From: Matt Corallo Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 02:07:15 +0000 (-0500) Subject: [fuzz] Check that channels don't get stuck in chanmon_consistency X-Git-Tag: v0.0.12~5^2 X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=refs%2Fheads%2F2020-11-chanmon_consistency-bits;p=rust-lightning [fuzz] Check that channels don't get stuck in chanmon_consistency This adds a new command string in the chanmon_consistency fuzzer which tests that, once all pending HTLCs are settled, at least one side of a channel can still send funds. While this should have caught the recent(ish) spec bug where channels could get stuck, I did not attempt to reproduce said bug with this patch. --- diff --git a/fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs b/fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs index 441931d65..377ac8d7b 100644 --- a/fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs +++ b/fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs @@ -542,7 +542,9 @@ pub fn do_test(data: &[u8], out: Out) { bc_events.clear(); new_events } else { Vec::new() }; + let mut had_events = false; for event in events.iter().chain(nodes[$node].get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().iter()) { + had_events = true; match event { events::MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => { for dest in nodes.iter() { @@ -599,6 +601,7 @@ pub fn do_test(data: &[u8], out: Out) { _ => panic!("Unhandled message event"), } } + had_events } } } @@ -678,6 +681,7 @@ pub fn do_test(data: &[u8], out: Out) { } else { Ordering::Equal } } else { Ordering::Equal } }); + let had_events = !events.is_empty(); for event in events.drain(..) { match event { events::Event::PaymentReceived { payment_hash, payment_secret, amt } => { @@ -697,6 +701,7 @@ pub fn do_test(data: &[u8], out: Out) { _ => panic!("Unhandled event"), } } + had_events } } } @@ -764,18 +769,18 @@ pub fn do_test(data: &[u8], out: Out) { } }, - 0x10 => process_msg_events!(0, true), - 0x11 => process_msg_events!(0, false), - 0x12 => process_events!(0, true), - 0x13 => process_events!(0, false), - 0x14 => process_msg_events!(1, true), - 0x15 => process_msg_events!(1, false), - 0x16 => process_events!(1, true), - 0x17 => process_events!(1, false), - 0x18 => process_msg_events!(2, true), - 0x19 => process_msg_events!(2, false), - 0x1a => process_events!(2, true), - 0x1b => process_events!(2, false), + 0x10 => { process_msg_events!(0, true); }, + 0x11 => { process_msg_events!(0, false); }, + 0x12 => { process_events!(0, true); }, + 0x13 => { process_events!(0, false); }, + 0x14 => { process_msg_events!(1, true); }, + 0x15 => { process_msg_events!(1, false); }, + 0x16 => { process_events!(1, true); }, + 0x17 => { process_events!(1, false); }, + 0x18 => { process_msg_events!(2, true); }, + 0x19 => { process_msg_events!(2, false); }, + 0x1a => { process_events!(2, true); }, + 0x1b => { process_events!(2, false); }, 0x1c => { if !chan_a_disconnected { @@ -875,6 +880,62 @@ pub fn do_test(data: &[u8], out: Out) { 0x5c => { send_hop_payment(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], chan_a, &nodes[2], chan_b, 1, &mut payment_id); }, 0x5d => { send_hop_payment(&nodes[2], &nodes[1], chan_b, &nodes[0], chan_a, 1, &mut payment_id); }, + 0xff => { + // Test that no channel is in a stuck state where neither party can send funds even + // after we resolve all pending events. + // First make sure there are no pending monitor updates, resetting the error state + // and calling channel_monitor_updated for each monitor. + *monitor_a.update_ret.lock().unwrap() = Ok(()); + *monitor_b.update_ret.lock().unwrap() = Ok(()); + *monitor_c.update_ret.lock().unwrap() = Ok(()); + + if let Some((id, _)) = monitor_a.latest_monitors.lock().unwrap().get(&chan_1_funding) { + nodes[0].channel_monitor_updated(&chan_1_funding, *id); + } + if let Some((id, _)) = monitor_b.latest_monitors.lock().unwrap().get(&chan_1_funding) { + nodes[1].channel_monitor_updated(&chan_1_funding, *id); + } + if let Some((id, _)) = monitor_b.latest_monitors.lock().unwrap().get(&chan_2_funding) { + nodes[1].channel_monitor_updated(&chan_2_funding, *id); + } + if let Some((id, _)) = monitor_c.latest_monitors.lock().unwrap().get(&chan_2_funding) { + nodes[2].channel_monitor_updated(&chan_2_funding, *id); + } + + // Next, make sure peers are all connected to each other + if chan_a_disconnected { + nodes[0].peer_connected(&nodes[1].get_our_node_id(), &Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() }); + nodes[1].peer_connected(&nodes[0].get_our_node_id(), &Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() }); + chan_a_disconnected = false; + } + if chan_b_disconnected { + nodes[1].peer_connected(&nodes[2].get_our_node_id(), &Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() }); + nodes[2].peer_connected(&nodes[1].get_our_node_id(), &Init { features: InitFeatures::empty() }); + chan_b_disconnected = false; + } + + for i in 0..std::usize::MAX { + if i == 100 { panic!("It may take may iterations to settle the state, but it should not take forever"); } + // Then, make sure any current forwards make their way to their destination + if process_msg_events!(0, false) { continue; } + if process_msg_events!(1, false) { continue; } + if process_msg_events!(2, false) { continue; } + // ...making sure any pending PendingHTLCsForwardable events are handled and + // payments claimed. + if process_events!(0, false) { continue; } + if process_events!(1, false) { continue; } + if process_events!(2, false) { continue; } + break; + } + + // Finally, make sure that at least one end of each channel can make a substantial payment. + assert!( + send_payment(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], chan_a, 10_000_000, &mut payment_id) || + send_payment(&nodes[1], &nodes[0], chan_a, 10_000_000, &mut payment_id)); + assert!( + send_payment(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], chan_b, 10_000_000, &mut payment_id) || + send_payment(&nodes[2], &nodes[1], chan_b, 10_000_000, &mut payment_id)); + }, _ => test_return!(), }