From: Matt Corallo Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:42:20 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Clean up `compute_fees` and add a saturating variant X-Git-Tag: v0.0.114-beta~45^2 X-Git-Url: http://git.bitcoin.ninja/index.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=refs%2Fheads%2F2022-10-heap-nerdsnipe;p=rust-lightning Clean up `compute_fees` and add a saturating variant Often when we call `compute_fees` we really just want it to saturate and we deal with `u64::max_value` later. In that case, we're much better off doing the saturating in the `compute_fees` as it can use CMOVs rather than branching at each step and then `unwrap_or`ing at the callsite. --- diff --git a/lightning/src/routing/router.rs b/lightning/src/routing/router.rs index eb6eede0e..8543956ac 100644 --- a/lightning/src/routing/router.rs +++ b/lightning/src/routing/router.rs @@ -885,18 +885,20 @@ impl<'a> PaymentPath<'a> { } } +#[inline(always)] +/// Calculate the fees required to route the given amount over a channel with the given fees. fn compute_fees(amount_msat: u64, channel_fees: RoutingFees) -> Option { - let proportional_fee_millions = - amount_msat.checked_mul(channel_fees.proportional_millionths as u64); - if let Some(new_fee) = proportional_fee_millions.and_then(|part| { - (channel_fees.base_msat as u64).checked_add(part / 1_000_000) }) { + amount_msat.checked_mul(channel_fees.proportional_millionths as u64) + .and_then(|part| (channel_fees.base_msat as u64).checked_add(part / 1_000_000)) +} - Some(new_fee) - } else { - // This function may be (indirectly) called without any verification, - // with channel_fees provided by a caller. We should handle it gracefully. - None - } +#[inline(always)] +/// Calculate the fees required to route the given amount over a channel with the given fees, +/// saturating to [`u64::max_value`]. +fn compute_fees_saturating(amount_msat: u64, channel_fees: RoutingFees) -> u64 { + amount_msat.checked_mul(channel_fees.proportional_millionths as u64) + .map(|prop| prop / 1_000_000).unwrap_or(u64::max_value()) + .saturating_add(channel_fees.base_msat as u64) } /// The default `features` we assume for a node in a route, when no `features` are known about that @@ -1254,10 +1256,10 @@ where L::Target: Logger { // might violate htlc_minimum_msat on the hops which are next along the // payment path (upstream to the payee). To avoid that, we recompute // path fees knowing the final path contribution after constructing it. - let path_htlc_minimum_msat = compute_fees($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $candidate.fees()) - .and_then(|fee_msat| fee_msat.checked_add($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat)) - .map(|fee_msat| cmp::max(fee_msat, $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat())) - .unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value()); + let path_htlc_minimum_msat = cmp::max( + compute_fees_saturating($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, $candidate.fees()) + .saturating_add($next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat), + $candidate.htlc_minimum_msat()); let hm_entry = dist.entry($src_node_id); let old_entry = hm_entry.or_insert_with(|| { // If there was previously no known way to access the source node @@ -1291,20 +1293,15 @@ where L::Target: Logger { if should_process { let mut hop_use_fee_msat = 0; - let mut total_fee_msat = $next_hops_fee_msat; + let mut total_fee_msat: u64 = $next_hops_fee_msat; // Ignore hop_use_fee_msat for channel-from-us as we assume all channels-from-us // will have the same effective-fee if $src_node_id != our_node_id { - match compute_fees(amount_to_transfer_over_msat, $candidate.fees()) { - // max_value means we'll always fail - // the old_entry.total_fee_msat > total_fee_msat check - None => total_fee_msat = u64::max_value(), - Some(fee_msat) => { - hop_use_fee_msat = fee_msat; - total_fee_msat += hop_use_fee_msat; - } - } + // Note that `u64::max_value` means we'll always fail the + // `old_entry.total_fee_msat > total_fee_msat` check below + hop_use_fee_msat = compute_fees_saturating(amount_to_transfer_over_msat, $candidate.fees()); + total_fee_msat = total_fee_msat.saturating_add(hop_use_fee_msat); } let channel_usage = ChannelUsage {