From: Matt Corallo Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 19:06:34 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Clean up test handling of resending responding commitment_signed X-Git-Tag: v0.0.117-alpha1~16^2~5 X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e37a40080c565ae1fa0c3e8a058367191d35143b;p=rust-lightning Clean up test handling of resending responding commitment_signed When we need to rebroadcast a `commitment_signed` on reconnect in response to a previous update (ie not one which contains any updates) we previously hacked in support for it by passing a `-1` for the number of expected update_add_htlcs. This is a mess, and with the introduction of `ReconnectArgs` we can now clean it up easily with a new bool. --- diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs index fbfa7e5b6..ebb2bb2e0 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs @@ -3030,7 +3030,11 @@ pub struct ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> { pub node_a: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, pub node_b: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, pub send_channel_ready: (bool, bool), - pub pending_htlc_adds: (i64, i64), + pub pending_responding_commitment_signed: (bool, bool), + /// Indicates that the pending responding commitment signed will be a dup for the recipient, + /// and no monitor update is expected + pub pending_responding_commitment_signed_dup_monitor: (bool, bool), + pub pending_htlc_adds: (usize, usize), pub pending_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), pub pending_htlc_fails: (usize, usize), pub pending_cell_htlc_claims: (usize, usize), @@ -3044,6 +3048,8 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> { node_a, node_b, send_channel_ready: (false, false), + pending_responding_commitment_signed: (false, false), + pending_responding_commitment_signed_dup_monitor: (false, false), pending_htlc_adds: (0, 0), pending_htlc_claims: (0, 0), pending_htlc_fails: (0, 0), @@ -3059,7 +3065,8 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd> { pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) { let ReconnectArgs { node_a, node_b, send_channel_ready, pending_htlc_adds, pending_htlc_claims, pending_htlc_fails, - pending_cell_htlc_claims, pending_cell_htlc_fails, pending_raa + pending_cell_htlc_claims, pending_cell_htlc_fails, pending_raa, + pending_responding_commitment_signed, pending_responding_commitment_signed_dup_monitor, } = args; node_a.node.peer_connected(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: node_b.node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None @@ -3144,13 +3151,12 @@ pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) { } else { assert!(chan_msgs.1.is_none()); } - if pending_htlc_adds.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 != 0 { + if pending_htlc_adds.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.0 != 0 || + pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 != 0 || + pending_responding_commitment_signed.0 + { let commitment_update = chan_msgs.2.unwrap(); - if pending_htlc_adds.0 != -1 { // We use -1 to denote a response commitment_signed - assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_adds.0 as usize); - } else { - assert!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty()); - } + assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_adds.0); assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_claims.0 + pending_cell_htlc_claims.0); assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_fails.0 + pending_cell_htlc_fails.0); assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty()); @@ -3164,7 +3170,7 @@ pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) { node_a.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail); } - if pending_htlc_adds.0 != -1 { // We use -1 to denote a response commitment_signed + if !pending_responding_commitment_signed.0 { commitment_signed_dance!(node_a, node_b, commitment_update.commitment_signed, false); } else { node_a.node.handle_commitment_signed(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update.commitment_signed); @@ -3173,7 +3179,7 @@ pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) { // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes node_b.node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack); assert!(node_b.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); - check_added_monitors!(node_b, 1); + check_added_monitors!(node_b, if pending_responding_commitment_signed_dup_monitor.0 { 0 } else { 1 }); } } else { assert!(chan_msgs.2.is_none()); @@ -3203,11 +3209,12 @@ pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) { } else { assert!(chan_msgs.1.is_none()); } - if pending_htlc_adds.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 != 0 { + if pending_htlc_adds.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_htlc_fails.1 != 0 || + pending_cell_htlc_claims.1 != 0 || pending_cell_htlc_fails.1 != 0 || + pending_responding_commitment_signed.1 + { let commitment_update = chan_msgs.2.unwrap(); - if pending_htlc_adds.1 != -1 { // We use -1 to denote a response commitment_signed - assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_adds.1 as usize); - } + assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_adds.1); assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_claims.1 + pending_cell_htlc_claims.1); assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), pending_htlc_fails.1 + pending_cell_htlc_fails.1); assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty()); @@ -3221,7 +3228,7 @@ pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) { node_b.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail); } - if pending_htlc_adds.1 != -1 { // We use -1 to denote a response commitment_signed + if !pending_responding_commitment_signed.1 { commitment_signed_dance!(node_b, node_a, commitment_update.commitment_signed, false); } else { node_b.node.handle_commitment_signed(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update.commitment_signed); @@ -3230,7 +3237,7 @@ pub fn reconnect_nodes<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(args: ReconnectArgs<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>) { // No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes node_a.node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&node_b.node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack); assert!(node_a.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); - check_added_monitors!(node_a, 1); + check_added_monitors!(node_a, if pending_responding_commitment_signed_dup_monitor.1 { 0 } else { 1 }); } } else { assert!(chan_msgs.2.is_none()); diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs index 3456a238e..e55adab85 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs @@ -3880,13 +3880,13 @@ fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken } else if messages_delivered == 3 { // nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]); - reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.0 = -1; + reconnect_args.pending_responding_commitment_signed.0 = true; reconnect_args.pending_raa.0 = true; reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args); } else if messages_delivered == 4 { // nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]); - reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.0 = -1; + reconnect_args.pending_responding_commitment_signed.0 = true; reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args); } else if messages_delivered == 5 { // nodes[1] still wants its final RAA @@ -4014,13 +4014,13 @@ fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken } else if messages_delivered == 2 { // nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]); - reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.1 = -1; + reconnect_args.pending_responding_commitment_signed.1 = true; reconnect_args.pending_raa.1 = true; reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args); } else if messages_delivered == 3 { // nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]); - reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.1 = -1; + reconnect_args.pending_responding_commitment_signed.1 = true; reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args); } else if messages_delivered == 4 { // nodes[1] still wants its final RAA