From: Matt Corallo Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 05:56:14 +0000 (+0000) Subject: f dont add additional test dependence on strict string matching - the tests are caref... X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=eae4ccca1142fcae7c6e53b3d37b2b3378392797;p=rust-lightning f dont add additional test dependence on strict string matching - the tests are careful to use regexes, so do the same --- diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs index 50ff91f33..47e7b3db4 100644 --- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs +++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs @@ -6539,7 +6539,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_amount_received_more_than_min() { let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap(); assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote side tried to send less than our minimum HTLC value\. Lower limit: \(\d+\)\. Actual: \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote side tried to send less than our minimum HTLC value. Lower limit: (1000). Actual: (999)".to_string() }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }); } #[test] @@ -6576,7 +6576,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_sender_can_afford_amount_sent() { let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap(); assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value"); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value".to_string() }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }); } #[test] @@ -6621,7 +6621,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_htlc_limit() { let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap(); assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to push more than our max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote tried to push more than our max accepted HTLCs (50)".to_string() }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }); } #[test] @@ -6647,7 +6647,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_in_flight_msat() { let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap(); assert!(regex::Regex::new("Remote HTLC add would put them over our max HTLC value").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote HTLC add would put them over our max HTLC value (100000000)".to_string() }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }); } #[test] @@ -6673,7 +6673,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_cltv_expiry() { let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap(); assert_eq!(err_msg.data,"Remote provided CLTV expiry in seconds instead of block height"); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote provided CLTV expiry in seconds instead of block height".to_string() }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }); } #[test] @@ -6723,7 +6723,7 @@ fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_repeated_id_ignore() { let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap(); assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote skipped HTLC ID \(skipped ID: \d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote skipped HTLC ID (skipped ID: 1)".to_string() }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }); } #[test] @@ -6757,7 +6757,7 @@ fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fulfill_htlc_before_commitment() { let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap(); assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC (0) before it had been committed".to_string() }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }); } #[test] @@ -6791,7 +6791,7 @@ fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fail_htlc_before_commitment() { let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap(); assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC (0) before it had been committed".to_string() }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }); } #[test] @@ -6825,7 +6825,7 @@ fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fail_malformed_htlc_before_commitment() let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap(); assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC (0) before it had been committed".to_string() }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }); } #[test] @@ -6867,7 +6867,7 @@ fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_incorrect_htlc_id() { let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap(); assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail an HTLC we couldn't find"); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote tried to fulfill/fail an HTLC we couldn\'t find".to_string()}); + check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }); } #[test] @@ -6909,7 +6909,7 @@ fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_wrong_preimage() { let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap(); assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill HTLC \(\d+\) with an incorrect preimage").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str())); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote tried to fulfill HTLC (0) with an incorrect preimage".to_string() }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }); } #[test] @@ -6958,7 +6958,7 @@ fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_missing_badonion_bit_for_malformed_htlc_messag let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap(); assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Got update_fail_malformed_htlc with BADONION not set"); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); - check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Got update_fail_malformed_htlc with BADONION not set".to_string() }); + check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }); } #[test] @@ -7264,15 +7264,17 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() { let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200; nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), InitFeatures::known(), &accept_channel); + let reason_msg; if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events()[0] { match action { &ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(msg.data.as_str())); + reason_msg = msg.data.clone(); }, - _ => { assert!(false); } + _ => { panic!(); } } - } else { assert!(false); } - check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period. Upper limit: 100. Actual: 200".to_string() }); + } else { panic!(); } + check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: reason_msg }); // We test msg.to_self_delay <= config.their_to_self_delay is enforced in Channel::new_from_req() nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();