2].len() == ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT && input.witness[1].len() == 33) { - log_error!(self, "Remote used revocation sig to take a {} HTLC output at index {} from commitment_tx {}", if input.witness[2].len() == OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT { "offered" } else { "accepted" }, input.previous_output.vout, input.previous_output.txid); - } else if input.witness.len() == 5 && input.witness[4].len() == ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT { + if accepted_preimage_claim { payment_preimage.0.copy_from_slice(&input.witness[3]); htlc_updated.push((source, Some(payment_preimage), payment_hash)); - } else if input.witness.len() == 3 && input.witness[2].len() == OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT { + } else if offered_preimage_claim { payment_preimage.0.copy_from_slice(&input.witness[1]); htlc_updated.push((source, Some(payment_preimage), payment_hash)); } else {